汶水泰雅語動詞構詞研究｜國立清華大學博碩士論文庫

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	彭淑芳 Peng, Shufang
論文名稱：	汶水泰雅語動詞構詞研究 A Study of Verbal Morphology in Mayrinax Atayal
指導教授：	廖秀娟 Liao, Hsiu-chuan
口試委員:	黃美金吳靜蘭
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	人文社會學院 - 台灣研究教師在職進修碩士學位班 Graduated Program of Taiwan Studies for in-service Teachers
論文出版年：	2016
畢業學年度：	104
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	147
中文關鍵詞：	汶水泰雅語、動詞構詞、角色指稱語法理論
外文關鍵詞：	Mayrinax Atayal, Verbal Morphology, Role and Reference Grammar
相關次數：	點閱：2 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

Chinese Abstract
摘要
在本論文中，筆者著重在探討汶水泰雅語的動詞分類，焦點標記和動詞詞綴的語意以及形態句法特徴。雖然在文獻中己經有許多學者探討過汶水泰雅的動詞分類、焦點標記及動詞詞綴，但文獻中尚未詳盡討論動詞分類及相關主題。本文所使用的角色指稱語法理論(Role and Reference Grammar)對動詞分類有獨到的見解及提供多方面的動詞內在特徵分析，故非常適合用來描述與解釋動詞的語法行為與分類。
以角色指稱語法理論為基礎的動詞分類系統(Aktionsart tests)以四種詞彙特徵來顯現各類動詞的內在語意及時貌特性:靜態性、動態性、終點性及瞬間性。依此四種詞彙特徵，筆者將汶水泰雅語動詞分為五類：第一類為帶有動態但無終點性及瞬間性的活動動詞，第二類為帶有靜態性但無終點性及瞬間性的靜態動詞，第三類為帶有動態性、終點性及瞬間性的瞬成動詞，第四類為帶有終點性但無瞬間性的成就動詞，第五類為帶有瞬間性但無終點性的瞬實動詞。
一般稱為焦點標記的詞綴m-,-un,-an,和si-在汶水泰雅的動詞五類中展現出不同類別動詞的內在語意及時貌特性。不同的詞綴與不同類別的動詞產生各種衍生語意。然而並非每個詞綴都能出現於五類動詞中，例如詞綴m-通常不會出現在表達屬性的狀態動詞。本文發現這些詞綴與五類動詞有共同出現的限制。第一，有特定終點或具體量詞的活動動詞會轉為活動成就動詞，而當活動動詞轉為活動成就動詞後會偏好出現在-un或-an句子。第二，有關心理狀態的靜態動詞通常出現在-un,-an,或si-句子，若出現在m-的句子時，則有臆斷的詮釋。第三，前四類動詞(除了第五類瞬實動詞外)可和使役動詞詞綴pa- 結合衍生出使役動詞，而且通常出現在-un句子。
根據本文中的語料分析，筆者推論m-,-un,-an,和si-等這些詞綴具有多重功能：他們除了文獻中所提到的焦點標記、動詞詞綴、及帶有時貌訊息的功能外，還有與動詞分類相關的功能。在這些焦點標記的詞綴中，詞綴si-有最多樣的衍生語意。除了介紹具有動詞詞綴功能的焦點標記詞綴外，本文也介紹其他動詞衍生詞綴，例如：ma-/pa-,matag(a)-,mas-,maka-,ta-/ti-,maki-,and mag(a)-。透過角色指稱語法理論的邏輯結構分析可知這些動詞衍生詞綴有三種動詞衍生方式：第一，從名詞詞幹衍生出活動動詞；第二，從活動動詞詞幹衍生出靜態動詞；第三，從靜態動詞詞幹衍生出成就動詞。因此筆者推論這些詞綴不僅具有動詞衍生詞綴的功能還有與動詞分類相關的功能。

English Abstract
This study deals with the classification of Mayrinax Atayal verbs, the semantics and morphosyntax of focus markers and other verbal prefixes. Although a number of previous studies have dealt with verb classification and affixes in Atayal, these studies appear to have overlooked some aspects of inherent features of verbs. The framework of Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) used in this study offers a unique view on lexical decomposition and provides us with a comprehensive analysis of verb classification.
The RRG-based Aktionsart tests manifest inherent semantic and temporal properties of each verb class in terms of four features: staticity, dynamicity, telicity, and punctuality. Mayrinax Atayal verbs are classified into five classes: (i)Activity, (ii)State, (iii)Achievement, (iv)Accomplishment, and (v) Semelfactive.
The so-called ‘focus’ affixes m-, -un, -an, and si- have distinct meanings in the five classes of verbs and can manifest inherent semantic properties of each verb class. These affixes with different verb classes will yield various derivational interpretations; however, not every affix will appear in all verb classes. For example, the affix m- is not found in individual-level states. Moreover, there are some co-occurrenc restrictions between these affixes and the five verb classes. First, when activities refer to a definite goal, a specific, or quantified object, they will become active accomplishments, usually occurring in -un or -an clauses. Second, stage-level psych predicates are usually expressed in -un, -an, or si- clauses. Third, except semelfactive, all other verb classes can take the causative prefix pa- to derive causative predicates, and the derived forms usually occur in -un clauses.
Results from RRG Aktionsart tests suggest that the so-called ‘focus’ affixes, such as m-, -un, -an, and si-, have multiple functions: valency increasing, focus markers, TAM information carriers, and verb classification differentiators. Among these affixes, the affix si- yields the most diverse derivational interpretations: instrument, benefactive, malefactive, transported theme, reason, and valence-increasing. In addition to the so-called ‘focus’ affixes, there are more prefixes that can be used to derive verbs, e.g. ma-/pa-, matag(a)-, mas-, maka-, ta-/ti-, maki-, mag(a)-. Using RRG logical structure analysis, it is noted that there are three types of verbal derivational processes: (i) deriving an activity predicate from a nominal root, (ii) deriving a state predicate from an activity root, and (iii) deriving an accomplishment from a state root. Therefore, we can tell that these prefixes function not only as verbal derivational affixes but also as verb class differentiators.

Table of Contents
Chinese Abstract    i
English Abstract    iii
Acknowledgments    v
Table of Contents    vii
List of Maps    x
List of Tables    xi
List of Figures    xiii
List of Abbreviations    xiv
Chapter 1: Introduction    1
1.    Motivation    1
2.    Objective of this research    1
3.    About the people and the language    2
3.1  Geographic setting, population, and customs    2
3.2  Dialects of Atayal    4
4.    Sources of the data    6
5.    The actancy structure of Mayrinax Atayal    8
6.    Organization of the thesis    9
Chapter 2: Literature Review    10
1.    Introduction    10
2.    Previous studies on Atayal phonology    10
3.    Previous studies on Atayal syntax    13
3.1  Word order and verbal clause patterns    14
3.2  Personal pronouns    15
3.3  Case markers    18
3.4  Negators    20
3.5  Linkers and complex clauses    21
4.    Previous studies on verbal affixes    23
4.1  Affixes as voice/focus markers    23
4.2  Verbal focus affixes interacting with the tense, aspect, and mood system    26
4.3  Previous studies on Atayal verbal affixes    31
5.    Atayal verb classification    34
5.1  Stative/dynamic verbs in Atayal    34
5.2  Three classes of verbs in Squliq Atayal    36
5.3  Five classes of verbs in Jian-shih Squliq Atayal    37
Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework    40
1.    Introduction    40
2.    Three major models of morphology    40
2.1  Word-based morphological model for Palauan    43
2.2  Word-based morphological model in Mayrinax Atayal    46
3.    Role and Reference Grammar    49
3.1  Introduction    49
3.2  Aktionsart verb classification    50
3.3  An application of RRG to Amis (Wu 2006)    55
3.3.1  How Amis voice markers interacting with root classes    55
2.3.2  Aktionsart tests and verb classes in Amis (Wu 2006)    57
3.4  An application of RRG to Kankanaey (Allen 2011)    62
Chapter 4: An Aktionsart Analysis of Mayrinax Atayal Verbs    72
1.    Introduction    72
2.    States    73
3.    Activitives    78
3.1  Active accomplishments    81
4.    Accomplishments    85
5.    Achievements    88
6.    Semelfactives    91
7.    Summary    94
Chapter 5: Verbal Affixes in Mayrinax Verb System    97
1.    Introduction    97
2.    Verbal affixes m-, -un, -an, and si- in five Aktionsart classes in Mayrinax    97
2.1  States    99
2.1.1  Individual-level states    100
2.1.2  Stage-level states    102
2.1.2.1  Stage-level psych states    104
2.2  Activities    108
2.2.1  Active accomplishments    112
2.3  Accomplishments    114
2.4  Achievements    117
2.5  Semelfactives    120
2.6  Causative verbs    122
3.    Verbal derivational affixes    125
3.1  Deriving a predicate from a nominal root    125
3.1.1  ma- and pa-    125
3.1.2  matag(a)-    126
3.1.3  mas-    126
3.1.4  maka-    127
3.1.5  ta- and ti-    127
3.2  Deriving a state predicate from an activity    128
3.3  Deriving an accomplishment predicate (mag(a)-) from a state    128
4.    Summary    130
Chapter 6: Conclusion    132
1.    Summary    132
2.    Directions for future research    134
References    135
Appendix I. Five classes of Mayrinax Atayal verbs    140

                                

References
Allen, Janet L. 2011. A Role and Reference Grammar analysis of Kankanaey. Ph.D. dissertation, Heinrich-Heine-Universität
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark, and Kirsten Fudeman. 2010. What is morphology? West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Blust, Robert A. 1999. Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: Some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (8-ICAL), ed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun and Paul Jen-kuei Li, 31-94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Blust, Robert A. 2003. Three notes on early Austronesian morphology. Oceanic Linguistics 42(2):438-478.
Chang, Jung-hsing. 2001. The syntax of event structure in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai‘i.
Chen, Yin-Ling. 2011. Issues in the phonology of Ilan Atayal. Ph.D. dissertation, National Tsing Hua University.
Chrétien, C.D. 1965. The statistical structure of the Proto-Austronesian morph. Lingua 14: 243-270.
Council of Indigenous Peoples, Executive Yuan. 2015. Population of indigenous peoples in Taiwan and Hokkien Provinces in December 2015. Online resource: http://www.apc.gov.tw
Council of Indigenous Peoples (CIP), and Ministry of Education (MOE). 2005. The Standard orthography of aboriginal languages. Taipei: Ministry of Education. [in Chinese]
Department of Civil Affairs, Miaoli County Government. 2015. Tai’an Township census in December 2015. Online resource: http://www.miaoli.gov.tw/
DeWolf, Charles M. 1985. Word and paradigm in Latin and Palauan: A study in morphology. For Gordon H. Fairbanks, ed. by Veneeta Z. Acson and Richard L. Leed, 257-270. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 20. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Egerod, Søren. 1966a. A statement on Atayal phonology. Artibus Aside Supplementum XXIII (Felicitation Volume for the 75th Birthday of Prof. G.H. Luce) 1: 120-30.
Egerod, Søren. 1966b. Word order and word classes in Atayal. Language 42 (2): 346-367.
Egerod, Søren. 1978. Atayal-English dictionary. 2 vols. Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph Series No. 35. London and Malmo: Curzon Press.
Egerod, Søren. 1999. Atayal-English dictionary (2nd edition). Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms. 1-88, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech: 20-32.
Foley, William A., and Robert D. Van Valin. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin, and Andra D. Smith. 2010. Understanding morphology. London: Hodder Education.
Hayung, Tali’. 2008. A study of prefixes in Jianshi Atayal. MA thesis, National Hsinchu University of Education. [in Chinese]
Huang, Hui-chuan J. 2006. Squliq Atayal syllable onset: Simple or complex? In Streams converging into an ocean: Festschrift in honor of Professor Paul Jen-kuei Li on his 70th birthday, ed. by Henry Y. Chang, Lillian M. Huang, and Dah-an Ho, 489-505. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Huang, Lillian M. 1993. A study of Atayal syntax. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Huang, Lillian M. 1994. Ergativity in Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 33 (1): 129-143.
Huang, Lillian M. 1995a. A study of Mayrinax syntax. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Huang, Lillian M. 1995b. The syntactic structure of Wulai and Mayrinax: A comparison. Journal of Taiwan Normal University 40:261-294.
Huang, Lillian M. 1996. Interrogative constructions in Mayrinax Atayal. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities & Social Sciences 41: 263-296.
Huang, Lillian M. 2000a. A reference grammar of Atayal. Taipei: Yuanliu. [in Chinese]
Huang, Lillian M. 2000b. Verbal classification in Mayrinax Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 39(2): 364-390.
Huang, Lillian M. 2001. Focus system of Mayrinax Atayal: A syntactic, semantic and pragmatic perspective. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities & Social Sciences 46.1-2: 51-69.
Huang, Lillian M., and Tali’ Hayung. 2008. Syntax and semantics of p- in Squliq Atayal. Language and Linguistics 9(3):491-521.
Jeng, Heng-syung. 1987. Teaching English preposition through case grammar. Papers from the Fourth Conference on English Teaching and Learning, ed. by Tzyh-lai Huang, Yun-hua Huang, Wu-chang Chang, Chyi-ruey Chen, Li-wen Chen, and Chyong-ju Chen. Taipei: the Ground Publishing Co., Ltd.
Johnson-Laird, Philip N., and Keith Oatley. 1987. Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion 1(1): 29-50.
Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fenning, eds. 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, seventeenth edition. Dallas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com/.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1980. The phonological rules of Atayal dialects. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 51.2:349-405.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1981. Reconstruction of Proto-Atayalic phonology. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 52.2:235-301.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1982. Atayalic final voiced stops. In Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 2: Tracking the travellers, ed. by Amran Halim, Lois Carrington, and S. A. Wurm, 171-185. Pacific Linguistics C-75. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1985. Linguistic criteria for classifying Atayalic dialect groups. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 56.4:699-718.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1994. The case-marking system in Mayrinax, Atayal. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Leiden, the Netherland, August 22-27, 1994.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1997. The Formosan tribes and migration. Taipei: Chang-ming Culture Company. [in Chinese]
Liao, Hsiu-chuan. 2004. Transitivity and ergativity in Formosan and Philippine languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai‘i.
Liao, Hsiu-chuan. 2011. ‘“On the reconstruction of Proto-Malayo-Polynesian *si- ‘simultaneous/concomitant aspect’”, paper read at the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL 2011), National Museum of Ethnology (MINPAKU), Osaka, Japan, July 25-30, 2011.
Lin, Cheng-Yuan. 2012. A study of morphological structure in Mayrinax Atayal. MA thesis, National Hsinchu University of Education. [in Chinese]
Liu, Tsai-hsiu. 2011. Complementation in three Formosan languages—Amis, Mayrinax Atayal and Tsou. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai‘i.
Lu, Yu-an. 2005. Mayrinax phonology: With special reference to UM affixation. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Matthew, Peter H. 1991. Morphology (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ogawa, Naoyoshi, and Erin Asai. 1935. The myths and traditions of the Formosan native tribes. Taipei: Taihoku Imperial University. [in Japanese]
Pustejovsky, James J. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rau, Victoria Der-hwa. 1992. A grammar of Atayal. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Ross, Malcolm D. 1995. Reconstructing Proto-Austronesian verbal morphology: Evidence from Taiwan. In Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan, ed. by Paul Jen-kuei Li, Cheng-hwa Tsang, Ying-kuei Huang, Dah-an Ho, and Chiu-yu Tseng, 727-791. Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Number 3. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Ross, Malcolm. 2009. Proto Austronesian verbal morphology: A reappraisal. In Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A Festschrift for Robert Blust, ed. by Alexander Adelaar and Andrew Pawley, 295-326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The parameter of aspect (2nd edition). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Starosta, Stanley. 1999. Transitivity, ergativity and the best analysis of Atayal case marking.
In Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (8-ICAL), ed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun and Paul Jen-kuei Li, 371-92. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Starosta, Stanley. 2002. Austronesian ‘focus’ as derivation: Evidence from nominalization.
Language and Linguistics 3(2):427-479.
Su, Mei-Chuan. 2004. Negation in Taoshan Atayal. MA thesis, National Hsinchu University of Education. [in Chinese]
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Towards a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Teng, Stacy Fang-ching. 2008. A reference grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian language of Taiwan. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Tseng, Chiou-yuh. 1989. Atayal verb classification. M.A. thesis, Fu-jen Catholic University.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr., and Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wilson, Helen Irene. 1972. The phonology and syntax of Palauan verb affixes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai‘i.
Wu, Chun-ming. 2013. The syntax of linking constructions in Mayrinax Atayal and Sinvaudjan Paiwan. Ph.D. dissertation, National Tsing Hua University.
Wu, Jing-lan Joy. 2006. Verb classification, case marking, and grammatical relations in Amis. Ph.D. dissertation, the State University of New York at Buffalo.
Yeh, Yu-ting. 2002. Emotion concepts in Squliq Atayal. MA thesis, National Taiwan University.
Yeh, Yu-ting. 2013. Event conceptualization and verb classification in Squliq Atayal. Ph.D. dissertation, National Taiwan University.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 2007. A grammar of Mantauran (Rukai). Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A4-2. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth, and Lillian M. Huang. 2000. Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 39 (2):391-414.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth, Lillian Huang, Marie M. Yeh, Anna-H Chang, and Joy J. Wu. 1996. The temporal, aspectual, and modal systems of some Formosan languages: A typological perspective. Oceanic Linguistics 35: 21-56.

全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文