隨著國際間大幅推動再生能源發展以及淨零排放之趨勢，台灣也逐步踏上了能源轉型的道路，過去企業大多直接向單一來源進行購電，現如今也正式迎向電力多元化的世代，分散式能源的興起使得一站式能源即服務( Energy as a Service, EaaS )的商業模式開始嶄露頭角，替企業規劃引進多種分散式電力來源，包含大型儲能電池、再生能源案場、需量反應自動化等，進一步為企業廠區打造「虛擬電廠」，達到提升使用效率並為企業節省電力開支的目標。在此一新興市場興起之時，許多通訊、電子業之老牌公司紛紛著手投入發展EaaS之相關產品及服務，面對初期競爭激烈、潛在競爭者眾多的產業環境，能源新創業者該如何建立競爭優勢，獲取市場價值？
因此，本研究之研究議題將目光放在台灣新創之能源即服務業者，透過半結構式訪談之研究方法，與EaaS業者進行深入對談，並探討以下三研究問題：(1)分散式能源逐步發展下，能源服務公司在產業中的定位為何？ (2)新創能源服務公司應如何運用動態能力回應外部產業環境變化？ (3)進入能源服務產業的關鍵競爭優勢為何？
本研究的貢獻在於深入了解能源服務產業，並揭示了公司必須具備哪些特徵才能更容易進入這一領域。透過發展核心能力和動態能力，並不斷擴展技術基礎和應用服務內容，能源服務公司能夠在競爭激烈的市場中保持強大的競爭力。且根據研究結果，可所得到之結論如下：
1. 能源服務公司在產業中的定位應朝向以大數據分析為核心。
2. 能源服務公司透過動態能力中的感知能力，快速發現並掌握新市場機會，是強化競爭力的關鍵。
3. 能源服務公司透過內部轉換迎合市場變化，來發展更具市場導向的技術能力。

With the global push for renewable energy and decarbonization, Taiwan is undergoing an energy transition. This has led to the rise of distributed energy and the Energy as a Service (EaaS) model, offering diversified electricity generation options for businesses. In this competitive landscape, new energy startups face the challenge of establishing a competitive edge and market value. This study focuses on Taiwanese EaaS startups and explores their positioning in the industry, utilization of dynamic capabilities to adapt to external changes, and key competitive advantages in the energy service sector.
Therefore, the focus of this study is on Taiwanese energy service startups. Through semi-structured interviews, in-depth discussions with EaaS companies will be conducted to address the following research questions: (1) What is the positioning of energy service companies in the industry as distributed energy gradually develops? (2) How should new energy service startups utilize dynamic capabilities to respond to external industry environmental changes? (3) What are the key competitive advantages for entering the energy service industry?
The contribution of this research lies in gaining a deeper understanding of the energy service industry and revealing the characteristics that companies should possess to enter this field more easily. By developing core capabilities and dynamic capabilities while continuously expanding their technical foundations and service offerings, energy service companies can maintain strong competitiveness in the market. Based on the research findings, the following conclusions are drawn:
1. The data processing capability of energy service companies is not only their development core but also a competitive foundation.
2. The ability of energy service companies to quickly discover and seize new market opportunities through perceptual capabilities is a key factor in strengthening their competitiveness and considering business model transformation.
3. Energy service companies develop market-oriented technical capabilities through technology selection.

網頁資料：
1. 國家發展委員會(2022)。臺灣 2050 淨零排放路徑及策略總說明。2022/03/30/，取自：https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/ietc/content/Content.aspx?menu_id=36553
2. 吳進忠(2020)。【綠色觀點】新創搶著加入！「電力物聯網」讓再生能源不再靠天吃飯。2020/05/01，取自：https://www.inside.com.tw/article/19674-iot-power-grid
3. 陳映璇(2021)。聯齊完成近9億元C輪募資！中美晶加入投資行列，未來3年擴張台日新能源業務。2021/12/28，取自：https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/67018/nextdrive--c-round
4. 李逸涵(2022)。這家新創兩度打掉重練 握穩碳中和商機 大膽嘗試勇於認錯 聯齊贏得日企的心。2022/02/16，取自https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183015/post/202202160043/
5. 陳映璇(2022)。曾一度面臨資金斷炊！聯齊如何靠耐力征服龜毛日企，拿到兆元能源產業門票？2022.06.01，取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/69604/nextdrive-bn

中文參考文獻：
1. 吳錦錩。(2006)。企業持續性競爭優勢構面──以台灣自有品牌企業為例。中華管理評論國際學報，9(2)：1-34。
2. 胡幼慧。(1996)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流。
3. 許士軍。(1996)。定性研究在管理研究上的重要性。中原學報 24(2): 1-3。
4. 蕭瑞麟。(2020)。不用數字的研究: 質性研究的思辯脈絡。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
5. 張宏榮, & 侯嘉政. (2009). 策略創業研究之觀念性架構. 創業管理研究, 4(3), 29-54.

英文參考文獻：
1. Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research policy, 14(1), 3-22.
2. Adner, R. and C. E. Helfat (2003). "Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities." Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 1011-1025.
3. Aspara, J., Lamberg, J. A., Laukia, A., & Tikkanen, H. (2011). Strategic management of business model transformation: lessons from Nokia. Management Decision.
4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
5. Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(4), 49-61.
6. Barney, J. B. (2002). "Strategic management: From informed conversation to academic discipline." Academy of Management Perspectives 16(2): 53-57.
7. Baum, J. A., Li, S. X., & Usher, J. M. (2000). Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 766-801.
8. Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of management journal, 49(4), 741-758.
9. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of management review, 28(2), 238-256.
10. Bertram, C. and I. Christiansen (2014). "Understanding research." An introduction to reading research. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
11. Chesbrough, H. (2010). "Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers." Long range planning 43(2-3): 354-363.
12. Chesbrough, H. and R. S. Rosenbloom (2002). "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin‐off companies." Industrial and corporate change 11(3): 529-555.
13. Cockburn, I. and R. Henderson (1994). "Racing To Invest? The Dynamics of Competition in Ethical Drug Discovery." Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 3(3): 481-519.
14. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.
15. Conner, K. R. (1991). "A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?" Journal of Management 17(1): 121-154.
16. Das, T. K. and B.-S. Teng (2000). "A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances." Journal of Management 26(1): 31-61.
17. Dierickx, I. and K. Cool (1989). "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage." Management Science 35(12): 1504-1511.
18. Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of personality and social psychology, 34(4), 590.
19. Eisenhardt, K. M. and J. A. Martin (2000). "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?" Strategic Management Journal 21(10-11): 1105-1121.
20. Gentles, S. J., C. Charles, J. Ploeg and K. A. McKibbon (2015). "Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature." The qualitative report 20(11): 1772-1789.
21. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management journal, 47(2), 209-226.
22. Grant, R. M. (1991). "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation." California Management Review 33(3): 114-135.
23. Groysberg, B., & Lee, L.-E. (2009). Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organization Science, 20(4), 740-758.
24. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American sociological review, 149-164.
25. He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
26. Helfat, C. E. (1997). "Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of r&d." Strategic Management Journal 18(5): 339-360.
27. Helfat, C. E. and M. A. Peteraf (2015). "Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities." Strategic Management Journal 36(6): 831-850.
28. Henderson, R. (1993). Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 248-270.
29. Henderson, R. and I. Cockburn (1994). "Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research." Strategic Management Journal 15(S1): 63-84.
30. Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
31. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of management journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
32. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). "Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development." Strategic Management Journal 13(S1): 111-125.
33. Lewis, M. W., Welsh, M. A., Dehler, G. E., & Green, S. G. (2002). Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of management journal, 45(3), 546-564.
34. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First‐mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 41-58.
35. Lin, H.-E., & McDonough III, E. F. (2011). Investigating the role of leadership and organizational culture in fostering innovation ambidexterity. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 58(3), 497-509.
36. Luo, Y. (2000). "Dynamic capabilities in international expansion." Journal of world business 35(4): 355-378.
37. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
38. Massa, L. and C. L. Tucci (2013). "Business model innovation." The Oxford handbook of innovation management 20(18): 420-441.
39. Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm's performance. Journal of business ethics, 94(2), 279-298.
40. Mitchell, D. and C. Coles (2003). "The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation." Journal of Business Strategy.
41. Morgan, R. E., & Berthon, P. (2008). Market orientation, generative learning, innovation strategy and business performance inter‐relationships in bioscience firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1329-1353.
42. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77-91.
43. O'reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, 82(4), 74-83.
44. O'reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment.
45. O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 185-206.
46. Oliver, C. (1997). "Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views." Strategic Management Journal 18(9): 697-713.
47. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). "The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view." Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 179-191.
48. Qiu, X., Holmen, E., Havenvid, M., De Boer, L., & Hermundsdottir, F. (2022). Open for business: Towards an interactive view on dynamic capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 107, 148-160.
49. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306.
50. Salomo, S., Talke, K., & Strecker, N. (2008). Innovation field orientation and its effect on innovativeness and firm performance. Journal of product innovation management, 25(6), 560-576.
51. Schmidt, J. B., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). Are really new product development projects harder to shut down? Journal of product innovation management, 15(2), 111-123.
52. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522-536.
53. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen (1997). "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management." Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-533.
54. Teece, D. J. (1998). "Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets." California Management Review 40(3): 55-79.
55. Teece, D. J. (2007). "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance." Strategic Management Journal 28(13): 1319-1350.
56. Teece, D. J. (2010). "Business models, business strategy and innovation." Long range planning 43(2-3): 172-194.
57. Teece, D. J. (2015). Intangible Assets and a Theory of Heterogeneous Firms. Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance. A. Bounfour and T. Miyagawa. Cham, Springer International Publishing: 217-239.
58. Teece, D., M. Peteraf and S. Leih (2016). "Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy." California Management Review 58(4): 13-35.
59. Teece, D. J. (2018). "Business models and dynamic capabilities." Long Range Planning 51(1): 40-49.
60. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1997). Sorting organizational hardware. The Journal of Business Strategy, 18(4), 43.
61. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). "A resource-based view of the firm." Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
62. Wernerfelt, B., & Montgomery, C. A. (1988). Tobin's q and the importance of focus in firm performance. The American Economic Review, 246-250.
63. Yin, R. K. (1981). "The case study as a serious research strategy." Knowledge 3(1): 97-114.
64. Yin, R. K. (1994). "Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research." Evaluation practice 15(3): 283-290.
65. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information systems research, 13(2), 147-150.
66. Zahra, S. A., H. J. Sapienza and P. Davidsson (2006). "Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda*." Journal of Management Studies 43(4): 917-955.
67. Zollo, M. and S. G. Winter (2002). "Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities." Organization Science 13(3): 339-351.
68. Zott, C. (2003). "Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study." Strategic Management Journal 24(2): 97-125.