簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 翁紫珞
Weng, Zi-Luo
論文名稱: 引導式筆記融入國小一年級生活素養導向課程之行動研究
An Action Research on Guided Notes into Competencies-Based Life Curriculum for the First Graders
指導教授: 顏國樑
Yen, Kuo-Liang
口試委員: 林志成
林國楨
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 竹師教育學院 - 課程與教學碩士在職專班
Department of Education and Learning Technology
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 142
中文關鍵詞: 引導式筆記生活素養導向課程行動研究
外文關鍵詞: Guided notes, competencies-based life curriculum, action research
相關次數: 點閱:162下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以國小一年級學生為研究對象,旨在探討引導式筆記融入國小一年級生活素養導向課程之學生引導式筆記的使用情況,並於實施引導式筆記策略後,探討學生的看法、教師的專業成長、教學困境及解決方法。
    研究方法採取行動研究,進行為期7週共28節課的引導式筆記教學,採用學生學習成果文件、半結構式訪談及教學省思札記等方式進行資料蒐集與分析,依據研究發現,茲將研究結果摘要如下:
    一、國小一年級學生能正確且完整的完成引導式筆記。
    二、國小一年級學生喜歡使用引導式筆記進行生活課程的學習,認為引導式筆記對於學習有幫助,希望未來能繼續使用引導式筆記進行學習。
    三、引導式筆記有助教師掌握課程內容、班級秩序、學生學習情形等,在教材研發、教學過程中也促使教師進行反思,促進教師教學專業成長。
    四、引導式筆記教學符合素養導向教學之原則。教學模式以學習者為中心,不但整合知識、技能、態度,給予不同程度、長才的學生表現機會,課程也有更多轉化空間,使學生能將所學與實際生活緊密連結。
    五、引導式筆記教學歷程中,所遇到的困境及解決方式:
    (一)學生使用引導式筆記遇到國字及空格不會寫、漏寫、書寫來不及等困境,學生會採用「和老師反應、找老師討論」、「看同學筆記」、「課後自行補充」、「回家查資料」等方式解決困境。
    (二)教師設計引導式筆記費時且不容易,可透過不同管道蒐集資料,加快教師教材準備速度,並使教學內容更加豐富。
    (三)學生重複出現同樣問題,可與學生在過程中一同尋找、累積解決方法。
    (四)學生進行討論、觀察等活動時紀錄不便,可透過A4板夾解決相關困境。
    (五)少數學生沒有參與課程任務,可加入不同的教學策略,提高學生的活動參與度。
    (六)學生課後自主延伸學習少,可透過課後任務、回家作業而得到改善。
    本研究依據研究結論,提出相關建議,供學校行政、教師教學及後續研究之參考。


    This study focuses on first graders in elementary school, aims to explore the use of guided notes into competencies-based life curriculum for first graders. Additionally, the study investigates students' perceptions, teachers' professional growth, instructional challenges, and their corresponding solutions after implementing the guided notes strategy.
    The research adopts an action research and conducts 7 week, 28 lesson guided notes teaching program. Data collection and analysis involve student learning outcomes, semi-structured interviews, and reflective notes from teachers. Based on the research findings, the conclusions of the results is as follows:
    1.First graders in elementary school can correctly and completely complete guided notes.
    2.First-graders enjoy using guided notes for learning in competencies-based life curriculum. They believe guided notes are helpful for learning and hope to continue using them in their studies.
    3.Guided notes aid teachers in grasping course content, maintaining classroom order, and understanding students' learning situations. The process of designing guided notes also prompts teachers to engage in reflection, fostering their professional growth.
    4.Guided notes teaching aligns with the principles of competencies-based curriculum. It centers on learners, integrating knowledge, skills, and attitudes, providing various performance opportunities for students with different abilities, and allowing curriculum transformation to connect what is learned with real-life applications.
    5.Challenges encountered during the guided notes teaching process and corresponding solutions:
    (a)Students face difficulties with Chinese characters and spacing issues. They resolve these challenges by "communicating with teachers, discussing with peers", "referencing classmates' notes", "supplementing after class", and "researching at home".
    (b)Designing guided notes consumes time and may not be easy. Teachers can expedite material preparation and enrich teaching content by collecting data through various channels.
    (c)Repeated issues among students can be addressed by jointly seeking and accumulating solutions during the process.
    (d)Difficulty in recording discussions and observations during activities can be resolved using A4 folders.
    (e)For a few students with limited participation, implementing different instructional strategies can enhance their engagement.
    (f)Students' limited self-directed learning after class can be improved by assigning post-lesson tasks and homework.
    Based on the research conclusions, this study offers relevant suggestions for school administration, teachers' instructional practices, and future research.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第三節 名詞釋義 5 第四節 研究範圍與限制 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 引導式筆記的意義、功能及文本製作與使用 9 第二節 生活素養導向課程的意涵 13 第三節 引導式筆記之相關研究 21 第三章 研究設計與實施 33 第一節 研究方法 33 第二節 研究參與者 35 第三節 研究架構與實施流程 38 第四節 研究工具 42 第五節 資料蒐集與分析 44 第六節 研究信實度 47 第七節 研究倫理 49 第四章 研究結果分析與討論 51 第一節 一年級學生的筆記完成度 51 第二節 一年級學生對引導式筆記之想法與評價 66 第三節 教師之專業成長 88 第四節 引導式筆記教學對應素養導向課程之原則 94 第五節 所遇的困境及解決方式 104 第五章 結論與建議 117 第一節 結 論 117 第二節 建 議 122 參考文獻 127 壹、中文部分 127 貳、英文部分 131 附錄 135 附錄一 訪談大綱(對照研究目的) 135 附錄二 行動研究信實度檢核表 137 附錄三 家長同意書 142

    呂威逸(2015)。詮釋結構模式於引導式筆記與電子教科書之比較研究~以清代社會文化單元為例~〔未出版之碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mmr5ps
    李庭熒(2013)。運用引導式筆記進行閱讀理解補救教學之研究〔未出版之碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/73mgur
    朱婉婷、許蕙鈞(2014)。「做筆記」策略聆聽教學之研究。樹德科技大學學報,16(1),53-82。https://reurl.cc/Z1d2M3
    何宜康(2006)。學習單的美麗與哀愁。師友月刊,469,78-81。http://dx.doi.org/10.6437/EM.200607.0078
    呂嘉紋(2016)。小學生課堂筆記活用術:呂嘉紋的悅讀俱樂簿。天衛文化。
    吳璧純(2017)。耕耘一畝兒童學習的沃土──十二年國民基本教育之生活課程特色。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊,10。http://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=280144
    吳璧純、詹志禹(2018)。從能力本位到素養導向教育的演進、發展及反思。教育研究與發展期刊,14(2),35-64。https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/retrieve/194722/2002.pdf
    吳璧純、鄭淑慧、陳春秀(2017)。以學生學習為主軸的生活課程素養導向教學。教育研究月刊,275,50-63。http://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=408019
    林永豐(2018)。素養導向教學設計的要領。載於周淑卿、吳璧純、林永豐、張景媛、陳美如(編輯)。養導向教學設計參考手冊(頁1-5)。教育部國民及學前教育署。https://reurl.cc/ymbOaM
    林志成(2007)。教育行動研究的迷思與省思。載於元智大學第二屆倫理與身體思維研討會會議手冊暨論文集(頁54-70)。元智大學。
    俞秀樾(2016)。引導式筆記結合概念構圖教學對八年級學生歷史課程學習表現之影響〔未出版之碩士論文,國立臺南大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/cjs282
    范信賢(2016)。導讀《國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育脈動電子期刊,5。https://reurl.cc/gQbrbN
    胡琪敏(2009)。「做筆記」策略教學對提升中年級學童聆聽能力之研究〔未出版之碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6ph8m8
    紐文英(2018)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。雙葉書廊。
    高雪瑩、陳品華(2014)。引導式筆記教學對提升國小五年級學生社會領域學習表現與學習態度之成效。教育研究與發展期刊,10(4),79-105。https://reurl.cc/oZbpGM
    秦葆琦(2015,12月)。十二年國民基本教育教材—生活課程。載於周珮儀、林慶隆(主持人),論壇—十二年國民基本教育教材(頁161-163)。教科書研究,8(3)。https://ej.naer.edu.tw/JTR/v08.3/2015-12-jtr-v8n3-155.pdf
    教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要-總綱。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/35950/96151.pdf
    教育部(2018a)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要-國民小學-生活課程。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/26264/56762.pdf
    教育部(2018b)。面向未來的能力:素養導向教學教戰手冊。教育部國民及學前教育署。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/56870/2b69fc7e-f6c2-4e06-a1c0-e9a793cfebec.pdf
    郭昇柔(2019)。引導式筆記教學對國小三年級學生自然領域學習成就與學習態度之影響〔未出版之碩士論文,國立臺南大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m4zbzz
    郭青鵬(2021)。翻轉吧!教學素養導向教學的課程設計。師友雙月刊,625,134-138。http://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=420910#
    陳春秀(2002)。課程行動研究與教師專業成長。課程與教學,5(4),37-56+163。http://dx.doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200210.0037
    陳品華(2013)。大學生課堂筆記策略教學方案之成效。教育研究集刊,59(1),73-112。http://www.edubook.com.tw/OAtw/File/PDf/200465.pdf
    陳政煥、邱瓊慧、吳秋儀(2012)。小學課堂中分享式筆記與提問複習之效益。當代教育研究季刊,20(2),47-91。http://dx.doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2012.2002.02
    許家驊(2019)。十二年國民基本教育課程核心素養導向教學策略之理念、設計實務與省思。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10),13-18。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/8-10/topic/03.pdf
    陳超明(2011)。筆記活用術—政大教授篇。載於聯合報編輯部(主編),滿分狀元筆記本,(頁162-169)。聯經。
    陳鴻賢(2001)。教育行動研究對教師專業成長的啟示。國教之友,53(2),35-43。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A01041512
    陳麗華(2018,8月)。從中小學的教材教法談課綱的未來想像。載於陳麗華(主持人),論壇—中小學教材教法的現況觀察與改革契機—素養導向觀點(頁111-119)。教科書研究,11(2)。https://ej.naer.edu.tw/JTR/v08.3/2015-12-jtr-v8n3-155.pdf
    辜玉旻(2010)。做筆記策略。載於柯華葳(主編),閱讀理解策略教學手冊(頁138-188)。教育部。https://reading.tp.edu.tw/uploadfiles/annex/20210910152717_1.pdf
    游自達(2019)。素養導向教學的實踐:深化學習的開展。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10), 06-12。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/8-10/topic/02.pdf
    曾昭悌(2014)。做筆記教學對國中生數學態度與數學成就之影響〔未出版之碩士論文,國立臺南大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yqjwuv
    趙曉美(2019)。素養導向教學的思考與課堂實踐。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10),27-30。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/8-10/topic/05.pdf
    樊素芳、樊琪、陈洁(2007)。大學生課堂筆記策略現狀研究研究。心理與行為研究,5(1),70-74。https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2007/V5/I1/70
    鄭淑文(2012)。小六國語做筆記策略教學行動研究〔未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g4sf69
    蔡清田(2007)。課程行動研究的實踐之道。課程與教學,10(3),75-89。http://dx.doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200707.0075
    蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南。
    蔡清田、陳延興(2013)。國民核心素養的課程發展意涵。課程研究,8(1),1-14。http://www.edubook.com.tw/OAtw/detail.aspx?no=200914
    鄭章華(2021)。如何進行素養導向的教學設計。師友雙月刊,625,36-42。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20190807001-202101-202101120008-202101120008-36-42&PublishTypeID=P001
    親野智可等(2011)。小學生100分筆記術養成書寫力,打造孩子的學習力!(卓惠娟,譯)。野人。(原出版年2009)
    謝欣秀(2016)。運用數位心智圖工具於引導式筆記教學之研究─以國中歷史知識建構為例〔未出版之碩士論文,國立新竹教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c3j647
    羅寶鳳(2017)。因應時代改變的終身學習:素養導向的教學與評量。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(3),24-27。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/6-3/topic/05.pdf
    Austin, J. L., Lee, M., & Carr, J. P. (2004). The effects of guided notes on undergraduate students’ recording of lecture content. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(4), 314–320. https://reurl.cc/WqYz19
    Austin, J. L., Lee, M. G., Thibeault, M. D., Carr, J. E., & Bailey, J. S. (2002). Effects of guided notes on university students' responding and recall of information. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(4), 243-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41824287
    Baker, L., & Lombardi, B. R. (1985). Students’ lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 12(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1201_9
    Barbetta, P. M. , & Skaruppa, C. L. (1995). Looking for a way to improve your behavior analysis lectures? Try guided notes. The Behavior Analyst, 18(1), 155-160. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2733659/
    Bonner, J. M., & Holliday, W. G. (2006). How college science students engage in note-taking strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 786-818. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20115
    Boon, R. T., Cecil, III, F., & Saleem, R. (2007). Students' attitudes and perceptions toward technology-based applications and guided notes instruction in high school world history classrooms. Reading Improvement, 44(1), 23-31(EJ765531). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ765531
    Campana, J.N. (2009). The effectiveness of using guided notes in a high school physics classroom [Unpublished master’s thesis, St. John Fisher University]. ST.JOHN FISHERUNIVERSITY. https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/mathcs_etd_masters/13/
    Carrier, C. A. (1983). Notetaking research: Implications for the classroom. Journal of Instructional Development, 6(3), 19–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30220724
    Chen, P.-H., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2017). Effects of guided notes on enhancing college students’ lecture note-taking quality and learning performance. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 36(4), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9459-6
    Glodowski, K., (2013). The effects of guided notes on pre-lecture quiz scores in introductory psychology [master’s thesis, Western New England University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c9700ec472dc5b71a122006439b5f5e0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
    Hamilton, S. L., Seibert, M. A., Gardner, R. III, & Talbert-Johnson, C. (2000). Using guided notes to improve the academic achievement of incarcerated adolescents with learning and behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 21(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100302
    Haydon, T., Mancil, G. R., Kroeger S. D., Mcleskey J., Lin W. J. (2011). A review of the effectiveness of guided notes for students who struggle learning academic content. Preventing School Failure: Alternative education for children and youth, 55(4), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2010.548415
    Henk, W. A., & Stahl, N. A. (1985). A meta-analysis of the effect of notetaking on learning from lectures. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 34, 70-75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244958471
    Heward, W. L. (2003). Guided Notes: Improving the effectiveness of your lectures. The Ohio State University. https://ada.osu.edu/guided-notes
    Heward, W. L. (2004). Want to improve the effectiveness of your lectures? Try guided notes. https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/1811/34578/1/Heward_Want_to_Improve_the_Effectiveness_of_Your_Lectures_2004.pdf.
    Isaacs, G. (1994). Lecturing practices and note-taking purposes. Studies in Higher Education,19(2), 203-216. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03075079412331382047
    Kiewra, K. A. (1987). Notetaking and Review: the research and its implications. Instructional Science, 16(3), 233-249. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23369241#metadata_info_tab_contents
    Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-172. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01326640
    Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.240
    Konrad, M., Joseph, L. M., & Eveleigh, E. (2009). A meta-analytic review of guided notes. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(3), 421-444. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42900031#metadata_info_tab_contents
    Kreiner, D. S. (1997). Guided notes and interactive methods for teaching with videotapes. Teaching of Psychology, 24(3), 183–185. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15328023top2403_6
    Lake, K. (1994). Integrated curriculum. Northwest regional education laboratory: School improvement research series. EducationNorthwest. https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/integrated-curriculum.pdf
    Lawin, K.H., Dawson, D., Erickson ,M., Larwin , D.A., (2012). Impact of guided notes on achievement in K-12 and special education students. International Journal of Special Education, 27(3), 108-119. https://reurl.cc/nZbxKD
    Lazarus, B. D. (1991). Guided notes, review, and achievement of secondary students with learning disabilities in mainstream content courses. Education and Treatment of Children, 14(2), 112-127. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42900451.pdf
    Lazarus, B. D. (1993). Guided notes: Effects with secondary and post secondary students with mild disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 16(3), 272–289. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899317#metadata_info_tab_contents
    Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems.Journal of Social Issues , 2(4), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
    Neef, N. A., McCord, B. E., & Ferreri, S. J. (2006). Effects of guided notes versus completednotes during lectures on college students’ quiz performance. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 39(1), 123-130. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16602392/
    Palmatier, R. A., & Bennett, J. M. (1974). Notetaking habits of college students. Journal of Reading, 18(3), 215-218. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40009958#metadata_info_tab_contents
    Patterson, K. B. (2005). Increasing positive outcomes for African American males in special education with the use of guided notes. The Journal of Negro Education, 74(4), 311-320. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40026731#metadata_info_tab_contents
    Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291-312. https://reurl.cc/WqYyXO
    Sweeney, W. J., Ehrhardt, A. M., Gardner, R. III, Jones, L., Greenfield, R., & Fribley, S. (1999). Using guided notes with academically at-risk high school students during a remedial summer social studies class. Psychology in the Schools, 36(4), 305-318. https://reurl.cc/X5rp43
    Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 323-338. https://reurl.cc/Yd5GvX
    White, J. D.(2017). The effects of guided and traditional note taking on student achievement in an eighth grade social studies class [Unpublished master’s thesis, Milligan College]. MILLIGANDigitalRepository. https://mcstor.library.milligan.edu/handle/11558/2490?show=full
    Williams, W. L, Weil, T. M., & Porter, J.C.K. (2012). The relative effect of traditional lectures and guided notes lecture on university student test scores. The Behavior Analyst Today, 13(1), 12-16(EJ970028). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ970028.pdf

    QR CODE