由於現在的網路科技的技術日益增進，研究者除了提出更有效率、更高效能的新機制外，還要更能確保整個系統的穩定性，也就是說，要能確定在一般的運作狀況下是穩定的，更要確定不會受到攻擊者的攻擊，導致整個系統的不正常運作，更而侵犯到合法使用者的利益和權力，在這篇論文中，因為在Network Mobility 的protocol裡面的安全機制無法完全應用在Vehicle IPv6上，尤其是在Vehicle IPv6的Domain裡面的機制，在一般狀況下是非常脆弱的，所以我們提出在Vehicle IPv6上的安全機制，提供mobile nodes或mobile networks在使用Vehicle IPv6時，能夠更穩定、更安全的去完成每一件所要完成的事情，其中包含了Vehicle IPv6的protocol下的mobile nodes或mobile networks對其Home Agent做Binding Update和mobile nodes或mobile networks對其Correspond node做Binding Update之外，更對domain內的機制提出完整的安全機制，例如：註冊(registration)、註冊更新(registration refresh)、轉送的請求(forwarding request)。

[1] IETF NEMO working group, http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nemo-charter.html
[2] Devarapalli, V., "Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol", RFC3969
[3] IETF MIP6 working group, http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip6-charter.html
[4] D. Johnson, C. Perkins and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in IPv6", RFC3775
[5]Jung S., Zhao F., Wu F., Kim H., Sohn S., “Threat Analysis for NEMO Basic Operations”, (draft-jung-nemo-threat-analysis-02.txt), Internet Draft, IETF, Feb. 2004, Work in Progress.
[6] Petrescu A., Olivereau A., Janneteau C., Lach H-Y., “Threats for Basic Netowrk Mobiltiy Support (NEMO threats)”, (draft-petrescu-nemo- threats-01.txt), IETF, Internet Draft, January 2004, Work in Progress.
[7] Aura T., Arrko J. “MIPv6 BU Attacks and Defenses”`,
(draft-aura-mipv6-bu-attacks-00.txt) IETF Draft. Feb 2002.
[8] Kent, S. and R. Atkinson, "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)", RFC 2406,
November 1998
[9] Kent, S. and R. Atkinson, "IP Authentication Header", RFC 2402, November 1998.
[10] Arkko, J., Devarapalli, V., and F. Dupont, "Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents", RFC 3776, June 2004.
[11] P. Savola, “Security of IPv6 Routing Header and Home Address Options,”
draft-savola-ipv6-rh-ha-security-02.txt, March 2002
[12] Mankin, A., et al., “Threat models Introduces by Mobile IPv6 and
Requirements for Security in Mobile IPv6,”
draft-ietf-mobileip-mipv6-scrty-reqts-02, work in process, May 2001
[13] ITU-T recommendation, X.509, “Public Key and attribute certificate
frameworks,”March 2000.
[14] Harkins, D. and D. Carrel, “The Internet Key Exchange (IKE),”RFC 2409,
November 1998.
[15] M. Mambo, K. Usuda, E. Okamoto, Proxy signatures for delegating signing
operation, in: Proc. 3rd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications
Security, New Dehli, India, ACM Press, New York, 1996, pp. 48–57.
[16] M. Mambo, K. Usuda, E. Okamoto, Proxy signatures: Delegation of the power to
sign messages, IEICE Trans. Fundam. E79-A (9) (1996) 1338–1354.
[17] T. ElGamal, A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete
logarithms, IEEE Trans. IT-31 (1985) 469–472.