研究生: |
翁子崴 Weng, Tzu-Wei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
已開發國家與新興國家在創新能力、吸收能力與經濟成長之動態關聯 On the Dynamic Nexus between Innovation Capabilities, Absorptive Capacity and Economic Growth in Developed and Emerging Countries |
指導教授: |
劉玉雯
Liu, Yu-Wen 梁晉嘉 Liang, Chin-Chia |
口試委員: |
史習安
Shih, Hsi-An 李嘉聖 Lee, Jia-Sheng 許竹君 Hsu, Chu-Chun |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所 Institute of Technology Management |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 30 |
中文關鍵詞: | 創新能力 、吸收能力 、經濟成長 、格蘭傑因果關係檢驗 、七大工業國組織 、金磚五國 |
外文關鍵詞: | innovation capability, absorptive capacity, Economic growth, panel Granger causality test, G7, BRICs |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的在於分析創新能力及吸收能力對於經濟成長方面所產生的影響及是否產生共同增長的效果,採用檢驗方法為拔靴追蹤Granger因果關係,並以1996-2014年期間七大工業國組織G7和金磚五國等國家的資料作為分析數據來源。實證結果顯示,巴西在吸收能力對經濟成長之間呈現出單向的格蘭傑因果關係,而義大利則是在創新能力對經濟增長上產生格蘭傑因果關係,此外經濟成長也導致俄羅斯和加拿大對於吸收能力產生影響,同時經濟成長對於德國和日本的創新能力也呈現顯著的因果關係。分析中更指出日本的吸收能力與經濟成長之間存有雙向的格蘭傑因果關係,其餘如印度、中國、南非、美國、英國和法國的創新能力/吸收能力與經濟增長之間則沒有顯著的因果關係。此研究對於一國尤其是新興國家的發展建設和政策制定具有相當重要的意義,促使其釐清未來發展的可能性。
This paper aims to make use of the bootstrap panel Granger causality test to analyze whether the coevolution of these two primary aspects: innovative capability and absorptive capacity could drive the economic growth, employing data from G7 and BRICs countries during the period of 1996–2014. Empirical results reveal that one-way Granger causality running from absorptive capacity to economic growth in Brazil, innovative capability Granger causes a variation in economic growth in Italy, economic growth Granger causes a change in absorptive capacity for Russia and Canada, and economic growth Granger causes innovative capability in Germany and Japan. A two-way Granger causality exists between absorptive capacity and economic growth in Japan, whereas no causality between innovative capability/ absorptive capacity and economic growth has been found in India, China, South Africa, US, UK, and France. These findings have significant implications for theoretical construction and policy-making which drive them to clarify the possibility of the future developing process, especially in emerging countries.
Bayar, A., et al. (2001). Did trade liberalization induce a structural break in imports of manufactures in Turkey?, ULB--Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
Bergsten, C. F., et al. (1978). "American multinationals and American interests." Washington, DC.
Borensztein, E., et al. (1998). "How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?" Journal of international Economics 45(1): 115-135.
Breusch, T. S. and A. R. Pagan (1980). "The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics." The Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 239-253.
Castellacci, F. and J. M. Natera (2013). "The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity." Research policy 42(3): 579-594.
Chang, Y. and X. Cui (2013). "The Interactive Relationship of Transnational Technology Transfer & Diffusion and National Innovation Capability-The Johansen Co-integration and Granger-Causality Relationship Test Based on China's Open Innovation System Construction." International Journal of Business and Management 8(21): 76-88.
Cheung, K.-y. and L. Ping (2004). "Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data." China economic review 15(1): 25-44.
Coe, D. T. and E. Helpman (1995). "International r&d spillovers." European Economic Review 39(5): 859-887.
Comin, D. and B. Hobijn (2004). "Cross-country technology adoption: making the theories face the facts." Journal of Monetary Economics 51(1): 39-83.
Dahlman, C. J. and R. Nelson (1995). Social absorption capability, national innovation systems and economic development. Social capability and long-term economic growth, Springer: 82-122.
Evangelista, R., et al. (1997). "Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry: some evidence from the Italian innovation survey." Research policy 26(4-5): 521-536.
Gassmann, O. and E. Enkel (2004). "Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes."
Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1990). "Trade, innovation, and growth." The American economic review 80(2): 86-91.
Guan, J. and N. Ma (2003). "Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms." Technovation 23(9): 737-747.
Holmes, T. J. and J. A. Schmitz Jr (2001). "A gain from trade: From unproductive to productive entrepreneurship." Journal of Monetary Economics 47(2): 417-446.
Kónya, L. (2006). "Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach." Economic Modelling 23(6): 978-992.
Lichtenberg, F. R. and B. v. P. de la Potterie (1998). "International R&D spillovers: a comment." European Economic Review 42(8): 1483-1491.
Mancusi, M. L. (2008). "International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations." Journal of international Economics 76(2): 155-165.
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). "General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels." 1-39.
Swamy, P. A. (1970). "Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model." Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 311-323.
Yam, R. C., et al. (2004). "An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China." Research policy 33(8): 1123-1140.