近三年台灣餐飲興起掛牌上市風潮，王品集團、85度C、瓦城，甚至是手搖飲料日出茶太等，也紛紛導入連鎖體系並且快速擴張經營，在沒有足夠的先例與路徑可以依循的情況下，本研究者將其視為研究對象，以對此行業發展提供微薄貢獻。
本研究基於上市餐飲服務業的領導者型態、領導風格會如何影響組織的氣候，再進而影響學習型組織的建立為研究思路，而何種領導風格去建立一個充滿知識與學習的環境進而讓員工可以全心投入，使員工個人目標與組織目標一致並為組織貢獻為本研究期待的研究結果。
本研究使用問卷分析法進行研究，並且選擇台灣成功餐飲集團且不分海內外的上市公司作為問卷調查對象，研究結果得出四個結論：
1. 領導型態會對學習型組織產生正向的影響：研究結果主管柔性領導與以身作則是普遍員工喜愛和重視的事，組織因而在上述的領導中，創造出鼓勵學習的環境。
2. 領導型態會對組織氣候產生正向的影響：不論是柔性領導或強勢領導，員工都在意制度是否清楚、以及責任是否明確。由於員工普遍認為組織內部是柔性領導，因此組織的氣候是愉悅氣氛。
3. 組織氣候會對學習型組織產生正向的影響：填答者認為組織總體擁有愉悅氣氛並鼓勵學習，由此可以判斷此餐飲集團非常的趨近學習型組織應有的型態。
4. 領導型態、組織氣候與學習型組織之三者關係—組織氣候的中介效果：從研究結果中的得出，領導型態顯著影響學習型組織，同時領導型態也會透過組織氣候而對於學習型組織產生影響。

關鍵字：領導型態、組織氣候、學習型組織

Abstract
Over the past three years, the food and beverage industry in Taiwan has been increasingly caught up in the trend of going public. One by one, enterprises such as Wowprime, 85°C, Thai Town, and even the beverage store, Chatime, have launched franchise systems to rapidly expand their operations. Lacking sufficient precedent or models on which to rely, the author attempts to focus on this research topic to provide a modest contribution to the development of this industry.

This study examines how the patterns and styles of leadership within listed companies of the food and beverage industry influence the overall atmosphere of an organization and its impact on the establishment of a learning organization. What kind of leadership style helps foster an environment of knowledge and learning, which in turn encourages the devotion of employees? This study seeks to contribute by finding
the best way to align the objectives of an organization with the personal goals of its employees.This study implements a survey analysis for its research. Furthermore, successful Taiwanese restaurant groups publicly listed in either a domestic or international exchange were selected to serve as the respondents. The results obtained lead to four conclusions:

1. Leadership style positively impacts a learning organization: The results suggest that a flexible style of leadership by a supervisor, as well as the act of leading by example are traits generally loved and valued by staff. By following the leadership style mentioned above, organizations can create an encouraging learning environment.

2. Leadership style positively impacts organizational climate. Regardless of whether the leadership style is flexible or stiff, employees are concerned about the clarity of the system and the definition of responsibilities. When employees generally consider an organization to show flexible leadership, the organizational climate is also more pleasant.

3. Organizational climate positively impacts the learning organization. When respondents consider the overall organization to have a pleasant atmosphere, this encourages the level of learning as well. From this, it can be determined that restaurant groups are very close to the proper form of a leaning organization.

4. The overall relationship amongst leadership style, organizational climate, and learning organization provides a mediating effect on the organizational climate. When considering the impact that both leadership style and organizational climate have on a learning organization, it is apparent that leadership style has a significant impact on a learning organization. Thus, leadership style impacts a learning organization through the organizational climate.

Keywords: Leadership Style, Organizational Climate, Learning Organization

參考文獻
英文部分：
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M., Jung, D. (1999) . Reexamining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Quesionnaire, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 7, 441-462
Bass, J. (1985), Organization culture and leadership: A dynamic view, San Francisco, Vol. 13, No.3, P173-175.
Farh, J.L. & Cheng, B.S. ,Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: A cultural
analysis., Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 2000, no.13, 127-180. (In Chinese)
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
Garvin, D.A. (1993),Building a learning organization, Harvard Business Review, 71(4): 78-91.
Goh, S. (1998). Toward a learning organization: the strategic building blocks. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 63(2), 15-22.
Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J.W. (1974), Organizational climate: Measure, researches
and contingencies. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 255-280.
Kaiser, H. (1966). The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis, Psychometrika, pp.189.
Litwin, G. H. & Stringer, R. A. (1968), Motivation and Organization Climate, Boston:
Harvard University.
Marquardt, M. (2002). Building the learning organization: mastering the five elements for corporate learning. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
Marquardt, M. J. (1996). Building the learning organization: A systems approach to quantum improvement and global success, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nont Sahaya.(2012). International Journal of Business and Management. Vol.7, No. 14
O’Brien M.J.(1994), The blocks of learning、organization、training & development, 48(6),41-49
Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (1991), The learning company: a strategy for sustainable development, London: McGraw-Hill
Prewitt, V. (2003), Leadership development for learning organizations, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 24(2): 58-61.
Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2004), Dimensions of transformational leadership:
S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 63(2), 15–20.
Sadler, P., (2003), Leadership, London: Kogan-Page.
Schein, E. H., On Dialogue、Culture and Organizational Learning. Organizational Dynamics, Winter, 1993, P40-51.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Tead, O., (1935), The art of Leadership, N.Y: HcGraw-Hill Book Co.
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. In K.E. Watkins (Ed.), Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(1), 132-151.
Yukl, G. (2002), Leadership in organizations, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Publishing.

中文部分:
丁 蔚(2001)，知織管理系統—建構學習型組織的工具，圖書情報工作，第六期。
王念孟(民95)。運用結構方程式探討領導型態、組織文化、組織承諾、組織學習、知識管理以及組織績效之關係-以保險金融業為例。國立東華大學企業管理系在職專班碩士論文。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2009），SPSS與統計應用分析（附光碟），台北：五南。
周芸薇(2000)。學習型組織評鑑量表建立。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
彼特•聖吉(2009)，第五項修煉—學習型組織的藝術與實務篇。張成林譯。中信出版社。
彼特•聖吉(2010)，第五項修煉—變革篇(下)。王秋海 等。中信出版社
孫本初(1995)。學習型組織的內涵與運用(上)。人事月刊，23(1)，P27-31。
張宛儒(民98)。「組織氣候與領導風格對員工工作態度影響探討-以M公司為例」。國立中央大學人力資源理研究所碩士論文。
張康玲(2001)。女性業務主管的人格特質、領導型態級領導效能關係之研究—以
台灣南區保險業為例。長榮管理學院經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
許士軍(1972)，有關Litwin & Stringer二氏「組織氣候」尺度在我國企業機構之適用性探討，國立政治大學學報，26，頁103-138。
許士軍(1975)，「工作滿足、個人特徵與組織氣候-文獻探討及證實研究」，國立政治大學學報，第35期，頁13-56。
許士軍(2002)。管理學，台北:東華。
湯仁棟(2009)。證券營業員人格特質、主管領導型態對工作績效之影響：以某證券公司為例。世新大學管理學院碩士論文。
管長青（2001），影響學習型組織形成之相關因素研究-以工程顧問業為例，台科大管理研究所未出版之碩士論文，台北市。
蔣景清(2002)，「組織氣候、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究-以C工廠為例」，國立中央大學人力資源管理在職專班碩士論文。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)，「家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量」，本土心理學研究，第14期，頁3-64。
鄭伯壎(1994)。<家長權威與領導行為之探討>。國科會專題計畫研究報告。
鄭伯壎(1995)，<家長權威與領導行為之關係>:一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究;中央研究院民族研究所集刊第79期119-173頁春季刊。
鄭伯壎、黃淑萍(2000)。<華人企業組織中的領導:一項文化價值的分析>:中山管理評論2000年冬季號P583-617。
鄭伯壎、樊景立(1998)。<華人組織家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析>:本土心理學研究，靶子論文。
鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳 (2006)，家長式領導，台北：華泰圖書公司。
謝明煌 （2007），運用學習型組織對組織工作滿意度與工作績效之關係研究-以社團法人中華民國中小企業協會為例，佛光大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
蘇東城(民95)。運用結構方程式探討領導型態、組織學習、內部服務品質、知識管理、創新能力與組織績效之關係-以行動通訊產業為例。國立東華大學企業管理系在職專班碩士論文。
蘇勇&陳小平(1999)，<文化與管理-對學習型組織的思考>，台北市：商業經濟與管理，06期，P96-97。