本研究旨在探討在職教師之資訊素養對其網際網路資訊尋求行為與資訊評估能力之影響，目的在於瞭解不同資訊素養之在職教師在網際網路搜尋資訊時的情形，以及評估搜尋結果、評估資訊內容，與資訊來源的情形。
本研究採取個案研究進行研究資料的蒐集。有幾項研究工具：一為「資訊素養題庫檢核系統」，用來測量在職教師之資訊素養的情形。另一為「網路資訊搜尋歷程管理系統」，用來記錄在職教師網路之資訊尋求行為情形，以及評估資訊之相關標準。最後，透過與在職教師深入訪談其資訊尋求行為與評估資訊的內容。
本研究結果顯示，第一，不同資訊素養在職教師在資訊尋求行為中有不同的差異，包含理解任務、喚起先備知識與決定所需資訊、搜尋策略與搜尋字詞等步驟上。第二， 不同資訊素養在職教師在資訊評估中有不同的差異，包含網頁檔案類型的實用性、開啟不同語言的網頁、判斷資訊的驗證性與可信度的準則，以及檔案類型的可信度等標準。
研究結果的討論與對未來研究之建議將在論文中被詳細的探討。

The purpose of this study was to explore how information literacy of in-service teachers influences world wild web information seeking behavior and information evaluation. The goal lies in understanding situation of in-service teachers of different information literacy on searching information, evaluating inquirying results, information contents and information sources.
This study adopts case study to collect research data. This study applies several research tools as following. First, ‘Information Literacy Assessment System’ to examinate in-sevice teachers‘ information literacy. Second, ‘WWW Information Searching Process Management System’ to record in-sevice teachers' information seeking behavior and criterias of evaluating information. Finally, in order to gather further content , researcher carries on the interview with in-service teachers.
This study reveals some findings. First, there are some differences between in-service teachers with different level of information literacy, including ‘formulating questions’,‘activating prior knowledge’, ‘determining needed information’,‘selecting search strategy’,‘specifying search terms’. Second, there are some differences between in-service teachers with different level of information literacy, ‘including judging search results’, ‘judging source and information’. These differences display in usability of homepage file type, different language homepage, criterias of information verifiability and reliability.
Discussion of research results and suggestion of future study are also discussed in detail in this thesis.

一、中文部份
王秀卿（民90）。「網路使用與資訊尋求行為之文獻探討。」大學圖書館，5，1，144-162。
王梅玲(民93)，大學生資訊素養課程設計與評鑑，圖書館學與資訊科學，30（2），頁134-142。
林菁（民90）。圖書資訊利用教育─國小階段之課程設計與教學實務。台北：五南。
林菁(民96)。資訊素養融入國小四年級社會學習領域教學：小小古蹟解說員的培訓研究。 教育資料與圖書館學 ，44（3），357-378。
林菁(民97)。資訊素養融入大學生主題探究之研究。 教育資料與圖書館學 ，46（2），233-266。
林珊如（民91）。網路使用者特性與資訊行為研究趨勢之探討。圖書資訊學刊，12， 35-47。
林青麗、鄭承昌、孫宜旺、黃郁涵 (民97)。增進國小學童進行網路資訊搜尋之教學策略。網路社會學通訊，69。
吳美美（民85）。在新時空座標中的圖書館功能--談資訊素養教育。圖書館學與資訊科學，45，29-52。
吳美美 (民90)。資訊時代的圖書館：新教育思潮與圖書資訊。台北：師大書苑。
吳青宜（民93）。運用專題導向學習提昇國小五年級學生資訊素養之研究。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
李德竹(民83)。由資訊素養研究圖書館資訊服務之意義與內涵(國科會專案研究計畫成果報告，NSC83-0111-S002-006-TL)。台北市：台灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。
杜義文（民94）。國二學生的網路搜尋策略與成果：檢視知識觀所扮演的角色。國立交通大學理學院碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
柯雲娥(民95)。傳播學門大學生資訊素養能力的研究。圖書與資訊學刊，56 ， 96-116。
洪秀熒（民94）。國民小學行政人員資訊素養與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政雙月刊，36，32-51。
胡立耘（民94）。論資訊素養的結構與意義。教育資料與圖書館學，42，4， 471-480。
范嘉仁(民96)。利用大眾分類法改善部落格排名效能。國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
郝家琪、許麗齡 (民97) 。護理系學生資訊素養能力之自評及其相關影響因素之研究。實證護理， 4（2），107-117。
陳仲彥 (民85) 。資訊素養與圖書館利用教育。 國立臺灣師範大學圖書館通訊 ，21， 2-6。
陳瀅方(民94)。 大學生網路資訊之批判思考運作暨相關教學的實驗研究。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
陳雪華(民84)。網路資源選擇與資訊評鑑。國立臺灣大學圖書館學刊，10， 44-45。
陳雪菱、梁朝雲（民93）。國高中生網路資訊尋求行為影響因素之研究。教育科技與媒體，67，4-24。
許文怡、梁朝雲(民96)。訊息來源可信度，情感認同與涉入程度對大學生採信消費性網路謠言之影響。教育資料與圖書館學，45，99-120。
莊雅萍(民93)。網路資訊搜尋者使用網路搜尋工具之滿意度研究。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
莊道明(民87) 。以資訊素養為基礎的圖書館利用教育課程─世新大學圖書館實施方式。書苑，35， 27-36。
莊道明(民88)。資訊素養溶入大專院校課程之探討─以「資料蒐集與報告寫作」課程為例。 大學圖書館 ，3（2），頁95-113。
教育部（民97）。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書。線上檢索日期：2009年11月11 日。網址：http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0010/97-100year.pdf
黃瀅芳(民95)。大學教師與學生網路學術性資訊品質判斷研究。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，未出版，台北。
黃慕萱（民90）。成人讀者之資訊尋求行為。台北市立圖書館館訊，19(2)。
張一蕃（民87）。人文關懷與專業素養。第六屆通識教育教師研習營：大學理念與實踐。臺中：逢甲大學。
張雅玲、徐新逸(民89)。e世代國小職前教師資訊素養之研究。教育資料與圖書館學， 38 (2)， 203-228。
張純純（民98）。大學生資訊素養指標之研究-以國立新竹教育大學為例。國立新竹教育大學教育學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
溫嘉榮、施文玲、林鳳釵(民94)。中小學教師應具備之資訊素養能力指標之研究。高雄師大學報，17，97-113。
歐陽誾(民91)。國民中小學學生網路資訊檢索相關議題之探討。初等教育學報，15，頁155-181。
蔡宗樺(民97)。從不同性別、科系、年級探究我國國立大學學生擷取與使用網路資訊的行為與觀念。國立清華大學資訊系統與應用研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
賴弘基(民97)。線上學習策略與能力的培養。台北市終身學習網通訊季刊，4，19-23。
賴鼎銘、黃慕萱、吳美美、林珊如編著（民90）。圖書資訊學概論。臺北市：空中大學。
謝寶煖(民91)。從網路學習談圖書館資訊素養教育。全國大專院校圖書館自動化第十八次研討會論文集。台北市：國立政治大學圖書館。
謝寶媛(民89) 。網站搜尋e 網打盡。台北：華文網。
羅思嘉(民89)。資訊素養課程及實施成效初探。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，6，77-102。
蘇諼 (民93)。大學圖書館與大學生的資訊素養問題再思。 圖書與資訊學刊， 51， 1-15。
蘇諼(民94)。從網路資源的選擇與評鑑問題探討學術圖書館的因應之道。 圖書與資訊學刊，55，24-32。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心。台灣寬頻網路使用調查。民98年1月，取自：http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/0901c.pdf
二、外文部份
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education: Standards, performance indicators, and outcomes. Retrieved Jul.16,2009, from http://www.ala.org/acrl
Adams, S. T. (1999). Critiquing claims about global warming from the World WideWeb:A comparison of high school students and specialists. Bulletin of Science, Technology& Society, 19, 539.
Aguilar, F. J.（1967）. Scanning the Business Environment. New York: Macmillan Co.
Belkin,N.J.,Oddy,R.N.& Brooks,H.M.(1982). ASK for information retrieval: Part 1. Background and theory. Journal of Documencation, 38,61-71. Retrieved Jun.23 , 2009, from http://jacksonmedeiros.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/belkin-ask-p1.pdf
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives.Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
Bodi,S.(1995). Scholarship or Propaganda: How Can Librarians Help Undergraduates Tell the Difference? Journal of Academic Librarianship. 21, 21-25.
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I. & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487–508.
Brand-Gruwel,S. Wopereis,I.& Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers and Education, 53, 1207-1217.
Case,D.O.（2002）. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information
Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 350. ISBN
0-12-150381-X. Retrieved Mar.16,2009, from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=153169
Choo, C.W., Detlor, B. & Turnbull, D.（1999）.Information seeking on the Web — An integrated model of browsing and searching. In: Woods, L., Editor, Proceedings of the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting, Information Today, Medford, NJ, pp. 3–16.
Choo,C.W. (2001). Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational
learning. Information Research ,7(1) .Retrieved Jun.14 , 2009, from http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/paper112.html
Cromwell, L.S.（1992）.Assessing critical thinking . In Critical thinking: Educational imperative, ed. C.A. Barnes, 37–50. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cummins, R.(2001). Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: Searchbots. Retrieved Jun.14 , 2009, from http://technologysource.org/article/50/
Doyle, C. S. (1994). Information literacy in an information society: a concept for the information age. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse. （ERIC document ED 372763）.
Duijkers,H.M., Gulikers-Dinjens, M.T.H. & Boshuizen ,H. P. A. (2001).Supporting students processes of searching, selecting and judging information In: Handboek Studiehuis Tweede Fase. Alphen a/d Rijn, The Netherlands: Samsom
Ellis, D.（1989）. A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval Systems Design. Journal of Documentation ,45 (3),171-212.
Ellis, D. （1997）. Modeling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation ,53 ,384-403.
Fidel, R., Davies, R. K., Douglass ,M. H., Holder, J. K. , Hopkins, C. J. , Kushner, E. J., Miyagishima, B. K., Toney, C. D. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 50, 24-38.
Fourie,I.（2004）.A Theoretical model for studies on web information-seeking behaviour In ProLISSA. Progress in Library and Information Science in Southern Africa . Retrieval Mar. 16, 2009, from
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/2630240103.html
Fricke, M. & Fallis , D.（2004）. Indicators of accuracy for answers to ready reference questions on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 , p. 238
Fritch, J.W. & Cromwell, R.L. (2001). Evaluating Internet resources: Identity, affiliation, and cognitive authority in a networked world. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 499.
Grimes, D. J., & Boening, C. H.(2001).Worries with the Web: A look at student use of Web resources. College and Research Libraries, 62, 11–23.
Henry, L. (2005). Information search strategies on the internet : a critical component of new literacies. Webology, 2(1) , Article 9. Retrieved Jun. 14,2009, from http://www.webology.ir/2005/v2n1/a9.html
Herring, S. D.（2001）. Faculty acceptance of the World Wide Web for student research. College & Research Libraries , 62（3）,251-258.
Hirsch, S. G.(1999). Children’s relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1265–1283.
Hölscher, C. & Strube, G. (2000). Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks ,33, 337-346.
Ikoja-Odongo, R. & Mostert, J.（2006）Information seeking behaviour: A conceptual framework. South African Journal of Library & Information Science , 72,145-158.
Jansen, B. J. & Spink, A. (2005). An analysis of Web searching by European Alltheweb.com users. Information Processing &Management, 41(2), 361–381.
Julien, H. & Barker, S. (2009).How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library and Information Science Research, 31 (1), 12-17.
Kafai, Y. & Bates, M. J.(1997). Internet web-searching instruction in the elementary classroom: building a foundation for information literacy. School Library Media Quarterly, 25, 103–111.
Knight,S.& Burn, J.（2005）.Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web. Informing Science Journal, 8, 159-172.
Krikelas, J.（1983）. Information-seeking behaviour: patterns and concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly, 19,5-20.
Koot, U. & Hoveijn, M. (2005). Google, de magische antwoordmachine [Google, the
magical answermachine].Retrieval Jun. 11 ,2009 , from http://www.kennislink.nl/publicaties/google-de-magische-antwoordmachine
Kuhlthau, C.C.（1991）.Inside the search process : information seeking from
the users perspective. Journal of the American Society of information Science, 42, 361-371. Retrieval Mar. 16, 2009,from http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~belkin/612-05/kuhlthau-jasist-91.pdf
Kuhlthau,C.C.(1997). Learning in digital libraries: An information search process approach.Library Trends, 45, 708–724.
Kuhlthau, C.C.（2004）.Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. 2nd edition, Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT.
Kurbanoglu ,S. ,Buket ,A.& Umay A.(2006).Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation ,62, 730-743.
Land, S. M. & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: a qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(1), 45–68.
Lorenzen, M. (2002). The land of confusion? High school students and their use of the World Wide Web for research. Research strategies, 18, 151–163.
Lubans,J.J.（1998）. How First-Year University Students Use and Regard Internet
Resources . Retrieved Jun.14 , 2009, from http://www.lubans.org/docs/1styear/firstyear.html
Lwo, L.S.(2005).College students’ uses and perceptions of World Wide Web in an information-seeking environment. 圖書館學與資訊科學, 31, 11-24.
MaKinster, J., Plucker, J.& Beghetto, R. (2002). Why can't I find Newton's Third Law? Case studies of students' use of the web as a science resource. J. Sci. Educ. Tech., 11(2), 155-172. Retrieved Jul. 5, 2009, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014617530297
Malik, A. , & Mahmood, K. (2009). Web Search Behavior of University Students: A Case Study at University of the Punjab. Chinese Librarianship: an International
Electronic Journal, 28. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2010, from
http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl28MM.htm
Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronicenvironments. New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieval Mar. 16 , 2009 , from
http://www.ils.unc.edu/~march/isee_book/Chapter_3.pdf
Marchionini, G. & Komlodi, A.（1998）. Design of interfaces for information seeking. Retrieval Mar. 16, 2009, from http://www.ils.unc.edu/~march/arist.pdf
McClure,C.R.（1994）. Network Literacy: A Role for Libraries? Information Technology and Libraries. Chicago, 13, 115 (11 pages)
Meho, L.& Tibbo, H. (2003). Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis’s study revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 570–587.
Metzger M.J., Flanagin A.J.& Zwarun L.（2003）. College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Comput Educ. 2003;41(3):271–290. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00049-6.
Nachmias, R. & Gilad, A. (2002). Needle in a hyperstack: Searching for information on the World Wide Web. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 475-486.
Penny, M. (2006). Information Literacy in the New Zealand Education Sector. School Libraries Worldwide, 12, 1-21.
Pérez-López, F.R. (2004). An evaluation of the contents and quality of menopause information on the World Wide Web. Maturitas, 49,276-282.
Rieh, S.Y.(2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145-161.
Rieh, S. Y., & Hilligoss, B. (2007). College Students’ Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process. Digital Media,Youth, and Credibility. Edited by Miriam J. Metzger and Andrew J. Flanagin. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 49–72. doi: 10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.049
Rose , D. E. & Levinson, D. (2004). Understanding user goals in web search. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web.(pp. 13–19), New York.
Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R.(2004). Laypersons searching for medical information on the web: The role of metacognition. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.). Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (p. 1638), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scott, T.J.& O'Sullivan, M.K.(2005). Analyzing student search strategies: making a case for integrating information literacy skills into the curriculum. Teacher Librarian, 33, 21-25. Retrieved Jul.7, 2009, from ProQuest Education Journals. (Document ID: 918912351).
Tabatabai, D.& Shore, B.M. (2005). How experts and novices search the Web. Library & Information Science Research, 27, 222-248.
Tapscott,D.(1996). The digital economy : Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. Retrieved Jul.24 , 2009, from
http://www.virtualitaet.de/stadt/internet/indage_bureaucracy_final.pdf
Taneichi, J.& Itsumura, H. (2006). Web searching behavior: Constructing a process model of information evaluation based on a survey of college students. Library and Information Science, 55, 1-23.
Tsai, C.C.(2004). Information commitments in web-based learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41,105-112.
Turnbull, D. (n.d) Augmenting information seeking on the World Wide Web using collaborative filtering techniques. Retrieved Jun. 4 , 2009, from http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~donturn/research/augmentis.html)
Van Merriënboer, J.J.G.(1999).Cognition and Multimedia Design for Complex Learning. Inaugural address, Open University of the Netherlands, The Netherlands.
Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J. & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9,75–104.
Walraven, A. , Brand-Gruwel, S. & Boshuizen, H. P.A. (2009) How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers & Education, 52, 234-246. ISSN 0360-1315
Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S. & Boshuizen, H.P.A. (2008). Information- problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 623-648.
Wang, Yu-Mei (2007). Riding to the Future - An Investigation of Information Literacy Skills of Students at an Urban University as Applied to the Web Environment. International Journal on ELearning, 6, 593.
Weick, K.E., Daft, R.L.（1983）. The effectiveness of interpretation systems. In Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models, Cameron KS, Whetten DA (eds). Academic Press: New York; 71–93.
Whitmire, E.(2004) The Relationship Between Undergraduates' Epistemological Beliefs, Reflective Judgment, And Their Information-Seeking Behavior ,Information Processing & Management ,40 , 97–111.
Wilson, T.D.（1997）. Information behaviour: An Interdisciplinary perspective. Information Processing and Management, 33, 551-572.
Wilson, T.D.（1999）. Models In information behaviour research. Journol of Documentation, 55, 249-270.
Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Information Science Research, 3, 49-56.
Wilson. T.D. (2006). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 62,p. 658.
Wu, Y.T. & Tsai, C.C. (2005).Information commitments: evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21,374-385(12).