摘要

奈米科技之應用帶來了奈米商機，然而，卻有科學家直指這樣的夢想無異於海市蜃樓的假象，因為在許多科學實驗中，都發現了奈米科技可能會對人體健康、環境造成傷害。一個奈米商品從製造到商品上市階段歷經兩個不同的生命周期，由於製造階段與消費階段的保護主體不同，且保護的原則亦不一致，實有區別之必要。消費階段與製造階段皆有賴資訊提供，以提升人類對於科技風險之控制感，惟資訊應否提供，或提供的程度，皆有賴現行制度予以回應。而資訊提供的途徑無非是標示制度，本文即著手研究兩個階段不同的標示目的，以建構製造階段與消費階段標示制度的模型，並就奈米物質、奈米商品於現行制度下之適用結果，提供現行制度作為奈米風險管制措施的建議。而本文得到兩個結論，其一：製造階段的標示目的係在預防風險，鑑於保護弱勢的原則，勞工有特別保護的必要，所以應由主管機關指定奈米物質為危害物；其二，消費階段則因公眾普遍欠缺對於奈米的認識，沈默標示亦可能構成誤導，所以應加強標示誤導之管制，並且在考慮是否以消費者保護法第7條第2項作為應標示義務的法律政策時，須特別注意預防原則的科學證據取信度，對商品製造人言論自由的衝擊以及消費階段是否有其他的風險預防替代措施，而以公共諮詢尋求共識是現制下最佳的方式，以避免貿然適用強制標示制度對於奈米產業造成的衝擊、及對於消費者的恐懼。

Abstract

The application of nanotechnology brings “nano opportunities”, however, a few of scientists pointed out that such gold dream is no different with a mirage. Because in many scientific experiments, it is found out that nano materials could do damage to the human health and the environment. A nano product would experience two different life cycles through manufacturing phase and consumption phase. In light of the difference of the protected subject as well as the protection principles of the two phases, it is necessary to draw a clear line between them.
As a result of the humans’ dependence on the provided information to enhance their sense of control in facing the technological risks, one would require the present regulations to respond whether the information regarding risks should be provided or to which degree should such information be provided. Namely, the access to provide information is labeling. Therefore, this article focuses on the different labeling purposes of the two phases in order to build up the models of labeling system of them, and gives advice on the analysis whether the present labeling system is suitable for regulating nanotechnology risks according to the consequences of the nano material/ product applied under the present regulations.
And this article comes up to two conclusions, one is that in manufacturing phase the Administration should identify nano material as a hazard substance because the labeling purpose of the manufacturing phase is to prevent the risk, and because of the vulnerability of labors; the other is in consumption phase, the public is generally short of knowledge of nanotechnology, so in case the merchandiser chooses to give some information but to remain silent about other information, the silence part could mislead the consumers and the labeling as a whole still constitutes false labeling even if the labeled part is not misleading. So it is important to strengthen control of the regulations of nano false labeling. And in consideration of taking the compulsory nano labeling policy, specific attention must be paid to three dimensions: 1st. the credibility of the scientific evidence under precautionary principle, 2nd. the impact on the freedom of speech of a merchandiser, and 3rd. whether there exists other substitute for risk regulations in the consumption phase. Finally, it is the best strategy to seek common consensus through public consultation, in doing this, the negative consequences including nano industry to be on the decline and public fear the compulsory labeling system brings could be avoided.

參考文獻
中文
一、 期刊
牛惠之(2004)，世界貿易組織SPS協定第五條第七項之研究--爭端案例中關於暫時性措施要件與預防原則之評析，政大法學評論，第79期。
何之邁(1996)，妨害營業信譽─以法國法為中心，公平交易季刊，第4卷第1期。
姜志俊(2004)，論消費資訊之規範─以廣告與標示為例，月旦法學雜誌，第110期。
陳自強(2001)，法律行為、法律性質與民法債編修正(下)，台灣本土法學，第6期。
陳羿谷，(2008)以美國Berkeley與Cambridge為例談奈米科技地方規制之態度及其作法，「引領科技蛻變 開創產業契約」法制研討會論文集。
陳羿谷，(2008)我國負責任奈米科技之新契機座談會紀實，科技法律透析，第20卷第8期。
陳錦芳(2004)，環境影響評估報告之司法審查，看守台灣季刊，2004年夏季，第6卷第2期。
陳櫻琴(1995)，公平交易法如何取締不實廣告，月旦法學雜誌，第1期。
廖義男(1989)，消費者保護法之行政監督，台大法學論叢，第18卷第2期。
黄俊夫(2006)，預防原則(The Precautionary Principle)導言─節錄聯合國教育、科學及文化組織2005年3月發表，生活科技教育月刊，39卷第6期。

二、 專書
Vincent R. Johnson著，趙秀文、楊智傑譯(2006)，英美侵權法，五南圖書出版公司，初版。
王澤鑑(1998)，侵權行為法(一)，自版，初版。
李憲佐、陳櫻琴、蘇敏煌(2007)，公平交易法第24條概括條款之檢討，收錄於《李憲佐財經法學論文集(一)》，元照出版公司。
林建中，奈米科技基礎與實務，新文京開發出版社股份有限公司。
洪家殷(2006)，行政罰法論，五南出版公司。
許宗力(2003)，行政法對民、刑法的規範效應』，收錄於葛克昌、林明鏘主編「行政法實務與理論」。
陳新民(2002)，憲法基本權利之基本理論(上)，元照出版社。
葛林•費雪班著，劉世平譯(2003)，奈米商機，培生教育出版有限公司，初版。

三、 學位論文
王希平(2002)，基因改造食品管理之相關法律問題研究，東吳大學法律學系研究所碩士論文。
林憲卿(2004)，商品標示、知覺品質與參考價格對消費者購買行為之影響，南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
張朝琴(2004)，台灣山地鄉原住民醫療照護體系之研究─健康權保障觀點的檢視，國立台灣師範大學政治學研究所博士論文。
林欣穎(2004)，食品安全認證標章之經濟效益分析－以我國「CAS」、「好畜圃」為例 ，台大農業經濟學研究所碩士論文。

郭淑珍(1998)，科技領域的風險決策之研究─以德國法為中心」，台大法研所碩士論文。

四、 研討會論文集
陳羿谷，以美國Berkeley與Cambridge為例談奈米科技地方規制之態度及其作法，「引領科技蛻變 開創產業契約」法制研討會論文集，2008年11月28日。
陳郁庭，從產業保護之觀點談奈米規範與產業自律機制的形成，「引領科技蛻變 開創產業契約」法制研討會論文集，2008年11月28日。

五、 研究報告
行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所，「勞工安全衛生研究報告─奈米微粒職場安全衛生狀況評估與管理制度研究」，行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所委託研究，2008年3月
李聯雄，「勞工安全衛生研究報告─勞工安全衛生法適用範圍之先趨研究」，行政院勞委會勞研所委託研究，2006年1月。
張振平、劉立文，「我國職業安全衛生法對產業可能衝擊之研究」，行政院勞委會勞工安全衛生研究所委託研究，2006年2月~12月。
張振平等，「我國職業安全衛生法對產業可能衝擊之研究」，行政院勞委會勞工安全衛生所委託研究，2007年3月。

六、 判決
屏東地方法院87年訴字第549號判決。
台灣高等法院90年度上字第488號判決。
台灣高等法院94年醫上字第2號判決。
最高法院77年台上字第5141號判決。
最高法院88年台上字第1862號判決。
最高法院91年台上字第1526號判決 。
司法院釋字第414號解釋蘇俊雄大法官不同意見書。
司法院釋字第414號吳庚、蘇俊雄、城仲模部分不同意見書。
司法院釋字第414號孫森焱大法官部分不同意見書。
司法院釋字第414號解釋理由書。
司法院釋字第469號解釋理由書。
司法院釋字第503號解釋理由書。
司法院釋字第509號解釋蘇俊雄大法官協同意見書。
司法院釋字第548號解釋理由書。
司法院釋字577號。
司法院釋字第584號解釋許宗力大法官協同意見書 。

英文
一、 期刊
C.Ford Runge and Lee Ann Jackson (2000), “Negative Labeling of Gentically Modified Organisms (GMOs): The Experience of rBST”, 3 AgBioForum 58.
C.Ford Runge, Gian-Luca Bagnara and Lee Ann Jackson (2001), “Differing U.S. and European Perspectives on GMOs: Political,Economic and Cultural Issues”, 2 The Estey Centre of International Law and Trade Policy.
C.J.Badenhorst (2004), “Occupational health risk assessment: central to the management of occupational health”, Group Occupational Hygiene Specialist, Anglo Platinum.
Clapp Stephenc (2007), “Monsanto seeks federal probe of rBST-free milk labels”, Food Traceability Report.
Cobb, M.D. (2004), & Macoubrie, J.. “Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust.” 6 Journal of Nanoparticle Research.
Cox, D.N., Koster, A., & Russell, C.G. (2004), “Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory.”, Appetite.
Donaldson K, Stone V, Tran CL, et al. (2004), A new frontier in particle toxicology relevant to both the workp lace and general environment and to consumer safety [ J ]. 61 (9) Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
GasKell(2004), Ten Eyck, Jackson, & Veltri, G.. “Public attitudes to nanotechnology in Europe and the United States”, 3 Nature Materials.
Georgia Miller (2006), “Workplace exposure to nanomaterials: Will nano be the next asbestos?”, Friends of the Earth.
Harris CE. (2003), “Methodologies for case studies in engineering ethics”. In: Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
Joseph E. Flanagan.Jr. (1960), Labeling Legislation:A summary of Recent Developments, 50 Journal of Public Health.
Kinsey, Jean D (1999), “Genetically Modified Food and Fiber: A Speedy Penetration or a False Start?”, 44 Cereal Foods World.
Kirsten S. Beaudoin (1999), “On Tonight’s Menu:Toasted Cornbread with Firefly Genes? Adapting Food Labeling Law to Consumer Protection Needs in the Biotech Century”, 83 Marquette Law Review.
Mekel Michele (2006), “Small science, big potential and bigger issues”, 49 Development.
Michael Siegrist (2007), Marie-Eve Cousin, Hans Kastenholz, Arnim Wiek, “Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust” , 49 Science Direct.
Oberdorster G. (2001)., 74 “Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultra fine particles, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health”.
Oberdorster G. (2002), Sharp Z., Atudorei V., Elder A., Gelein R., Lunts A., Kreyling W., Cox C., “Extrapulmonary translocation of ultra carbon particle following whole-body inhalation exposure of rats”, J. 65 Toxicol. Environ. Health A
Paul A. Schulte (2007), “Ethical and Scientific Issues of Nanotechnology in the Workplace”, 115 Environ Health Perspect.
Putnam, R.D. (1995), “Tuning in, tuning out :The strange disappearance of social capital in America”.28 PS:Political Science and Politics.
Service RF. (2003), “Nanotechnology shows signs of toxicity”, Science.
Siegrist, Earle, and Gutscher (2003), “Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF)risks”, 23 Risk Analysis.
Sivaramjani Thambisetty (2007), “Patents as credence goods”, 27 Oxford J. Legal Stud.
Vicki L Colvin (2003), “The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials”, 21 nature biotechnology.
Ye, X. et al. (2000), “Engineering the Provitamin A ($-Carotene) Biosynthetic Pathway into (Caroteniod-Free) Rice Endosperm”, 287 Science.
二、 論文
Nina Granqvist(2007), “Nanotechnology and Nanolabeling – Essays on the Emergence of New Technological Fields”, Helsinki School of Economics .
三、 專書
Nancy Appleton (1996), “ Lick the Sugar Habit”, Garden City Park, N.Y.:Avery Pub. Group,.
Sherry Seethaler(2009), “Lies, Damned Lies, and Science: How to Sort through the Noise around Global Warming, the Latest Health Claims, and Other Scientific Controversies”, FT Press.
World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology(2005), “The Precautionary Principle”.

四、 網路資料
Dr. Daniel Bloch, “Nanoparticles and occupational health-The Occupational physician’s perspective”, retrieved at the date of 2009/05/16 from NanoImpactNet (European Network on the Health and Environmental Impact of Nanomaterials) at http://www.nanoimpactnet.eu/object_binary/o2945_09-03-27_Bloch.pdf

EPA : Nanotechnology White Paper (2007) at http://epa.gov/ncer/nano/publications/whitepaper12022005.pdf

Feynmenn’s Talk: “There’s plenty of room at the bottom”http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html

Flora Stay, Ebook:“Product Labels:A cautionary tale”, from the website of cleure(fusion of clear and pure), http://www.cleure.com

Friends of the Earth, “International Union of Food, Farm & Hotel Workers considers global nano-moratorium” & “No Nano in Food and Agriculture” available at: http://nano.foe.org.au/node/185

Kantrowitz, “The separation of facts and values”, available at http://www.piercelaw.edu/risk/vol6/spring/kantro2.htm http://www.ipr-helpdesk.org/news/news_6673.en.xml.html?mode=subscription
Mark Anthony, “Ensuring the safety of ingredients”, http://www.foodprocessing.com/articles/2008/157.html?page=1

“Manufactured Nanoscale Materials Health & Safety Disclosure”, available at http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/uploadedFiles/Planning_(new_site_map_walk-through)/Level_3_-_General/Manuffactured%20Nanoscale%20Materials.pdf

NIOSH, “Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology:An Information Exchange with NIOSH”, Cincinnati, OH:National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/safenano/

“Proposed law would require product hazard label”, Canwest news service, http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/features/greenlife/story.html?id=6ccd12b6-2072-4b15-9943-0634b701e540

U.S.C. FFDCA section 502(a) http://www.fda.gov/CDRH/devadvice/3315.html