本研究旨在探討學前融合教師運用文化回應教學於介入反應模式之實施歷程，彙整在歷程中影響教師的實施因素與挑戰，同時紀錄幼兒在教學歷程中的學習表現。本研究採質性研究，以研究日誌、訪場綱要、教學評量表、教學檢核表作為資料搜集之工具，研究場域為新北某公立幼兒園中小混齡班，其教師為研究對象，研究者以參與式觀察者的角色進行紀錄、訪談。研究結果與結論如下：
一、 參與教師運用文化回應教學於介入反應模式中之觀點
(一) 班級經營扮演關鍵角色，建立明確的行為規範與獎懲制度，能提升幼兒行為表現的穩定性並增進幼兒在學習上的參與度。
(二) 針對幼兒的學習表現及需求進行策略調整，並結合其多元文化背景，提供適性教材與任務難度，持續累積實作經驗來提升品質。
二、 參與教師運用文化回應教學於介入反應模式中之實施歷程分為三個階段: 準備期強調團體活動與生活常規建立；前期透過小團體教學改善行為與問題解決能力；中後期則提供個別操作機會以提升動機與參與度。
三、 參與教師面臨的挑戰包括：多元背景幼兒人數多導致人力不足、評量工具以團體為主難以檢核個別能力，以及家長配合度不足影響親師合作。
最後，研究提出對教學實務與未來研究的建議。

The purpose of this study was to explore how inclusive preschool teachers implement culturally responsive teaching (CRT) within the response-to-intervention (RTI) model. It examines the factors and challenges influencing the implementation process and documents children's learning outcomes. The study was conducted in a public preschool class in New Taipei City, with a primary focus on the teachers as the targeted participants. The researcher took on the role of a participant-observer, using observation and interviews as key methods of data collection. The findings and conclusions of the study are as follows:
1. Perspectives of participating teachers on using CRT within the RTI Model
(1) Classroom management is crucial.
(2) Instructional strategies must be responsive and adaptive.
2. Implementation process from the participating teachers on using CRT within the RTI
Model, including three phases: preparation stage (i.e., emphasized group activities and the establishment of daily routines), early stage (i.e., used small-group instruction to address behavioral and problem-solving skills), and middle to later stage (i.e., provided individualized activities to boost motivation and participation).
3. Challenges faced by participating teachers
(1) A high number of children from diverse backgrounds leads to staffing shortages.
(2) Group-based assessment tools make it difficult to evaluate individual capabilities.
(3) Limited parental cooperation affects the effectiveness of home-school collaboration.
Finally, the study offers practical recommendations for practical and future research directions.

壹、 中文部分
內政部移民署（2023）。我國與外籍配偶結婚統計。取自https://www.immigration.gov.tw/5385/7344/7350/8887/?alias=settledown
王貞雲、黃欣蕙、何淑菁（2012）。新移民家庭父母教養子女的問題與因應策略之探討。家庭教育雙月刊，37，28-40。https://doi.org/10.6422/JFEB.201205.0028
王薰葦（2011）。使用課程本位測量於介入反應模式中鑑定閱讀障礙學生可行性研究。國立臺北教育大學特殊學系碩士班碩士論文，臺北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/cn576d
文高上（2011）。Gardner的多元智能理論之教育哲學主義探悉。鵝湖月刊，(434)，32-37。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.201108.0005
全國法規資料庫（2005）。中華民國憲法增修條文。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0000002
余恩慧（2022）。文化回應教學結合英語課程對國小中年級排灣族學童英語學習動機提升之行動研究。國立屏東科技大學應用外語系所碩士論文，屏東縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zm9472
谷鴻暐（2019）。運用文化回應教學提升英語學習動機與口說能力之行動研究－以國小四年級原住民學童為例。國立臺中教育大學教師專業碩士學位學程碩士論文，臺中市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jhrbcd
呂庭妤（2012）。運用文化回應教學於新移民子女之行動研究。淡江大學課程與教學研究所碩士班碩士論文，新北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/83y93p
吳清山（2018）。文化回應教學。教育研究月刊，290，127-128。
吳淑美（2016）。融合教育理論與實務。臺北：心理。
李台元（2017）。從多元文化到多元文化教育。教育脈動，(12)，32-37。
李淑菁（2017）。想像與形構：臺灣多元文化教育發展之論述分析。臺灣教育社會學研究，17(2)，1-44。https://doi.org/10.3966/168020042017121702001
李慧娟、汪麗貞（2016）。幼兒社會因應取向之初探。長庚科技學刊，(24)，1-15。https://doi.org/10.6192/CGUST.2016.6.24.1
何淑玫（2014）。RTI運用在國小學生閱讀障礙鑑定之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文，臺北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3vc6t4
何縕琪（2005）。文化回應教學：因應文化差異學生的課程設計與教學策略。國立編譯館館刊，33(4)，30-41。
林彩岫（2022）。從文化回應教學與族群本位課程的區別談原住民族實驗教育的展望。臺灣教育評論月刊，11(2)，9-18。
林姝吟、陳淑美（2017）。我國幼兒園實施融合教育之實務探討。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(2)，63-67。
林修澈、李台元（2014）。族語保存與教育。文化保存。永續發展教育系列叢書(第8卷)，國家教育研究院(主編)，199-224。臺北：五南出版公司。
林昭溶、毛萬儀、吳敏而（2013）。幼兒自主認知之初探。教育資料與研究，(111)，1-27。https://doi.org/10.6724/ERR.201311_(111).0001
林葙葙（2010）。RTI向下延伸之新趨勢－介入反應模式在幼兒階段之應用。特教論壇，(8)，1-14。https://doi.org/10.6502/SEF.2010.8.1-14
林芳如（2009）。教學介入反應(RTI)及其相關研究之探討。國小特殊教育，48，23-31。https://doi.org/10.7034/SEES.200912.0023
林桂如（2008）。回應性介入(RTI)內涵及其對國內融合教育之啟示。國小特殊教育，(45)，68-77。
周宣辰（2017）。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱之多元文化教育意涵評析。教科書研究，10(3)，133-158。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201712_10(3).05
周梅雀（2011）。原住民族語文化在地化教育之實踐—以一所排灣族部落托育班浸潤式教學為例。教育與多元文化研究，4，73-117。
柯秋雪（2020）。兩歲特殊幼兒上學了：親師合作實施個別化教育計畫之研究。教育學報，48(1)，87-107。
柯秋雪（2018）。歐美學前融合教育之課程與教學的發展與特徵。課程與教學季刊，21(1)，1-26。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201801_21(1).0001
柯雅齡（2017）。幼兒園教師教學轉化以適應特殊需求幼兒之歷程。幼兒教育年刊，(28)，39-59。
洪巧珣、林宏熾(2010)。國小階段身心障礙資源班教師多元文化教育素養及其相關因素之研究。特殊教育學報，(31)，53-84。https://doi.org/10.6768/JSE.201006.0053
洪儷瑜（2014）。邁向融合教育之路-回顧特殊教育法立法三十年。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊，103，21-32。
洪儷瑜、何淑玫（2010）。「介入反應」在特殊教育的意義與運用。特殊教育季刊，115，1-13。https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.201006_(115).0001
洪儷瑜、陳淑麗、王瓊珠、方金雅、張郁雯、陳美芳、柯華葳(2009)。閱讀障礙篩選流程的檢驗—篩選或教師轉介之比較。特殊教育研究學刊，34(1)，1-22。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE200903.3401001
洪瑞斌、莊騏嘉、陳筱婷（2015）。深思敘說研究之研究倫理議題：回到倫理學基礎探討。生命敘說與心理傳記學，3，55-79。https://doi.org/10.6512/lnp.2015.03.03
查威佑（2016）。介入反應模式(RTI) :探索閱讀障礙的架構。國立中正大學教育領導與管理發展國際碩士學位學程碩士論文，嘉義市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9qfrzc
馬敬涵（2018）。把握學前融合教育之黃金期。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(8)，153-157。
徐月秋（2018）。臺灣國民中小學學習障礙學生鑑定實施狀況之研究。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士班碩士論文，臺北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/b3agpb
教育部（2023）。特殊教育法。臺北：教育部。
教育部（2022）。110學年度各級學校新住民子女概況。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/110_son_of_foreign.pdf
教育部（2019）。幼兒園及其分班基本設施設備標準。臺北：教育部。
教育部（2017）。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。教育部國民及學前教育署。
教育部特殊教育通報網（2023a）。111學年度學前及國教階段身心障礙類外籍人士子女統計。取自https://www.set.edu.tw/Stastic_Spc/sta2/doc/stuForeigh_city_edulev/stuForeigh_city_edulev_20230528.pdf
教育部特殊教育通報網（2023b）。111學年度學前及國教階段身心障礙類原住民子女統計。取自https://www.set.edu.tw/Stastic_Spc/sta2/doc/stuNative_city_edulev/stuNative_city_edulev_20230528.pdf
教育部特殊教育通報網（2022）。110學年度特教學生安置類別概況。取自https://tp-adapt.set.edu.tw/book_ul/7/1945/111%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E4%B8%AD%E8%8F%AF%E6%B0%91%E5%9C%8B%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1.pdf
教育部特殊教育通報網（2021）。109學年度特教學生安置類別概況。取自https://tp-adapt.set.edu.tw/book_ul/7/1943/110%E7%89%B9%E6%95%99%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1_%E4%B8%8B%E8%BC%892.rar
胡致念（2023）。原住民族實驗教育之研究：以泰雅族兩所國民小學文化回應教學為例。國立嘉義大學教育學系教育行政與政策發展碩士班碩士論文，嘉義市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rnb9uw
張曉婷、辛靜婷（2020）。融入越南文化之反偏見課程行動研究:教學歷程與幼兒族群關係發展。課程與教學季刊，23(3)，109-140。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202007_23(3).0005
陳玟樺（2017）。師生共構文化回應數學教學之個案研究。教育研究集刊，63(2)，49-100。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082017066302002
陳儒晰（2017）。幼兒教師對文化回應教學的教學實踐與專業省思。中華管理發展評論，6(2)，37-57。https://doi.org/10.6631/JCMD.201712_6(2).0004
陳姿諭（2012）。從介入反應模式（RTI）談普通班教師與特教教師之協同合作。桃竹區特殊教育，(20)，19-25。https://doi.org/10.6359/JSE.201212.0019
陳姿螢（2019）。教師文化回應教學、教師文化回應自我效能感與學校組織氣氛之關聯性探討。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，臺南市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/247343
陳欣瑜（2016）。文化回應教學在國小國語課程實踐之行動研究。國立屏東大學教育學系碩士班碩士論文，屏東縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/832szt
陳書婷（2018）。我國融合教育的發展與實施困境。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(1)，137-141。
陳炫任、匡小可（2012）。美國多元文化師資培育課程對臺灣之啟示。教育與多元文化研究，7，37-63。
陸怡君（2017）。我國學前融合教育文獻回顧與探討。幼兒教保研究，(18)，47-69。
連文宏（2018）。計算核心課程對數學學習障礙高危險群學童介入成效-不同統計法在小樣本研究之應用。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士班碩士論文，臺北市。取自https://doi.org/10.6345/DIS.NTNU.DSE.014.2018.F02
曹祐榮、洪儷瑜（2020）。從國際發展趨勢談臺灣推動融合教育之實踐。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊，69-102。
鈕文英（2022）。擁抱個別差異的新典範－融合教育(三版)。臺北：心理。
鈕文英（2017）。質性研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。臺北：雙葉書廊。
曾淑賢（2021）。學前融合教育課程調整模式之探討。教育實踐與研究，34(2)，124-148。
黃富美（2011）。運用文化回應教學於東南亞多元文化教材之行動研究。國立暨南國際大學東南亞研究所碩士論文，南投縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4wt25h
黃玉鈴（2010）。運用文化回應教學於國小四年級社會領域課程之行動研究─以新移民子女為例。國立臺中教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文，臺中市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mzgzz2
黃莉雯、楊國賜、施宜煌、陳儒晰（2019）。臺北市教保服務人員學前融合教育態度之研究。幼兒教保研究，(21)，59-84。
潘淑滿（2008）。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北：心理。
溫明麗（2017）。迦德納的智慧。教育脈動，(9)，76-81。
葉嘉瑜（2011）。新竹縣市國小教師的多元文化素養與新移民女性家長親師互動之相關研究。中國文化大學農學院生活應用科學系碩士論文，臺北市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/54v78f
趙婉玲（2022）。學前融合教師效能與文化回應教學之相關研究。國立清華大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，新竹市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8ua8cv
連文宏（2018）。計算核心課程對數學學習障礙高危險群學童介入成效－不同統計法在小樣本研究之應用。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，臺北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/v9f72x
廖凰吟（2021）。從融合教育中看見 CRPD－以多元文化主義觀點。台東特教，53，30-34。
廖文峯（2011）。自然科學發展處處長致全體自然科學界的一封信－研究的基石重視學術倫理。取自http://esrpc.ncu.edu.tw/public/tw/news/detail/58/1?search=&date_start=&date_end=
劉以心（2020）。越南裔新住民於雙文化間之幼兒教養觀及策略。國立清華大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，新竹市。取自 https://etd.lib.nctu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/hugsweb.cgi?o=dnthucdr&s=id=%22G021071914010%22.&searchmode=basic
劉錫吾（2020）。學前教育教師在融合教育的專業知能需求之研究。障礙者理解學刊，17(1)，79-97。https://doi.org/10.6513/JUID.202001_17(1).0004
劉美慧、游美惠、李淑菁（2018）。多元文化教育。臺北：高等教育。
劉美慧(2012)。文化回應教學。載於譚光鼎、劉美慧、游美惠(編著)，多元文化教育(頁 327-356)。臺北市：高等教育。
劉美慧（2011）。多元文化教育研究的反思與前瞻。人文與社會科學簡訊，12(4)，56-63。
劉美慧（2001）。文化回應教學：理論、研究與實踐。課程與教學季刊，4(4)，143-152。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200110.0143
劉唐勻(2018)。文化回應教學結合英語繪本對國小高年級泰雅族學童英語學習動機影響之研究〔碩士論文〕。國立臺中教育大學。
衛生福利部（2021）。兒童及少年福利與權利保障法。台北：衛生福利部。
郭又方、林坤燦、曾米嵐（2016）。臺灣融合教育的實施與展望。東華特教，(56)，1-9。
蔡清田（2013）。教育行動研究新論。臺北：五南。
盧美貴、黃月美、陳玉芳（2013）。幼兒教育階段核心素養之研究。課程研究，8(1)，15-40。
謝惠珍（2021）。原生家庭經驗對特殊需求兒童父母教養的影響。國立臺中教育大學幼兒教育學系早期療育碩士班碩士論文，臺中市。取自https://ntcuir.ntcu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/16644/2/48543.pdf
謝妃涵（2013）。不同文化觀點之幼教師面對新移民子女之教學困境與解決策略。兒童與教育研究，8，85-121。
顏惠君（2016）。文化回應的差異化教學。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(8)，162-165。
魏淑卿、陳淑美（2018）。談都市原住民幼兒教育－一個幼兒園教師的觀點。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(5)，154-159。
鄭雅莉（2018）。早期療育服務需求、家庭成果和家庭生活品質相關研究～以花蓮縣接受早期療育服務之家庭為例。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，(44)，63-88。
鄭麗雪（2010）。教學反應(RTI)-學習障礙鑑定的新趨勢。國小特殊教育，(49)，99-106。https://doi.org/10.7034/SEES.201006.0099
譚光鼎、劉美慧、游美惠(2008)。多元文化教育。臺北：高等教育。
鐘梅菁（2018）。學前融合教育方案之建構要素。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(6)，197-202。
蘇純慧（2014）。運用文化回應教學於國小生活課程之行動研究。國立屏東教育大學教育學系碩士班碩士論文，屏東縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5yk2j5
貳、 英文部分
Adler, S. M. (2011). Teacher epistemology and collective narratives: Interrogating teaching and diversity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.015
Arrimada, M., Torrance, M. & Fidalgo, R. (2022). Response to Intervention in first-grade writing instruction: a large-scale feasibility study. Reading and Writing, 35, 943–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10211-z
Arrimada, M., Torrance, M., & Fidalgo, R. (2020). Response to Intervention Model in writing: A review of Assessment measures and instructional practices. Pap. Psicól, 41, 54-65. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2918
Associate Gill, S., & Gergen, K. (2020). Educational Evaluation: A Relational Perspective. The Sage Handbook of Social Constructionist Practice, 402.
Angela, I. P., Charles, L. W. & Pamela, M. S. (2016). Response to Intervention: Where It Came From and Where It's Going. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(3), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2015.1065399
Baker, S. K., Fien, H., & Baker, D. L. (2010). Robust reading instruction in the early grades: conceptual and practical issues in the integration and evaluation of tier 1 and tier 2 instructional supports. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(9), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v42i9.6693
Bayat, M., Minds, G., & Covitt, S. (2010). What does RTI (Response to Intervention) look like in preschool? Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 493-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0372-6
Buysse, V., Peisner-Feinberg, E., Soukakou, E., Fettig, A., Schaaf, J., & Burchinal, M. (2016). Using recognition & response (R&R) to improve children’s language and literacy skills: Findings from two studies. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.11.005
Bursuck, B., & Blanks, B. (2010). Evidence-based early reading practices within a response to intervention system. Psychology in the schools, 47(5), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20480
Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York:Guilford Press.
Chu, S.-Y., Yang, T.-H. & Wang, Y.-W. (2023). Implementing Culturally Responsive Teaching Practices in Inclusive Preschools in Taiwan. Early Childhood Educ J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01586-5
Chu, S.-Y. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching efficacy in inclusive education at Taiwanese preschools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1880547
Chu, S.-Y., & Garcia, S. B. (2018). Collective Teacher Efficacy and Culturally Responsive Teaching Efficacy of Inservice Special Education Teachers in the United States. Urban Education, 56(9), 1520-1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918770720
Chu, S.-Y., & Garcia, B. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching efficacy beliefs of in-service special education teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513520511
Chu, S.-Y. (2011). Perspectives in understanding the schooling and achievement of students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(3), 201-209.
Chu, S.-Y. (2010). The influence of perceived collective teacher efficacy, and contextual variables on individual teacher efficacy of special education teachers serving students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Chu, J. J., & Sun, P. S. (2010). A Study of Social Exclusion Vietnamese and Mainland Chinese brides in Taiwan. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 6(4), 12-23.
Cabell, S. Q., Justice, L. M., Logan, J. A., Konold, T. R. (2013). Emergent literacy profiles among prekindergarten children from low-SES backgrounds: Longitudinal considerations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.03.007
Djuwita, W., & Jamaris, M. (2017). Improving Teachers’ Effectiveness s in developing 5-6 Years Old Children’s Multiple Intelligences based on Holistic Integrative Instructional Approach. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 2(12), 500-505.
Dunst, C. J. (2007). Early intervention for infants and toddlers with developmental disabilities. In S. L. Odom, R. H. Homer, M. Snell, & J. Blacher (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities (pp. 161-180). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Eissa, M. A. (2020). Effects of RTI on letter naming and spelling among kindergarteners at risk for reading failure. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 19(4), 2032-2041. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.763216
Ford, B. A., Stuard, D. H., & Vakil, S. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching in the 21st century inclusive classroom. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 15(2), 56–62.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2017). Critique of the national evaluation of response to intervention: A case for simpler frameworks. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917693580
Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-Intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442150
Fuchs, L. S. (2009). Responsiveness To Intervention. Speech in the conference titled Creating a new era of inclusive education. Chungli: Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan.
Fuchs, L.S. (2007). NRCLD update on responsiveness to intervention: Research to practice. [Brochure]. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Stecher, P. M. (2010). The blurring of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600304
Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn., S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gay, G. (2015). The what, why, and how of culturally responsive teaching: international mandates, challenges, and opportunities. Multicultural Education Review, 7(3), 123-139。https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2015.1072079
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gardner, H. E. (2008). Multiple intelligences：New horizons in theory and practice. Basic book.
Greenwood, C. R., Bradfield, T., Kaminski, R., Linas, M., Carta, J. J., & Nylander, D. (2011). The response to intervention approach in early childhood. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43(9), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v43i9.6912
Greenwood, C. R., Kratchowill, T., & Clements, M. (2008). Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools. New York: Guilford.
Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide. (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED504 264).
Guralnick, M. J. (2005). An overview of the developmental systems model for early intervention. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The developmental systems approach to early intervention (pp. 3-28). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Hemmeter, M. L., Snyder, P. A., Fox, L., & Algina, J. (2016). Evaluating the implementation of the Pyramid Model for promoting social-emotional competence in early childhood classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(3), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416653386
Hale, J. B., Kaufman, A., Naglieri, J. A., & Kavale, K.A. (2006). Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology In The Schools, 43(7), 753-770. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20186
Jackson, S., Pretti-Frontczak, K., Harjusola-Webb, S., Grisham-Brown, J. & Romani, J. (2009). Response to intervention: Implications for early childhood professionals. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 424-434. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0027)
Jiménez, J. E. (2019). Modelo de respuesta a la intervención. Comercial Grupo ANAYA, SA.
Johnson, L. (2014). Culturally Responsive Leadership for Community Empowerment. Multicultural Education Review, 6(2), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2014.11102915
Kayser, A., Kayser, B., Holmstrom, L., & Brazil Keys, B. (2021). “We Appreciate What You Are Doing, But You Are Doing It Wrong”: Two Schools Address School-Family Tensions Through Culturally Responsive Family Partnerships. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 20(2), 9-27.
Koutsoftas, A.D., Harmon, M. T, & Gary, S. (2009). The effect of tier 2 intervention for phonemic awareness in a response-to-intervention model in low-income preschool classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in School, 40, 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/07-0101)
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2005). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In N. Gonzalez, L. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms, 71-88. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect home and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
Morrison, K. A., Robbins, H. H., & Rose, D. G. (2008). Operationalizing culturally relevant pedagogy: A synthesis of classroom-based research. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(4), 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680802400006
Saad, M. A. E. (2018). The Effectiveness of a Life Skills Training Based on the Response to Intervention Model on Improving Disruptive Behavior of Preschool Children. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 7(2), 60.
Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action Research: A Handbook for Practitioners (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Siwatu, K. O. (2011). Preservice Teachers’ Culturally Responsive Teaching Self-Efficacy-Forming Experiences: A Mixed Methods Study. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(5), 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.487081
Tudge, J. R., Freitas, L. B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2015). The Virtue of Gratitude: A Developmental and Cultural Approach. Human Development, 58(4-5), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444308
Texas Education Agency (2004). Three-tier reading mode: Reducing reading difficulties for kindergarten through three grade students. University of Texas, Center for Reading and Language Art, Texas.
UNESCO(2008). Inclusive education: The way of the future. Conclusions and recommendations of the 48th session of the International Conference on Education [ICE], Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Policy_Dialogue/48th_ICE/C ONFINTED_48-3_English.pdf
UNESCO(2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C. S., Scammacca, N., Linan-Thompson, S., & Woodruff, A. L. (2009). Response to early reading intervention: Examining higher and lower responders. Council for Exceptional Children, 75(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500203
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
Vanderheyden, Amanda & Witt, Joseph & Gilbertson, Donna. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45. 225-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.004
Vygotsky, L (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.
Yuan, L., Zhang, L., Yang, L., Deng, Q., & Liu, Y. (2020). Promoting effects of RTI-based mathematical play training on number sense growth among low-SES preschool children. Early Education and Development, 31(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1664261