簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳怡璇
Wu,Yi-Hsuan
論文名稱: 探討高中生運用Trello平台進行自主科學探究合作學習之成效
Exploring the Effectiveness of High School Students Utilizing the Trello Platform for Autonomous Collaborative Inquiry-based Learning in Science
指導教授: 林秋斌
Lin, Chiu-Pin
口試委員: 區國良
OU, KUO-LIANG
邱瓊慧
CHIU, CHIUNG-HUI
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 竹師教育學院 - 學習科學與科技研究所
Institute of Learning Sciences and Technologies
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 102
中文關鍵詞: 科學探究自主學習合作學習學習鷹架
外文關鍵詞: Scientific Inquiry, Self-regulated Learning, Collaborative Learning, Learning Scaffold
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在108課綱的彈性課程中,自主學習課程主要目的是希望學生朝自己有興趣的領域做有系統的規畫學習,本研究採行動研究法,以高雄市某高中一年級25位來自不同班級的學生,選擇科學探究類主題的學生為研究對象,讓學生使用Trello平台作為學習的紀錄及小組互動的工具,老師透過探究式學習鷹架作為引導,使學生進行探究式學習,探討在探究式學習架構的引導下合作學習對學生學習成效、學習態度、個人自我效能及合作傾向的影響,並從Trello模板上的編輯度及學生學習後的反思心得來分析學生的合作模式及學習經驗,研究結果顯示合作學習的學習成效明顯高於個人學習的學習成效,合作學習在學生的學習態度、個人自我效能及合作傾向在學習後都有顯著的提升,而小組的互動及明確的分工則是提升合作學習成效的關鍵,此外,也透過教師反思以提升帶領學生進行自主學習的能力。


    The primary goal of self- regulated learning courses is to encourage students to engage in systematic planning for learning in areas of their personal interest. This study focuses on 25 students from a high school in Kaohsiung City, who have an interest in science and come from different classes. Students utilize the Trello platform as a tool for recording their learning progress and facilitating group interactions. The teacher guides students in inquiry-based learning through the use of learning scaffolding. The study investigates the impact of collaborative learning under the guidance of inquiry-based learning on students' learning outcomes, attitudes, personal self-efficacy, and cooperative tendencies. Analyze students' collaboration patterns based on the degree of editing on Trello templates and their reflective insights after learning. The research results indicate that the learning outcomes of collaborative learning are significantly higher than those of individual learning. Collaborative learning shows a significant improvement in students' attitudes, personal self-efficacy, and cooperative tendencies after the learning process. Effective group interaction and clear task allocation are key factors in enhancing the effectiveness of collaborative learning. Additionally, teacher reflections are utilized to improve the ability to guide students in self-directed learning.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 名詞解釋 4 第四節 研究範圍與限制 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 108課綱核心素養及自然科探究能力的學習表現 6 第二節 自主學習 10 第三節 合作調節 21 第四節 探究式學習 24 第三章 研究方法 30 第一節 研究流程與架構 30 第二節 研究對象 33 第三節 研究工具 34 第四節 教學引導流程 37 第四章 研究結果與發現 39 第一節 學習成效分析 39 第二節 學習態度分析 41 第三節 個人自我效能分析 44 第四節 合作傾向分析 47 第五節 小組合作及模板編輯情形 49 第六節 教師省思 63 第五章 結論與建議 66 第一節 結論 66 第二節 建議 67 參考文獻 70 壹、中文部分 70 貳、英文部分 70 附錄一 rubric評量標準 72 附錄二 學習態度量表(以google表單填寫) 74 附錄三 個人自我效能量表(以google表單填寫) 75 附錄四 合作學習量表(以google表單填寫) 76 附錄五 自主科學探究學習自我評量 77 附錄六 自主科學探究學習自我評量學生填寫情形 78

    王坦(2002)。合作學習簡論。中國教育學刊,2002(1),32-35。
    左昌倫(2003)。促進學生有效地合作學習。中國教育學刊,2003(6),41-43。
    任勇、蔡金榮(2007)。高中教學中如何培養學生的自主學習能力。US-China Education Review,4(2),78-81。
    吳璧純(2018)。學生自主學習,老師「做什麼」?。教育脈動,(15),1-7。
    邱弘昇、趙貞怡(2012)。應用網路實況平臺進行自主學習之學習成效研究。資訊傳播研究,2(2),59-75。doi:10.6144/JIC.2012.0202.04
    林吟霞(2010)。自主學習取向之適性課程與教學研究:臺灣小學與德國小學「方案教學」個案比較。課程與教學,13(3),47-76。doi:10.6384/CIQ.201007.0047
    林堂馨 (2018)。大學推動自主學習課程概況之分析,南臺學報社會科學類,第3卷第1期 ,89-105。
    洪詠善、林佳慧、楊惠娥(2018)。十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。教育脈動,(15),1-9。
    黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。台北市:五南。
    黃政傑、吳俊憲 (2006)。合作學習發展與實踐。台北市:五南。
    國家教育研究院(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校自然科學領域。
    Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14-22.
    Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346.
    Dodge, B. (1995). WebQuests: a technique for Internet-Based learning. Distance Educator, 1(2),10-13.
    Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17
    Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 778–789.
    Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013), A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses, Computers & Education, 69, 121-130.
    Järvelä, S.,& Hadwin, A. (2013). New Frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25-39.
    Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge.
    National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338122)
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451-502). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing, American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
    Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: an educational perspective. New Jersey: Pentice-Hall.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1992). Selfregulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15(2), 98-101.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). New York: Academic.

    QR CODE