簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄭安利
Cheng, An-Li
論文名稱: 線上品牌社群互動結構探討 -以機車品牌為例
Exploring Interaction Structures of Online Brand Communities : A Case Study of Two Scooter Brands
指導教授: 王俊程
Wang, Jyun-Cheng
口試委員: 林聖芬
Lin, Sheng-Fen
王貞雅
Wang, Chen-Ya
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 服務科學研究所
Institute of Service Science
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 56
中文關鍵詞: 線上品牌社群社會網絡分析服務主導邏輯品牌管理GOGORO
外文關鍵詞: online brand communities, social network analysis, service dominant logic, brand management, GOGORO
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著社群網站的普及與盛行,越來越多人透過線上社群獲得品牌訊息,因此近年來企業紛紛於社群網站上成立品牌社群,一方面希望透過品牌社群讓口碑行銷效應加乘,提升品牌知名度,另一方面更期望透過品牌社群,維持客戶的品牌忠誠度。儘管社會網絡被視為是品牌管理的關鍵因素,但過去品牌管理的文獻少有研究運用網絡觀點探討線上品牌社群的互動結構與互動類型。為了瞭解不同邏輯型思維營運的企業,於線上品牌社群的經營操作上是否存有差異,本研究以台灣兩大機車品牌GOGORO(服務主導邏輯型企業)與KYMCO(商品主導邏輯型企業)之Facebook粉絲專業為研究對象。運用社會網絡分析與內容分析,來描繪並比較GOGORO與KYMCO線上品牌社群的經營樣貌。預期透過兩間企業個案的對照,為品牌管理提出實務上的建議。研究結果發現不同邏輯型思維營運的企業對於價值的態度,會反映在線上品牌社群的互動上。


    With the proliferation of social networking sites, online brand communities (OBC) have played a significant role in both brand perception and marketing. Contemporary enterprises are devoted to building, promoting and managing OBC, eager to cultivate loyal end customers. Although social network has been claimed as a critical factor in brand management, few studies investigated OBC from a network perspective. In addition, this study attempts to figure out the operational difference under the S-D logic enterprise and the G-D logic enterprise.
    This study compares and contrasts the interaction patterns of OBC with an emphasis on interaction structures and types between two distinct Taiwanese scooter brands GOGORO (S-D logic oriented enterprise) and KYMCO (G-D logic oriented enterprise). These two brands were chosen because of the uniqueness, feasibility and nature of the study. Combined with social network analysis and content analysis, this exploratory study collects observational data from the Facebook social networking site. By triangulating findings from different methods, the expected results reveal practical implications, which shed light on OBC management.

    1. Introduction 10 1.1. Research Background 10 1.2. Research Motivation 11 1.3. Research Purposes and Contributions 11 2. Literature Review 13 2.1. Brand Community 13 2.1.1. Brand Community Interaction Structure 14 2.1.2. Brand Community Interaction Type 16 2.2. Brand Management 17 3. Research Methodology 19 3.1. Cases Study:Scooter Brand in Taiwan 19 3.1.1. GOGORO 22 3.1.2. KYMCO 23 3.2. Research Methods 23 3.3. Data Collection 24 3.4. Data Analysis 26 3.4.1. Interaction Structure Analysis 27 3.4.2. Interaction Type Analysis 29 3.4.3. Centrality Measurement Analysis 36 3.4.4. Postings Content Analysis 38 4. Research Result 39 4.1. Comparison of Interaction Structure 40 4.2. Comparison of Interaction Type 40 4.3. Comparison of Behavior 40 4.4. Comparison of Strategies 41 4.5. Discussion 42 5. Conclusion 43 5.1. Research Implications 43 5.2. Research Contribution 44 5.3. Future Research 45 5.4. Conclusions 46 6. Reference 46 7. Appendix 49

    Brodie, R. J., Brodie, Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer
    engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal
    of business research, 66(1), 105-114.
    Butts, C. T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian
    Journal of Social Psychology, 11(1), 13–41.
    Cole F.L. (1988) Content analysis: process and application. Clinical Nurse Specialist,
    2(1), 53–57.
    Elo, S., Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of
    advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
    Fournier, S. (2009). Getting Brand Communities Right. Harvard Business Review,
    87(4)
    Gamboa, A. M., Gonçalves, H. M. (2014). Customer loyalty through social networks:
    Lessons from Zara on Facebook. Business horizons, 57(6), 709-717.

    Gensler, S., Völckner, F., Liu-Thompkins, Y. and Wiertz, C. (2013) Managing brands
    in the social media environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27 (4):
    242–256.
    Goh, K., Heng, C., Lin, Z. (2013). Social Media Brand Community and Consumer
    Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-
    Generated Content. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 88-107.
    Grönroos, C., Ravald, A. (2011). Service as business logic: implications for value
    creation and marketing. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 5-22.
    Habibi, M. R., Laroche, M., Richard, M. (2014). Brand communities based in social
    media: How unique are they? Evidence from two exemplary brand
    communities. International journal of information management, 34(2), 123-
    132.
    Jang, H., Olfman, L., Ko, I., Koh, J., & Kim, K. (2008). The influence of on-line
    brand community characteristics on community commitment and brand
    loyalty. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12 (3), 57-80.
    Jung, N. Y., Kim, S. (2014). Influence of consumer attitude toward online brand
    community on revisit intention and brand trust. Journal of retailing and
    consumer services, 21(4), 581-589.
    Kassarjian, H.H. (1977). Content Analysis in Consumer Research. The Journal of
    consumer research, 4(1), 8.
    Marchi, G., Giachetti, C., de Gennaro, P. (2011). Extending lead-user theory to online
    brand communities: The case of the community Ducati. Technovation,
    31(8), 350-361.
    McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building Brand
    Community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38
    McMillan D. W., Chavis D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory.
    Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
    Merz, Merz, M. A., He, Yi., & Vargo, S. L. (2009). The evolving brand logic: a
    service-dominant logic perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Journal,
    37(3), 328-344.
    Muniz, AM., O'Guinn, TC. (2001). Brand community. The Journal of consumer
    research, 27(4), 412-432.
    Perks, H., Gruber, T., Edvardsson, Bo. (2012). Co-creation in Radical Service
    Innovation: A Systematic Analysis of Microlevel Processes. The Journal of
    product innovation management, 29(6), 935-951.
    Prezza, M., Costantini, S. (1998). Sense of community and life satisfaction:
    investigation in three different territorial contexts. Journal of community &
    applied social psychology, 8(3), 181-194.
    Relling, M., Schnittka, O., Sattler, H., & Johnen, M. (2016). Each can help or hurt:
    Negative and positive word of mouth in social network brand communities.
    International journal of research in marketing, 33(1), 42-58.
    Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of consumption:
    An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1),
    43–61.
    Tsai, W. S., Men, L. R. (2017). Consumer engagement with brands on social network
    sites: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the USA. Journal of
    marketing communications, 23(1), 2-21.
    Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A. (2009). Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for
    Service Science: Clarifications. Service science, 1(1), 32-41.
    Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation:
    A service systems and service logic perspective. European management
    journal, 26(3), 145-152.
    Wellman, B. (1983). Network Analysis: Some Basic Principles. Sociological Theory,
    1, 155-200.
    Zaglia, M.E. (2013). Brand communities embedded in social networks. Journal of
    business research, 66(2), 216-223.
    Degenne, A., Forse, M., Forsé, M. (1999). Introducing Social Networks.
    Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute. (2014). Retrieved December 15, 2016,
    from https://mic.iii.org.tw/micnew/IndustryObservations_PressRelease02.as
    px?sqno=374

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2022/11/14 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE