研究生: |
褚彥廷 Yan-Tyng, Chu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器面板廠商之專利地圖分析 A Patent-based Strategy Analysis for TFT-LCD Panel Manufacturers |
指導教授: |
林博文
Bou-Wen, Lin |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所 Institute of Technology Management |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 99 |
中文關鍵詞: | 專利地圖 、專利分析 、專利佈局 、購併 、策略聯盟 、TFT LCD |
外文關鍵詞: | Patent Map, Patent Analysis, Patent Portfolio, Merger, Strategy Alliance, TFT LCD |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在競爭激烈的高科技產業中,專利已成為企業所必備之競爭武器。台灣TFT-LCD繼半導體產業之後,即成為國內產值最大產業;然而,過去國外大廠常藉由強大的專利佈局向台灣索取鉅額權利金,以此前車之鑑,未來台灣應更積極提升專利強度與建構完整之專利布局。
TFT-LCD產業發展至今已逐漸步入成熟階段,近年更有大者恆大之態勢,本研究透過專利地圖分析全球23家TFT-LCD面板廠商其專利於美國與大陸兩大市場之變化與技術趨勢演進,以及進一步探討策略聯盟甚至購併後之專利分佈與市場變化。
研究結果顯示,大陸市場之專利成長趨勢有相當程度類同於美國市場,顯示各大TFT-LCD面板廠皆意識到大陸市場專利佈局之重性。然而,過去日本廠商雖擁有美國市場專利佈局上之優勢,至今也保有相當高度之專利品質,但如今大陸市場反被韓廠、台廠捷足先登,日本廠商真正有心經營大陸市場的面板廠已寥寥無幾,近期多家欲東山再起的日廠無不選擇以橫向整併、合資的方式力圖振作,促進了TFT LCD產業大者恆大的趨勢。而從專利地圖分析也發現出,因應大者恆大的趨勢,無論是美國還是大陸市場,其專利數量累積前五名者皆是由進行購併後以及聯盟型態的廠商佔居鰲頭。
藉由本研究之專利地圖分析我們也意識到,專利雖是近年來TFT LCD產業愈來愈重視之一環,但似乎還有其他影響面板廠商生存、強弱的因素存在,因此,本研究於專利地圖分析之後,針對日、韓、台、中四國於產能、LCD TV品牌、以及大陸LCM廠佈局三項因素進行綜合性討論。研究結果指出,在這個競爭激烈又步入大者恆大趨勢的TFT LCD產業當中,光是掌握某項優勢是不夠的;歸咎2006年全球市佔率前五名面板廠商能獨霸鰲頭的原因,數據顯示,包含專利在內之四項指標是幫助這些面板廠商突破重圍、缺一不可之關鍵因素。
In the fiercely competing high-tech industry, patent has already become the indispensable weapon for companies to compete. Following the industry of semiconductor, TFT-LCD namely became the domestic greatest industry of output value in Taiwan. However, big foreign companies often asked Taiwan companies to pay for huge royalties by using their strong patent portfolio. With the lessons drawn from others' mistakes, Taiwan companies should more actively enhance the intensity of patent and develop complete patent portfolio in the future.
So far TFT-LCD industry gradually steps into mature stage, recently it even become to be the situation that the bigger the stronger. This study is aimed at 23 TFT-LCD panel manufacturers to analyze their patents in America and China two markets via patent map analysis, and further discuss the distribution of patent and changing in two markets after panel manufacturers proceed strategic alliance or even more merger.
The result of study shows that the growth trend of patent in China market has certain degree the same as the American market, which reveals that each big TFT-LCD panel factory all realizes the importance of the patent portfolio in China market. However, in the past although the Japanese manufacturers had competency on patent overall American market, and simultaneously possessed highly patent quality so far, but nowadays the China market is got ahead of others by the factory of Korea and Taiwan instead , it has been already very few Japanese manufacturers that really diligently managed panel factories on China market. Recently many factories try hard to bestir themselves by ways of horizontal merger and joint-venture invariably, which has promoted TFT LCD industry to be the situation that the bigger the stronger. And from the patent map analysis we find that due to the situation that the bigger the stronger, all the top five patent manufacturers in America or China market have carry on merger or alliance with others.
Analyze with the patent map of this research that we realize, although the patent is the important part that TFT LCD industry pays more and more attention in recent years, but it still seems to have other factors which can influence TFT LCD industry, so after patent map analysis, this research is aimed at Japanese, Korea, Taiwan, China four countries and study on three factors: output capability, LCD TV brands, LCM factory which located on Mainland China. The result of study is pointed out, in this fiercely competing TFT LCD industry which facing the situation that the bigger the stronger, it is not enough to only grasp a certain competency, impute to the reason that the top five panel manufacturers in 2006 in the world which accounting for the market share, those who can dominate to head of others, the data show, four indexes which the patent is inclusive of are the key factors to help these panel manufacturers to break through the tight encirclement.
中文文獻
1.2006年面板市場新佈局暨新興技術的竄起(2006),拓墣產業研究所。
2.王信陽(2006),日韓TFT LCD產業動態,光聯雙月刊,3•62期。
3.王信陽(2006),TFT LCD廠商搶進關鍵零組件佈局,光聯雙月刊,5•63期。
4.元勤科技(2002),光學儲存技術專利探索1。
5.行政院國家科學委員會科學技術資料中心(2003),生物分子馬達專利地圖及分析。
6.企業之專利管理(1992),經濟部中央標準局。
7.光電產業專利分析與佈局應用(2006),經濟部工業局光電技術人才培訓計畫講義。
8.李煥仁,魏志賓(2006),我國TFT-LCD發展情境與策略分析,科技發展政策報告。
9.李怡靜(2004),高科技產業專利策略與專利佈局─以薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器面板廠商為例,國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
10.李東龍(2006),由競爭現況探討台灣面板廠發展策略,拓墣產業研究所焦點報告。
11.吳俊雄(1998),液晶顯示器產業專題報告,財團法人工業技術研究院光電工業研究所。
12.周暉(2006),2005年亞太TFT-LCD產業發展回顧,光電科技,3月。
13.岩井善弘,越石健司(2004),平面顯示器的關鍵元件、材料技術,全華出版社。
14.林新賢,專利與國際貿易─台灣和美國電子電器市場的實證,中國經濟學會論文集,1-34頁,民國八十年。
15.許瓊文,劉尚志,蔡千姿,龍仕璋(2005),科技管理,智勝出版社。
16.陳國慈(2004),科技企業與智慧財產,國立清華大學出版社。
17.陳正(2005),我國FPD製程設備發展策略,工研院機械所。
18.專利管理高手(1998),資策會科技法律中心出版。
19.凱文瑞維特、大衛客萊著,林柳君譯(2001),閣樓上的林布蘭,第206頁,經典傳訊出版社。
20.曾陳明汝(2004),兩岸暨歐美專利法,學林文化事業有限公司出版。
21.黃三本(2006),LCD行銷之突破策略,光聯雙月刊,6•61期。
22.葉錦清(2007),台日韓面板廠積極在中國大陸佈局電視用LCM,IEK-IT IS計畫。
23.詹斯玄(2003),以專利指標衡量台灣平面顯示器產業之創新能力,國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
24.廖和信(2003),專利就是科技競爭力,天下文化出版社。
25.劉尚志(1993),我國高科技產業技術移轉與智慧財產之管理,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
26.賴榮哲(2002),專利分析總論,翰蘆出版社。
27.賴士葆,陳松柏,謝龍發(2004),科技管理,華泰文化出版社。
28.謝寶煖 (1998),專利與專利資訊檢索,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系副教授論文。
29.顧鴻壽(2005),光電液晶平面顯示器-技術基礎及應用-,新文京開發出版社。
英文文獻
1.Ashton, W. B and Sen, R. K. (1988), “Using Patent Information In Technology Business Planning-I”, Research Technology Management, 31(6):42-46.
2.Berkowitz, L. (1993), “Getting the Most From Your Patents”, Research Technology Management, 32(2):26-31.
3.Brockhoff (1992), “Instrument for patent data analysis in business firms,” Technovation, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 41-58.
4.Chakrabarti(1991), A.K. “Competition in High Technology:Analysis of U.S., Japan, U.K., France, West Germany, and Canada, “IEEETransactions on Engineering Management, Vol 38, No 1,pp.78-84.
5.Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F. and Woolf, P. (1981), “Citation Rates to Technologically Important Patents”, World Patent Information, 4:160-163.
6.Davis, J. L. and Harrison, S.S.(2001), Edison in the Boardroom, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7.Ernest, H.(1998), “Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(4):279-308.
8.G.Marcotti(1998),.Technology innovation:Eight out of ten new products are commercial failures .Financial Times ,March 31:21.
9.Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F.M. and Vopel, K. (1998), “Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions”, Reviews Economics & Statistics, 81(3): 511-515.
10.Pavitt, K. and Soete(1980), L.” Innovative Activities and Export Share:Some Comparisons between Industries and Countries,” in K. Pavitt, ed, Technical Innovation and British Economic Performance, London, Macmillan.
11.Reivette, K.G. and Kline D.(2000), Rembrands in the Attic:Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents, Harvard Business School Press.
12.Trajtenberg, M. (1990), “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations”, The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1): 172-187.
網站資料
1.APIPA全球專利檢索分析系統,http://gpsa.apipa.org.tw/APIPA/
2.CHI Research,http://www.chiresearch.com/index.php3
3.DisplaySearch網站,http://www.displaysearch.com/products/
4.WIPO網站,http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.en
5.友達光電,http://www.auo.com/auoDEV/?ls=tc
6.中華人民共和國國家智慧產權局,http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo/gk/
7.奇美電子,http://www.chimei.com.tw/big5/index.asp
8.美國專利暨商標局,http://patents.uspto.gov/