本研究以數位遊戲場域之政治正確性議題為核心，透過《Concord™》個案探討過度實踐之潛在影響。研究動機源自研究者兼具三十年資深玩家與科技產業工程師之雙重視角，針對遊戲產業近年政治正確性反噬現象進行學理探究。研究架構採歷史脈絡分析法，首先梳理政治正確性於媒體領域之演進軌跡，繼而聚焦其向數位遊戲媒介之轉向，析論《鬥陣特攻》與《模擬市民4》等作在包容性設計之正向案例，並透過Sweet Baby Inc與DEIDetected等機構，闡釋遊戲場域政治正確性之動態演變。

研究方法整合質性內容分析與多案例比較研究法，系統性解構政治正確性之實踐模式與影響機制。研究進一步解碼DEI（多元、平等、包容）框架導入遊戲產業之制度性成因，並以《刺客教條：暗影者》因日本封建時代黑人武士再現引發之文化爭議為例，論證意識形態移植與歷史脈絡脫鉤所生之認知衝突。關鍵分析面向涵蓋：包容性敘事之誤現（misrepresentation）、市場預期與玩家基模之斷裂、媒體話語與玩家社群的論述競合，以及毒性積極性（toxic positivity）對遊戲生態系之結構性影響，最終建構政治正確性過度實踐與商業失敗之因果鏈結。

This essay introduces the topic of political correctness in digital games, focusing on the game "Concord™" as a case study to explore the consequences of over-implementing political correctness. The motivation for this research stems from the author's 30-year experience as a gamer and technology industry-related engineer, and the curiosity triggered by the backlash against political correctness in the gaming industry. The essay reviews the history of political correctness in media and its shift to digital games, including examples such as Sweet Baby Inc and DEIDetected to illustrate the evolution of political correctness in gaming. It employs a multi-faceted methodological approach combining qualitative content analysis and case study examination to understand the implementation and impact of political correctness in games. Furthermore, the essay investigates why DEI was brought into the digital gaming industry and why it faced backlash. The essay examines examples of politically correct changes in games and controversies, such as the backlash against "Assassin’s Creed: Shadows" for its portrayal of a black Samurai in feudal Japan. It analyzes the misrepresentation of inclusivity, market and player disconnect, journalistic reviews over player feedback, toxic positivity, and the impact of these factors on the game's failure. The essay also highlights the positive impact of inclusive design choices in games like "Overwatch" and "The Sims".