簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳思呈
Chen, Sih-Cheng
論文名稱: 影響企業權益比率因素之研究
What Determines the Equity Ratio?
指導教授: 盧姝璇
Lu, Shu-Shiuan
口試委員: 黃朝熙
廖珮如
盧姝璇
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 41
中文關鍵詞: 權益比率風險厭惡結構性轉變
相關次數: 點閱:1下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 權益比率(Equity Ratio)是將股東權益總額除以資產總額之比值,對公司而言該比率代表自有資金佔所有資金來源的比例。我們計算1988年到2008年美國與台灣非金融民營企業權益比率,發現美國權益比率在這段期間較台灣高。文獻上探討資本結構問題多以公司治理角度出發,並未考慮個人風險態度與金融環境。因此,我們建立一模型來了解決定權益比率的因素。該模型包含風險厭惡程度係數與金融環境並具有以下特徵:(1)權益比率由個人資金分配到廠商的份額(簡記為St)決定;(2)權益比率(及St)與存款準備率呈現同向變化;(3)風險趨避程度、投入廠商資金報酬率的變異、存款利率三者與權益比率(及St)反向變動;(4)資金投入廠商期望報酬率與權益比率(及St)的關係為同向變動。最後,我們採用2000年到2008年的資料,利用OLS-CUSUM test 檢定結構性轉變,確認美國與台灣企業權益比率在2000年到2008年皆穩定,可各自代表其恆定狀態(Steady State)。因此,我們以美國及台灣2000-2008年的平均值作比較發現變數變動的方向和模型預測一致(存款利率及投入廠商資金報酬變異除外),其中以風險趨避程度差異最為明顯,故美國權益比率大於台灣權益比率的原因與風險厭惡程度有關。


    目錄 2 圖表目錄 3 壹、緒論 4 一、 研究動機與目的 4 二、 研究架構 6 貳、文獻回顧 7 一、Modigliani& Miller(1958) 7 二、Modigliani& Miller(1963) 8 三、Miller(1977) 9 四、Jensen & Meckling (1976) 10 五、Myers(1984)與Myers & Majluf (1984) 11 參、模型 13 一、 模型設定 13 二、 各部門之決策 15 (一)、廠商 15 (二)、銀行 15 (三)、消費者 16 (四)、政府 17 三、 市場結清與均衡方程式 18 四、 模型特徵 20 肆、模型結果 22 伍、資料與統計檢定 26 一、資料來源與計算 26 二、結構性轉變檢定 27 陸、實證結果 33 一、各影響因素與權益比率的關係 33 二、討論 37 柒、結論 39 參 考 文 獻 40

    Baltensperger, E. (1980),“Alternative approaches to the theory of the banking firm”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 1-37

    Bernanke, B. and Gertler, M. (1989),“Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 14-31

    Bodie, Z., Kane, A., and Marcus, A. J. (2002),“Investments”, McGraw-Hill/Irwin

    Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., Evans, J. M. (1975), “Techniques for testing constancy of regression relationships over time”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 37, pp. 149-163

    Chow, George (1995),“Portfolio selection based on return, risk, and relative performance”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 54-60

    Elyasiani, Elyas (1983),“The two product banking firm under uncertainty”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 1002-1017

    Frank, M. Z. and Goyal, V. K. (2003), “Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 217-248

    Graham, J. R. and Harvey, C. R. (2001),“The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 60, pp. 187-243

    Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976),“Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, V. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360

    Levy, H. and Markowitz, H. M. (1979),“Approximating expected utility by a function of mean and variance”, American Economic Review, Vol. 69, pp. 308-317

    Lu, Shu-Shiuan (2010),”The role of capital market efficiency in long-term growth: a quantitative exploration”, National Tsing-Hua University, working paper

    Markowitz, H. M. (1952),“Portfolio selection”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, pp. 77-91

    Marsh, P. (1982),“The choice between equity and debt: an empirical study”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 121-144

    Miller, M. H. (1977),“Debt and taxes”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 261-275

    Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. (1958),“The costs of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment”, American Economic Review, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 261-297

    Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. (1963),“Corporate income taxes and the costs of capital : a correction”, American Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 433-443

    Myers, S. C. and Majluf, N. S. (1984),“Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 187-221

    Myers, S. C. (1984),“The capital structure puzzle”, Journal of Finance, 39, 575-592

    Ploberger, W. and Krämer, W. (1992), “The CUSUM test with OLS residuals”, Econometrica, 60, pp. 271-285

    Sealey, C. W. Jr. and Lindley, J. T. (1977),“Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1251-1266

    Shyam-Sunder, L. and Myers, S. C. (1999),“Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 219-244

    Steinbach, M. C. (2001),“Markowitz revisited: mean-variance models in financial portfolio analysis”, SIAM Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 31-85

    Swank, J. (1996),”Theories of the banking firm: a review of the literature”, Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 48, Issue 3, pp. 173-207

    Zeileis, A., Leisch, F., Hornik, K., and Kleiber, C. (2002),“strucchange: An R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models”, Journal of Statistical Software, 7(2), 1-38.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE