近年來，如何透過綠能科技解決全球石油價格上漲及溫室效應的問題，已受到世界各國的關注，其中電動車最為人所矚目。尤其對於許多進入汽車產業時間較遲，且始終無法在國際汽車供應鏈佔據一定地位的國家，如韓國、中國大陸及台灣等而言，發展電動車產業被視為減低環境汙染與能源耗竭問題的解決方案之一，且是可促進經濟成長的潛力產業。而行政院於2010年核定「智慧電動車發展策略與行動方案」，並推動一系列示範運行方案，盼可提升自主品牌之電動車製造商及零組件廠商技術能耐；然而，迄至2015年底止，執行成效與預期目標相去甚遠。為探討台灣電動車產業發展的成效，本研究將以Malerba (2002)產業創新系統(sectoral system of innovation)為主要理論架構，以此創新系統之三大構面: 技術與知識、行動者與網絡及體制，及透過專利檢索與分析及半結構式深度訪談等研究方法，據以剖析台灣電動車產業創新系統產生系統問題或系統失靈。本研究初步發現:(1)近幾年台灣機構在USPTO獲取的專利權數量雖大幅成長，惟相較其他世界大國，技術能耐仍然偏低，尤其是電池技術(2)國內廠商之間缺乏足夠的互動鏈結，以致於技術無法提升，及(3)政府政策不明確及政策工具不足等，均是導致系統失靈之關鍵因素。而針對上述的系統失靈，本研究將提供政策制定與管理者一些相關建議。

Fossil fuel shortages and global warming have spurred the development of alternative energy initiatives, especially battery electric vehicles have been recognized as one of the most promising solutions. Some Asian countries such as South Korea, China and Taiwan, that have not played important roles of the automobile supply chain, have seen developing battery electric vehicles industry as a potential opportunity to economic growth as well as a tool to solve the mentioned problems above. A “Smart EV Development Strategy and Action Plan” was approved by Taiwan’s Executive Yuan in 2010 and was expected to enhance the capability both the local car makers and parts or module suppliers of the EV industry in Taiwan, and set up several EV pilot projects. However, until the end of 2015, the results of the policies failed to match with the expected target largely. Patent analysis and semi-constructed interviews are conducted in the paper to explore what types of system failures in Taiwan electric vehicle industry through the lens of the sectoral systems of innovation perspective. The SSI includs three important building blocks: knowledge and technology, actors and networks and institutions. This paper finds out that: (1) the number of patents granted by Taiwan organizations in USPTO has increased significantly in the recent years, while compared with the other global manufacturers, especially the battery technology, the growth of the Taiwan organizations is still too low; (2) the weak connections and interactions among Taiwan organizations hinder to the development of their technology capabilities; and (3) unclear policy directions and insufficient policy tools adopted are the main factors to result in system failures, hindering the development of Taiwan BEV industry. Finally, some suggestions are given for policy makers and managers to solve the system failures.

中文部分:
中央日報, 1974.首輛電動汽車9月初可問世.
北美智權報, 2014.TESLA大戰TOYOTA 電動車之爭誰能勝出？網址: http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Industry_Economy/publish-272.htm，最後瀏覽日期:2016.11.27
行政院, 2010.智慧電動車發展策略與行動方案.
行政院, 2014.智慧電動車輛發展策略與行動方案.
余彥葶, 2012.探討台灣電動車消費者購買動機之研究, 國立中興大學科技管理研究所學位論文.
拓墣產業研究所, 2013.新能源車飆漲 BMS成關鍵.
洪德俊、薛義誠、陳玉蕙、劉惠美, 2014.台灣電動車產業商業模式之研究, 創業管理研究, 9卷1期, 27-58.
高崑銘、袁建中、劉俊儀、汪忠輝, 2012.應用專利技術功效矩陣分析電動車產業輪內馬達之技術佈局, 創新與管理, 9卷2期, 1-29.
陳宥杉、賴奎魁、施宜君, 2008.以專利分析探討油電混合車之發展現況, 環境與管理研究 9卷1期, 46-70.
曾建華, 1996.電動車相關報導, 自由時報.
馮淑慧,2012.臺灣推動電動車產業之關鍵成功因素, 交通大學經營管理研究所學位論文.
黃樑傑,2016.電動車產業發展與展望.網址:https://www.artc.org.tw/upfiles/EditUpload/file/ecHo/201603/電動車產業發展與展望.pdf , 最後瀏覽日期:2016.11.27
經濟部能源局, 2007. 2007能源科技研究發展白皮書. 經濟部能源局.
經濟部智慧財產局, 2015.我國氫燃料電池車關鍵技術專利分析. 經濟部智慧財產局。
羅志成、黃維澤、林蘭惠、楊文霖, 2012.電動自行車馬達技術演化網絡分析. 計量管理期刊. 10卷1期，49-66.
鍾榮峰,2016.傳蘋果電動車推出時程延至2021年, 中央社, 網址: http://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201607220114-1.aspx,最後瀏覽日期:2016.11.27
錢聖, 2011.以專利分析探討電動車鋰電池材料發展趨勢, 國立交通大學科技管理研究所學位論文
英文部分:
Ahman, M., 2006. Government policy and the development of electric Vehicles in Japan. Energy Policy 34, 433-443.
Andrew, C., Johannes, U., 2012. Oil prices and energy technology innovation: An empirical analysis. Global Environmental Change 22, 407–417.
Arthur, W.B., 1990. Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American 262, 92-99.
Burt, R.S., 1987. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 1287-1335.
Calef, D., Globle, R., 2007. The Allure of technology: How France and California promoted electric and hybrid vehicles to reduce urban pollution. Policy Science 40, 1-34.
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., 1997. In search of useful public policies—key lessons and issues for policy makers, Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics. 299-315.
Catenacci, M., Verdolini, E., Bosetti, V., Fiorese, G., 2013. Going electric: Expert survey on the future of battery technologies for electric vehicles. Energy Policy 61, 403-413.
Chaminade, C., Edquist, C., 2010. Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: A systems of innovation approach. The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 95-114.
Chaminade, C., Intarakumnerd, P., & Sapprasert, K. 2012. Measuring systemic problems in national innovation systems. An application to Thailand. Research Policy, 41(8), 1476-1488.
Chang, Y.-C., Chen, M.-H., 2004. Comparing approaches to systems of innovation: the knowledge perspective. Technology in Society 26, 17-37.
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, K.-K., Shih, I.-C., Chan, C.-L., 2008. Using Patent Analysis to Explore the Development of the Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Journal of Environment and Management 9, 46-70.
Christensen, C.M., Rosenbloom, R.S., 1995. Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy 24, 233-257.
Cowan, R., 1990. Nuclear power reactors: a study in technological lock-in. The Journal of Economic History 50, 541-567.
Cowan, R., Hulten, S., 1996. Escaping lock-in: the case of the electric vehicle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 53, 61-79.
DeBresson, C., Amesse, D., 1991. Networks of innovations: a review and introduction to the issue. Research Policy 20, 363-379.
Dosi, G., 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11, 147-162.
Dyerson, R., Pilkington, A., 2000. Innovation in complex systems: regulation and technology towards the electric vehicle. International Journal of Innovation Management 4, 33-49.
Dyerson, R., Pilkington, A., 2005. Gales of creative destruction and the opportunistic incumbent: The case of electric vehicles in California. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17, 391-408.
Edquist, C., Hommen, L., Johnson, B., Lemola, T., Malerba, F., Reiß, T., & Smith, K. 1998. The ISE Policy Statement-The Innovation Policy Implications of the" Innovation Systems and European Integration"(ISE) Research Project: Plus ISE Final Report on CD-ROM.
Foster, R.N., 1986. Innovation: The attacker's advantage. Summit Books New York.
Foxon, T., Pearson, P., 2008. Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 148-161.
Geels, F.W., 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31, 1257-1274.
Geels, F.W., 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33, 897-920.
Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1(1), 201-233.
Hu, M.-C., Hung, S.-C., 2014. Taiwan's pharmaceuticals: A failure of the sectoral system of innovation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 88, 162-176.
IEA, 2012. Energy Technology Perspectives 2012, Pathways to a Clean Energy System, OECD/IEA, Paris.
Kempton, W., Letendre, S.E., 1997. Electric vehicles as a new power source for electric utilities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2, 157-175.
Livinţ, G., Horga, V., Răţoi, M., Albu, M., 2011. Control of Hybrid Electrical Vehicles. Electric Vehicles – Modelling and Simulations, 41-66.
Lundvall, B. (ed.) 1992, National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter Publishers.
Madsen, T.L., Walker, G., 2007. Incumbent and entrant rivalry in a deregulated industry. Organization Science 18, 667-687.
Malerba, F. 1996. Public policy and industrial dynamics: an Evolutionary Perspective. manuscript submitted to the Commission, December.
Malerba, F., 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31, 247-264.
Malerba, F., 2005. Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14, 63-82.
Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 1997. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 6, 83-118.
Mikkola, J.H., 2001. Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management. Technovation 21, 423-435.
Narin, F., 1995. Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics 34, 489-496.
Negro, S.O., Alkemade, F., Hekkert, M.P., 2012. Why does renewable energy diffuse so slowly? A review of innovation system problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 3836-3846.
Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N., 2001. Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 44, 31-54.
Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1977. In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6, 36-76.
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010). Business Model Generation – A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers and Challengers. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. .
Oltra, V., & Saint Jean, M. 2009. Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: an application to the French automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 567-583.
Perkins, R., 2003. Technological “lock-in”. in Online Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics. International Society for Ecological Economics, no. February, 1–8.
Pilkington, A., Dyerson, R., 2004. Incumbency and the disruptive regulator: the case of electric vehicles in California. International Journal of Innovation Management 8, 339-354.
Pilkington, A., Dyerson, R., Tissier, O., 2002. The electric vehicle:: Patent data as indicators of technological development. World Patent Information 24, 5-12.
Reddy, N.M., Aram, J.D., Lynn, L.H., 1991. The institutional domain of technology diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management 8, 295-304.
Rothaermel, F.T., 2001. Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets Via Interfirm Cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 22, 687-699.
Rothwell, R., 1992. Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management 22, 221-240.
Schot, J., Hoogma, R., Elzen, B., 1994. Strategies for shifting technological systems. Futures 26, 1060-1076.
Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., Van Wee, B., 2012. The competitive environment of electric vehicles: an analysis of prototype and production models. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2, 49-65.
Smith, K., 2000. Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 1, 73-102.
Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15, 285-305.
Trajtenberg, M., 1990. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 172-187.
Unruh, G.C., 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28, 817-830.
Wang, X., Duan, Y., 2011. Identifying core technology structure of electric vehicle industry through patent co-citation information. Energy Procedia 5, 2581-2585.
Wasserman, S., Faust, K., 1994. Social network analysis:Methods and applications.(Vol 8) Cambridge University Press.
Wesseling, J.H., Faber, J., Hekkert, M.P., 2014. How competitive forces sustain electric vehicle development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 81, 154-164.
WIPO, 2015. International Patent Classification (Version 2015) Guide. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Woolthuis, R.K., Lankhuizen, M., Gilsing, V., 2005. A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation 25, 609-619.
Yang, L.-f., Xu, J.-h., Neuhäusler, P., 2013. Electric vehicle technology in China: An exploratory patent analysis. World Patent Information 35, 305-312.