簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡青潣
Ching-Min Tsai
論文名稱: 學術創業中跨領域互動之研究
The Study of Cross-Disciplinary Interaction in Academic Entrepreneurship
指導教授: 林福仁
Fu-Ren Lin
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所
Institute of Technology Management
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 70
中文關鍵詞: 學術創業跨領域互動知識活動
外文關鍵詞: Academic entrepreneurship, Cross-disciplinary interaction, Knowledge activities
相關次數: 點閱:76下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 學術創業今日被認為是影響國家經濟的其中一項因素,然而有關學術創業的知識管理議題尚未被廣泛地討論,而對於學術創業中跨領域互動之相關研究則更為稀少。而在今日講求時基競爭的時代下,若創業過程當中還需要面臨因跨領域的互動所生的時間磨耗成本,那麼可能會影響創業者將技術商品化的時程。
    而本研究為了找尋本個案團隊的互動現象,因而採用紮根理論,以希望發現學術創業團隊成員間互動背景與互動前的認知等重要因素,以及互動過程與結果。
    透過本研究可以了解到,學術創業中影響跨領域成員互動的因素有哪些、學術創業過程中的知識活動中的互動行為,以及互動之後所產生的影響。而藉由這些互動的過程中以瞭解學術創業的互動情況,而讓日後的學術創業者在面臨跨領域成員互動上能夠減少其跨領域互動的時間磨耗,而對其有所幫助。


    Academic entrepreneurship is regarded as one of the factors which affect the economics of a nation nowadays, but the issue on knowledge management in academic entrepreneurship has not been broadly discussed yet. The cross-disciplinary interaction in academic entrepreneurship is especially rarely studied. However, in the age of time-based competition, if a new start-up has to deal with the time consumption in cross-disciplinary communication, the progress of entrepreneurship or commercialization will be influenced.
    The objective in this research is to find out the interaction phenomena in terms of knowledge activities in an entrepreneurial team. We adopt grounded theory method to figure out the important factors such as the interaction context, and the cognition of academic entrepreneurial team members before the interaction among them. Besides, we also explore these interactions and obtain outcomes.
    In this research, we know what factors in academic entrepreneurship influence cross-disciplinary interactions. Also, we realize the interactive behaviors in the knowledge activities in academic entrepreneurship, and the results or effects after the interactions. Academic entrepreneurs in the future can reduce the time consumption in cross-disciplinary interactions through understanding the interaction phenomena in academic entrepreneurial process.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 2 第四節 研究範圍與研究限制 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 學術創業要素與創業過程 4 一、學術創業的要素 4 二、創業過程 7 第二節 知識管理 8 一、知識管理流程 8 二、跨領域知識流動 12 第三節 人際互動與群體動力學 12 第四節 紮根理論研究方法 14 一、紮根理論中的分析方法 15 二、理論性抽樣 16 第五節 個案研究法 17 第三章 研究設計 19 第一節 研究架構 19 一、學術創業中跨領域知識活動的背景: 19 二、學術創業中跨領域知識活動的過程: 19 第二節 研究流程 20 第三節 資料來源 21 第四節 資料分析 21 第四章 個案簡介 23 一、團隊成員的背景 23 二、個案團隊各階段的發展 24 第五章 研究結果與討論 26 第一節 學術創業知識轉換 26 一、背景 33 二、互動條件 28 三、行動/互動 29 四、結果 29 第二節 創業概念萌芽期之互動模式 29 第三節 團隊摸索期之互動模式 31 第四節 能力成長期之互動模式 36 第五節 自信完整期之互動模式 38 第六章 結論與建議 40 第一節 結論 40 一、團隊形成初期無團隊的任務進度 41 二、組織的知識擴大 41 三、跨領域的互動 41 四、學術創業團隊成員對於知識來源的信任 42 五、固定空間對於團隊互動之幫助 42 第二節 建議 43 一、學術創業團隊形成初期的任務進度 43 二、善用各項知識取得方式與互動 43 三、跨領域的互動 43 四、學術創業團隊成員對於知識來源的信任之議題 44 五、提供固定空間予學術創業團隊 44 第三節 對於未來研究之建議 44 一、各項資源的運用 44 二、團隊成員關係的改變 45 三、專家訪談中,創業團隊成員對於訪談對象選擇性透露 45 四、技術擁有者 45 參考文獻 46 附錄一、學術創業中跨領域互動之背景 52 附錄二、互動條件 62 附錄三、精煉團隊內部知識之行動/互動 63 附錄四、尋找團隊外部知識之行動/互動 64 附錄五、精煉團隊內部知識之互動條件、行動/互動與結果 65 附錄六、尋找團隊外部知識之互動條件、行動/互動與結果 67 附錄七、互動結果 69

    Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management system: conceptual foundations and research. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
    Argyle, Michael. (1969). Social Interaction. London: Methuen.
    Beath, J., Owen, R. F., Poyago-Theotoky, J., & Ulph, D. (2003). Optimal incentives for income-generation in universities: the rule of thumb for the Compton tax. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1301-1322.
    Beckman, T. J. (1997). Implementing the knowledge organization in government, paper and presentation, 10th National conference on federal quality.
    Beckman, T. J. (1999). The current state of knowledge management. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press.
    Bertcher, H., & Maple, F. (1974). Individual change through small groups. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Bird, B. J., & Allen, D. N. (1989). Faculty entrepreneurship in research university environments. Journal of higher education, 60(5), 583-595.
    Blair, D., & Hitchens, D. (1998). Campus Companies in the UK and Ireland: Aldershot: Ashgate.
    Blumer, Herbert (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Brehmer, B. (1976). Social judgment theory and the analysis of interpersonal conflict. Psychological Bulletin, 83(6), 985–1003.
    Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies 30(3), 439–462.
    Cattell, R. B. (1948). concepts and methods in the measurement of group syntality. Psychological Review, 55, 48-63.
    Chen, C.-J., & Lin, B.-W. (2004). The effects of environment, knowledge attribute, organizational climate, and firm characteristics on knowledge sourcing decisions. R&D Management, 34(2), 137-146.
    Chiesa, V., & Piccaluga, A. (2000). Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy. R&D Management 30( 4), 329-339.
    Clayton, J., Gambill, B., & Harned, D. (1999). The curse of too much capital: building new businesses in large corporations. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 48–59.
    Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
    Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381-400.
    Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Stout, R. J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42(1), 151-173.
    Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structure design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
    Darr, E. D., Argote, L., & Epple, D. (1995). The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in Franchises. Management Science, 41(11), 1750-1762.
    Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge, how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Debackere, K. (2000). Managing academic R&D as a business at K.U. Leuven: context, structure and process. R&D management, 30(4), 323-328.
    DiBella, A., & Nevis, E. (1998). How organizations learn: An integrated strategy for building learning capability: Jossey-Bass.
    Drucker, P.F. (2002). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 95-101.
    Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 350-383.
    Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1994). Small group decision making communication and the group process 4th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Fisher, B. A. (1978). Perspectives on human communication. New York: Macmillan.
    Forsyth. (1990). roup Dynamics 2nd ed. California: Brooks/Cole Publish Co.
    Franklin, S. J., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 127-141.
    Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 821–845.
    Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
    Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic management journal, 19, 293-317.
    Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496.
    Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83–103.
    Hare, A. (1976). Handbook of small group research 2nd ed. New York: Free press.
    Hill, W. F., & Gruner, L. (1973). A study of development in open and closed groups. . Small Group Behavior, 4, 355-381.
    Hsu, D. H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Research Policy, 36, 722–741.
    Hult, G. T., Snow, C. C., & Kandemir, D. (2003). The role of entrepreneurship in building cultural competitiveness in different organizational types. Journal of Management, 29(3), 401-426.
    Jarillo, H. H. S. J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Special Issue: Corporate Entrepreneurship), 17-27.
    Jeffrey L. Cummings, & Teng, B.-S. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of engineering and technology management 20, 39–68.
    Johannisson, B. (1996). The dynamics of entrepreneurial networks Växjö University, Sweden.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining together-group theory and group skills 4th ed: Prentice-Hall.
    Klofsten, M., Jonsson, M., & Simón, J. (1999). Supporting the pre-commercialization stages of technology-based firms: the effects of small-scale venture capital. Venture Capital, 1(1), 83-93.
    Lehrer, M., & Asakawa, K. (2004). Pushing scientists into the marketplace: promoting science entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 46(3), 55-76.
    Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the source of innovation. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Luwel, M., Noyons, E. C. M., & Moed, H. (1999). Bibiometric assessment of research performance in Flanders: policy background and implications. R&D Management, 29(2), 133-141.
    Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management 33(2), 107-115.
    Mike Wright, Ajay Vohora, & Lockett, A. (2004). The formation of H񖶎high-tech university spinouts: the role of joint ventures and venture capital investors. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 287–310.
    Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: state, effect, and response uncertainty. The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133-143.
    Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 89-106.
    Mowday, R., Steers, R., & Porter, L. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 14, 224–247.
    Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31 (3), 399-418.
    Nelson, R. R. (2001). Observations on the post-Bayh–Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 13–19.
    Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
    Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press
    Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of "ba": Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54.
    Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 309-340.
    Petrash, G. (1996). Dow's journey to a knowledge value culture. European management journal 14, 365-373.
    Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–311.
    Postrel, S. (2002). Islands of shared knowledge: specialization and mutual understanding in problem-solving teams. Organization Science, 13(3), 303-320.
    Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 879–893.
    Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
    Shane, S. (2004). Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., MA.
    Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 14, 111–133.
    Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., & Link, A. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115–142.
    Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.
    Simmonds, P. G., Dawley, D. D., Ritchie, W. J., & Anthony, W. P. (2001). An exploratory examination of the knowledge transfer of strategic management concepts from the academic environment to practicing managers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(3), 360-375.
    Simonin, B. L. (1999a). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20( 7), 595-623.
    Simonin, B. L. (1999b). Transfer of marketing know-how in international strategic alliances: an empirical investigation of the role and antecedents of knowledge ambiguity. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 463–490
    Smith, G. V., & Parr, R. L. (2003). Intellectual Property: Licensing and Joint Venture Profit Strategies, 2nd Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Second Edition: Sage Publications.
    Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55-79.
    Thelen, H. A. (1968). Dynamics of group at work. Chicago: university of Chicago.
    Tornatzky, L. G., Waugaman, P. G., & Casson, L. (1995). Benchmarking Best Practices for University-industry Technology Transfer: Working with Start-up Companies (Vol. NC): Research Triangle Park.
    Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge Management: Where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Systems With Applications, 13(1), 1-14.
    Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35, 481–501.
    Zack, M. (1998). What knowledge-problems can information technology help to solve,. In E. H. a. I. Benbasat (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 644-646).
    Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-145.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE