簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 納 漢
Syed Nabhan
論文名稱： 論企業社會責任的強制性 ： 印度視角
Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility: An Indian Perspective
指導教授： 蔡昌憲
Tsai, Chang-Hsien
口試委員: 林勤富
Lin, Ching-Fu
黃朝琮
Huang, Chao-Tsung
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 科技管理學院 - 國際專業管理碩士班
International Master of Business Administration(IMBA)
論文出版年： 2022
畢業學年度： 110
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 63
中文關鍵詞： 企業社會責任 、強制的 、公司法，2013 年；印度 、效力 、動機 、挑戰
外文關鍵詞： Corporate Social Responsibility, Mandated, Companies Act, 2013; India, CSR Effectiveness, Motivations, Challenges
相關次數： 點閱：3  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • N/A

    Abstract:

    In recent years we have seen great interest among researchers on Corporate social
    responsibility, as a result it garbed increased notice as a means for sustainable
    development. India is the first country to legally mandate specific spends on CSR for
    all the corporate firms based on the profit, or income, or net worth criteria following an
    amendment to the Companies Act, 2013 in April 2014. The Act also stipulates the
    activities and areas that would be eligible for the said purpose. My thesis sheds light on
    the subtleties of section 135 of India’s Companies Act, 2013 which relates to CSR and
    explains the criteria for the companies to contribute two percent of their average net
    profit in the past three years. In case of violation by firms for failing to contribute the
    mandated amount, the board requires them to provide the reasons and basis to validate
    their stance. This thesis also aims to analyze the impact that the mandatory CSR
    regulation may have on companies CSR Spending. Analysis of the CSR scenarios in
    India prior to and post 2013, the year in which legislation was passed. I have further
    discussed the drivers and barriers to CSR spending. Primary data collection through
    brief interview with the expert and collection of data from the surveys and databases
    such as Companies Act of 2013, Ministry of corporate affairs websites, National CSR
    portal, and the Indian Institute of corporate affairs. Using above-mentioned approaches,
    I have reached a conclusion that there is a significant increase in CSR activity among
    the firms affected by Section-135.

    Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Companies Act, 2013; India, Mandatory
    CSR, CSR Effectiveness, Covid-19, Motivations, Challenges.

    Contents Abstract Acknowledgement Chapter 1: Background...................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Evolution of CSR.........................................................................................................................2 1.3 Regulations of mandated CSR in India .............................................................................4 1.4 Parliamentary discussion on the bill ................................................................................11 1.5 The problematic angle of CSR legislation ......................................................................12 1.6 Research Questions.................................................................................................................15 1.7 Research Methods ..................................................................................................................15 1.8 Roadmap ....................................................................................................................................15 Chapter 2: Literature Review………...………………………………………….................................…17 2.1 Definition of CSR......................................................................................................................19 2.2 Different Theories …………......................................................................................................20 2.2.1 Modernist view on social responsibility……………………………………...................….20 2.2.2 The Stakeholder Theory of CSR……………………………………………….........................22 2.3 Carroll's pyramid of CSR ......................................................................................................23 Chapter 3: Effectiveness of Mandated CSR….......................................................................30 3.1 Impact of Section-135 on CSR expenditure..................................................................30 3.2 Firms explanations for not expending on CSR activities..........................................34 3.3 Top ten firms CSR contributions........................................................................................35 3.4 Sector-wise CSR spending’s in India.............................................................................37 3.5 State-wise CSR expenditure in India................................................................................39 Chapter 4: Mandated CSR: Motivations and challenges.................................................41 4.1 Drivers of CSR ..........................................................................................................................41 4.1.1 Supporting internal market.............................................................................................41 4.1.2 Setting up good image of the firm...............................................................................42 4.1.3 Global expansion through CSR .....................................................................................42 4.2 Barriers of CSR .........................................................................................................................43 4.2.1 Unwillingness of top leadership.....................................................................................43 4.2.2 Shifting the culture of the organization to incorporate CSR...............................44 4.2.3 Strengthening CSR capability......................................................................................... 44 Chapter 5: Findings / Results......................................................................................................46 Chapter 6: Conclusions.................................................................................................................53 References………………………………………………………………….......................................………...57

    References:

    Aguilera, Ruth. V and Jackson, Gregory. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate
    governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3),
    460.
    Ahuja, Neetika. 2020. Analysing recent amendments to corporate social responsibility
    legislation. Lexology.
    Bagatsing, Emelyn. 2014. Philanthropy and Corporate Social Responsibility – What is
    the difference? http://www.lincolnmartin.com/blogs/philanthropyand-csr-what-is-thedifference-part-1/
    Bhaduri, N. Saumitra, and Selarka, Ekta. 2016. Corporate Governance and Corporate
    Social Responsibility of Indian Companies. Singapore: Springer.
    Belliappa, Jyotsna, and Lal, Vinu. 2022. View: India becomes the first country to have
    statutorily mandated CSR for specified companies. The Economic Times.
    Branco Manuel Castelo, and Rodrigues Lucia Lima. 2006. Corporate Social
    Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2),
    111. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z
    Broomhill, Ray. 2007. Corporate Socal Responsibility: Key Issues and Debates.
    Australia: Don Dunstan Foundation.
    Carney, Michael. 2008. The many futures of Asian business groups. Asia Pacific
    Journal of Management, 25(4), 598.
    Carroll, Archie. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate
    performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 499-500.
    Carroll, Archie. B. and Buchholtz K. Ann. 2003. Business & society :Ethics and
    stakeholder management (Vol. 7th ed). Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College
    Pub./Thomson Learning.
    Carroll, Archie. B. 2016. Carroll's pyramid of CSR: taking another look - International
    Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social
    Responsibility, 1(3), 3‐4.
    Carpenter, Mason. A., Geletkanycz, Marta. A., and Sanders, Wm. Gerard. 2004. Upper
    echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top
    management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 750.
    Chapple, Wendy, and Moon, Jeremy. 2005. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in
    Asia a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business & Society, 44(4), 416.
    Chatterjee, Bhaskar and Mitra, Nayan. 2016. CSR Implementation: How it is done in
    India in Mitra & Schmidpeter (eds.) Corporate Social Responsibility in India: Cases
    and Developments After the Legal Mandate. Springer International Publishing.
    Chatterjee, Bhaskar and Mitra, Nayan. 2017. CSR should contribute to the national
    agenda in emerging economies - The 'Chatterjee model.' International Journal of
    Corporate Social Responsibility, 2(1), 2.
    Cheffins R. Brian. 2001. Does Law Matter? The Separation of Ownership and Control
    in the United Kingdom, The Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), 459.
    Clarkson, Max B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating
    corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(10), 105.
    CSR in India, Corporate Social Responsibility India CSRBOX. (n.d.). CSRBox.
    Retrieved April 12, 2022, from https://csrbox.org/CSR-in-India
    Dharmapala, Dhammika. and Khanna, Vikramaditya. 2018. The Impact of Mandated
    Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from India's Companies Act of 2013.
    International Review of Law and Economics, 56, 93-94.
    Dahlsrud, Alexander. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis
    of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,
    15(1), 4. doi:10.1002/csr.132
    Donaldson, Thomas and Preston, Lee E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the
    corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review,
    20(1), 82.
    Fernandes, Kasmin, and Thacker, Hency. 2021. Top 100 companies in India for CSR
    and Sustainability in 2021. The CSR Journal.
    Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston:
    Pitman Publishing.
    Friedman, Milton. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.
    The New York times magazine.
    Foster, David, and Jonker, Jan. 2005. Stakeholder Relationships: The Dialogue of
    Engagement. Corporate Governance, 5(5), 51.
    Gallagher, Scott. 2005. A strategic response to Friedman's critique of business ethics.
    Journal of Business Strategy, 26(6), 57.
    Gaur, Ajay. S., Kumar, Vikas., and Singh, Deeksha. 2014. Institutions, resources, and
    internationalization of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 13.
    Gupta, Surojit. 2022. India is now a $3.1 trillion economy. Times of India.
    Hawkins, David E. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Balancing tomorrow’s
    sustainability and today’s profitability. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Henderson, David. 2001. Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social
    responsibility. New Zealand: New Zealand Business Roundtable.
    Hummels, Harry. 1998. Organizing Ethics: A Stakeholder Debate. Journal of Business
    Ethics, 17(13), 1403.
    Husted, Bryan. W. and de Jesus Salazar, Jose. 2006. Taking Friedman seriously:
    Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 75.
    Jain, Naveen. K., Hausknecht, Doughlas. R., and Mukherjee, Debmalya. 2013.
    Location determinants for emerging market firms. Management Decision, 51(2), 405-
    406.
    Jamali, Dima., and Mirshak, Ramez. 2007. Corporate social responsibility (CSR):
    Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3),
    244-245.
    Johnson, Gerry. 1992. Managing strategic change—strategy, culture and action. Long
    Range Planning, 25(1), 28-29.
    Jensen, Michael. C. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate
    objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(3), 299.
    Karnani, Aneel. 2013. Mandatory CSR in India: A Bad Proposal. Stanford Social
    Innovation Report.
    Keinert, Christina. 2008. CSR Conceptualisation Corporate Social Responsibility as an
    International Strategy (pp. 59): Physica-Verlag HD.
    Kuna-Marszałek, & Kłysik-Uryszek 2020. CSR and Socially Responsible Investing
    Strategies in Transitioning and Emerging Economies. IGI Global.
    KPMG International Limited. 2021. MCA amended CSR provisions under the
    companies Act, 2013. KPMG International. Retrieved April 12, 2022, from
    https://home.kpmg/in/en/home/insights/2021/02/firstnotes-corporate-socialresponsibility-companies-act-2013-amendments.html
    Lantos, Geoffrey. P. 2001. The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility.
    Journal of consumer marketing, 18(7), 603.
    Lee, Eun. Mi., Park, Seong. Yeon., and Lee, Hyun. Jung. 2013. Employee perception
    of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research,
    66(10), 1718.
    Mahapatra, Richard. 2020. How India remains poor: 'It will take 7 generations for
    India's poor to reach mean income'. Down To Earth.
    McQueen, Rob. 2017. How Law Matters: The Debate as to the Inter-Relationship
    Between Legal Origin and Economic Performance, in Routledge Handbook of
    Corporate Law (Tomasic, Roman Ed.) 1, 78.
    McWilliams, Abagail, and Siegel, Donald. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A
    Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117.
    McWilliams, Abagail., Siegel, Donald., and Wright, M. Patrick. 2006. Corporate social
    responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 3.
    Mishra, Narmadesvar. 2021. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) AmendmentSection 135. TaxGuru.
    Mitra, Rahul. 2011. Framing the corporate responsibility-reputation linkage: The case
    of Tata Motors in India. Public Relations Review, 37(4), 392.
    Mitra, Rahul. 2012. “My country’s future”: A culture-centered interrogation of
    corporate social responsibility in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(2), 133.
    Mitra, Nayan. 2016. Community engagement models in real estate - A case study of
    Tata housing development company limited. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 111.
    Mitra, Nayan. and Schmidpeter, Rene. 2016. The why, what and how of the CSR
    mandate: The India Story. In Mitra & Schmidpeter (Eds.). Corporate Social
    Responsibility in India: Cases and Developments after the Legal Mandate. Springer
    International Publishing, Switzerland.
    Mohan, Anupama. 2001. Corporate citizenship: Perspectives from India. Journal of
    Corporate Citizenship, 2 (Summer), 108.
    Mukherjee, Arup and Chaturvedi, Ratnesh. 2013. From CSR to MCSR: The Journey
    Towards Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in India. Golden Research
    Thoughts, 3(2), 2.
    Mukherjee, Deepraj. 2016. Case analysis: Tata Motors' acquisition of Jaguar Land
    Rover. The Business & Management Review, 8(3), 48.
    National CSR Portal. 2022. CSR Legislation. csr[@]gov. Retrieved April 12, 2022,
    from https://csr.gov.in/content/csr/global/master/home/aboutcsr/csr-legislation.html
    Parker Christine, Braithwaite 2003. The Oxford handbook of legal studies: Oxford
    University Press Oxford.
    Rahim Mia Mahmudur 2013. Legal regulation of corporate social responsibility: A
    metaregulation approach of law for raising CSR in a weak economy Dordrecht:
    Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    Shirodkar, Vikrant., Beddewela, Eshani., and Richter, Ulf. Henning. 2018. Firm-level
    determinants of political CSR in emerging economies: evidence from India. Journal of
    Business Ethics, 148(3), 675.
    Smits M, Jan and Faure G, Michael. 2011. Does Law Matter? An Introduction 1, 2-4
    (Maastricht European Private Law Institute Working Paper No. 2011/35),
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1950335.
    Stevens, Charles. E, Makarius, Erin E, and Mukherjee, Debmalya. 2015. It takes two to
    tango: Signaling behavioral intent in service multinationals' foreign entry strategies.
    Journal of International Management, 21(3), 235-236.
    Tata Housing. 2018. About Sparsh. Retrieved from
    https://www.tatahousing.in/csr/about_sparsh.php on October 8, 2018.
    Wickert, C.M.J., Scherer, A. G., and Spence, L. J. 2016. Walking and talking corporate
    social responsibility: Implications of firm size and organizational cost. Journal of
    Management Studies, 53(7), 1173.
    Woo Elizabeth, Li-Anne. 2006. The Importance of the Law Matters Thesis, Corporate
    Ownership & Control, 3(4), 224-225.

    QR CODE