研究生: |
温家怡 Wen, Chia-Yi. |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
戶外教育對國小學童科學過程技能與概念認知學習之影響-以校園植物為例 The Influence of Outdoor Education on Primary School Students' Science Process Skills and Scientific Concept Learning – A Case of the Plants in Campus |
指導教授: |
蘇宏仁
Su, Hung-Jen 林裕仁 Lin, Yu-Ren |
口試委員: |
葉國樑
Yeh, Gwo-Liang 巫俊明 Wu, Chun-Ming |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
竹師教育學院 - 數理教育研究所碩士在職專班 Mathematics & Science Education Master Inservice Program |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 152 |
中文關鍵詞: | 戶外教育 、順流學習法 、科學過程技能 、校園植物概念認知 |
外文關鍵詞: | outdoor education, flow learning method, science process skills, scientific concept of campus plants |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討國小六年級學童所具有之科學過程技能及校園植物概念認知,在施行八週之戶外教育融入順流學習法後的改變情形,並進一步分析與背景變項間的相關性。研究工具為改編之「科學過程技能量表」與自編之「校園植物概念認知量表」,經由成對樣本t檢定檢驗前測與後測間的差異情形,並使用質性資料作為檢證。在相關性分析方面,使用皮爾森積差相關、列聯相關等方法進行背景變項、科學過程技能以及校園植物概念認知間的相關性分析。
本研究重要發現如下:
1.國小六年級學童進行戶外教育實驗教育之前,較為具有之科學過程技能為「觀察」、「比較與分類」以及基於多方資料進行觀察的「歸納與推斷」技能。較不具有對資料進行通則性解釋的「歸納與推斷」、「組織與關聯」以及「傳達」技能。
2.國小六年級學童進行戶外教育實驗教育之前,較為具有之校園植物概念認知項目為「植物特徵資料檢索」、「校園植物特徵資料檢索」與「植物分類方法」,較不具有「植物各器官特徵」與「校園植物特徵」等兩項校園植物概念認知。
3.戶外教育實驗教學對國小六年級學童的「觀察」、「比較與分類」、對資料進行通則性解釋的「歸納與推斷」、「組織與關聯」以及「傳達」等科學過程技能學習皆有顯著提升,但在基於多方資料進行觀察的「歸納與推斷」技能則無顯著提升。
4.戶外教育實驗教學對國小六年級學童的「植物特徵資料檢索」、「校園植物特徵資料檢索」與「植物分類方法」、「植物各器官特徵」與「校園植物特徵」等植物概念認知學習皆具有顯著提升效果。
5.科學過程技能與校園植物概念認知學習無顯著相關,但背景變項之「性別」與科學過程技能的改變情形呈顯著中度相關。「家長教養方式」與校園植物概念認知的學習呈顯著中度相關。
The aim of this study was to explore the changes in science process skills and scientific concept of campus plants among sixth graders after implementing an eight-week outdoor education program using the flow learning method, as well as to analyze the correlations with background variables. The research tools included the adapted "Science Process Skills Scale" and the self-developed "Campus Plant Conceptual Understanding Scale." The differences between pre-test and post-test were examined using paired-sample t-tests, and qualitative data were used for verification. Pearson's product-moment correlation and contingency correlation were used for the correlation analysis between background variables, science process skills, and campus plant conceptual understanding.
The key findings of this study are as follows:
1. Prior to the outdoor education experiment, sixth graders were more proficient in the science process skills of "observation," "comparison and classification," and inductive and deductive reasoning based on multiple data observations. They were less proficient in skills such as inductive and deductive reasoning for generalizing data, "organization and correlation," and "communication."
2. Prior to the outdoor education experiment, sixth graders had a better understanding of concepts related to campus plants, such as "retrieving plant characteristic data," "retrieving campus plant characteristic data," and "plant classification methods." They had less understanding of concepts such as "characteristics of plant organs" and "campus plant characteristics."
3. The outdoor education experiment significantly enhanced the learning of science process skills such as "observation," "comparison and classification," inductive and deductive reasoning for generalizing data, "organization and correlation," and "communication" among sixth graders. However, there was no significant improvement in the skill of inductive and deductive reasoning based on multiple data observations.
4. The outdoor education experiment significantly improved the learning of campus plant conceptual understanding in areas such as "retrieving plant characteristic data," "retrieving campus plant characteristic data," "plant classification methods," "characteristics of plant organs," and "campus plant characteristics."
5. There was no significant correlation between science process skills and campus plant conceptual understanding. However, the change in science process skills was moderately correlated with the background variable of "gender," and the learning of campus plant conceptual understanding was moderately correlated with the background variable of "parenting style."
一、中文文獻
1. 王美芬、 熊召弟(2005)。國小階段自然與生活科技教材教法.。新北,心理出版社。
2. 王雅雪、盧秀琴(2004)。環境教育融入生活課程之設計與實現。國教學報,16,153-184。
3. 王鑫(2014)。概說戶外教育的要點。學校體育(140),84-92。
4. 何昕家、洪銘德(2018)。初探臺灣戶外教育政策。台灣教育(713),,95-105。
5. 吳玫玢(2021)。運用戶外教學進行環境教育之行動研究─以許厝港濕地生態為例。﹝碩士論文。開南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3h5z5e
6. 吳秋慧(2019)。從戶外教育發展脈絡探討戶外教育之內涵。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(12),153-159。
7. 吳清山(2015)。教育名詞-戶外教育。教育脈動(4),129-130。
8. 周育輝(2021)。體驗學習融入戶外教育之校本課程的行動研究:以山佳國小六年級為例。﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g8rdxk。
9. 周儒、呂建政(1999)。戶外教學。臺北,五南圖書。
10. 林美玉(2020)。參與戶外教育國小學童對環境態度、滿意度與學習成效之探討-以龜山區南美國小為例。﹝碩士論文。開南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w9jkz2。
11. 林素華(2004)。英國LLEDR HALL戶外環境學習中心之心體驗. 國教輔導,44(2),12-16。https://doi.org/10.6772/gee.200412.0012
12. 胡美婌(2003)。高雄地區國小六年級學童基本科學過程技能之城鄉, 性別差異研究--以傳達能力為例。﹝碩士論文。國立嘉義大學﹞
13. 范銘仁(2021)。戶外教育對國小高年級生科學素養覺知及學習動機之影響。﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z2q534。
14. 徐麗雪(2002)。國小科學遊戲教學活動成效分析。﹝碩士論文。臺北市立師範學院﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w23uxu。
15. 高靜芳(2021)。戶外教育對學生環境認知、環境態度、環境行為影響之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺東大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/857uvp。
16. 教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程 (第一界階段) 暫行綱要.。教育部。
17. 許彩梁(2013)。校外教學在臺灣。生態臺灣(41),29-34。
18. 許榮富(1985)。科學過程技能簡介。中等教育(174),26-31。
19. 許毅璿、盧居煒、李芝瑩、黃昱翔、江玉玲(2012)。英國「教室外學習(Learning Outside the Classroom)」發展理念與品質標章。台灣林業,38(5),50-59。
20. 梁英聰(2021)。戶外教育跨領域課程實施與評量之行動研究—以攀樹課程為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mhpks2。
21. 郭碧祝、陳秀婷(2009)。提升國小四年級學生過程技能的主題式教學活動。屏東教育大學學報。教育類(33),365-395。
22. 陳文典(2000)。實作評量的理念與實施。科學教育,231, 64-66。
23. 陳文典(2005)科學素養的內涵.科學素養的內涵與解析(三版)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學1-10。
24. 曾鈺琪、黃茂在、郭工賓(2005)。戶外教育:學習走出課室,讓孩子夢想起飛 [An introduction of Taiwan outdoor education policy]。教育脈動(4),12-24。
25. 張靜如(2014)。國小四年級戶外教學課程設計與學習成效之研究—以臺中市南屯區為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺中教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w9573g。
26. 黃茂在、曾鈺琪(2015)。臺灣戶外教育內涵與課程優質化初探 [An exploration of the connotation and content of quality outdoor education in Taiwan]。教育脈動(4),25-43。
27. 黃婉鈴(2004)。以科學探究教學模組提升國小中年級學童科學過程技能之行動研究。﹝碩士論文。國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所﹞
28. 黃萬居(2002)。自然科學教育: K-9 以 [發現為基礎] 的教材教法.。台北:學富文化。
29. 楊宏仁、何妙桂、賴南宏、王嵩逸、林長裕(2005)。國小自然與生活科技過程技能之研究。科技教育課程改革與發展學術研討會論文集(2005), 210-216。
30. 楊蕙芬、郭雄軍(2018)。從休閒遊憩探究戶外教育的趨勢 [Exploring the trend of outdoor education from leisure recreation]。休憩管理研究,5(2),45-62。
31. 葉凱翔(2021年2月8日)。環境解說應用於戶外教育中。戶外教育資源平台。https://outdoor.moe.edu.tw/home/about/document.php
32. 蔡居澤(1996)。戶外教育的涵意及其發展之探討。公民訓育學報(5), 283-302。
33. 靳知勤、王盈丰、黃鴻博、吳穎沺、許良榮、游淑媚、林素華、陳麗文(2011)。自然與生活科技教材教法。164-193。臺北:五南圖書。
34. 廖焜熙(2001)。理化科學概念及過程技能之研究回顧與分析 [An Analytic Review on Research of Science Concept and Process Skill in Physics-Chemistry Textbooks]。科學教育月刊(238),2-11。 https://doi.org/10.6216/sem.200104_(238).0001
35. 劉香(2003)。探討不同學習風格的國小中年級學童過程技能表現之研究。﹝碩士論文。臺北市立師範學院﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6x78xu
36. 劉妙佳(2016)。以專題學習實施於戶外教育課程對提升國小學童問題解決能力之行動研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k47833
37. 鄭辰旋、謝顥音、曾鈺琪(2017)。Exploring In-service Teachers' Perspectives in Implementing Outdoor Environmental Education [影響在職教師執行戶外環境教育之因素探討]。環境教育研究13(2),111-137。、https://doi.org/10.6555/jeer.13.2.111
38. 鍾聖校(1984)。國小自然科新舊課程學生科學過程能力之比較研究。臺北師專學報,11,1-44
39. 盧秀琴、施慧淳(2016)。玩「昆蟲大富翁」遊戲培養國小學童的科學過程技能 [Playing "Insects Playing Board Games" to Cultivate the Scientific Process Skills of Primary School Students]。科學教育學刊24(1),1-30。 https://doi.org/10.6173/cjse.2016.2401.01
二、英文文獻
1. Wiratman, A., Mustaji, M., & Widodo, W. (2019). The effect of activity sheet based on outdoor learning on student’s science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
2. Acar, H. (2013, Oct 27-29). Learning Environments for Children in Outdoor Spaces.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences [4th world conference on learning teaching and educational leadership (wclta-2013)]. 4th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership (WCLTA), Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, SPAIN.
3. Agostini, F., Minelli, M., & Mandolesi, R. (2018). Outdoor Education in Italian Kindergartens: How Teachers Perceive Child Developmental Trajectories [Article]. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 12, Article 1911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01911
4. Agusta, A. R., & Noorhapizah. (2018, Nov 23-24). Improving the Student's Cooperation and Environmental Care Skill using Outdoor Learning Strategy Outbound Variation.Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research [Proceedings of the 1st international conference on creativity, innovation and technology in education (ic-cite 2018)]. 1st International Conference on Creativity, Innovation and Technology in Education (IC-CITE) - Redesigning Educational Instruction for the 4th Industrial Revolution, Banjarmasin, INDONESIA.
5. Archie, M. L. (2003). Advancing education through environmental literacy. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6. Barantes, A. K. A., & Tamoria, J. R. (2021). LARO (Learners Active Response to Operant) lessons in improving the basic science process skills of elementary pupils. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(1), 11-24.
7. Buntod, P. C., Suksringam, P., & Singseevo, A. (2010). Effects of learning environmental education on science process skills and critical thinking of mathayomsuksa 3 students with different learning achievements. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 60-63.
8. Çakiroğlu, Ü., Güven, O., & Saylan, E. (2020). Flipping the experimentation process: influences on science process skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3425-3448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09830-0
9. Cheng, J. C.-H., Hsieh, I. H., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2017). Exploring In-service Teachers’ Perspectives in Implementing Outdoor Environmental Education. 環境教育研究, 13(2), 111-137.
10. Cooley, S. J., Holland, M. J. G., Cumming, J., Novakovic, E. G., & Burns, V. E. (2014). Introducing the use of a semi-structured video diary room to investigate students' learning experiences during an outdoor adventure education groupwork skills course [Article]. Higher Education, 67(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9645-5
11. Cornell, J. (2005). 共享自然的喜悦.(方潔玫譯)臺北, 張老師文化(原著出版於1996年)
12. Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The educational forum
13. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87, 107-111.
14. Ford, P. (1986). Outdoor Education: Definition and Philosophy. Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
15. Ford, P. M. (1981). Principles and practices of outdoor/environmental education. Wiley.
16. Hammerman, D. R., & Hammerman, W. M. (1968). Outdoor Education: A Book of Readings. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Company.
17. Hammerman, D. R., & Hammerman, W. M. (1973). Teaching in the outdoors. Minneapolis: Burgess.
18. Henrietta, T., & Felicia, R. A. (2018, Jul 06-07). The Evaluation Of Outdoor Learning Activities In Primary School.European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences [Erd 2018 - education, reflection, development, 6th edition]. Conference on Education, Reflection, Development (ERD), Babes Bolyai Univ, Cluj Napoca, ROMANIA.
19. Keil, C., Haney, J., & Zoffel, J. (2009). Improvement in student achievement and science process skills using environmental health science problem-based learning curricula. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(1). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu.
20. Lappin, E. (1984). Outdoor Education for Behavior Disordered Students. Las Cruces, NM (Eric Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools)
21. Lewis Jr, C. A. (1975). The Administration of Outdoor Education Programs. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
22. National Foundation for Educational Research. (2004). A Review Research of Research on Outdoor Learning. London: FSC, Department for Education and Skills, Groundwork, RSPB, WWT, English Outdoor Council, Skills Active and British Ecological Society.
23. National Wildlife Federation. (2013). Schoolyard Habitats Program. Retrieved from http://www.nwf.org
24. Priest, S. (1986). Redefining outdoor education: A matter of many relationships. The Journal of environmental education, 17(3), 13-15.
25. Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. London: National Foundation for Educational Research and King's College London.
26. Sakofs, M. S. (1979). Proposition 13 and outdoor education. Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 50(2), 66-67.
27. Sideri, A., & Skoumios, M. (2021). Science process skills in the Greek primary school science textbooks. Science Education International, 32(3), 231-236.
28. Simpson, R. L., Lacava, P. G., & Sampson Graner, P. (2004). The no child left behind act: Challenges and implications for educators. Intervention in school and clinic, 40(2), 67-75.
29. Smith, P. R. (1987). Outdoor education and its educational objectives. Geography, 209-216.
30. Ting, K. L., & Siew, N. M. (2014). Effects of Outdoor School Ground Lessons on Students’ Science Process Skills and Scientific Curiosity. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n4p96
31. Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2011, Dec 17-20). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences [Universiti kebangsaan malaysia teaching and learning congress 2011, vol i]. Universiti-Kebangsaan-Malaysia Teaching and Learning Congress, Malaysia.