研究生: |
吳育綺 Wu, Yu-Chi |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台灣製造部門產業群聚之實證研究 An Empirical Study on Industrial Agglomeration of Taiwan Manufacturing Sectors |
指導教授: |
祁玉蘭
Chyi, Yih-Luan |
口試委員: |
李宜
Lee, Yi 劉文獻 Liu, Wen-Hsien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 65 |
中文關鍵詞: | 產業群聚 、投入要素的共享 、勞動市場的結合 、知識外溢 、自然優勢 、Ellison and Glaeser 指數 |
外文關鍵詞: | Industrial agglomeration, Input sharing, Labor market pooling, Knowledge spillovers, Natural advantage, Ellison and Glaeser index |
相關次數: | 點閱:4 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇論文主要研究台灣製造產業是否存在群聚現象以及為何會產生。實證研
究首先採用Ellison and Glaeser (1997) 所建立的衡量方式,以工廠校正暨營運調查資料計算三位碼產業在1992 年到2003 年的群聚程度,實證結果顯示台灣製造產業普遍存在地理集中現象。本論文接著延續Marshall(1920)所提出的概念,實證地檢驗產業形成群聚的主要因素,為了能深入分析各種產業是否存在不同的群聚力量,我們依照經濟部統計局的分類,將台灣製造產業依其產品與營業特性區分成五種產業並各自研究形成群聚的主要原因。研究結果顯示在整體製造業中,勞動市場的結合(labor market pooling)與投入要素共享(input sharing)在城市與區域類別中有著正向的驅使力量使產業形成群聚現象,在個別產業的研究結果指出知識外溢仍是一個重要的群聚力量並同時存在正向和負向影響力;然而Marshall 所提出的其他要素只有在某些產業中存在正向顯著的結果。
In this thesis, we investigate whether the production activities are geographic concentration and why firms would collocate near one another in the same industry. We first employ agglomeration index that is constructed by Ellison and Glaeser (1997) for Taiwan manufacturing sectors from Factory Operation Census to calculate the degrees of geographic concentration in SIC three-digit level industries during 1992 to 2003. Our results confirm that geographic concentrations in Taiwan manufacturing sectors are ubiquitous. Having shown evidences of concentration, we then examine the main driving forces of industrial agglomeration by constructing measures to proxy for Marshall’s theories of agglomeration economies. We not only examine the microfoundations of industrial agglomeration in the overall manufacturing but also split data into five classifications to further investigate the role of Marshallian forces particularly. Empirical results suggest that labor market pooling and input sharing respectively have obvious difference to attract firm to collocate between cities and districts in the overall manufacturing. In the case of particular industries, knowledge spillovers still play an important role and act as centrifugal and centripetal forces; however, other Marshallian forces are only positive and significant in some industries.
Alecke, Björn, Christoph Alsleben , Frank Scharr ,and Gerhard Untiedt. 2006. "Are there really high-tech clusters? The geographic concentration of German manufacturing industries and its determinants.” The Annals of Regional Science 40(1), pages 19-42.
Audretsch, David B.,and Maryann P. Feldman.1996. “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production.” The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630- 641.
Bertinelli, Luisito ,and Jehan Decrop.2005. “Geographical agglomeration: Ellison and Glaeser’s index applied to the case of Belgian manufacturing industry.” Regional Studies 39, 567–583.
Buzard, Kristy and Gerald Carlino.2009. “The geography of research and development activity in the U.S.” FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 09-16 .
Chan, Li-Yu. 2010. “Geographic Concentration and Its Determinants in Taiwan Manufacturing Industries.” Journal of Geographical Science (58), 25-47. (In Chinese)
Combes, Pierre P. ,and Gilles Duranton.2006. “Labour Pooling, Labour Poaching, and Spatial Clustering.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 1–28.
Devereux, Michael P., Rachel Griffith ,and Helen Simpson.2004. “The geographic distribution of production activity in the UK.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 34 (5), 533–564.
Duranton, Gilles, and Henry G. Overman. 2005.“Testing for Localization Using Micro-Geographic Data.”Review of Economic Studies, 72(4),1077-1106.
Ellison, Glenn, and Edward L. Glaeser. 1997. “Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach.” Journal of Political Economy, 105(5), 889–927.
Ellison, Glenn, and Edward L. Glaeser. 1999. “The Geographic Concentration of Industry: Does Natural Advantage Explain Agglomeration?” American Economic Review, 89(2), 311-316.
Ellison, Glenn, Edward L. Glaeser, and William R. Kerr. 2010. “What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns.” American Economic Review, 100(3), 1195–1213.
Gabe, Todd M., and Jaison R. Abel.2012. “Specialized Knowledge and the Geographic Concentration of Occupations.” Journal of Economic Geography 12( 2), 435-53.
Guillain, Rachel, and Julie Le Gallo. 2007. “ Agglomeration and Dispersion of Economic Activities in and around Paris: An Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis.” LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2007-01, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
Holmes, Thomas J..1999. “How Industries Migrate When Agglomeration Economies Are Important.” Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 240-263.
Krugman, Paul .1991. “Geography and Trade, Geography and Trade.” Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lu, Jiangyong ,and Zhigang Tao.2009. “Trends and determinants of China’s industrial agglomeration.” Journal of Urban Economics 65, 167-180.
Mariotti, Sergio, Lucia Piscitello ,and Stefano Elia.2010. “Spatial agglomeration of multinational enterprises: the role of information externalities and knowledge spillovers.” Journal of Economic Geography,10(4), 519-538.
Marshall, Alfred .1920. “Principle of Economics.” MacMillan, New York.
Maurel, Françoise and Be´atrice Se´dillot.1999. “A measure of the geographic concentration in French manufacturing industries.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 29 ,575–604.
Rosenthal, Stuart S. and William C. Strange.2001. “The Determinants of Agglomeration.” Journal of Urban Economics 50, 191-229.