本研究旨在探討馬拉松賽事的跑友在環境永續意識、環境作為感受以及再參加環境永續賽事意願之關係，研究對象為2022北宜公路超級馬拉松參賽者，以問卷形式進行研究調查。本研究會使用到描述性統計、t檢定、one-way ANOVA、雪費檢定、Pearson相關分析以及路徑分析等統計方法探討參賽者「環境永續意識」、「賽事環境永續作為感受」以及「再參加環境永續賽事」三個構面之間的相關性，並探討這些因素之間的相互作用。當中主要研究發現有以下數點：
一、 參賽者在「環境永續意識」的平均得分是三個構面之最，高於「賽事環境永續作為感受」以及「再參加環境永續賽事」兩項構面。參加路跑次數較多的參賽者在環境永續意識上得分也較高，「再參加環境永續賽事」可續步持續提升參賽者的環境永續意識。
二、 而跑齡較長與年齡較大的跑友更願意再參加環境永續賽事支持環境永續賽事。最後，年齡較高的參賽者，表現出較強的環境永續作為感受。
三、 參賽者再參加環境永續賽事的意願會受到其本身的環境永續意識以及賽事的環境永續作為所影響。
本文亦就研究發現提出以下建議：
一、 561歲以上參賽者在「環境永續意識」、「環境永續作為感受」兩以及「支持環境永續賽事」三方面均表現出較高的平均值，日後應更著重於對年輕人年齡段的永續意識提升的推廣。
二、 結果顯示跑友永續意識愈漸提高，賽事單位可以在規劃相關作為時邀請跑友共同規劃，提升其認同程度。考慮如何提升跑齡較短的跑友的環境永續意識。
三、 賽事辦理單位應建構整合性溝通宣傳策略，讓參賽者感受賽事辦理單位的賽事永續作為。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among environmental consciousness, perception of environmental practices, and the intention to Re-participate in environmentally sustainable events, with a focus on the 2022 Beiyi Ultra Marathon participants. Using a questionnaire survey, the research employed methods such as descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe's test, Pearson correlation analysis, and path analysis to explore the relationships between participants' environmental consciousness, their perceptions of the environmental practices at running races, and their intentions to Re-participate in such races.
The study revealed that participants scored the highest in "Environmental Consciousness," surpassing the scores for "Perception of Environmental Practices" and "Intention to Re-Participate in Environmentally Sustainable Running Races." Secondly, those who frequently participate in running events exhibit higher environmental sustainability consciousness, showing that engaging in such running races enhances this consciousness. Additionally, runners with more experience and those of older age show a greater willingness to support environmentally sustainable running races. It is also observed that older participants have a stronger perception of environmental practices. Lastly, the willingness of participants to join environmentally sustainable running races is influenced by their environmental sustainability consciousness and the sustainable practices of the running races itself.
Based on the findings of this study, there are a few recommendations. Firstly, we recommend focusing future efforts on enhancing sustainability consciousness among younger age groups, as participants aged 51 and above showed higher levels of environmental sustainability consciousness and perception of environmental practices. Additionally, the results show that runners' environmental consciousness is steadily increasing. Event organizers can enhance their sense of belonging by inviting runners to participate in the planning process when making relevant arrangements. Lastly, event organizers should develop intact communication and promotion strategies to enhance participants' perception of the environmental practices of the event organizers.

王明元、魏伊君（2014）。運動觀光參與者的滿意度與再次參與意願相關研究－以2013高雄國際馬拉松為例。商業現代化學刊，7(3)，15-29。https://doi.org/10.6132/JCM.2014.7.3.02

周廷彰（2023）。心靈外宿中。微笑台灣2023春季號，34。

許智超（2022年12月18日）。2022臺北馬拉松今開跑！民眾不甩大會提醒「亂丟雨衣」畫面全曝光。三立新聞網。https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=1225533。

綠色和平（2018年6月7日）。路跑活動每年丟棄400萬個免洗杯 綠色和平調　　　查：七成跑者願意自備水杯。綠色和平。https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/press/5973。

運動筆記編輯團隊（2021年1月14日）。【賽事】加油好嗎？2020五大再加油賽事，你報了哪一場？。運動筆記。https://running.biji.co/index.php?q=news&act=info&id=105084。

運動筆記編輯團隊（2023年12月5日）。【跑步大調查】2022年跑者習性大公開！馬拉松議題全都錄 你是哪一類跑者呢！？。運動筆記。https://running.biji.co/index.php?q=news&act=info&id=109669&subtitle。

廖禹婷、劉庭莉（2022年12月19日）。一場路跑幾萬個紙杯消失 運動產業供應鏈加入減碳行動。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/235682。

廖禹婷、劉庭莉（2022年12月19日）。【翻譯米糕】路跑也能算碳足跡！台灣首個運動賽事「產品類別規則」如何誕生？。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/235675。

Casper, J. M., Pfahl, M. E., & McCullough, B. (2014). Intercollegiate sport and the environment: Examining fan engagement based on athletics department sustainability efforts. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 7, 65–91.

Casper, J. M., Pfahl, M. E., & McCullough, B. P. (2019). Examining environmental fan engagement initiatives through values and norms with intercollegiate sport fans. Sport Management Review, 23(2), 348-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.03.005

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2012). Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Decision, 50(3), 502-520. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216250

Chen, Y. S. (2013). Towards green loyalty: Driving from green perceived value, green satisfaction, and green trust. Sustainable Development, 21(5), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.500

DeChano-Cook, L. M., & Shelley, F. M. (2017). Climate change and the future of international events: A case of the Olympic and Paralympic Games. In B. P.McCullough & T. B. Kellison (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and the environment, 94–106. London: Routledge.

Fédération Internationale de Football Association. (2022). FIFA World Cup2022™ Greenhouse gas accounting report. Fédération Internationale de Football Association. Retrieved from https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/283d8622accb9efe/original/ocv9xna0lkvdshw30idr-pdf.pdf

Huang, H.-C., Lin, T.-H., Lai, M.-C., & Lin, T.-L. (2014). Environmental consciousness and green customer behavior: An examination of motivation crowding effect. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.04.006

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf

Kim, J., Kim, S., & Chung, J. (2023). Examining the Relationship between Pro-Environmental Attitudes, Self-Determination, and Sustained Intention in Eco-Friendly Sports Participation: A Study on Plogging Participants. Sustainability, 15(15), 11806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511806

Könecke, T., Schunk, H., Schappel, T., Hugaerts, I., Wagner, F., & Malchrowicz-Mo´sko, E. (2021). German Marathon Runners’ Opinions on and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(18), 10337. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810337

Lichter, A., Pestel, N., & Sommer, E. (2015). Productivity Effects of Air Pollution: Evidence from Professional Soccer. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8964. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Retrieved from https://ftp.iza.org/dp8964.pdf

Lobillo Mora, G., Ginesta, X., & de San Eugenio Vela, J. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Football Clubs: The Value of Environmental Sustainability as a Basis for the Rebranding of Real Betis Balompié in Spain. Sustainability, 13(24), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413689

McCullough, B. P., & Cunningham, G. B. (2011). Recycling intentions among youth baseball spectators. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 10(1-2), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2011.043618

McCullough, B. P. (2013). Identifying the influences on sport spectator recycling behaviours using the theory of planned behaviour. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 14(1-4), 146-168. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2013.060631

Puangmanee, S., & Saearlee, M. (2020). Solid waste management at an international full-marathon running event in Southern Thailand. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 247, 35-45. doi:10.2495/WM200041

Sánchez-Sáez, J. A., Sánchez-Sánchez, J., Martínez-Rodríguez, A., Felipe, J. L., García-Unanue, J., & Lara-Cobos, D. (2020). Global Positioning System Analysis of Physical Demands in Elite Women's Beach Handball Players in an Official Spanish Championship. Sensors, 21(3), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030850

Scott, D., Steiger, R., Rutty, M., & Johnson, P. (2014). The future of the Olympic Winter Games in an era of climate change. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(10), 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.887664

Straughan, R. and Roberts, J. (1999) Environmental Segmentation Alternatives: A Look at Green Consumer Behavior in the New Millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16, 558-575. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769910297506

Thormann, T. F., & Wicker, P. (2021). Determinants of pro-environmental behavior among voluntary sport club members. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 51, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-020-00700-8

Thormann, T.F.;Wicker, P.; Braksiek, M. (2022). Stadium Travel and Subjective Well-Being of Football Spectators. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127278

Townsend, A. R., Howarth, R. W., Bazzaz, F. A., Booth, M. S., Cleveland, C. C., Collinge, S. K., Dobson, A. P., Epstein, P. R., Holland, E. A., Keeney, D. R., Mallin, M. A., Rogers, C. A., Wayne, P., & Wolfe, A. H. (2003). Human health effects of a changing global nitrogen cycle. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(5), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0240:HHEOAC]2.0.CO;2

Trail, G. T., & McCullough, B. P. (2020). Marketing sustainability through sport: Testing the sport sustainability campaign evaluation model. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(2), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2019.1580301

Walker, M. & Heere, B. (2011). Consumer Attitudes toward Responsible Entities in Sport (CARES): Scale development and model testing. Sport Management Review, 14(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2010.08.001

Walker, M. (2013). Does green management matter for donation intentions?: The influence of environmental consciousness and environmental importance. Management Decision, 51(8). doi:10.1108/MD-10-2012-0732.

Wicker, P. (2019). The carbon footprint of active sport participants. Sport Management Review, 22(4), 513-526. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2018.07.001