胡塞爾在《笛卡爾式的沉思錄》的第五沉思中，提出了一個相當完整的交互主體性之理論架構(Theorie der Intersubjektivität)。此篇論文以原初領域(die primordiale Sphäre)之概念為切入點，去展示此理論的理論設定以及其所蘊含的困局。在此篇論文，我提出主要三個問題：一，被規定為非陌異性(nicht-Fremdheit)的屬己性領域(die Eigenheitssphäre)是否可能成功？二，原本的原初領域是透過抽象懸擱(abstrakte Epoche)而獲得的，理應只是一個為了解釋上有效的概念，但是，到了他者建構分析時，屬己的原初領域變成是一個自我單子(Monade)的原初領域，並且要在自我單子之中建構出另一同樣作為單子的自我。那麼，原初領域究竟只是解釋上的概念，亦或實存上的概念？三，就他者議題而言，胡塞爾這種由自我去通達他者的方法，是否就能夠徹底地闡明與他者遭逢的經驗？在論文中，我將原初領域區分了靜態現象學(statische Phänomenologie)式與發生現象學(genetische Phänomenologie)式的概念，以回應我所提出的問題。我的結論有三：一，靜態現象學下，屬己性領域無法達到徹底排除陌異性的要求，如此的理論設定無法成功。二，發生現象學下，透過自身闡明所獲得的原初領域，無法被經驗地觀察到。此理論假設違反現象學闡明之精神。三，由自我闡明通往他者的方法論，承接著尋找確然明證之哲學基礎的理論目的。在如此的知識計畫下，他者無法帶來陌異性。

In Cartesian Meditations, Husserl has showed us the structure of the theory of intersubjectivity. In this thesis, I focus on the concept of the primordial sphere to analyze the theoretical presuppositions and this implication of the theoretical problems. I have raised three main questions: (1) would it be possibly successful, that we could exclude out the non-alienness to achieve the pure ownness sphere? (2) The primordial sphere, which was firstly made by abstract epoché, would be a justifying concept of the explication of the theoretical foundation. But in the step of the constitutional analysis of the other, the sphere of ownness turns into a monad in the primordial sphere. In this way, is the primordial sphere a justifying concept or an ontological concept? (3) Concerning the theme of the other, could Husserl thoroughly explicate the experience of countering the other by the method which is from the explication of the ego to the explication of the existence of the other? In my thesis, in order to deal with the questions, I have distinguished the concept of the primordial sphere into the concept of static phenomenology and of the genetic phenomenology. From my discussions I have made three conclusions: (1) in static phenomenology, the claim, that the sphere of ownness should exclude all of the alienness, fails. (2) in genetic phenomenology, the primordial sphere, which is achieved by the self-explication, contravene the attitude of phenomenological research. (3) the methodology from the ego to the other receives the motivation from the project of the foundation of knowledge, which looks for the radical philosophical ground in the evidence of apodicticity. .

胡塞爾原典文獻

Edmund Husserl. Ideas Pertaining to a Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological
Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology.
Translated by F.Kersten. The Hague. Martinus Nijhoff publishers,1982.
──Cartesian Meditations: an Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion
Cairns. 5th edition. The Hague. Martinus Nijhoff publishers,1973.
──The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology : an
Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by David Carr. United states of America. Northwestern University Press. 1970.
──Experience and Judgment. Edited by Ludwig Landgrebe and translated by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Northwestern University Press, Evanston: 1973.
──Logical Investigations II. Translated by J. N. Findlay. Published by Humanity Books, 2000.
──Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907. Edited by Ulrich Glaesges. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Published by Kluwer Academic: The Netherland, 1997.
──Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic. Translated by Anthony J. Steinbock. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

外文研究文獻

李南麟(Nam-In Lee). “Static-Phenomenological and Genetic-Phenomenological Concept of Primordiality in Husserl’s Fifth Cartesian Meditation.” Husserl Studies: pp. 165-183, 2002.
Bernhard Waldenfels, “Experience of the Alien in Husserl’s Phenomenology.” Translated by Antony J. Steinbock. In EH. Vol. IV, pp. 345-358. (EH=Edmund Husserl: Critical Assessments Of Leading Philosophers. Edited by Rudulf Bernet, Donn Welton and Gina Zavota. Routledge, 2005.(論文集)，以下皆代稱為EH)
Alfred Schutz. “The Problem of Transcendental Intersubjectivity in Husserl.” In EH. Vol. I, pp. 90-116.
Iso Kern.”The Three Ways to The Transcendental Phenomenological Reduction in the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl.” In EH. Vol. II, pp. 56-94.
Eugen Fink. “Operative Concepts in Husserl’s Phenomenology.” in EH. Vol. I, pp. 242-256.
Ludwig Landgrebe. “Husserl’s Departure of Cartesianism.” in EH. Vol. I, pp. 134-176.
Elisabeth Stroker.”Husserl’s Principle of Evidence: the Significance and Limitations of a Methodological Norm of Phenomenology As A Science.” in EH. Vol. II, pp. 113-139.
Klaus Held. “Husserl’s Phenomenology of Life-World.” Translated by Lanei Rodemeyer. In: The New Husserl, pp. 50-51, edited by Donn Welton. Idiana University Press: 2003.
Paul Ricoeur. Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Translated by Edward G.. Ballard and Lester E. Embree. Northwestern University Press, 1967.
Kathleen M. Haney. Intersubjectivity Revisited: Phenomenology and the Other. Published by Ohio University Press. In USA, 1994.
Dan Zahavi. “Beyond Empathy─Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity.” In: Journal of Consciousness Studies. Vol. 8, pp. 151-167, 2001.
雅恩‧帕托契卡，<胡塞爾現象學之主體主義與一門「非主體性的」現象學之可能性>，譯者：吳俊業。收錄於《面對實事本身》，頁690-709。北京，東方出版社，2006。(輔助原文對照：Jan Patocka. „Der Subjektivismus der Husserlschen und die Möglichkeit einer, asubjektiven 'Phänomenologie “)
Bernhard Waldenfels, Topographie des Fremden: Studien zur Phänomenologie des Fremden. Publisched by Schurkamp Verlag, Auflage: 5, 1997.
Martin Heidegger. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Published by Harper and Row. In New York, 2008.
Jean-Paul Sartre. Being and Nothingness. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. Published by Routledge. In New York, 2003.
Alfred Schutz. Phenomenology of Social World. Translated by George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert. Published by Northwestern University Press. Evanston: 1967.
Micheal Theunissen, Der Andere: Studien zur sozialontologie der Gegenwart. Publisher: Gruyter, 1981.
Emmanuel Lévinas, Totalität und Unendlichkeit: Versuch über die Exteriorität. Translated by Wolfgang Nikolaus Krewani. Published by Alber Studienausgabe, Verlag Karl Alber Freiburg, München, 2002.
A.D. Smith. Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations. Routledge, 2003.
Dan Zahavi. Husserl’s phenomenology. Standford University Press, 2003.

中文研究文獻

吳俊業，<胡塞爾與他者問題──基本規模的闡釋與初步定位>。《哲學與文化》，第三十六卷第四期(2009, 04)，頁71-84。
吳俊業，<海德格的共在理論與他人問題──循現象學進路的重新評價>。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫之成果報告，民國九十八年十月三十一日。
羅麗君，<胡塞爾現象學中的單子論：對萊布尼茲之『單子』概念的承接與轉化>。《揭諦》，2005年4月，第八卷，頁211-243。
游淙淇，<當代現象學的文化論述：瓦登菲爾斯論文化間際性與文化交融性>。《第七屆儒佛會通暨文化哲學學術研討會論文集》，台北縣石碇鄉華梵大學哲學系，民92，頁123-135。
倪梁康，《現象學及其效應：胡塞爾與當代德國哲學》，北京：三聯書店，1994。
倪梁康，《胡塞爾現象學概念通釋》，北京：三聯書店，2007。
傅偉勳，《西洋哲學史》，三民書局，台北：1981。