新竹科學園區自1980年成立以來，發揮了中小企業彈性及充份運用網絡關係獲取本身不足之資源。網絡是企業取得外部資源、知識、降低環境不確定性很重要的工具，最重要的是企業利用網絡分享知識形成共同學習的環境而趨動區域創新的動能。本研究將竹科視為一區域創新系統針對網絡分為二個研究子主題，第一部分著重竹科內網絡的演進及新一代主流網絡的更新及掘起，本研究主張系統外在的趨動力及內在動能將衍生新的產業，而新興產業將當時主流產業網絡視為環境，對原本產業產生替代及互補效果，進而取代原本產業之主流地位，成為領導性產業網絡，這種更替及更新的網絡不斷趨動整個創新系統成長，本研究以電腦及週邊產業、半導體製造業、新興IC設計及通訊光電業三大產業網絡之更新及演進過程為例。另外一個主題是對系統中企業成員締結聯盟性質與創新能力之影響做實証研究。以新竹科學園區取樣上市櫃企業為樣本，以聯盟事件資料庫之形式取得園區企業聯盟之數量化資料進行Tibit迴歸分析。研究發現區域內、外網絡的建立、國際網絡及與研究機構之合作聯盟等均對企業創新績效有顯著的正向相關。

There are two parts in this research. One is to describe the evolution of the industry networking in HSIP. In this study it describes how the new industry network grows to become the main stream and to generate another new industry. The research is separated three industry networks and the semi-conductor industry play the role to pass on. The second part research is micro perspective. The primary purpose of the second study is to explore how the industrial network affects the innovation ability of firms. In this study, survey data collected during 1993-2002 was utilized to investigate how industry network affected innovation outputs of High-Tech firms in Hsinchu Science-based Park in Taiwan. Multiple-regression and Tobit regression model were used to analyze the data. The study finds that international, intra-regional networks and connections with Research Institution are significantly positively related to innovation outputs.

1. 方世杰(民90年)，「以網路個體分析方法探討我國中小企業之國際化與績效-中衛體系電子資訊業廠商之實証研究」，管理學報，第十八卷第一期，頁49-74。
2. 林裕淩、蕭志同、朱博湧(民90年)，「新興工業化國家研發支出影響因素之研究--以臺灣科學園區為例」，科技管理學刊，第六卷第二期，頁71-88。
3. 徐進鈺(民86年)，「台灣積體電路工業發展歷程之研究----高科技、政府干預與人才回流」，台大地理學系地理學報，第23期，頁33-48。
4. 張世勳（民91年），地理群聚內廠商之網絡關係對其競爭力影響之研究-新竹科學園區之實證，朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士論文
5. 張俊彥、游伯龍(民90年)，活力：台灣如何創造半導體與個人電腦產業奇蹟，時報文化。
6. 曾信超(民89年)，「企業科技能力與技術移轉績效關係之研究--以新竹科學工業園區為例」，長榮學報，第三卷第二期，頁1-16。
7. 新竹園區管理局網頁，http://www.sipa.gov.tw
8. 楊志海、陳忠榮(民90年)，「創新活動的投入、產出與效率-科學園區內外高科技廠商的比較」，台大管理論叢第十一卷第二期，頁129~153。
9. Acs, Z. J., J. Mothe and G. Paquet (2000), “Regional Innovation: In Search of an Enabling Strategy”, in Acs, Z. J. (eds.), Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.
10. Acs, Z. J., L. Anselin and A. Varga (2002), “Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge,” Research Policy, 31:1069–1085.
11. Albino, V., A. C. Garavelli and G. Schiuma (1999),”Knowledge Transfer and Inter-firm Relationships in Industrial Districts: the Role of the Leader Firm,” Technovation, 19 (1):53-63.
12. Arocena, R. and J. Sutz (2001),”Changing Knowledge Production and Latin American Universities, Research Policy,30(8):1221-1234.
13. Ashton, W. and R. Sen (1988). “Using Patent Information in Technology Business Planning”, Research and Technology Management. November: 42-59.
14. Baptista, R. and P. Swann (1998),”Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More? ,” Research Policy, 27:525-540.
15. Cantwell, J. and S. Iammarino (1998), ”MNCs, Technological Innovation and Regional Systems in the EU: Some Evidence in the Italian Case”, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5(3):383-408.
16. Carlsson, B., S. Jacobsson , M. Holmen and A. Rickne (2002), ”Innovation Systems: Analytical and Methodological Issues”, Research Policy, 31:233-245.
17. Chakrabati, A.K. (1990)”Scientific Output of Small and Medium Size Firms in High-tech Industries.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 38:45-52.
18. Cooke, P. (2000),”Business Processes in Regional Innovation System in the European Union”, in Acs, Z. J. (eds.), Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.
19. Cooke, P., M. G. Uranga and G. Etxebarria (1997),”Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organizational Dimensions,” Research Policy, 26: 475-491.
20. Coriat, B. and O. Weinstein (2002), “Organizations, Firms and Institutions in the Generation of Innovation,” Research Policy , 31:273–290.
21. Deroýan, F. (2002),”Formation of Social Networks and Diffusion of Innovations,” Research Policy 31: 835–846.
22. Feller, I., C. P.Ailes and J. D. Roessner (2002),” Impacts of Research Universities on Technological Innovation in Industry: Evidence from Engineering Research Centers,” Research Policy, 31:457-474.
23. Felsenstein D. (1994), “University-related Science Parks - "Seedbeds" or "Enclaves" of Innovation?” Technovation, 14(2): 93-111.
24. Figueiredo, P. N. (2002), ”Does Technological Learning Pay off? Inter-firm Differences in Technological Capability-accumulation Paths and Operational Performance Improvement,” Research Policy, 31: 73–94.
25. Garofoli, G. and B. Musyck (2001),” Innovation Policies for SMEs in Europe: Towards and interactive model?” Regional Studies, 35(9):869-872.
26. Gregersen, B. and B. Johnson (1997),” Learning Economies, Innovation Systems and European Integration, Regional studies, 31(5):479-490.
27. Hagedoorn, J. (2002), “Inter-firm R&D Partnerships: an Overview of Major Trends and Patterns since 1960,” Research Policy, 31: 477–492.
28. Hartung, V. and A. MacPherson (2001),” Location and Innovation Performance of Commercial GIS Companies, Growth and Change, 32(1):3-22.
29. Hill, C. and D. Deeds (1996)” The Importance of Industry Structure for the Determination of Firm Profitability: A neo-Austrian Perspective”. Journal of Management Studies, 33(4): 429-451.
30. Holm, D. B., K. Eriksson and J. Johanson (1996),”Business Networks and Cooperation in International Business Relationships”, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5): 1033-1054.
31. Jones, C., W.S. Hesterly and S. P. Borgatti (1997), “A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms”, Academy of Management Review, 22(4):911-945.
32. Kline, S. and N. Rosenberg (1986), “An Overview of Innovation” In: Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academy press, Washington, DC, pp. 275-305.
33. Koschatzky, K. (2000),”A River is a River—Cross-broader Networking Between Baden and Alsace, European Planning Studies, 8(4): 429-449.
34. Koschatzky, K. and R. Sternberg (2000), “R&D Cooperation in Innovation Systems--Some Lessons from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS),” European Planning Studies, 8(4):487-501.
35. Lofsten, H. and P. Lindelof (2001),” Science Parks in Sweden - Industrial Renewal and Development?” R&D Management, 31(3):309-322.
36. Lofsten, H. and P. Linderlof (2002),” Science Parks and the Growth of New Technology-based Firms—Academic-industry Links, Innovation and Markets,” Research Policy, 31:859-876.
37. Love, J. H. and S. Rober (2002),”Location and Network Effects on Innovation Success: Evidence for UK, German and Irish Manufacturing Plants,” Research Policy, 30:643-661.
38. Lundvall, B.A. (Ed.), (1992), “National System of Innovation,” Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter Publishers, London.
39. Malerba, F. (2002),”Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production,” Research Policy ,31: 247–264.
40. Mathews, J. A. (2002), “The Origins and Dynamics of Taiwan’s R&D Consortia,” Research Policy, 31: 633–651.
41. McEvily, B. and A. Zaheer (1999),” Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities,” Strategic Management Journal, 20(12):1133-1156.
42. Monck, C.S.P., R.B. Porter, P. Quintas, D.J. Storey and P. Wynarczyk (1988) Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. London: Croom Helm.
43. Muller, E. and A. Zenker (2001),”Business Services as Actors of Knowledge Transformation: the Role of KIBS in Regional and National Innovation Systems,” Research Policy, 30: 1501-1516.
44. Nelson, R. R. and K. Nelson (2002), “Technology, Institutions, and Innovation Systems,” Research Policy, 31:265–272.
45. Nelson, R.R. and S. G. Winter (1982),” The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited”, The American Economic Review, 72(1):114-133.
46. Pakes, A. (1985) “Patents, R&D, and Stock Market Rate of Return.” Journal of Political Economy. 93: 390-409.
47. Phillimore, J. (1999), “Beyond the Linear View of Innovation in Science Park Evaluation - An Analysis of Western Australian Technology Park,” Technovation, 19(11): 673-680.
48. Porter, M. E. (1998),” Clusters and the New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, 76(6):77-90.
49. Ramanathan, R. (1995) Introductory Econometrics with Applications. Florida: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.pp647-650
50. Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
51. Saxenian, A. (2002),”Brian Circulation”, The Brookings Review, 20(1):28-31.
52. Steinle, C. and H. Schiele (2002), “When Do Industries Cluster? A Proposal on How to Assess an Industry’s Propensity to Concentrate at a Single Region or Nation,” Research Policy, 31 :850-858.
53. Stolpe, M. (2002), “Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion as Evidenced in Patent Data: the Case of Liquid Crystal Display Technology,” Research Policy, 31 :1181–1198.
54. Tomes, A., R. Erol, P.and Armstrong (2000),” Technological Entrepreneurship Integrating Technological and Product Innovation,” Technovation, 20 (3): 115-127.
55. Vedovello C. (1997), “Science Parks and University -Industry Interaction: Geographical Proximity between the Agents as a Driving Force,” Technovation, 17(9): 491-502.
56. Westhead, P. and D. J. Storey (1995), “Links between Higher Education Institutions and High Technology Firms,” Omega, 23(4):16.
57. Zedtwitz, M. V. and O. Gassmannb (2002),” Market versus Technology Drive in R&D Internationalization: Four Different Patterns of Managing Research and Development,” Research Policy, 31:569-588.