研究生: |
林承緯 Cheng-Wei Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
隨意無線網路上的群組化GAF節能技術 A Grouping GAF Power Saving Algorithm in Ad hoc Wireless Networks |
指導教授: |
王家祥
Jia-Shung Wang |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
電機資訊學院 - 資訊工程學系 Computer Science |
論文出版年: | 2006 |
畢業學年度: | 94 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 41 |
中文關鍵詞: | 感測網路 、能源 、隨意 、無線網路 、連通 、拓樸 |
外文關鍵詞: | Sensor Networks, GAF, Power Saving, Ad hoc, Wireless Networks, Connectivity, Topology Maintenance |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
無線感測器網路應用設計,是在一個廣大的區域大量的地散佈感測器以達到監測環境的效果。感測器通常是由電池供電而難以改換電池並配置受限的運算處理器。在這樣的劇本之下,無線感測器網路和傳統的區域網路以及無線網路是非常不同的。
在考量設計無線感測器網路的協定時,能源節約和封包傳遞品質是二個非常重要的考量。為了達到這二個要求,已經有非常多的論文提出各種方法來協調感測器之間的睡眠時間以維護必需的網路拓樸。GAF利用地理位置資訊來定義每個感測器之間的等價性進而關掉多餘的感測器無線電。
在本篇論文,我們提出一個群組化GAF演算法。我們主要對著名的GAF做了下面二個修改。首先,我們將GAF裡的方形虛擬網格改成六角形並評估修改之後的效能。之後我們提出一個群輪替方法,它將整個網路分成四個群,每個群輪流起來為並喚醒維持網路連通性必需的點。在理論上用我們的方法能夠將網路中醒著的點數降至GAF的51.96%。而在我們的實驗結果中,我們喚醒的點數是GAF的50.69%。只額外造成了1.16%的封包傳遞延遲時間。由於邊界網格不完全的問題,我們獲得了比理論值還好的實驗值。
Wireless sensor networks can be thought as wireless ad hoc networks with limited energy supply and restricted computation ability. However, unlike traditional local area networks or wireless networks, sensor networks should take these constraints into consideration.
Energy limitation and routing fidelity are two of the most concerns in developing protocols and algorithms for wireless sensor networks. To achieve these two goals, many researches focus on how sensor nodes coordinate with each other to turn off their radio intermittently, thus reduce their energy consumption. For example, Geographical Adaptive Fidelity (GAF) [1] conserves energy by using geographic location information to identify the equivalence between nodes then turn off redundant nodes.
In this thesis, a grouping GAF method is proposed. It replaces GAF virtual grid with hexagonal cell first, and periodically rotates the active nodes between several groups (partition of nodes). Theoretically the proposed method wakes up only 51.96% of nodes that GAF does without losing the property of network connectivity. The simulation results show that with our algorithm, we awake only 50.69% of the nodes compared to GAF with additional 1.16% packet delivery delay.
[1] Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, “Geography-informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing,“ in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Rome, July 2001, pp. 70--84.
[2] I.F. Akyildiz and W. Su and Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci, “Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey,“ IEEE Computer, vol. 38, no. 4, pages 393-422, Mar. 2002.
[3] K. Akkaya and M. Younis, “A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks, “ Elsevier Ad Hoc Network Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 325-349, 2005.
[4] Tijs van Dam , Koen Langendoen, “An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks, “ in Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 05-07, 2003, Los Angeles, California, USA
[5] B. Das and V. Bharghavan, “Routing in ad-hoc networks using minimum connected dominating sets, “ in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’97) (June 1997).
[6] J. Wu and H. Li, “On calculating connected dominating set for efficient routing in ad hoc wireless networks, “ in Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Discrete Algorithms and Methods for Mobile Computing and Communications, Seattle, WA (August 1999).
[7] K. M. Alzoubi, P.-J. Wan, and O. Frieder. “A Distributed heuristics for connected dominating set in wireless ad hoc networks, “ IEEE ComSoc/KICS Journal on Communication Networks, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.22-29, March 2002.
[8] S. Guha and S. Khuller, “Approximation Algorithms for Connected Dominating Sets,” Algorithmica, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 374-387, 1998.
[9] Bennett F., Clarke D., Evans J.B., Hopper A., Jones A., Leask D.: Piconet: Embedded Mobile Networking, IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 4, no. 5, pp.8-15, October 1997
[10] K. Sohrabi and G. J. Pottie, ”Performance of a novel self-organization protocol for wireless ad hoc sensor networks, ” in Proceeding of IEEE 50th Vehicular Technology Conf., 1999, pp. 1222-1226.
[11] W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan,” Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks, ” in Proceeding of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(HICSS), pp. 3005-3014, Jan. 2000
[12] Raghavendra, C., and Singh, S. ” PAMAS: Power Aware Multi-Access Protocol with Signaling for Ad Hoc Networks, ” ACM Computer Communication Review, pp.5-26 , July 1998.
[13] Suresh Singh, Mike Woo, and C. S. Raghavendra. ” Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks, ” In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pp. 181-190, 1998.
[14] W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, ”An energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks, ” in Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, June 2002.
[15] T. Dam and K. Langendoen, ”An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” in Proceeding of Networked Sensor Systems, Los Angeles, CA, November 2003.
[16] Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. ”Adaptive energy conserving routing for multihop ad hoc networks,” USC/Information Sciences Institute, Technical Report 527, October 2000.
[17] B. Chen, K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Morris, ”Span: An Energy-efficient Coordination Algorithm for Topology Maintenance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks, ” in Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001, pp. 85--96.
[18] Nomura et al., ”Multiple Radio Zone Plans in Mobile Radio Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Tech; vol. VT-25, No. 3, Aug. 1977, pp. 68-74.
[19] M. Stemm and R. Katx, ”Measuring and Reducing Energy Consumption of Network Interfaces in Hand-Held Devices, ” IEICE Transactions on Communication, vol. E80-B, No. 8, 1997.