研究生: |
楊聖安 Yang, Sheng-An |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
企業併購個案研究-以半導體設備商科林研發與諾發系統的併購案為例 A case study of mergers and acquisitions on semiconductor equipment manufacturer Lam Research and Novellus Systems Merger |
指導教授: | 林哲群 |
口試委員: |
楊屯山
林哲群 蔡錦堂 張焯然 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 高階經營管理碩士在職專班 Executive Master of Business Administration(EMBA) |
論文出版年: | 2012 |
畢業學年度: | 100 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 66 |
中文關鍵詞: | 併購 、資源基礎理論 、自由現金流折現法 、併購綜效 |
外文關鍵詞: | Mergers and Acquisitions, Resource-based theory, Discounted free cash flow, Synergy |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
併購是企業透過外部成長以達到擴張目的的方式,亦是企業在面對市場環境不確定時可採行的財務策略。
2011年12月14日,半導體設備商科林研發與諾發系統同時發表併購同意聲明,科林研發將以每股44.42美元的價格,總價33億美元來併購諾發系統。雙方約定以換股的方式完成併購,換股比例為按12月14日Nasdaq收盤股價的1.125股科林研發普通股換發1股諾發系統普通股。
本研究以資源基礎理論中所對應的財務比率對這兩家公司做分析,比較兩者的競爭優勢,並就併購的價格及併購的整合過程加以探討。
研究結果發現,在競爭優勢的整體評比方面,科林研發比諾發系統俱有較佳的競爭力。在併購價格的分析方面,以自由現金流折現法得到的結果顯示,科林研發的44.42美元每股收購價,比估算價格短少1.88美元,貶損了4.06%。另外,在併購過程中引進外部專業團隊的協助,藉由其專業的經驗與規劃,可使併購整合的程序進行的更順利。但是,在溝通的工作上,仍需公司的管理高層親力親為,以最大的誠意來消彌員工的不安情緒。
科林研發與諾發系統兩家公司的產品與技術是彼此互補的,預期在合併之後將可以成為產品組合更為廣泛的半導體設備公司。可將合併後新公司之營運與獲利表現,列為併購綜效之後續觀察與持續研究之項目。
For enterprises, Mergers and Acquisitions are the way of external growth to achieve the expansion.
December 14, 2011, semiconductor equipment manufacturers Lam Research and Novellus Systems, both announced a statement of M&A agreement, Lam Research will merge Novellus Systems at the price of $ 44.42 per share, amounting to $ 3.3 billion. These two companies agreed to the convertible way completed the acquisition. The conversion ratio is 1.125 shares of ordinary shares of Lam Research to a share of ordinary shares of Novellus Systems at Nasdaq closing stock price on December 14, 2011.
In this study, the resource-based theory corresponding financial ratios are used to analyze, to compare the competitive advantage of the two companies, the price evaluation and the integration process of the M&A are also explored.
The results showed that, Lam Research in the overall appraisal of the competitive advantage is more competitive than Novellus Systems. In the analysis of the acquisition price to the discounted free cash flow, at the results obtained show the $ 44.42 per share purchase price offered by Lam, less than the estimate of $ 1.88, discount 4.06%.
In addition, the introduction of the assistance of external professional team during M & A process, by their professional experience and planning, the integration program of merger will go more smoothly. However, in the work of communication, it still needs the company's senior management to do it with the greatest sincerity to diminish the anxiety of the staffs.
Lam Research and Novellus Systems, the products and technologies of both companies complement each other. After the merger, it is expected to become a semiconductor equipment company with broader product portfolio. The synergy of operating and profitability performance of the new company can be as the follow-up study projects.
中文部分:
1. 林婷鈴,2000,中華管理評論,Oct. Vol. 3,No. 3,pp. 29~52.
2. 吳思華,2000,策略九說.
3. 洪啟仁,2008, 企業併購交易指南.
4. 唐瓔璋、劉芬美、黃寶慧,2007,「輕資產戰略與營運績效關係之研究-以台灣企業為例」,管理學報,第24卷第1期,75-91頁.
5. 游明德, 會計研究月刊, 第308期 2011年7月號.
6. 蔡靜美,2006,「半導體產業購併策略之實證研究」,國立清華大學科技管理學院高階經營管理在職專班碩士論文.
7. 楊素美,2008,「企業併購與企業價值之探討-以工業電腦產業為例」,東吳大學會計系碩士論文.
8. 劉樺,2010,「資產評價與併購定價 以頎邦科技合併飛信半導體為例」,國立清華大學科技管理學院高階經營管理在職專班碩士論文.
9. 魏啟林,1992,台灣廠商跨國經營之購併策略分析,台灣企業國際化研討會論文.
英文部分:
1. Aldag & Stearns. 1981. Management, 2nd ed, South-Western Publishing Co., Ohio, pp.717-719.
2. Amihud, Y. & B. Lev. 1981.“Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers,” Bell Journal of Economics, Autumn, pp. 605-617.
3. Andersson, U., J. Johanson, & J. E. Vahlne. 1997. “Organic Acquisitions in the Internationalization Process of the Business Firm,” Management International Review, Special Issue (2), pp. 67-84.
4. Ansoff, H.I. 1987. “Strategic Management of Technology “, Journal of Business Strategy, vol.27, p.37.
5. Anthony, R. N., and Govindarajan, V. 1998. Management Control Systems. (9ed). Irwin McGraw-Hill: Burr Ridge, Ill.
6. Barney, J.B., 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99-120.
7. Chandler, A.D. 1975. Business Policy & Strategy-Concept & Reading, p.374.
8. Glueck, William F. 1979. Business Policy: Strategy formation and management action.(Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
9. Graham Tarry. 1987. “Acquisition in the USA: The systematic Route To Success”, Industrial Marketing Dgest, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 103-112.
10. Grossman, S. J. & O. D. Hart. 1980. “ Takeover Bids, the Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation,” Bell Journal of Economics, Spring, pp. 42-62.
11. Halpern, P. 1983. “Corporate Acquisitions: A Theory of Special Cases? A Review of Event Studies Applied to Acquisitions,” Journal of Finance, pp. 297-317.
12. Hamel G.. and Prahalad C. K. 1994. “Competing for the Future,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 122-128.
13. Hennart, J.F. & Y.R. Park. 1993. “Greenfield vs. Acquisition The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States, Management Science, 39, pp. 1054-1070.
14. Hunt, Shelby. D. 2000. A General Theory of Competition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pulications.
15. Hymer, S. 1960. “ On Multinational Corporations and Foreign Direct Investment,” In J. Dunning, U.N. Library on Transantional Corporation, Vol.1, pp23-43.
16. Kay, J. 1993. The structure of strategy. Business Strategy Review, Vol. 4, pp.17-37.
17. Kitching, J. 1967. “Why Do Mergers Miscarry?,”Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, pp.84-85.
18. Lewellen, W. G. 1971. “A Pure Financial Rationale for the Conglomerate Merger,” Journal of Finance, 26, pp. 521-537.
19. Marcus, A. J. 1982. “Risk Sharing and the Theory of the Firm,” Bell Journal of Economics, Fall, pp.369-378.
20. Mueller, D. C. 1969. “A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers,” Quaterly Journal of Economics, 83, pp. 643-659.
21. Penrose, E. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
22. Porter, M.E., 1985. “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance,” New York: Free Press.
23. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. 1990. “The Core Competence of the Corporation,”Harvard Business Review Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 79-91.
24. Rust, R. T. Ambler, T. Carpenter, G. S. Kumar, V. Srivastava, R. K. 2004. “Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions,” Journal of Marketing , Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 76-89
25. Rothaermel, F. T. 2001. Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 687-699.
26. Scherer, F. M. 1980. “Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance,”p.28
27. Tang, Y. C. and Liou, F. M., 2008. “Does firm performance reveal its own causes?: the Role of Bayesian Inference,” Strategic Management Journal, second revision.
28. Teece, D., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-33.
29. Williamson, O. E. 1983. “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications,” Journal of Law & Economics, pp.315-366.
30. Wise Trevor D. 1984. “Objective setting for Acquistion Activity”, Managerial Planning, Vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 44-47.
31. Wernerfelt, B. A., 1984. “Resource-based view of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 171-180.