研究生: |
簡秀珊 Jian, Siou-Shan. |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
公司不動產持有對於績效報酬的影響- 以電子產業為例 The Impact of Corporate Real Estate Holdings on the Performance and Return – A Study on Electronic Industry of Taiwan |
指導教授: |
蔡子皓
Tsai, Tzu-Hao |
口試委員: |
余士迪
Yu, Shih-Ti 李傳楷 Lee, Chuan-Kai 林宗宏 Lin, Zong-Hong |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 財務金融碩士在職專班 Master Program of Finance and Banking |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 29 |
中文關鍵詞: | 公司不動產 、不動產持有 、公司報酬與績效 |
外文關鍵詞: | Corporate real estate, CRE holdings, return and efficiency of company |
相關次數: | 點閱:42 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
不動產在公司的資產組合裡一直扮演著重要的角色,國內外文獻針對公司不動產持有比例(指不動產科目占總資產比例)對公司風險與報酬的影響亦有諸多探討,然而過去研究多針對全部產業進行分析,台灣也是以所有上市櫃公司為樣本分析公司不動產持有之於報酬與績效的關聯性,然而考量到各產業間會因不動產的營運生產屬性差異,本研究將只針對電子產業進行研究,檢驗單一產業間不動產持有比例對於公司報酬與績效的影響,亦探討不動產與其他資產配置上的差異與影響。
實證結果發現,就電子產業公司而言,以市場績效來說,公司不動產持有比例與股價報酬的實證結果為不顯著,表示股票市場未能夠反映公司不動產持有比例;再進一步將不動產依資本類型區分為投資性不動產、營業性不動產,實證發現公司持有投資性不動產相較於營業性不動產有較高比例時,顯示公司降低了本業的繼續投資,於股票市場會有較低的報酬表現。以營運績效來說,公司不動產持有比例較高者,使得公司資產使用效率降低,股東權益報酬會有較低的表現;進一步分析財會科目內的營業用不動產與營運設備比例,營業用不動產較營運設備持有比例較高者,因不動產具有低折舊率的特性,為財務上營運績效帶來正面影響,股東權益報酬會有較佳的表現。最後以營運績效之本業獲利率來說,同樣檢驗公司不動產持有、投資性不動產與營業用不動產及營業用不動產與營運設備持有情形對於本業獲利率則無顯著影響。
Since Corporate real estate (CRE) plays an important role in corporate asset portfolio, there are many theses studying the relationship between CRE holdings ratio and corporate risks and returns. While present studies used all industries type as the research subject, this study focus on the relationship stated above of single industry -electronics industry, to exclude the endogenous difference existing in different industries. Not only the CRE holdings but also other ratios from balance sheet related with assets are taking into account as the research subject.
The empirical results show that, for the efficiency of market, the CRE holdings of electronic industry appear not to be associated with the stock return performance, which means the stock market would not reflect the condition of CRE holdings by the company. Furthermore, this study defines the CRE as Investment Property and Operation Property by the capital category. The result shows a negative relation between IP/OP ratio and stock return. Higher IP/OP ratio is associated with the lower stock return, which could be concluded from the less investment for the business operation. For the efficiency of operation, the CRE holdings are associated with lower ROE performance due to the less utility of capital strategy, and the ratio of the operation property and equipment is associated with increased ROE as a result of the lower depreciation of real estate. However, for the business operation performance, the results of the CRE holdings, IP/OP ratio and the ratio of the operation property and equipment are insignificant.
1. 鐘柏翔,2012,台灣上市櫃公司不動產持有程度對公司風險及報酬之影響,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士論文。
2. Ambrose, B. W. (1990). Corporate Real Estate’s Impact on the Takeover Market. The journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 3, 307-322.
3. Ambrose, B.W., M., Diop and J. Yoshida. (2016). Product Market Competition and Corporate Real Estate Investment under Demand Uncertainty. Real Estate Economics, 10.1111/1540-6229.12150
4. Brounen, D., and P. Eichholtz. (2005). Corporate Real Estate Ownership Implications: International Performance Evidence. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 30, 429–445.
5. Brounen, D., Dijk, M. V., and P. Eichholtz. (2008). Corporate Real Estate and Corporate Takeovers: International Evidence. Journal of Real Estate Research, 30(3), 293-313.
6. Cheong, K., and S. K. Kim. (1997). Corporate Real Estate Holdings and the Value of the Firm in Korea. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 3 (1), 39-50.
7. Deng, Y., and J. Gyourko. (1999). Real Estate Ownership by Non-Real Estate Firms: An Estimate of the Impact on Firm Returns, Unpublished Working Paper, Wharton School.
8. Deng, X., S. E., Ong and M. Qian. (2017). Real Estate Risk, Corporate Investment and Financing Choice, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, DOI 10.1007/s11146-017-9599-y.
9. Diop, M. (2018). Real Estate Investment, Product Market Competition and Stock Returns. Real Estate Economics, 2, 291-333.
10. Liow, K.H. (2004). Corporate Real Estate and Stock Market Performance. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29, 119–140.
11. Liow, K.H. and N.-C. Ingrid. (2008). A Combined Perspective of Corporate Real Estate. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 10, 54–67.
12. Roulac, S. E. (2003). Corporate-owned Real Estate Represents a Substantial Investment Universe. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 9(2), 167-178.
13. Seiler, M. J., Chatrath, A., and Webb, J.R. (2001). Real Asset Ownership and the Risk and Return to Stockholders. Journal of Real Estate Research, 22(1), 199-212.
14. Tuzel, S. (2010). Corporate Real Estate Holdings and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 2268–2302.
15. Zhao, D., and T. F., Sing (2016). Corporate Real Estate Ownership and Productivity Uncertainty. Real Estate Economics, 17 (1), 51-88.