國家整體競爭力的提昇，是來自於人才的培育與產業的躍進，透過政府與民間產業的合作，並於不同的專業領域中培育優秀人才，將可增加產業其經濟價值與企業的永續經營，進而提昇國家於全球的競爭力。為此，政府推動一系列的國家型科技計畫，來協助跨部會間的合作模式，以帶動產業的垂直整合，讓政府和產業的資源能相互有效運用，開創新的產業契機，藉以提升人民生活水準與社會的服務品質。
有鑑於系統化及有效率性的建構政府國家型科技計畫的績效評估，故於此篇論文中回顧國內外科技型計畫的評估模式，並加以比較其評估策略，以此作為研究之標竿學習。本研究依據紫式決策分析架構建構國家型科技計畫的層級架構與績效指標之模型，並採用層級分析法(AHP)由上而下去解構其目標層級，再由下而上逐層去實現高層賦予之目標，且利用資料包絡法(DEA)對執行單位進行效率分析與績效評估。本論文以智慧電子國家型科技計畫(NPIE)做為實務驗證，藉以提供政府機關對於科技計畫績效評估之參考方向。

Aiming at the enhancement of the national competitiveness and performance is through the industrial development and talent training. The cooperation between the government and industrial companies, and the training in different professional fields can increase economic values for sustainable development in the industrial companies and also promote national competitiveness in a global economy. The government proposes a set of the national science and technology programs in order to assist the integration of the resources effectively for forward-looking technologies and innovations. Through those strategies will further strengthen the competitiveness of the industries and also improve the quality of our life.
In order to evaluate the performance of the national science and technology programs, our study aims at studying a survey of the previous works on evaluating programs and also comparing their strategies as benchmarking. Moreover, we adopt UNISON to construct the hierarchical structure model and use analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to deconstruct the target hierarchy from the top-down analysis and then achieve the goal from the bottom-up analysis. In addition, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used for analyzing the efficiency and the performance evaluation of the responsible entity. At last, we verify our analysis model with NPIE as a case study and our method provides a referable direction of improving the performance of national science and technology programs.

Keywords: Technology management, UNISON, DEA, Efficiency analysis, Performance evaluation

2015台灣產業發展的願景與策略 (2007)，經濟部技術處。
朱斌妤(2006)，科技專案績效評估，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫-成果報告(NSC 94-2416-H-110-016)
陳美玲、席時昶、張善政(1998)，「政府科技計畫評審、管考與評估」，研考雙月刊，第 22卷，第 6期，11-20。
洪文琪(2007)，日本政府研發評估的發展與變革，科技發展政策報導， 1期，頁63-66。
施顏祥，吳明機(2011), 我國科技發展專案計畫管理機制與成果, 研考雙月刊， 35卷5期。
耿筠，劉耀中，薛招治，張淑敏，陳樹榮(2008)，我國與美國科技計畫績效評估方法之探討，科技發展政策報導,53卷1期,頁53-68。
馬難先(1992)，Development and Prospects of the Science and Technology Idnicators in Taiwan，太平洋經濟合作理事會雅加達亞太科技指標研討會會議報告，頁100-109。
張石柱、蔡正暉(2009)，經濟部科技研究發展專案計畫執行效率之探討-資料包絡法分析及分析層級程序法之應用，會計學報，2卷1期，頁51-72。
智慧電子國家型科技計畫總體規劃書，國立清華大學，2012。
游啟聰(1990)，「大型工業技術研究發展成果績效評估之研究」，經濟部七十九年度研究發展專題。
游啟聰(1991)，「大型工業技術研究發展成果績效評估之研究」，經濟部八十年度研究發展專題。
葉繼豪、張景嵐、蔣孝緯(2006)，以資料包絡法與主成分分析法建構台灣LCD產業供應鏈PDM系統之績效評估模式，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告。
楊千(1995)，科技專案績效評估指標之研究，國立交通大學科管所。
經濟部技術處(1995)，為它訂作評量表-科專績效如何評估？技術尖端雜誌，9卷，頁1-2。

劉錦隆(民 83)，「科技研發績效評估之探討」，研考雙月刊，第十八卷第五期，頁21-31。
劉常勇(1998)，後進地區科技產業發展策略探討-以台灣半導體產業與光碟機產業為研究對象，中華民國科技管理年會論文研討會論文集：頁41-50。
劉代洋(2004)，科技專案機構的效益評估-以工研院、資策會為例。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
劉代洋，葉勝年，許聰欣 (2008)，科技研發專案績效評估之實證研究，驗證追蹤專案計畫，國立台灣科技大學。
簡禎富(2002)，科技發展計畫績效評估指標與評估模式之研究。
簡禎富(2005），決策分析與管理，雙葉書廊，台北。
簡禎富、林國義（2010），建構半導體整廠績效指標層級架構及其驗證，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系。
簡禎富、彭金堂、許嘉裕（2011），產學合作模式之研究-以科學工業園區固本精
進產學合作計畫為例，管理與系統。
Bao, Y.k., Zhang, J. l., and Li, X.N., (2002),“Evaluating Government-Sponsored Science and Technology Projects in China”, Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 2(1),16-19.
Brown, M. G. and Svenson, R. A., (1988), “Measuring R&D Productivity,” Research Technology Management, 31(4), 11-15.
Chien, C. F., (2002), “ A portfolio-evaluation framework for selecting R&D projects,” R&D Management, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering
Management National TsingHua University. 32(4), 359-368.
Chien, C.F., Chen, C.P., and Chen, C.H., (2009), “Designing performance indices and a novel mechanism for evaluating government R&D projects,” Journal of Quality, 16(2), 119-135.
Chien, C.F., Chen, Y.J., and Peng, J.T., (2010), “Manufacturing intelligence for semiconductor demand forecast based on technology diffusion and product life cycle”, Int. J. Production Economics.
Drongelen, I. C. K. V., Petra, C. de W. N., and Fisscher, O. A. M., (1996), Describing the Issues of knowledge Management in R&D: Towards a Communication and Analysis Tool, R&D Management, 26(3).
Geisler, E., (1995), “An Integrated Cost-performance Model of Research and Development Evaluation”, Omega. Int. J. MgmtSci, 23(3), 281-294.
James, P. P., William, A. B., Timothy, W.J., (2011), “Selecting, a Portfolio of Environmental Programs for a Synthetic Fuels Facility”, INFORMS.
Huang, C. C., Chu, P.Y., and Chiang, Y. H., (2008), “A fuzzy AHP Application in Government-sponsored R&D project selection”, Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, 36, 1038-1052.
Hwang, J. H., and Moon, J. K., (2006), “Design of in-depth R&D Program Evaluation System and its Application in Korea”, AEA Conference.
Hwang, J. H., and Moon, J. K.,KISTEP, http://www.kistep.re.kr.
Keeney, R. L., (1987), “An Analysis of the Portfolio of Sites to Characterize for Selecting a Nuclear Repository”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1987.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., (1993), “Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs”, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Keeney, R. L., (1994), “Creativity in Decision Making with Value-Focused Thinking”, Sloan Management Review.
Ken K., Ikujiro, N., and Akiya, N., (2000), “Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings”, Organization science, 9(6).
Koichi, M., and Hiroshi, K., (2009), “An Evaluation of Factory Performance Utilized KPI/PAI with Data Envelopment Analysis”, Journal of the Operations Research, Society of Japan, 52(2), 204-220.
Lee, M. R., Son, B. H. and Om, K. Y., (1996), “Evaluation of national R&D projects in Korea,” Research Policy, 25(5), 805-818.
Lee, H., Park, Y., and Choi, H., (2009 ), “Comparative Evaluation of Performance of National R&D Programs with Heterogeneous Objectives: A DEA approach,” European Journal of Operation Research, 196(3), 847-855.
Liberatore, M. J., Nydick, R. L., and Sanchez, P. M., (1992), “The Evaluation of Research Papers” (or How to get an academic committee to Agree on something), INTERFACES, 22(2), 92-100.
Li, J., Yue, D. R., (2005), “Managing Global Research and Development in China: Patterns of R&D Configuration and Evolution”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(3), 317-337.
Mark, G. B., and Raynold, A. S., (1998),” Measuring R&D Productivity”, Research Technology Mangement”, Industrial Research Institute, Inc.
Oh, D. H,and Kim, Y. J., “Evaluating National Research and Development Programs in Korea”.
Ruegg, R. (2003), Evaluation Framework, Part I.
Ruegg, R. (2006), “Bridging from Project Case Study to Portfolio Analysisin a Public R&D Program”, NIST GCR, 06–891.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Tohumcu, Z., and Karasakal, E.,(2010), “R&D Project Performance Evaluation With Multiple and Interdependent Criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(4), 620-633.
Yim, S., and Kang, H. K., (2011), “Feasibility Analysis Studies on New National R&D Programs in Korea”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 59.
Yoo, S. J., Gill, B. J.,and Woo, C. C., ” In-depth Evaluation of R&D Program in Korea”, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, http://www.kistep.re.kr.
Yoshitaka, O.,and Michikazu, M., (2002), “Development and Application of A New Methodology of Evaluating Industrial R&D Projects”, R&D Management, 32(1).
Zeynep, T., Esra, K.,(2010), “R&D Project Performance Evaluation With Multiple and Interdependent Criteria”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57 (4).
Wang, K. M., Wang, C. K., and Hu, C., (2005),“Analytic Hierarchy Process with Fuzzy Scoring in Evaluating Multidisciplinary R&D Projects in China,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 119-129.