本研究旨在探討樂高積木教學對於國小特教班自閉症兒童於矩陣推理能力之成效。選擇三位就讀於國小集中式特教班自閉症兒童，以單一受試研究法中的倒返設計（ABM設計）為研究方法，設計架構分別為基線期、介入期與追蹤期，安排三名受試者進行8週的樂高積木教學介入，並在實驗各階段實施以亂數抽取10題的彩色矩陣推理測驗（以下簡稱「CPM」）作為評量依據，並透過施測完整的CPM進行前後測分析，以了解樂高積木課程介入對於國小特教班自閉症兒童於矩陣推理能力之成效。研究過程中以目視分析與C統計進行實驗資料的量化分析，並透過CPM前測與後測之測驗成績了解樂高積木介入成效；質性分析則以觀察、錄影與文字紀錄並行的分析方式，輔以相關資料進行相互驗證。
　　綜合本研究結果，研究者提出以下結論：
一、 樂高積木課程的介入對於國小特教班自閉症兒童的矩陣推理能力在立即成效上有正向的效果。
二、 樂高積木課程的介入對於國小特教班自閉症兒童的矩陣推理能力的維持成效不一致。
三、 在樂高積木課程的介入後，三位受試者在CPM的成績上皆有提升。
四、 運用樂高積木課程需要依據受試者的個別差異調整並給予適當的教學策略。

The study of progressive matrices ability with autism by using WeDo2.0 Lego education training in special education class of Elementary Schools.

Abstract
This study explored the effects of using WeDo2.0 Lego education training for students with autism in Centralized special education class of Elementary Schools. The study used single text Mining Law A Return design as a study method, which is divided into baseline period, intervention period, and maintenance period. This research is based on experimental data are categorized and quantified in order to ascertain the progressive matrices ability with autism. Subjects were three students with autism in Centralized special education class of Elementary Schools at Hsinchu city.
The results of this study as bellow:
1. After using the WeDo2.0 Lego education training, these three students have obviously improve on CMP test. Prove that the WeDo2.0 Lego education training has immediately effectiveness of progressive matrices ability for student.
2. After using the WeDo2.0 Lego education training, the performance of the progressive matrices ability of the autism showed a positive growth compared with that without intervention. Among the three students, the performance of the progressive matrices ability of one student was significantly different.
3. After using the WeDo2.0 Lego education training, the performance of the progressive matrices ability of the autism had an inconsistent retention effect.
4. The use of WeDo2.0 Lego education curriculum needs to be adjusted according to the individual difference and give appropriate teaching strategies.

一、 中文部份
王真瑤(1997)。積木遊戲與活動計劃（原作者:西久保禮造、野村睦子）。臺北，財團法人成長文教基金會。
田耐青（1999）。由「電腦樂高」談新世紀的學習：一個「科技支援之建構學習環境」實例。教學科技與媒體，44，24-35。
朱鴻欣（2014）。樂高積木教學對感覺處理障礙兒童注意力及視－動統整能力之成效。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
吳志緯（2002）。國小學生以電腦 樂高進行科學學習之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)，臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所，臺北市。
吳沛璇、張正芬（2012）。亞斯柏格症學生在魏氏兒童智力量表 ─第四版（WISC-IV）的表現。特殊教育研究學刊，37卷2期，85-110頁。
吳緒筑 譯(1994)。幼兒教具設計與活用 (原作者:村田茂、春川秀忠、小林芳文、筱原吉德)。臺北，五南。
杜正治（2006）。單一受試研究法。心理出版社。
周玉萍、江秋樺（2014）。應用行為分析於國小集中式特教班教學之運用。惠明特殊教育學刊，1期，53~77。
施能木（2009）。樂高組件對國小學童學習生活科技課程「簡單機械」單元之影響研究。生活科技教育月刊，四十二卷，3-26。
柯冠伶、周映君（2016）。以積木為媒介對於自閉症孩童的成效回顧。職能治療學會雜誌。民國105年34卷第2期，頁214-229。
紐文英、吳裕益（2015）。單一個案研究法－研究設計與後設分析。心理出版社。
高明美(1986)。魅力無窮的積木。學前教育月刊，8(12)。
張文瑜（2018）。圖片兌換溝通系統融入共享式注意力策略之方案提升自閉症兒童共享式注意力之成效。臺北市立大學，臺北市。
張世彗（2015）。非語文智力測驗建製之探究。特殊教育發展期刊，第59期，1-14頁。
張春興（2006）。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市，東華。
梁麗珍、賴靜惠（2003）。二專在職進修部學生學習動機與學習策略之研究。教育與心理研究，26期，717-748頁。
許雅惠、李鴻章、曾火城、許文宗、鄭瓊月、謝義勇（2006）。幼兒社會學，頁200，五南。
許瑜青(2018)。自閉症兒童之母親教養經驗個案研究。未出版碩士論文。臺北市立大學，臺北市。
陳淑玲（2012）。樂高治療提升自閉症學童交談能力之行動研究。國立新竹教育大學教育，臺北市。
陳淑玲、曾文志（2011）。樂高治療在提升自閉症兒童社交發展介紹與應用。諮商與輔導。第308期，第2-7頁。
陳榮華（1997）。魏氏兒童智力量表第三版－指導手冊。臺北市：中國行為科學社出版。
陳榮華、陳心怡（2006）。瑞文氏矩陣推理測驗指導手冊（原著為J. Raven, J. C. Raven & J. H Court）。中國行為科學社出版。
黃國鴻（2000）。以專題製作為主的電腦化學習環境之比較研究－認知取向與情境取向（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
楊孟山、林宜玄（2018）。Maker教育理論與實踐。台灣教育評論月刊，2018，7（2），頁29-38。
溫秀燕（2015）。透過樂高積木遊戲對亞斯伯格症兒童人際關係之個案研究（未出版碩士論文）。南開科技大學，南投縣。
劉慧玲（2012）。觸覺數學對增進重度自閉症數與量概念與計算之研究。國小特殊教育期刊，第54期，94-101。
鄭美蓮、陳聲珮（2013）。自主建構學習模式：「問題－探索－經驗」學習，編輯於陳惠玲、關珊（主編）『「敢」問「感」學：課程設計與推行』，頁43-76，香港，香港教育學院匯豐幼兒發展中心。
二、 英文部份
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder-V (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248-254.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Two new theories of autism: hyper-systemising and assortative mating. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91, 2-5.
Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N., & Wheelwright, S. (2003).　The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. The Royal Society, 358,　361-374.
Casey, M. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: a nature nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Riview,16, 241-260.
Dewey, D., Lord, C., & Magill, J. (1988). Qualitative assessment of the effect of play materials in dyadic peer interactions of children with Autism. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 242-260.
Frase, L.T.（1977）. Purpose in reading. Newark, Del,: International Reading Association.
Honer, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., Mcgee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single -subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.
Johnson, H. M. (1996). The art of block building. In E. S. Hirsch (Ed.), The block book (3rd ed.)(pp.9-25). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Krainick, J. Teaching social skills to children with Autism Spectrum Disorders using LEGO club-based therapy. 2018. ProQuest Information & Learning, 2018.
Lehman, Helane G.（1992）. Graphic Organizers Benefit Slow Learners. Clearing House, Vol. 66, Iss. 1, : 53-55.
Lindsay, S.; Houndell, K. G.; Cassiani, C. A scoping review of the role of LEGO ® therapy for improving inclusion and social skills among children and youth with autism. Disability and health journal, v. 10, n. 2, p. 173–182, 2017.
Michelle Dawson, Isabelle Soulie`res, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, and Laurent Mottron(2007). The Level and Nature of Autistic Intelligence. Psychological Science, 18(8), 657-662.
Napolitano, D. A., Smith, T., Zarcone, J. R., Goodkin, K., & McAdam, D. B. (2010).Increasing response diversity in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 265-271.
Ottenbacher, K. J. (1992). Analysis of data in idiographic research: Issue and methods. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 202-208.
Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B.F., & Rogers, S.J.(1991).Executive function deficits in high functioning children with autism: relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081-1106.
Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. New York : Ablex.
Prior, M., Dahlstrom, B., & Squires, T.L.(1990). Autistic children’s knowledge of thinking and feeling states in other people. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 587-602.
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2003). General overview （Raven Manual Section 1）. P.xii~xiii. U.S.A.: Harcourt Assessment Inc.
Resnick,M.(1996). Distributed Constructionism.Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Northwestern University
Rosser, R. （1994）. Cognitive development: Psychological and biological perspectives. Boston, MA : Allyn and Bacon.
Roth, W. (1998). Designing communities. Boston : Kluwer.
Rumsey, J.M. (1992). Neuropsychological studies of high-level autism. In Schopler, E. & Mesibov, G.B.(Eds.) High- functioning individuals with autism (p.41-64). New York: Plenum Press.
Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Tryon, W. W. (1982). A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 423-429.
Venter , A., Lord, C., & Schopler, E. (1992). A follow-up study of high functioning autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 489-507.
Winn, B.D., Skinner, C.H., Allin, J.D., & Hawkins, J.A.(2004). Practicing school consultants can empirically validate intervention: A Journal of Applied School Psychology description and demonstration of the non-concurrent multiple-baseline design. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20, 109-128.