研究生: |
陳思呈 Chen, Sih-Cheng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
影響企業權益比率因素之研究 What Determines the Equity Ratio? |
指導教授: |
盧姝璇
Lu, Shu-Shiuan |
口試委員: |
黃朝熙
廖珮如 盧姝璇 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
論文出版年: | 2011 |
畢業學年度: | 99 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 41 |
中文關鍵詞: | 權益比率 、風險厭惡 、結構性轉變 |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
權益比率(Equity Ratio)是將股東權益總額除以資產總額之比值,對公司而言該比率代表自有資金佔所有資金來源的比例。我們計算1988年到2008年美國與台灣非金融民營企業權益比率,發現美國權益比率在這段期間較台灣高。文獻上探討資本結構問題多以公司治理角度出發,並未考慮個人風險態度與金融環境。因此,我們建立一模型來了解決定權益比率的因素。該模型包含風險厭惡程度係數與金融環境並具有以下特徵:(1)權益比率由個人資金分配到廠商的份額(簡記為St)決定;(2)權益比率(及St)與存款準備率呈現同向變化;(3)風險趨避程度、投入廠商資金報酬率的變異、存款利率三者與權益比率(及St)反向變動;(4)資金投入廠商期望報酬率與權益比率(及St)的關係為同向變動。最後,我們採用2000年到2008年的資料,利用OLS-CUSUM test 檢定結構性轉變,確認美國與台灣企業權益比率在2000年到2008年皆穩定,可各自代表其恆定狀態(Steady State)。因此,我們以美國及台灣2000-2008年的平均值作比較發現變數變動的方向和模型預測一致(存款利率及投入廠商資金報酬變異除外),其中以風險趨避程度差異最為明顯,故美國權益比率大於台灣權益比率的原因與風險厭惡程度有關。
Baltensperger, E. (1980),“Alternative approaches to the theory of the banking firm”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 1-37
Bernanke, B. and Gertler, M. (1989),“Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 14-31
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., and Marcus, A. J. (2002),“Investments”, McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., Evans, J. M. (1975), “Techniques for testing constancy of regression relationships over time”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 37, pp. 149-163
Chow, George (1995),“Portfolio selection based on return, risk, and relative performance”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 54-60
Elyasiani, Elyas (1983),“The two product banking firm under uncertainty”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 1002-1017
Frank, M. Z. and Goyal, V. K. (2003), “Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 217-248
Graham, J. R. and Harvey, C. R. (2001),“The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 60, pp. 187-243
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976),“Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, V. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360
Levy, H. and Markowitz, H. M. (1979),“Approximating expected utility by a function of mean and variance”, American Economic Review, Vol. 69, pp. 308-317
Lu, Shu-Shiuan (2010),”The role of capital market efficiency in long-term growth: a quantitative exploration”, National Tsing-Hua University, working paper
Markowitz, H. M. (1952),“Portfolio selection”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, pp. 77-91
Marsh, P. (1982),“The choice between equity and debt: an empirical study”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 121-144
Miller, M. H. (1977),“Debt and taxes”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 261-275
Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. (1958),“The costs of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment”, American Economic Review, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 261-297
Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. (1963),“Corporate income taxes and the costs of capital : a correction”, American Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 433-443
Myers, S. C. and Majluf, N. S. (1984),“Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 187-221
Myers, S. C. (1984),“The capital structure puzzle”, Journal of Finance, 39, 575-592
Ploberger, W. and Krämer, W. (1992), “The CUSUM test with OLS residuals”, Econometrica, 60, pp. 271-285
Sealey, C. W. Jr. and Lindley, J. T. (1977),“Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1251-1266
Shyam-Sunder, L. and Myers, S. C. (1999),“Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 219-244
Steinbach, M. C. (2001),“Markowitz revisited: mean-variance models in financial portfolio analysis”, SIAM Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 31-85
Swank, J. (1996),”Theories of the banking firm: a review of the literature”, Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 48, Issue 3, pp. 173-207
Zeileis, A., Leisch, F., Hornik, K., and Kleiber, C. (2002),“strucchange: An R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models”, Journal of Statistical Software, 7(2), 1-38.