簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊期蘭
Yang, Chi-Lan
論文名稱: 探索知識透明化設計對線上知識傳遞的影響
Understanding the Effects of Knowledge Transparency in Online Knowledge Transfer
指導教授: 王浩全
Wang, Hao-Chuan
袁千雯
Yuan, Chien-Wen
口試委員: 許永真
Hsu, Yung-Jen
林福仁
Lin, Fu-Ren
曾元琦
Tseng, Yuan-Chi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電機資訊學院 - 資訊系統與應用研究所
Institute of Information Systems and Applications
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 41
中文關鍵詞: 知識傳遞透明化專家新手共同理解
外文關鍵詞: knowledge transfer, transparency design, expert, novice, common ground
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 進⾏合作任務時,互動的雙⽅需要知道對⽅的狀態來達到共同的理解,當雙
    ⽅需要互相傳遞知識時,特別是專家要將他的經驗、知識傳遞給新⼿時,彼此⾯
    臨的挑戰之⼀在於雙⽅之間的專業差異可能導致互動過程受阻礙。專家由於對特
    定領域的知識掌握程度⾼,使其低估新⼿可能遭遇的困難;⽽新⼿對領域知識的
    不熟悉也使其未必能夠完全理解專家表達的概念。於線上進⾏這類型知識傳遞時,
    促進雙⽅意識到對⽅的理解程度(awareness)也許能幫助知識傳遞。因此,這篇論
    ⽂在協作⼯具上提出⼀設計概念 - 知識透明化(knowledge transparency),新⼿標
    記出⾃⼰對於知識內容的理解,使遠距專家能夠得知新⼿對於當下知識的理解狀
    態。透過⼀控制實驗,這篇研究⽐較專家與新⼿分別在有與無知識透明化設計輔
    助下的知識傳遞過程,發現知識透明化的設計使新⼿感受到較佳的溝通品質,但
    其學習表現在無知識透明化設計輔助時卻較佳。本研究於⽂末將探討知識透明化
    設計對線上知識傳遞的影響以及設計啟發。


    To accomplish collaborative work, collaborators need to know one another’s states of work for coordination. Similarly, in situations of knowledge transfer where experts need to instruct novices by passing implicit knowledge and personal experience about the task, one challenge lies in the knowledge gap between experts and novices. Both parties need to gain an awareness of each other’s state of task knowledge for effective knowledge transfer. In this paper, we aim to investigate how online knowledge transfer is supported by a design called knowledge transparency of a shared document workspace, which allows explicitly annotating and sharing ones’ knowledge state to make it visible to their collaborators. We conducted a laboratory study to examine how knowledge transparency affects knowledge transfer among experts and novices using an image editing task over an online document. The results shed light on how to support knowledge co-construction and communication for the purpose of knowledge transfer through interface design.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... I 摘要........................................................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ III TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... 3 2.1 DIFFICULTIES OF SHARING AND ACQUIRING HOW-TO KNOWLEDGE BY EXPERTS AND NOVICES ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 FROM GROUNDING IN REMOTE COLLABORATION TO ONLINE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER ................................................................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER 3 METHOD ..................................................................................................... 11 3.1 EXPERIMENT DESIGN .................................................................................................... 11 3.2 KNOWLEDGE TRANSPARENCY PROTOTYPE FOR SHARED DOCUMENT ..................... 11 3.3 EXPERIMENTAL STAGES AND TASKS ............................................................................ 13 3.4 PARTICIPANTS ................................................................................................................ 15 3.5 PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................... 16 3.6 MEASUREMENT .............................................................................................................. 17 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 21 4.1 KNOWLEDGE CO-CONSTRUCTION PROCESS IN ONLINE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER ..... 21 2 4.2 THE OUTCOMES OF INTRODUCING KNOWLEDGE TRANSPARENCY IN ONLINE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER ........................................................................................................ 25 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................. 30 5.1 THE PROCESS OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: KNOWLEDGE CO-CONSTRUCTION AND ITS BENEFITS ........................................................................................................................... 30 5.2 COMMUNICATION QUALITY IS ENHANCED BUT NOT TASK PERFORMANCE. WHY? . 31 5.3LIMITATION AND FUTURE WORK ..................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 6CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 36 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 37

    [1] Mark S. Ackerman, Juri Dachtera, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf. 2013. Sharing Knowledge
    and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management. Computer Supported Cooperative
    Work (CSCW) 22, 4–6: 531–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8
    [2] Linda Argote and Paul Ingram. 2000. Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in
    Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 1: 150–169.
    https://doi.org/10.1006/OBHD.2000.2893
    [3] PE Benner. 2001. From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice.
    [4] Jeremy Birnholtz and Steven Ibara. 2012. Tracking changes in collaborative writing. In
    Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work -
    CSCW ’12, 809. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145325
    [5] Yuan-Chia Chang, Hao-Chuan Wang, Hung-kuo Chu, Shung-Ying Lin, and Shuo-Ping Wang.
    2017. AlphaRead: Support Unambiguous Referencing in Remote Collaboration with Readable
    Object Annotation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported
    Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW ’17, 2246–2259.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998258
    [6] Ulrike Cress and Joachim Kimmerle. 2007. A theoretical framework of collaborative knowledge
    building with wikis: a systemic and cognitive perspective. In Proceedings of the 8th iternational
    conference on Computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL'07), Clark A. Chinn, Gijsbert
    Erkens, and Sadhana Puntambekar (Eds.). International Society of the Learning Sciences 156-
    164.
    [7] Herbert H Clark and Susan E Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on
    socially shared cognition. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075588
    [8] Sarah D’Angelo and Andrew Begel. 2017. Improving Communication Between Pair
    Programmers Using Shared Gaze Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on
    Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17, 6245–6290.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025573
    [9] Sarah D’Angelo and Darren Gergle. 2016. Gazed and Confused: Understanding and Designing
    Shared Gaze for Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human
    Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’16, 2492–2496. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858499
    [10] Paul Dourish and Victoria Bellotti. 1992. Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces.
    Proc. Intl. Conf. on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, November: 107–114.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.143468
    38
    [11] Scott Freeman, Sarah L Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor,
    Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in
    science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
    United States of America 111, 23: 8410–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
    [12] Susan R. Fussell, Robert E. Kraut, and Jane Siegel. 2000. Coordination of communication:
    effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM
    conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’00, 21–30.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.358947
    [13] Jeanne Gamble. 2001. Modelling the Invisible: The pedagogy of craft apprenticeship. Studies in
    Continuing Education 23, 2: 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370120101957
    [14] Ge Gao, Sun Young Hwang, Gabriel Culbertson, Susan R. Fussell, and Malte F. Jung. 2017.
    Beyond Information Content: The Effects of Culture on Affective Grounding in Instant
    Messaging Conversations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW:
    1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134683
    [15] Darren Gergle, Robert Kraut E., and Susan Fussell R. 2012. Using Visual Information for
    Grounding and Awareness in Collaborative Tasks. Human–Computer Interaction 28, 1: 1–39.
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2012.678246
    [16] Charlotte N. Gunawardena, Constance A. Lowe, and Terry Anderson. 1997. Analysis of a Global
    Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social
    Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing
    Research 17, 4: 397–431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
    [17] Paul Hendriks. 1999. Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for
    knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management 6, 2: 91–100.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199906)6:2<91::AID-KPM54>3.0.CO;2-M
    [18] P J Hinds, M Patterson, and J Pfeffer. 2001. Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on
    knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. The Journal of applied psychology 86,
    6: 1232–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1232
    [19] Pamela J. Hinds. 1999. The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on
    prediction of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5, 2: 205–221.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.5.2.205
    [20] Pamela J. Hinds and Jeffrey Pfeffer. 1996. Why Organizations Don’t “Know What They Know”:
    Cognitive and Motivational Factors Affecting the Transfer of Expertise. Beyond Knowledge
    Management: Sharing Expertise: 1–31.
    [21] Andrea B. Hollingshead. 1998. Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory
    39
    Systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34, 5: 423–442.
    https://doi.org/10.1006/JESP.1998.1358
    [22] Ellen a. Isaacs and Herbert H. Clark. 1987. References in conversation between experts and
    novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116, 1: 26–37.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.26
    [23] David Jonassen, Mark Davidson, Mauri Collins, John Campbell, and Brenda Bannan Haag.
    1995. Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American
    Journal of Distance Education 9, 2: 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885
    [24] Malte F. Jung and Malte F. 2017. Affective Grounding in Human-Robot Interaction. In
    Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction -
    HRI ’17, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020224
    [25] Makoto P. Kato, Ryen W. White, Jaime Teevan, and Susan T. Dumais. 2013. Clarifications and
    question specificity in synchronous social Q&A. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human
    Factors in Computing Systems on - CHI EA ’13, 913. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468519
    [26] Juho Kim and Juho. 2013. Toolscape: enhancing the learning experience of how-to videos. In
    CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on - CHI EA ’13, 2707.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479497
    [27] David Kirk, Tom Rodden, and Danaë Stanton Fraser. 2007. Turn it this way: grounding
    collaborative action with remote gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human
    factors in computing systems - CHI ’07, 1039. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240782
    [28] Michail D. Kozlov and Cornelia S. Große. 2016. Online collaborative learning in dyads: Effects
    of knowledge distribution and awareness. Computers in Human Behavior 59: 389–401.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.01.043
    [29] Gilly Leshed, Eben M. Haber, Tara Matthews, and Tessa Lau. 2008. CoScripter:automating
    & sharing how-to knowledge in the enterprise. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual
    CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’08, 1719.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357323
    [30] Leigh Anne Liu, Chei Hwee Chua, and Günter K. Stahl. 2010. Quality of communication
    experience: Definition, measurement, and implications for intercultural negotiations. Journal of
    Applied Psychology 95, 3: 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019094
    [31] Mai Otsuki, Taiki Kawano, Keita Maruyama, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Yusuke Suzuki. 2017.
    ThirdEye: Simple Add-on Display to Represent Remote Participant’s Gaze Direction in Video
    Communication. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
    Systems - CHI ’17, 5307–5312. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025681
    40
    [32] Martha E Pollack. 1985. Information sought and information provided: an empirical study of
    user/expert dialogues. In CHI ’85: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in
    Computing Systems, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1145/1165385.317486
    [33] Marina Rey. 1989. Responding To “ Huh ?”: Answering Vaguely Articulated Follow-Up
    Questions. In CHI ’89 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
    Systems, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/67450.67469
    [34] Jeff Sauro and Joseph S. Dumas. 2009. Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability
    questionnaires. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in
    computing systems - CHI 09, 1599. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518946
    [35] Walter Swap, Dorothy Leonard, Mimi Shields, and Lisa Abrams. 2001. Using Mentoring and
    Storytelling to Transfer Knowledge in the Workplace. Journal of Management Information
    Systems 18, 1: 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195165128.003.0012
    [36] Jaime Teevan and Alexander Hehmeyer. 2013. Understanding how the projection of availability
    state impacts the reception incoming communication. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on
    Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’13, 753.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441860
    [37] Josh Tenenberg, Wolff-Michael Roth, and David Socha. 2016. From I-Awareness to We-
    Awareness in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 25, 4–5: 235–278.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9215-0
    [38] Cristen Torrey, Elizabeth F. Churchill, and David W. McDonald. 2009. Learning how: the search
    for craft knowledge on the internet. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on
    Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09, 1371. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518908
    [39] Minh Hong Tran, Gitesh K. Raikundalia, and Yun Yang. 2006. Using an experimental study to
    develop group awareness support for real-time distributed collaborative writing. Information and
    Software Technology 48, 11: 1006–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFSOF.2005.12.009
    [40] Pei-Yun Tu, Chien Wen (Tina) Yuan, and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2018. Do You Think What I Think:
    Perceptions of Delayed Instant Messages in Computer-Mediated Communication of Romantic
    Relations. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
    Systems - CHI ’18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173675
    [41] Lev Vygotsky and Revised and edited by Alex Kozulin. 1978. Mind in society: the development
    of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Retrieved November 18, 2017 from
    https://books.google.com.tw/books/about/Mind_in_Society.html?id=RxjjUefze_oC&redir_esc=y
    [42] A Weinberger . Fisher, F. 2006. A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction
    in computer assisted collaborative learning. Computer & Education Journal 46: 71–95.
    41
    [43] Miriam Weinel, Maria Bannert, Jörg Zumbach, H. Ulrich Hoppe, and Nils Malzahn. 2011. A
    closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration.
    Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1: 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2010.09.020
    [44] Naomi Yamashita, Katsuhiko Kaji, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Keiji Hirata. 2011. Improving
    visibility of remote gestures in distributed tabletop collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM
    2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’11, 95.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958839
    [45] Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Keiji Hirata, Shigemi Aoyagi, and Yoshinari Shirai. 2011.
    Supporting fluid tabletop collaboration across distances. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual
    conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’11, 2827.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979362
    [46] Moonyati Yatid and Masahiro Takatsuka. 2011. Awareness to improve interaction: design of
    distance learning environment. Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction
    Conference, 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1145/2071536.2071587
    [47] Ikujiro Nonaka. 1994. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization
    Science 5, 1: 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
    [48] Sharma, N., Cohen, M., Hilligoss, B., & Patterson, E. 2010. Handoffs & Handovers:
    Collaborating in Turns. In CSCW 2010 Workshop, Savannah, Atlanta.
    [49] Hinkin, T. and Tracey, J. 2000. The Cost of Turnover: Putting a Price on the Learning Curve.
    Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. 41, 3 (2000), 14-21.
    [50] Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., & Kraut, R. E. 2003, April. Effects of head-mounted and sceneoriented
    video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI
    conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 513-520). ACM.

    QR CODE