研究生: |
黃皓瑋 Huang, Hao-Wei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
運用向量自回歸模型(Vector Autoregression,VAR)探討疫情後美國商業銀行債券持有行為 Applying Vector Autoregression to Examine the Correlation of Bond holding behavior of U.S. commercial banks after Covid-19 |
指導教授: |
林哲群
Lin, Che-Chun |
口試委員: |
蔡錦堂
Tsay, Jiin-tarng 索樂晴 So, Leh-Chyan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 財務金融 Master Program of Finance and Banking |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 50 |
中文關鍵詞: | 聯邦基金利率 、債券持有行為 、滯後效果 、示範效應 |
外文關鍵詞: | Federal Funds Rate, Bond-holding behavior, Lagged effects, Demonstration effect |
相關次數: | 點閱:46 下載:2 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文利用向量自回歸模型(VAR),探討聯邦基金利率(Fed Fund Rate)調整對美國大型與小型銀行持有債券行為的影響。研究結果顯示,大型銀行能利用其規模和資源靈活調整資產組合,迅速反應市場變化,展現其主導地位和高度敏感性。相比之下,小型銀行反應較為遲緩,顯示在策略和風險管理上的相對劣勢。此外,研究指出大型銀行的策略調整對小型銀行具有顯著的示範效應,小型銀行常觀察並模仿大型銀行的行為。本研究涵蓋2007年2月至2024年2月期間的3041家美國商業銀行數據,根據資產規模將銀行劃分為大型和小型銀行。
研究發現,聯邦基金利率的調整不僅抑制了銀行的資產配置與債券持有,還促進了大小銀行之間的策略互動。升息對債券持有的衝擊具有顯著的延遲效應,初期影響迅速,但隨後變化趨緩,表明市場參與者需要時間消化新信息並調整預期。這與Mario Catalán和Alexander W. Hoffmaister在《Do Corporate Bond Shocks Affect Commercial Bank Lending》中的研究結果一致,他們揭示通膨和升息如何通過影響銀行的資產負債表行為,對周圍銀行產生深遠影響。另一個發現是,聯邦基金利率的變動不僅影響銀行的債券持有行為,還影響其存款行為。大型銀行的存款量變動顯著影響小型銀行的存款量,顯示出策略互動效應。這表明大型銀行的策略調整具有示範作用,小型銀行會根據大型銀行的行為調整策略,進一步強化大型銀行在金融市場中的主導地位。
This study employs a Vector Autoregression (VAR) model to explore the impact of Federal Funds Rate adjustments on the bond-holding behaviors of large and small banks in the U.S. .Results show that large banks leverage their scale and resources to adjust asset portfolios quickly, demonstrating market dominance and high sensitivity. In contrast, small banks react more slowly, showing relative disadvantages in strategy and risk management. Large banks' strategic adjustments significantly influence small banks, which often mimic their behavior. The study covers data from 3,041 U.S. commercial banks from February 2007 to February 2024, categorized by asset size.
Findings indicate that Federal Funds Rate adjustments suppress banks' asset allocation and bond holdings while promoting strategic interactions between large and small banks. Interest rate hikes have significant lagged effects, with initial impacts appearing quickly and subsequent changes tapering off, indicating time needed to digest new information. This aligns with Catalán and Hoffmaister's findings in "Do Corporate Bond Shocks Affect Commercial Bank Lending," showing inflation and rate hikes' profound impact on banks. Additionally, changes in the Federal Funds Rate affect deposit behaviors. Variations in large banks' deposits significantly influence small banks, indicating strategic interaction. This reinforces the dominance of large banks in the financial market.
中文文獻
1.林錦華 (2018),《國際債券市場投資與關聯性實證研究》。
2.錢辰 (2023),《通貨膨脹和升息循環對債券市場之影響》。
3.李子薇 (2013),《次貸金融風暴前後台灣股票市場與各年期債券市場之相關性分析》。
4.央行 (2020),《中央銀行年報》。
5.央行 (2023),《近期美歐銀行危機事件之研析及其對我國之影響》。
6.紀淑梅 (2023),《論美國矽谷銀行倒閉成因及後續聯準會的強化監管措施》銀行公會會訊,第137期。
英文文獻
1.Bauer, M. D., & Swanson, E. T. (2020), “The Fed's Response to Economic News Explains the 'Fed Information Effect',” Working Paper.
2.Catalán, M., & Hoffmaister, A. W. (2023), “Do Corporate Bond Shocks Affect Commercial Bank Lending?” Working Paper.
3.Forni, M., & Gambetti, L. (2014), “Sufficient Information in Structural VARs,” Working Paper.
4.Gambetti, L., & Musso, A. (2010), “Loan Supply Shocks and the Business Cycle,” Working Paper.
5.Kim, S., Kim, S., & Ryan, S. G. (2023), “Banks’ Motivations for Designating Securities as Held to Maturity,” Working Paper.
6. Liang, J. N. (2020), “Corporate Bond Market Dysfunction During COVID-19 and Lessons from the Fed’s Response,” Working Paper.
7.Nguyen, T.M.A. (2022), “COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Effects on Bank’s Profitability Performance: A Case Study of Banking Sector in the U.S.,” Master's Thesis, Chinese Culture University.
8.Kim, R. (2023), “Hedging Securities and Silicon Valley Bank Idiosyncrasies,” Working Paper.
9.Jiang, E., Matvos, G., Piskorski, T., & Seru, A. (2023), “Limited Hedging and Gambling for Resurrection by U.S.Banks During the 2022 Monetary Tightening,” Working Paper.
10.Dursun-de Neef, H. Ö., Ongena, S., & Schandlbauer, A. (2023), “Monetary Policy, HTM Securities, and Uninsured Deposit Withdrawals,” Working Paper.
11.Jiang, E., Matvos, G., Piskorski, T., & Seru, A. (2023), “Monetary Tightening and U.S. Bank Fragility in 2023: Mark-to-Market Losses and Uninsured Depositor Runs,” Working Paper.
12.Burns, P. (2002), “Robustness of the Ljung-Box Test and its Rank Equivalent,” Working Paper.
13.International Monetary Fund (2006), “Peer Group Analysis and Descriptive Statistics,” Working Paper.
14.Fleming, M. J., & Remolona, E. M. (1997), “What Moves the Bond Market?” FRBNY Economic Policy Review.