簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 廖羿竣
LIAO,YI-JYUN
論文名稱: 身心障礙學生霸凌與身心壓力相關因素研究之初探
Preliminary study of students with disabilities bullying and physical and mental stress factors
指導教授: 薛明里
SYUE,MING-LI
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 竹師教育學院 - 特殊教育學系
Special Education
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 124
中文關鍵詞: 身心障礙學生霸凌身心壓力
外文關鍵詞: Students with disabilities, Bullying, psychosomatic pressure
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在目前社會變遷劇烈,也感於當前身心障礙學生遭霸凌新聞層出不斷,又爆發數起舉國關注的嚴重霸凌事件-南部特教學校集體性霸凌事件及八德國中事件,近年國內鮮有針對身心障礙學生做霸凌相關研究,故針對國內對霸凌現況及其可能因素進行了解實有必要之處,故本研究透過特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫(Special Needs Education Longitudinal Study,SNELs)其中的99年度國三學生問卷、部分的家長與教師問卷將之分成三組背景變項,性別、高出現率障礙、霸凌事件中角色分類、四個潛在變項(受霸凌情況、過動行為特質、內化行為特質、身心壓力),來探討行為特質如何影響受霸凌情況及身心壓力,並建立多變量的迴歸模型,其統計方法是透過ANOVA及SEM多群組分析等統計技術來進行分析,研究結果顯示性別、高出現率障礙之間確實的存在不同的迴歸模型(p<.000),在單純主要效果的ANOVA分析結果也是如此,但在身心壓力在各組之間均沒有差異存在,然而各組在預測受霸凌情況及身心壓力上均有不同程度的預測值,且女性及非高出現率障礙在過動與內化行為特質預測受霸凌情況及身心壓力的迴歸值上,要比男性及高出現率的在迴歸值的變化範圍要大上一倍,這樣的結果與文獻探討的研究不盡相同的地方,在於男性過動特質程度越大理應預測受霸凌情況也應有更高的預測值,但在此卻是女性才如前述一致,過動特質越明顯則在預測受霸凌情況就越高,此外過動行為預測受霸凌情況及身心壓力的方向為相反,這些都需要後續研究進步探究,而本研究也建議受續研究可使用PLS、Mplus、HLM進行更進一步的分析,本研究限制在於集中式特殊班校在學生問卷的缺少導致本研究結果無法推論至集中式特殊班校,其次在背景變項-霸凌事件中角色分類因答題趨勢而無法納入SEM進行分析,故本研究在SEM的分析結果無法依推論至受霸凌者等腳色之中,並期待後續研究據此進行探討。


    In the current social changes violently, but also a sense of the current students with disabilities were bullied News layers of constantly broke several cases of serious bullying of the whole country - the southern special education schools, collective bullying and eight in the German event, in recent years, domestic few bullying studies for students with disabilities to do so for domestic bullying status and possible factors to understand the real necessary place, so the study of long-term tracking database through the special Education (special Needs Education Longitudinal Study, SNELs) where 99 year junior high school student questionnaires, parents and teachers will be part of the questionnaire is divided into three groups of background variables, gender, high occurrence rate disorders, bullying roles classification, four potential variables case (subject to bullying, hyperactive behavior traits, internalized behavior traits, physical and mental stress), to explore how behavioral traits affected by bullying situation and the physical and psychological pressure and multivariable regression model, ANOVA statistical methods through multiple groups and SEM analysis, statistics techniques for analysis, the results show indeed exists between the sexes, high rates of disorder appears different regression models (p <.000), the ANOVA analysis of simple main effects is true, but in between each set of physical and mental stress were no differences, however, in predicting that the groups are on the bullying situation and the predictive value of physical and psychological pressure to varying degrees, and the high occurrence rate of women and non-hyperactive disorder in the inner qualities of behavior prediction by bullying situations and physical and mental stress on the return value, range and high occurrence rate than men in the return value to be twice as large, and the results of such research literature exploring different places, that the greater the degree of male hyperactive traits that supposedly predict bullying situation should have a higher predictive value, but this is only women as previously agreed, hyperactive traits more obvious in the case of the higher forecast bullying by the addition hyperactive behavior prediction by bullying and physical and mental conditions the opposite direction of the pressure, which requires follow-up studies to explore the progress, and this study also suggest that continued research may be used PLS, Mplus, HLM for further analysis, this study limitation is that the centralized school students in special classes missing questionnaire result the results can not be inferred to the centralized special classes school, followed by the background variables - bullying role categorical dependent clickers trend can not be included in the SEM for analysis, so this study in SEM analysis results are not by inference to that bully and other roles being and look forward to the follow-up study to explore accordingly.

    目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 4 第三節 研究目的 6 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 身心障礙學生遭受霸凌的現況研究 11 第二節 霸凌研究之樣本分類相關探討 24 第三節 個人因素相關研究 26 第四節 身心障礙學生遭霸凌下之身心壓力情況 33 第五節 綜合討論 39 第三章 研究方法 43 第一節 研究架構與研究假設 43 第二節 研究樣本 49 第三節 研究工具 52 第四節 變項設定與計算方法 60 第五節 統計工具與分析方法 64 第四章 研究結果 75 第一節 描述性統計結果 75 第二節 變異數分析族系統計結果 77 第三節 結構方程模式之統計結果 86 第四節 綜合討論 97 第五章 結論與討論 103 第一節 研究結論 103 第二節 研究討論 108 第三節 研究貢獻 110 第四節 研究限制與建議 111 第五節 綜合討論 112 參考文獻 113 中文部分 113 英文部分 115 表次 表 1 1名詞解釋與對應題項摘要表 8 表 2 1-1身心障礙涉及霸凌研究摘要表(研究趨勢部分) 13 表 2-1 2 身心障礙涉及霸凌研究摘要表(調查對象與結果部分) 15 表 2 3身心壓力定義摘要表 34 表 2 4各類研究文獻之結果摘要表 40 表 3 1依障礙類別之樣本分配摘要表 51 表 3 2刪除遺漏值前後樣本相關係數摘要表 51 表 3 3行為特質因素分析摘要表 52 表 3 4身心壓力與受霸凌情況之因素分析摘要 53 表 3 5內化行為因素之信度分析摘要表 55 表 3 6過動行為因素之信度分析摘要表 55 表 3 7身心壓力因素之信度分析摘要表 56 表 3 8受霸凌情況之信度分析摘要表 57 表 3 9估計變項之常態性檢定摘要表 58 表3 10涉及霸凌情況之題項計分方式 61 表 3 11霸凌類別之區別摘要表 62 表 3 12 霸凌事件之分類代碼 63 表 3 13 SEM適配指標之標準摘要表 67 表 4 1 樣本背景因素摘要表 75 表 4 2 各變項描述統計摘要表 77 表 4 3共變量矩陣等式的 Box 檢定摘要表 77 表 4 4 性別方面 Levene變異數同質性檢定 77 表 4 5性別方面 ANCOVA摘要表 78 表 4 6 性別方面 ANOVA 摘要表 79 表 4 7 高出現率障礙方面 Levene變異數同質性檢定 80 表 4 8 高出現率障礙方面 ANCOVA 摘要表 81 表 4 9 高出現率障礙方面 ANOVA摘要表 81 表 4 10 在霸凌事件中的角色分類 變異數同質性檢定 83 表 4 11 霸凌事件中的角色分類方面 ANCOVA 摘要表 84 表 4 12 霸凌事件中的角色分類方面 ANOVA 摘要表 84 表 4 13 性別部分 SEM適配指標摘要表 87 表 4 14 性別部分SEM多群組分析模式變化摘要表 87 表 4 15 性別部分SEM潛在變項估計摘要表 89 表 4 16 高出現率障礙部分 適配度指標摘要表 91 表 4 17 高出現率障礙部分 多群組分析之模式比較摘要表 92 表 4 18 高出現率障礙部分SEM潛在變項 估計摘要表 93 圖次 圖3 1 多變項假設路徑圖……………………………………………………………48 圖3 2 受霸凌情況常態分配圖 58 圖3 3 身心壓力之常態分配圖 59 圖3 4 內化行為常態分配圖 59 圖3 5 過動行為常態分配圖 60 圖3 6 霸凌分類SPSS語法輸入圖 63 圖3 7 SEM模式與變項架構圖 70 圖 4 1 性別部分 受霸凌情況趨勢圖 80 圖 4 2 高出現率障礙 受霸凌趨勢圖 83 圖 4 3 霸凌事件中角色 受霸凌趨勢圖 86 圖 4 4 SEM 性別男性 模式架構圖 90 圖 4 5 性別 女性 SEM模式架構圖 90 圖 4 6 高出現率障礙 SEM模式架構圖 94 圖 4 7 非高出現率障礙 SEM模式架構圖 94 圖 4 8 未分類的 SEM模式圖 97 圖 5 1 SEM各組迴歸值折線圖 108

    中文部分
    王天苗(2010)。特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫:99學年度資料使用手冊(電子檔)。桃園:中原大學。
    王天苗(2010)。特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫:99學年度國三家長問卷(電子檔)。桃園:中原大學。
    王天苗(2010)。特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫:99學年度國三教師問卷(電子檔)。桃園:中原大學。
    王天苗(2010)。特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫:99學年度國三學生問卷(電子檔)。桃園:中原大學。
    王彩鳳(2010年12月30日)。遭霸凌生被直笛塞口,聯合報,社會新聞版
    王定傳與陳恩惠(2011年06月28日)。霸凌2身障生 判賠37萬、10萬,自由時報,取自 : http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/504029
    立法院 (2013年9月2日)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法,全國法規資料庫,取自: http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0080065 。
    林項爵 (2010)。父母教養型態, 教師管教方式與國小高年級學生霸凌行為之相關探討. 國立臺北教育大學教育學系教育創新與評鑑碩士班學位論文, 1-174. (未出版) 。
    李茂能. (2008)。 SEM 適配度指標的潛藏問題 : 最佳模式難求。測驗統計年刊,(16) 17-29頁。
    朱真楷 (2010年12月21日)。八德國中老師連署換校長,中國時報,社會新聞版。
    陳映竹 (2010年12月30日)。學生追打老師,教長事隔一周才知道,中廣新聞網,取自: http://dailynews.sina.com/bg/tw/twpolitics/bcc/20101229/21142121004.html 。
    張君豪與蔡偉祺(2009年2月11日),國中女生施酷刑‧鹽塞同學下體,中國時報,社會新聞版。
    紀凡 (2015年09月04日)。日青少年自殺風潮盛 校園霸凌更增壓力,風向新聞,取自 : http://kairos.news/8049 。
    邱瓊平 (2009年5月17日)。我兒碰上校園小霸王,聯合晚報,6版 。
    邱皓政(2005)。結構方程模式LISREL 的理論、技術與應用,雙葉書廊有限公司。
    邱皓政 (2006)。量化研究與統計分析,五南圖書出版股份有限公司. 。
    邱皓政 (2007)。斷裂時代中的量化研究: 統計方法學的興起與未來. αβγ 量化研究學刊 , 1(1), 1-34 。
    黃沛彤 (2011)。國中學生自殺意圖及其相關因素之研究-對台灣地區國中學生樣本的分析,亞洲大學健康管理所碩士學位論文,未出版。
    兒童福利聯盟文教基金會 (2014)。2014 年臺灣校園霸凌狀況調查報告,未出版。
    法務部 (2011)。100年少年兒童犯罪概況及其分析,(已出版)。
    吳文琪、陸玓玲與李蘭 (2013) 。台灣地區國中學生霸凌角色之分佈及其與個人和家庭因素之分析。 臺灣公共衛生雜誌,32(4),372-381。
    吳明隆 (2009) 。結構方程模式: AMOS 的操作與應用。臺北市: 五南。.
    張雅婷 (2002)。桃園市國中生校園暴力行為及其相關因素研究,臺灣師範大學衛生教育學系學位論文,1-152。
    張欣戊、林淑玲與李明芝(譯) (2010) 。發展心理學(原作者 : David R Shaffer, Katherine Kipp著)。臺北。學富文化。
    楊永盛 (2014年01月21日) 。霸凌 學障生遭鐵條圍毆,6生鎖門海扁 「喊到啞沒人理」,蘋果日報,取自: http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20140121/35592795/ 。
    ETTODAY新聞雲 (2014年03月10日) 。台東校園驚現「霸凌地獄」女同學自殘、身障生當狗遛,取自 : http://www.ettoday.net/news/20140310/333180.htm?feature=profile_011&tab_id=334 。
    蘋果日報 (2014年06月21日) 。【更新】身障生昨天遭霸凌 校方剛剛知道了,取自: http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140621/420451/ 。
    ETTODAY新聞雲 (2015年09月01日) 。嘉陽高中3打1霸凌 網路再爆新影片「已經不是第一次」,取自 : http://www.ettoday.net/news/20150918/566750.htm 。
    蘋果日報 (2015年04月23日 ) 。宅男女神自殺亡 遺書控網路霸凌,取自 : http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20150423/36509370/ 。
    自由時報 (2011年6月21日) 。霸凌2身障生 判賠37萬、10萬,取自 : http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/504029 。
    教育部 (2011)。100 年各級學校校園安全事件統計分析報告(摘要),(已出版)。
    教育部 (2013)。102學年度 一般學校 身心障礙類安置班別學生統計【原始數據】。取自: http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/frame_print.asp?filename=stuA_city_All_cls_ABCE/stuA_city_All_cls_ABCE_20131021.asp 。
    陳節如 (2014)。沉默—台灣一所特殊學校集體性侵事件。臺北市。我們。
    陳正昌 (2013)。SPSS 與統計分析。台北:五南。
    譚子文與董旭英 (2010)。自我概念與父母教養方式對臺灣都會區高中生偏差行為之影響。 教育科學研究期刊,55(3) 203-233頁。
    鐘武達 (2010年12月6日)。駭人聽聞,高職女遭同學集體凌虐性侵。中國時報,社會新聞版。
    鐘武達 (2010年12月20日)。國二女遭霸凌。中國時報,社會新聞版。
    羅丰苓與盧台華 (2013)。台中市國中普通班身心障礙學生遭受同儕霸凌現況之調查研究. 特殊教育與復健學報,(29) 73-102頁。
    魏麗敏 (2003)。校園欺凌行為,家庭環境與學校氣氛之關係 。 台中師院學報(台灣), (17) 21-49頁。

    英文部分
    Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O'Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American psychologist, 32(7), 513.
    Bramston, P., Fogarty, G., & Cummins, R. A. (1999). The nature of stressors reported by people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(1), 1-10.
    Boel-Studt, S., & Renner, L. M. (2013). Individual and familial risk and protective correlates of physical and psychological peer victimization. Child abuse & neglect, 37(12), 1163-1174.
    Bowes, Maughan, Caspi, Moffitt & Arseneault(2010) Families promote emotional and behavioural resilience to bullying: evidence of an environmental effect , Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51:7 (2010), pp 809–817
    Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65.
    Coolidge, F. L., DenBoer, J. W., & Segal, D. L. (2004). Personality and neuropsychological correlates of bullying behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1559-1569.
    Conti-Ramsden, G., & Botting, N. (2004). Social difficulties and victimization in children with SLI at 11 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 47(1).
    Connolly, I., & O'Moore, M. (2003). Personality and family relations of children who bully. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(3), 559-567.
    Daire Hooper, Joseph Coughlan, Michael Mullen(2008) Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit , Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods ,Volume 6 Issue 1 , pp53-60.
    Dawkins, J. L. (1996). Bullying, physical disability and the paediatric patient.Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 38(7), 603-612.
    Due, P., Holstein, B. E., Lynch, J., Diderichsen, F., Gabhain, S. N., Scheidt, P., & Currie, C. (2005). Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. The European Journal of Public Health, 15(2), 128-132.
    Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Pettit, G. S., & Price, J. M. (1990). Peer status and aggression in boys' groups: Developmental and contextual analyses. Child development, 61(5), 1289-1309.
    Elgar, F. J., Pickett, K. E., Pickett, W., Craig, W., Molcho, M., Hurrelmann, K., & Lenzi, M. (2013). School bullying, homicide and income inequality: a cross-national pooled time series analysis. International journal of public health,58(2), 237-245.
    Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Crowther, A., Akos, P., & Boudah, D. J. (2009). Students with exceptionalities and the peer group context of bullying and victimization in late elementary school. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(2), 136-150.
    Espelage, D. L., Bosworth, K., & Simon, T. R. (2001). Short-term stability and prospective correlates of bullying in middle-school students: An examination of potential demographic, psychosocial, and environmental influences. Violence and Victims, 16(4), 411-426.
    Espelage, D., & Horne, A. (2008). School violence and bullying prevention: From research based explanations to empirically based solutions. In S. Brown, & R. Lent, Handbook of counseling psychology (4th edition ed., pp. 588-606).
    Greenham, S. L. (1999). Learning disabilities and psychosocial adjustment: A critical review. Child neuropsychology, 5(3), 171-196.
    Handwerk, M. L., & Marshall, R. M. (1998). Behavioral and emotional problems of students with learning disabilities, serious emotional disturbance, or both conditions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 327-338.
    Health, N. L.(1992)Learning disabilities and depression : Research, theory and Practice. Exceptionality Education in Canada.2(3 & 4),59-74.
    Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311-322.
    Holt, M. K., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(8), 984-994.
    Levin, K. A., Torsheim, T., Vollebergh, W., Richter, M., Davies, C. A., Schnohr, C. W., ... & Currie, C. (2011). National income and income inequality, family affluence and life satisfaction among 13 year old boys and girls: A multilevel study in 35 countries. Social indicators research, 104(2), 179-194.
    Langevin, M., Bortnick, K., Hammer, T., & Wiebe, E. (1998).
    Teasing/bullying experienced by children who stutter: Toward development of a questionnaire. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 25, 12–24.
    Little, L. (2002). Middle-class mother’s perceptions of peer andsibling victimization among children with Asperger’s syndrome and nonverbal learning disorders. Issues in ComprehensivePediatric Nursing, 25, 43–57.
    Llewellyn, A. (2000). Perceptions of mainstreaming: A systemsapproach. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 42,106–115.
    Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (1977). Labels, categories, behaviors: ED, LD, and EMR reconsidered. The Journal of Special Education, 11(2), 139-149.
    Karin Schermelleh-Engel , Helfried Moosbrugger , Hans Müller(2003) Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures , Methods of Psychological Research Online 2003, Vol.8, No.2, pp. 23-74.
    Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpelä, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpelä, A. (2000). Bullying at school—an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of adolescence, 23(6), 661-674.
    Kaukiainen, A., Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Tamminen, M., Vauras, M., Mäki, H., & Poskiparta, E. (2002). Learning difficulties, social intelligence, and self–concept: Connections to bully–victim problems. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 43(3), 269-278.
    Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1996). Social skill deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of learning disabilities, 29(3), 226-237.
    Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press
    Knox, E., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2003). Bullying risks of 11-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI): does school placement matter?.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38(1), 1-12.
    Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company
    Kumpulainen, K., Räsänen, E., & Puura, K. (2001). Psychiatric disorders and the use of mental health services among children involved in bullying.Aggressive Behavior, 27(2), 102-110.
    Kuhne, M. & Wiener, J. (2000). Stability of social status of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(1), 64-75.
    Kloosterman, P. H., Kelley, E. A., Craig, W. M., Parker, J. D., & Javier, C. (2013). Types and experiences of bullying in adolescents
    with an autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(7), 824-832.
    Kokkinos, C. M., & Antoniadou, N. (2013). Bullying and victimization experiences in elementary school students nominated by their teachers for Specific Learning Disabilities. School Psychology International, 34(6), 674-690.
    Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6), 1231-1237.
    Olweus, D. (1989). Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention programme. In Pepler D. & Rubin K. H. (Eds), The development and treatment of childhood aggression , 441-448.
    O’Moore, A. M., & Hillery, B. (1989). Bullying in Dublin schools. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 426-441.
    Martlew, M., & Hodson, J. (1991). Children with mild learning difficulties in an integrated and in a special school: Comparisons of behaviour, teasing and teachers’ attitudes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 355-372
    Margalit, M., & Levin-Alyagon, M. (1994). Learning disability subtyping, loneliness, and classroom adjustment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17(4), 297-310.
    Margalit, M. (1995). Social skills learning for students with learning disabilities and students with behaviour disorders. Educational Psychology, 15(4), 445-456.
    Marini, Z. A., Koruna, B., & Dane, A. V. (2006). Individualized interventions for ESL students involved in bullying and victimization. Contact (Spring Issue), 1,15.
    Monchy*, M. D., Pijl, S. J., & Zandberg, T. (2004). Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of pupils with behaviour problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19(3), 317-330.
    Moore, S. R., & Simpson, R. L. (1983). Teacher-pupil and peer verbal interactions of learning disabled, behavior-disordered, and nonhandicapped students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6(3), 273-282.
    Morrison, G. M., Furlong, M. J., & Smith, G. (1994). Factors associated with the experience of school violence among general education, leadership class, opportunity class, and special day class pupils. Education & Treatment of Children.
    Montes, G., & Halterman, J. S. (2007). Psychological functioning and coping among mothers of children with autism: a population-based study. Pediatrics,119(5), e1040-e1046.
    Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Jama, 285(16), 2094-2100.
    Nabuzoka, D., & Smith, P. K. (1993). Sociometric status and social behaviour of children with and without learning difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(8), 1435-1448.
    Nabuzoka, D. (2003). Teacher ratings and peer nominations of bullying and other behaviour of children with and without learning difficulties. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 307-321.
    Norwich*, B., & Kelly, N. (2004). Pupils' views on inclusion: moderate learning difficulties and bullying in mainstream and special schools. British Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 43-65.
    Rowley, E., Chandler, S., Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Loucas, T., & Charman, T. (2012). The experience of friendship, victimization and bullying in children with an autism spectrum disorder: Associations with child characteristics and school placement. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,6(3), 1126-1134.
    Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L., & Monda‐Amaya, L. E. (2009). Bullying and victimisation rates among students in general and special education: A comparative analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 761-776.
    Rose, C.A., Monda-Amaya,L.E., Espelage,D.L.(2011) Bullying Perpetration and Victimization in Special Education: A Review of the Literature, Remedial and Special Education,32(2),p114-130
    Rose, C. A., & Monda-Amaya, L. E. (2012). Bullying and Victimization Among Students With Disabilities Effective Strategies for Classroom Teachers.Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(2), 99-107.
    Rose, C. A. Espelage, D .L . Monda-Amaya, L.E., Shogren, K. A. Aragon,
    S.R.(2015)Bullying and Middle School Students with and without Specific Learning Disabilities: An Examination of Social-Ecological Predictors, Journal of learning disabilities,48(3),p239-254
    Sapouna, M., & Wolke, D. (2013). Resilience to bullying victimization: The role of individual, family and peer characteristics. Child abuse & neglect, 37(11), 997-1006.
    Sabornie, E. J., Cullinan, D., Osborne, S. S., & Brock, L. B. (2005). Intellectual, academic, and behavioral functioning of students with high-incidence disabilities: A cross-categorical meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 72(1), 47-63.
    Sabornie, E. J., Evans, C., & Cullinan, D. (2006). Comparing Characteristics of High-Incidence Disability Groups A Descriptive Review. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 95-104
    Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression.Adolescence, 38(152).
    Slee, P. T. (1995). Peer victimization and its relationship to depression among Australian primary school students. Personality and Individual Differences,18(1), 57-62.
    Singer, E. (2005). The strategies adopted by Dutch children with dyslexia to maintain their self-esteem when teased at school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(5), 411-423.
    Smokowski, P. R., & Kopasz, K. H. (2005). Bullying in school: An overview of types, effects, family characteristics, and intervention strategies. Children & Schools, 27(2), 101-110.
    Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive behavior, 29(3), 239-268.
    Sourander, A., Helstelä, L., Helenius, H., & Piha, J. (2000). Persistence of bullying from childhood to adolescence—a longitudinal 8-year follow-up study.Child abuse & neglect, 24(7), 873-881
    Sullivan, T. N., Helms, S. W., Bettencourt, A. F., Sutherland, K., Lotze, G. M., Mays, S.,& Farrell, A. D. (2012). A Qualitative Study of Individual and Peer Factors Related to Effective Nonviolent versus Aggressive Responses to Problem Situations among Adolescents with High Incidence Disabilities.Behavioral Disorders, 37(3).
    Svetaz, M. V., Ireland, M.,& Blum, R.(2000) Adolescents with learning disabilities : Risk and protective factors associated with emotional well-being: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of Adolescent Health,27,340-348
    Swearer, S. M., Wang, C., Maag, J. W., Siebecker, A. B., & Frerichs, L. J. (2012). Understanding the bullying dynamic among students in special and general education. Journal of school psychology, 50(4), 503-520.
    Pearl, R., & Bay, M. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of learning disabilities. InHandbook of psychosocial characteristics of exceptional children (pp. 443-470). Springer US.
    Tattum, D. P. & Lane, D. A. (1989). Bullying in schools. London: Trentham Books.
    Thompson, D., Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bullying of children with special needs in mainstream schools. Support for learning, 9(3), 103-106.
    Twyman, K. A., Saylor, C. F., Saia, D., Macias, M. M., Taylor, L. A., & Spratt, E. (2010). Bullying and ostracism experiences in children with special health care needs. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 31(1), 1-8.
    Unnever, J. D., & Cornell, D. G. (2004). Middle school victims of bullying: Who reports being bullied?. Aggressive Behavior, 30(5), 373-388.
    Vossekuil, B., Fein, R. A., Reddy, M., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2002). The final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative. US Secret Service and Department of Education, Washington, DC.
    Van Cleave, J., & Davis, M. M. (2006). Bullying and peer victimization among children with special health care needs. Pediatrics, 118(4), e1212-e1219.
    Woods, S., & Wolke, D. (2004). Direct and relational bullying among primary school children and academic achievement. Journal of School Psychology,42(2), 135-155.
    White, N. A., & Loeber, R. (2008). Bullying and special education as predictors of serious delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(4), 380-397.
    Yen, C. F., Yang, P., Wang, P. W., Lin, H. C., Liu, T. L., Wu, Y. Y., & Tang, T. C. (2014). Association between school bullying levels/types and mental health problems among Taiwanese adolescents. Comprehensive psychiatry, 55(3), 405-413.
    Yude, C., Goodman, R., & McConachie, H. (1998). Problems of children with hemiplegia in mainstream primary schools. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(4), 533-541.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE