研究生: |
賴國華 Kuo-Hua, Lai |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
聚集現象-台灣科技產業實證分析 Agglomeration effect on the performance of High-tech firms in Taiwan |
指導教授: |
吳世英
Shih-Ying, Wu |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 100 |
中文關鍵詞: | 聚集效果 、新竹科學園區 |
外文關鍵詞: | agglomeration effect, Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著各國產業聚落的現象, 我國自竹科發展後, 也在許多地區出現產業聚落的現象。 故本研究想以都市化、 區域化的外部性, 檢視科技廠商在聚集程度較高的地區, 是否真能對於其競爭力有所提升, 反應在經營績效上。
本文以1995、 1997 至1999 年工廠營運查資料的精密科技、半導體、 通訊以及電腦產業廠商為研究對象, 依Holmes(1999) 所提出衡量聚集的方式,先計算出各廠商在相同產業、 相關產業以及無關產業的聚集程度, 再將廠商營運變數納入, 包含研發投入、 廠商規模、 市場占有率、 廠齡等, 來分析廠商在營運表現 (資產報酬率、勞動生產力和附加價值的變化) 上的差異。實證方法採用雙因子固定縱橫資料分析 (panel data), 以台灣鄉、 鎮地區分布結構作探討。
實證結果發現, 區域化外部性和都市化外部性皆顯著, 顯示一個區域內不論是相同產業、 相關產業或是無關產業愈多, 對於整體廠商的經營績效皆有正面的幫助 (對於獲利率有正的影響, 對於勞動生長力以及附加價值則是沒有顯著的影響); 但若是由產業別來看的話, 則可以發現較明顯的趨勢。 在精密科技、半導體、以及通訊產業聚集的程度的提高, 對其經營績效有正面提升的效果, 然其影響並非是全面性的, 依產業別而變。但是在電腦產業所呈現的情況則是相反, 聚集程度的提高, 對於電腦產業的營運績效有負向的影響。在區域化和都市化經濟的比較上, 呈現區域化經濟的外部性對於科技產業較有明顯的效果。
Taiwan’s high-tech firms have gradually agglomerated in several key regions since the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park (HSIP) was established. Based on the concepts of urbanization externality and localization externality, this thesis investigates whether a firm can improve its competitiveness by being located in a district of high industrial agglomeration. Therefore, this thesis evaluates the effects of industrial agglomeration on various indices of a firm’s performance. Utilizing the 1995, 1997, 1998 and 1999 Industrial Statistical Survey Report,this thesis focuses on the industries of precision technology, semiconductor, communication and computer. We utilize Holmes (1999) to calculate the degree of industrial agglomeration by classifying firms into the same industry, relevant industries and unrelated industries.We adopt the two factor fixed panel model to estimate the effect of industrial agglomeration as well as the effects of other firm characteristics, including R&D, sales, market shares and a firm’s age, on a firm’s performance.
Our empirical results prove that a firm receives a higher externality and more advantages to performance when more of firms in the same industry, relevant industry or unrelated industries are located in the same region. Both urbanization and localization externality cause significant influences on a firm’s performance. Therefore our findings are consistent with the implications of MAR externality and Jacobs externality effect hypothesis. Furthermore, we estimate the agglomeration effects for each industry and find even more significant effects for some industries. The degree of agglomeration has a positive influence on the performance of firms in the precision technology, semiconductor, andcommunication industries. However, we find an opposite effect for the computer industry. The degree of agglomeration causes a negative influence on the performance of the computer industry. As for the effects of the urbanization externality and the localization externality, the localization externality exerts a more significant in.uence on the high-tech industries in Taiwan.
中文文獻
林盛輝, 產業與都市成長關係之研究, 國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文, 2000.
祁玉蘭、黃春興、劉瑞華, Measuring Cluster Development in HSIP, 2006.
吳淑貞, 產業網絡、群聚現象與企業競爭力關係之研究- 以兩岸製鞋業為例, 中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文, 2002.
陳木在、李國鼎, 我國經濟發展策略總論, 台北: 聯經出版公司, 1994.
陳玟君, 群聚觀點下的產業空間分布研究-以電子產業為例, 政治大學地政研究所碩士論文, 2002.
徐旻穗, 聚集經濟與都市發展關係之檢證- 台灣地區之實證研究, 國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文, 1995.
許財良, 廠商創新能力、產業發展與政府科技政策對科學園區廠商競爭優勢及績效影響之研究, 成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文, 2002.
游淑慧, 產業聚集外部性對製造業廠商績效影響, 世新大學經濟學系碩士論文,2004.
詹立宇, 產業聚集效應對就業創造之影響-台灣製造業的實證, 人文及社會科學集刊, 17(4), 2005, 683-713.
詹立宇、郭迺鋒, 產業聚集效應對就業創造之影響- 台灣製造業的實證, 台灣經濟學會論文, 2003.
詹立宇、 張明宗、 徐之強, Vertical Disintegration and Industry Agglomer-ation in Taiwan’s Manufacturing Sector, 經濟論文叢刊, 32(4), 2004,483-511.
楊政龍、金嘉禾, The E.ects of Knowledge Infrastructure on the TotalFactor Productivity of Taiwan’s Manufacturing Industry, 都市與計劃, 29(4), 2002, 513-532.
蔡政軒, 產業群聚與研發行為: 台灣製造業之實證研究, 暨南國際大學經濟研究所碩士論文, 1998.
邊泰明, 台灣地區製造業都市化經濟及地方化經濟分析, 國立政治大學學報,66,1993, 233-248.
羅於凌等, 台灣產業群集發展及創新能力分析 (第一輯: 產業集群的演進), 行政院國家科學委員會技術資料中心, 2003.
英文文獻
Anderson, G., Industry Clustering For Economic Development, Economic Development Review, 12(2), 1994, 26-33.
Arrow, K., The economic implications of learning by doing, Review of Economic Studies, 29, 1962, 155- 173.
Atherton, A., Examining clusters formation from the bottom-up : an analysis of four cases in the North of English, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21, 2003, 21- 35.
Audretsch, David B, Feldman, Maryann P., R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, The American Economic Review, 86(3), 1996, 630- 641.
Baptista, B., and P. Swann, Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More?,Research Policy, 27, 1998, 525- 540.
Barkley, D. L., M. S. Henry and Y. Kim, Industry Agglomerations and Employment Change in Non-Metropolitan Areas, Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 11(3), 1999, 168- 186.
Baumol, The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, NY: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Boulding, William, Richard Staelin Environment, Market Share, and Market Power, Management Science, 36(10), 1990, 1160- 1178.
Brendan, B., Examine a company’s research to forecast long-term growth, Capital District Business Review, 24(4), 1997, 21- 45.
Busch, M. L., and E. Reinhardt, Industrial Location and Protection:The Political and Economic Geography of U.S. Nontariff Barriers,American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1999, 168- 186.
Carlson, V. L. and R. H. Matton, Industry Targeting: A New Approach to Local Economic Development, Chicago Fed Letter,77,1994.
Ciccone, A., Agglomeration e.ects in Europe, European Economic Review, 46, 2002, 213- 227.
Ciccone, A. and R. E. Hall, Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity, American Economic Review, 86(1), 2002, 54- 70.
Dahlman, C. J., Developing blocks in industrial economics, Scandinavia Economic History Review, (1), 1979, 3- 14.
Demsetz, Harold, Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy,Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 1973, 1- 19.
Dumais, G., G. Ellison, and E. Glaeser, Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic Process, NBER working paper6270, 1997.
Ellison, G. and E. Glaeser, Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach, Journal of Political Economy, 105, 889- 927.
Fuller, W. A. and Battese, G. E., Estimation of linear model with crossed-error structure, Journal of Econometrics, 2, 1974, 67- 78.
Gustavo J Bobonis, Howard J Shatz., Agglomeration, Adjustment, and State Policies in the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Cambridge, 89(1), 2007, 30.
Han, Jin K., Namwoon Kim and Rajendra K. Srivastava, Market orientation and organization performance: Is innovation a missing link., Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 1998, 30- 45.
Head K, J Ries, D Swenson, Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investments in the United States, Journal of International Economics, 38, 1995,223- 247.
Henderson, J. V., E.ciency of Resource Usage and City Size, Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 1986, 47- 70.
Henderson, J. V., A. Kuncoro and M. Turner, Industrial Development in Cities, Journal of Political Economy, 103, 1994, 1067- 1090.
Henderson, J. V., Marshall’s Scale Economies, Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 2003, 1- 28.
Henry, M. S. and M. Drabenstott, A New Micro View of the U.S. Rural Economy, Economic Review- Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 81(2), 1996, 53- 70.
Hill, Charles W. and Scott A. Snell., E.ects of ownership, structure and control on corporate productivity, Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 1989, 25- 46.
Holmes, T. J., Localization of Industry and Vertical Disintegration, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(2), 1999, 314- 325.
Hoover, E., Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1936.
Hsiao, Cheng, Analysis of Panel Data, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Hubbell, B. J., Entropy Based Measurement of Geographic Concentration in U.S. Hog Production, in faculty series of Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, 1999.
Jacobs, J., The economy of cities, Random House, New York, 1969.
Jaffe, Adam B, Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence Form Firms’Patents And Market Vauel, American Economic Review, 76, 1986, 984- 999.
Jaffe, Adam B, Trajtenberg, Manuel, Henderson, Rebecca, Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 1993, 577.
Jeong, K. Y. and R. T. Masson, Market Structure, Entry, and Performance in Korea, The Review of Economics and Statistics,72(3),1990, 455- 462.
Jovanovic, B., Selection and the Evolution of industry, Econometrica (pre-1986), 50(3), 1982, 649- 670.
Keffer, W., Geographic localization of international technology diffusion, The American Economic Review, 92(1), 2002, 120- 143.
Krugman, P., Geography and Trade, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press,1991.
Krugman, P., Increasing Return and Economic Geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 1991, 483- 499.
Kumar, N. and M. Saqib, Firm Size and Effcient Entrepreneurial Activity: A Reformulation of the Schumpeter Hypothesis, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 1996, 771- 782.
Leach, D.F, Concentration-Profits Monopoly vs. E.ciency Debate: South African Evidence, Contemporary Economic Policy,15(2),1997, 12- 23.
MacKinnon D, Cumbers A, Chapman K, Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates, Progress in Human Geography, 26, 2002, 293- 295.
Markham, J. W., Market Structure, Business Conduct, and Innovation, American Economic Review, 55, 1965, 323- 333.
Marshall, A., Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan, 1890.
Marshall, A., Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan, 1920.
Martin, Stephen, Market power and/or efficiency, Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 1988, 331- 35.
Maurel, F. and B. Sedillot, A Measure of the Geographic Concentration in French Manufacturing Industries, Regional Science and Urban Economy, 29, 1999, 575- 604.
Maskell, P., Towards a Knowledge-based Theory of the Geographical Cluster, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 2001, 921- 43.
Nakamura, R., Agglomeration Economies in Urban manufacturing Industries:A Case of Japanese Cities, Journal of Urban Economics,17, 1985, 108- 124.
Noble, C.H., R.K. Sinha, and A. Kumar., Marketing orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A longitudinal assessment of performance implications, Journal of Marketing, 66, 2002, 25- 39.
Park, R.W. (1967), Efficient estimation of a system of regression equations when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 1967, 500- 509.
Pelham, Market orientation and other potential influences on performance in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms, Journal of Small Business Management, 38(1), 2000, 48- 67.
Pinch, S., and Henry, N., Paul Krugman’s Geographical Economics, Industrial Clustering and British Motor Sport Industry, Regional Studies, 33(9), 1999, 815- 827.
Porter, M., The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Macmillan, 1990.
Porter, M., Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, November-December, 1990, 77- 90.
Ripley, B. D., Modeling Spatial Pattterns, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39(2), 1977, 172- 212.
Romer, P., Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1984, 1002- 1037.
Rosenthal, S. and W. Strange, The Determinants of Agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 2001, 191- 229.
Saxenian, A., Regional Advantage: Cluster and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route128, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, 1994.
Shanmugam, K.R. and Bhaduri, S.N., Size, Age and Firm Growth in the Indian Manufacturing Sector, Applied Economics Letters, 9(9), 2002, 607- 613.
Simmie, J. and J. Sennett, Innovative Clusters: Global or Local Linkages?, National Institute Economic Review, 170, 1999, 87- 98.
Tirole, J., The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press, 1988.
Tung, An- Chi, Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry: What the State Did and Did Not, Review of Development Economics, 5(2), 2001, 226- 228.
Venables, A. J., The International Divison of Industries: Clustering and Comparative Advantage in a Multi- industry Model, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1999, 498- 513.
Vlachvei, A. & K. Oustapassidis, Advertising, Concentration and profitability in Greek Food manufacturing Industries, Agricultural Economics, 18(2), 1998, 191- 198.
Wang, J., and M. Wang, High and New Technology Industry Development Zones, China’s Transition to a Global Economy Houndmills, U.K. and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, 168- 190.