簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 周嘉鏞
Chou,Chia Yung
論文名稱: 紫式決策分析關鍵零組件新產品供應商選擇-TFT-LCD中小尺寸面板為例
UNISON Decision Framework for Analyzing Selecting Critical Component New Product Supplier for Middle Small Size Panel TFT-LCD
指導教授: 簡禎富
Chien, Chen-Fu
口試委員: 彭金堂
Peng, Jin-Tang
吳吉政
Wu, Jei-Zheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系碩士在職專班
Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 層級分析法面板產業紫式決策分析供應商選擇
外文關鍵詞: AHP, TFT-LCD, UNISON, Supplier Evaluation and Selection
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著TFT-LCD面板產業日趨成熟,相關產品開發時程及產品生命週期也愈來愈短。製作中小尺寸的TFT-LCD面板產品,除了開發面板本身外,還需要組裝相關的材料零組件成為面板產品。一個面板產品使用的關鍵零組件至少需要十幾項材料,每一個高中低階產品所需搭配的材料零組件供應商又有所不同,而材料供應商的好壞,攸關產品的開發送樣時程,因此,企業的供應商選擇與管理對開發新產品極為重要。面板廠的決策單位主管若能以合格供應商清單先行區分高中低階供應商群組,在每次開發新產品時,使用決策指標針對不同的高中低階產品選擇合適的供應商,將減少企業在產品開發過程中更換供應商的次數,及縮短產品送樣時間。
    本研究的目的是建構面板產業的供應商選擇決策指標,以AHP (analytic hierarchy process)為研究架構,在新產品開發的供應商選擇以五個目標和十四個屬性進行評核,建立出相對應的屬性權重,讓決策者可以依循模式評比,根據應用的產品類型選擇出適當的關鍵零組件供應商。本研究以台灣某TFT-LCD 中小尺寸面板廠為案例驗證決策指標的可行性,研究結果證實本研究提出之指標可供決策者評選供應商之參考。


    With the TFT-LCD industries become more mature, the product development times and life cycles have become shorter. The production of small and medium size TFT-LCD product not only need to focus on the TFT-LCD’s R&D, but also need to assemble the related material components. A TFT-LCD product includes more than ten key components which are provided by different suppliers at high, middle, and low levels of products. The reliability of materials suppliers will affect the sample product lead time and product development process. Therefore, supplier selection and management is a critical factor for enterprises in developing new product. For selection and management of suppliers, the decision makers can sort the qualified suppliers into three groups (high, middle and low), then using decision indicators to match suitable suppliers with the new product. By doing so, the enterprises can reduce times of change suppliers in the product development process and shorten sample test procedure.
    This study aims to establish decision indicators of supplier selection in the TFT-LCD Industry by adopting AHP (analytic hierarchy process) framework. There are five goals and fourteen attributes need to be assessed with corresponding attribute weights. The results can be a basis for the decision maker to select suitable key components suppliers. To examine the validity of this approach, an empirical study was conducted in a small and medium size TFT-LCD company in Taiwan, and the results demonstrated the practical viability of this approach.

    第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景、動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 論文結構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 面板背景 4 2.2 供應商選擇 5 2.3 紫式決策分析架構 6 2.4 分析層級程序法(AHP) 8 第三章 新產品供應商選擇指標層級架構 10 3.1問題定義 11 3.2界定利基及問題範圍 12 3.3架構的影響關係 13 3.4感受和客觀敘述 14 3.5綜合判斷與權衡 18 3.6最適決策與執行回饋 20 第四章 實證研究 22 4.1瞭解問題與問題定義 22 4.2發掘利基並界定問題範圍 23 4.3 分析層級法權重評估程序 24 4.4 問卷設計說明 30 4.5 AHP問卷設計說明 31 4.6 供應商選擇實證分析方案 38 4.7 效度檢驗 40 第五章 結論 41 5.1 研究貢獻 41 5.2未來研究方向 41 參考文獻 42 附錄一、關鍵零組件新產品供應商選擇指標問卷 44

    毛治國(2003),決策,天下出版社,台北
    林繼勇、簡禎富、胡志翰(2008),紫式決策分析以建構液晶原料廠製程確效評估模式,品質學報,15卷5期,頁385-398。
    吳吉政、陳春男(2013),臺灣發光二極體產業製造策略卓越經營決策分析架構,品質學報,20卷4期,頁403-425。
    周明璇、陳文智、簡禎富(2013),建構半導體廠跨廠績效評估以提昇資源分配決策品質之研究,品質學報,20卷4期,頁427-444。
    胡菀寧(2007),台灣面板產業新版圖 : 新技術,新應用,新商機,財訊出版社,台北。
    陳勁甫、 簡禎富 (2009) 何謂決策品質,品質學報,16 卷 2 期,頁P87-94。
    簡禎富(2014),決策分析與管理-紫式決策分析以全面提升決策品質(二版),雙葉書廊,台北。
    簡禎富、游智閔、徐紹鐘(2009),紫式決策分析以建構半導體晶圓廠人力規劃決策模型,管理與系統,第16卷,第2期,頁157-180。
    簡禎富 、 陳勁甫、 陳建宏 (2009),績效評估指標與政府科技發展計畫評估機制,品質學報,第16 卷 2 期,頁119-135。
    Chien, Chen-Fu, Wu, J.-Z., and Wu, C.-C. (2013), “A Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Approach for New Tape-Out Allocation Decisions for Demand Fulfillment Planning in Semiconductor Manufacturing,” Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 25(3), 286-309.
    Chen, W. and Chien, Chen-Fu (2011), “Measuring Relative Performance of Wafer Fabrication Operations: A Case Study,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(3), 447-457.
    Chien, Chen-Fu, Hu, C., and Lin, C. (2008), “Analysing Inspection Frequency for Wafer Bumping Process and an Empirical Study of UNISON Decision Framework,” International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 14(1/2), 130-144.
    Chan, Felix T. S., Kumar, Niraj (2007), “Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach”, Omega-International Journal of management science,35(4),417-431
    Ghodsypour, SH, O'Brien, C(1998), “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming”,, International Journal of Production Economics,56-7,199-212
    Lee, Amy H. I., Kang, He-Yau, Chang, Ching-Ter (2009) , “Fuzzy multiple goal programming applied to TFT-LCD supplier selection by downstream manufacturers”, Expert systems with applications 36(3),6318-6325
    Liu, FHF Hai (2005), “The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier”, Hlinternational Journal of Production Econmics,97(3),308-317
    Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H., (1993), “Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs”, Cambridge University Press, New York.
    Wang, G, Huang, SH, Dismukes (2004), “Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology”, International Journal of Production Economics, 91(1), 1-15

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE