簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳虹君
Chen, Hung-Chun
論文名稱: 車載語音人機介面互動之風險評估
Risk Assessment for In-Vehicle Speech Interaction Systems: Talking Car System
指導教授: 黃雪玲
Hwang, Sheue-Ling
口試委員: 劉正禮
黃斐慧
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系
Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 70
中文關鍵詞: 風險評估車用語音系統失效模式與效應分析駕駛安全
外文關鍵詞: Risk Assessment, In-Vehicle Speech Interaction System, FMEA, Driving Safety
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著科技的進步和資訊流動加快,駕駛對車用資通訊功能的需求也大幅提高,龐大的市場因此讓汽車電子被視為帶動電子產業商機的第四C,進而加速相關技術的發展。很多駕駛在開車的時候,往往會透過車用資訊系統來取得路況、音樂、廣播等資訊,然在取得這些相關資訊的同時,駕駛可能因為人機介面的設計不妥等因素造成使用車用資通訊系統時發生失誤而影響其行車安全。本研究以一款由工研院開發之全盲式中文車用語音系統Talking Car為研究對象,使用風險評估相關技術來找出此語音介面設計上的潛在問題。
    在本研究中,首先進行一次駕駛模擬實驗,共計有16位受試者,每位受試者須一邊開車一邊操作Talking Car來完成指定的任務,並在實驗後填寫主觀問卷及接受訪談。實驗中,同時設有錄影機記錄受試者的所有行為,包括開車和操作語音系統。透過影片觀察以及訪談可以蒐集、分析駕駛模擬實驗中發生的所有的失效模式、錯誤操作以及其造成原因與產生效應,再進行納入人為操作考量的修正型失效模式與效應分析,並針對每個失效模式與操作動作計算其風險優先數,由高到低排列出其需改善的順序。
    研究結果顯示現行Talking Car語音系統確實存在需要修改之處,分別是「系統引導語句」、「方向盤上的控制按鍵」及「部分系統介面」。而此修正後的失效模式與效應分析也被認為是可用來評估操作語音系統作業之系統化工具。本研究亦針對Talking Car語音系統不足之處提出改善建議,預期透過介面改善,降低Talking Car失誤發生之頻率並提升其操作績效與安全性。


    The purpose of this study was to identify the potential problems of an in-vehicle speech interaction system called Talking Car by using risk assessment techniques.
    In this study, 16 participants took part in a driving simulation experiment and were asked to complete the assigned tasks by controlling the Talking Car system while driving. The participants also had to answer a subjective questionnaire and sit for an interview after the experiment. By conducting the experiment, the failure modes, incorrect operations, failure causes, and effects were observed and collected. Then, a modified failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) method which took human operation into account was used to determine and analyze these failure modes and incorrect operations. After completing the analysis, the risk priority number (RPN) was computed to detect which failure had a significant effect on driving safety. RPNs and subjective questionnaires indicated that “System Dialogue with Elicitation,” “Control Button on Steering Wheel,” and “Partial System Interface” urgently need improvement.
    This study revealed significant deficiencies in the current Talking Car system. Additionally, the results also revealed that the modified FMEA method was feasible and can be proposed as a systematic technique to assess the task of controlling in-vehicle speech interaction systems while driving. Furthermore, recommendations to address the design problems of the Talking Car system are presented to facilitate driving safety.

    摘 要 i Abstract ii 誌 謝 iii Table of Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and motivation 1 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Research framework 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.1 The changes of telematics systems 5 2.1.1 Driving distractions and in-vehicle speech interaction systems 5 2.1.2 Limitations of in-vehicle speech interaction systems 7 2.1.3 The Talking Car system 10 2.2 Failure modes and effects analysis 14 2.2.1 Evolution and application of FMEA 15 2.2.2 Process of FMEA 17 2.2.3 Perspective of human behavior in FMEA 23 Chapter 3 Research Method 25 3.1 Experiment: driving simulation experiment 25 3.1.1 Experiment design and experiment tasks 25 3.1.2 Apparatus and experimental environment setting 28 3.1.3 Experimental procedure 30 3.2 A modified FMEA procedure for operational safety 31 3.2.1 Classifying human operations of the tasks 32 3.2.2 Defining the failure modes and incorrect operations 33 3.2.3 Identifying causes and effects 35 3.2.4 Assigning severity, occurrence, detection rate 36 Chapter 4 Results 37 4.1 The results of experimental tasks 37 4.2 Results of the modified FMEA for operational safety 39 4.2.1 Driving Task 39 4.2.2 Controlling the System Task 41 4.3 Subjective Questionnaire 43 Chapter 5 Discussion 45 5.1 Comparison with other evaluation used for in-vehicle systems 45 5.2 Comparison with other human behavior-related FMEA methods 46 5.3 Task failure rate and interface design improvement 49 5.4 Recommendations for Improvement 49 5.5 Study limitations 52 Chapter 6 Conclusions 54 6.1 Main conclusions 54 6.2 Future works 55 References 56 Appendix I: Talking Car operation flow chart 62 Appendix II: Modified FMEA worksheet of “Driving Task” 63 Appendix III: Modified FMEA worksheet of “Controlling the System Task” 67 Appendix IV: Subjective questionnaire 70

    Barón, A., & Green, P. (2006). Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Task while Driving: A Brief Literature Review (Technical Report UMTRI 2006-5). University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
    Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50(2), pp. 203-213.
    Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., & Montanari, R. (2003). Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19(5), pp. 425-443.
    Cameron, H. (2000). Speech at the interface. Voice Operated Telecom Services workshop. Ghent, Belgium.
    Chang, K. H. (2009). Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology. Microelectronics Reliability, 49(12), pp. 1586-1596.
    Chen, F., Jonsson, I. M., Villing, J., & Larsson, S. (2010). Application of Speech Technology in Vehicles, in: Speech Technology: Theory and Application (pp. 195-219). Retrieved from: http://links.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/
    978-0-387-73819-2_11, DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73819-2_11
    Chiozza, M. L., & Ponzetti, C. (2009). FMEA: a model for reducing medical errors. Clinica Chimica Acta, 404(1), pp. 75-78.
    Cohen, M. H., Giangola, J. P., & Balogh, J. (2004). VOICE USER INTERFACE DESIGN. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
    Dailey K. W. (2004). The FMEA pocket handbook (1st ed.). DW Publishing Co, USA.
    Feili, H. R., Akar, N., Lotfizadeh, H., Bairampour, M., & Nasiri, S. (2013). Risk analysis of geothermal power plants using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) technique. Energy Conversion and Management, 72, pp. 69-76.
    Fitch, G. M., Soccolich, S.A., Guo, F., McClafferty, J., Fang, Y., Olson, R. L.,…Dingus, T. A. (2013). The Impact of Hand-Held And Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk (DOT HS 811 757), Washington DC: NHTSA.
    Gupta, U., Chugh, M., Sharma, A., Bansal, A., & Jain, N. (2004). Failure Mode Effect Analysis in Healthcare-Preventing An Error before any Harm is Done. Apollo Medicine, 1(1), pp. 64-68.
    Ho, C. C., & Liao, C. J. (2011). The use of failure mode and effects analysis to construct an effective disposal and prevention mechanism for infectious hospital waste. Waste management, 31(12), pp. 2631-2637.
    Hua, Z., & Ng, W. L. (2010). Speech Recognition Interface Design for In-Vehicle System. In Proc. 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Application, 11-12 November, 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
    Huang, J. J. (2000). Safety Evaluation of the Positive Pressure Facilities (gas supply system) in the Semiconductor Fabs (IOSH89-S112, pp. 4-16), Taipei: IOSH
    Huemer, A. K., & Vollrath, M. (2012). Learning the Lane Change Task: Comparing different training regimes in semi-paced and continuous secondary tasks. Applied ergonomics, 43(5), pp. 940-947.
    Itoh, K., Miki, Y., Yoshitsugu, N., Kubo, N., & Mashimo, S. (2004). Evaluation of a Voice-Activated System Using a Driving Simulator. Society of Automotive Engineers, 113(7), pp. 59-64.
    Jamson, A. H., Westerman, S. J., Hockey G. R. J., & Carsten O. M. J. (2004). Speech-based E-Mail and Driver Behavior: Effects of an In-Vehicle Message System Interface, Human Factors: The journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(4), pp.625-639.
    Johnson, K. G., & Khan, M. K. (2003). A study into the use of the process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA) in the automotive industry in the UK. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 139(1), pp. 348-356.
    Jonsson, I.-M., & Chen, F. (2006). How big is the step for driving simulators to driving a real car? In Proc. IEA 2006 Congress, Maastricht, The Netherlands, July 10–14.
    Kmenta, S., & Ishii, K. (2000). Scenario-based FMEA: a life cycle cost perspective. In Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 10-14 September, 2000, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Kojima, S., Uchiyama, Y., Hoshino, H., & Hongo, T. (2004). Evaluating the safety of verbal interface use while driving. R&D Review of Toyota CRDL, 39(1), pp. 23-28.
    Ku, P. Y. (2013). Human-Machine Interface Design of In-Vehicle Speech Interaction System with Expert Convenience. Retrieved from National Tsing Hua University Library website: http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/
    Kujala, T., Silvennoinen, J., & Lasch, A. (2013). Visual-manual in-car tasks decomposed: text entry and kinetic scrolling as the main sources of visual distraction. In Proc. 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 28-30 October, 2013, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
    Lee, J. D., Caven, B., Haake, S., & Brown, T. L. (2001). Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computer: The effect of speech-based e-mail on driver’s attention to the roadway. Human Factors, 43(4), pp. 631-640.
    Leong, I. C. (2012). Human-Machine Interface Design of In-Vehicle Speech Interaction System: Talking Car System. Retrieved from National Tsing Hua University Library website: http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/
    Li, P. C., Chen, G. H., Dai, L. C., & Li, Z. (2010). Fuzzy logic-based approach for identifying the risk importance of human error. Safety science, 48(7), pp. 902-913.
    Lin, Q. L., Wang, D. J., Lin, W. G., & Liu, H. C. (2014). Human reliability assessment for medical devices based on failure mode and effects analysis and fuzzy linguistic theory. Safety Science, 62(26), pp. 248-256.
    Liu, C. T. (2013). Safety Analysis of System Design and Management – A Case of Photovoltaic Plant. Retrieved from National Tsing Hua University Library website: http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/
    Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Bian, Q. H., Lin, Q. L., Dong, N., & Xu, P. C. (2011). Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), pp. 4403-4415.
    Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), pp. 828-838.

    López, G. E., Rengel, G. R., Isorna, L. F., & Rosa, I. F. (2007). OPTIMIZATION OF A SOLAR HYDROGEN STORAGE SYSTEM: SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS. In Proc. 2nd, International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS).
    McGehee, D. V., Mazzae, E. N., & Scott Baldwin G. H. (2000). Driver Reaction Time in Crash Avoidance Research: Validation of a Driving Simulator Study on a Test Track. In Proc. the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 44 (3), pp. 320-323, SAGE Publications.
    Ministry of Transportation and Communications in Taiwan, 89th and 90th Road Safety Traffic Rules (December 13, 2011), from http://motclaw.motc.gov.tw/
    Law_ShowAll.aspx?LawID=E0055087&Mode=0&PageTitle=%E6%A2%9D%E6%96%87%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9.
    Mitsopoulos-Rubens, E., Trotter, M. J., & Lenné M. G. (2011). Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: A comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation. Applied Ergonomics, 42 (4), pp. 583–591.
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2010). Overview of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Driver Distraction Program. Retrieved May 6, 2014, from: www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/distracted_driving/pdf/
    811299.pdf
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2010). Blueprint for Ending Distracted Driving. Retrieved May 6, 2014, from: www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/
    distracted_driving/pdf/811629.pdf
    Organisation for Economic Co-Operation Development/European Conference of Ministers of Transport (2006). SPEED MANAGEMENT. Retrieved from: http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/Pub/pdf/06Speed.pdf
    Pentti, H., & Atte, H. (2002). Failure mode and effects analysis of software-based automation systems (STUK-YTO-TR-190). August, 2002, Helsinki, Finland.
    Price, C. J., & Taylor, N. S. (2002). Automated multiple failure FMEA. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 76(1), pp. 1-10.
    Puente, J., Pino, R., Priore, P., & de la Fuente, D. (2002). A decision support system for applying failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 19(2), pp. 137-150.
    Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. M. (2003). Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, 9(2), pp. 119-137.
    Rhee, S. J., & Ishii, K. (2003). Using cost based FMEA to enhance reliability and serviceability. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 17(3), pp. 179-188.
    Sellappan, N., & Palanikumar, k. (2013). Modified Prioritization Methodology for Risk Priority Number in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 3(4), pp. 27-36.
    Shankar, N. R., & Prabhu, B. S. (2001). Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 18(3), pp. 324-336.
    Stamatis, D. H. (1995). Total quality service: principles, practices, and implementation. CRC Press.
    Standard, S. A E. (2000). SAE J1739: Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (Design FMEA) and Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA) and Effects Analysis for Machinery (Machinery FMEA). Warrendale, PA: SAE
    Standard, U. M. MIL-STD-1629A (1980). Procedures for performing a failure mode, effect and criticality analysis. Department of Defense, USA.
    Strickland, D. L. (2012). Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices. Federal Register, 77(37), pp. 11200-11250.
    Tashiro, M., Horikawa, E., Mochizuki, H., Sakurada, Y., Kato, M., Inokuchi, T.,… Yanai, K. (2005). Effects of fexofenadine and hydroxyzine on brake reaction time during car-driving with cellular phone use. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 20(7), pp. 501-509.
    Teng, S. H. G., & Ho, S. Y. M. (1996). Failure mode and effects analysis: an integrated approach for product design and process control. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 13(5), pp. 8-26.
    Vandenbrande, W. W. (1998). How to use FMEA to reduce the size of your quality toolbox. Quality progress, 31(11), pp. 97-100.

    Wei, M. H. (2013). Designing an Auditory In-Vehicle Speech System with Novice Elicitation Function. Retrieved from National Tsing Hua University Library website: http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/
    Weinstein, R. A., Linkin, D. R., Sausman, C., Santos, L., Lyons, C., Fox, C.,…Lautenbach, E. (2005). Applicability of healthcare failure mode and effects analysis to healthcare epidemiology: evaluation of the sterilization and use of surgical instruments. Clinical infectious diseases, 41(7), pp. 1014-1019.
    Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
    Yang, J., Huang, H. Z., He, L. P., Zhu, S. P., & Wen, D. (2011). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster–Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(8), pp. 2084-2092.
    Yin, M., & Zhai, S. (2006). The benefits of augmenting telephone voice menu navigation with visual browsing and search. In Proc. the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, 22-27 April, 2006, Montréal, Canada.
    Young, K. L., Lenné, M. G., & Williamson, A. R. (2011). Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand. Applied ergonomics, 42(4), pp. 611-618.
    Yu, F. J., Hwang, S. L., & Huang, Y. H. (1999). Task Analysis for Industrial Work Process from Aspects of Human Reliability and System Safety. Risk Analysis, 19(3), pp.401-415.
    簡志郎 (2003)。模糊理論與TOPSIS 法於失效模式與效應分析之應用。逢甲大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE