研究生: |
陳鈺芬 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
握持作業的不舒適感預測模型之建立 |
指導教授: | 王茂駿 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 79 |
中文關鍵詞: | 累積性傷害 、不舒適評比 、身體各部位不舒適 、活動範圍 、預測模型 |
外文關鍵詞: | cumulative trauma disorders, discomfort rating, body part discomfort, range of motion, predicting model |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
上肢累積性工作傷害對人員產生的影響及衍生的社會成本均十分可觀,而主觀不舒適感受可視為工作傷害的預兆,因此本研究以主觀不舒適感受做為工作負荷的評量指標,進而建立一個主觀不舒適預測模型,除了可預防上肢累積性傷害的發生,進一步更可提高人員的工作滿意度。
本研究針對上肢的握持動作進行模擬實驗,以主觀及客觀方法評估其工作負荷,實驗因變項計有高度(肩高、水平伸直的手臂向上屈曲30o時的手高、水平伸直的手臂向下屈曲30o時的手高)、距離(上肢最遠握持距離、上肢最遠握持距離的0.6倍)、負重(0.86kg、1.12kg)、頻率(2/分鐘、4/分鐘)與持續時間(5分鐘、10分鐘),共有48種不同工作負荷的實驗組合,每種實驗組合執行時間為60秒。本實驗有15位男性與15位女性參與,實驗期間均紀錄受試者的肌電訊號反應(斜方肌、三角肌、三頭肌、二頭肌、屈指肌)、動作速度表現(公分/秒)、關節活動度(頸關節、肩關節、肘關節、腕關節),而後以Category partition scale (CP-50)進行全身與身體各部位主觀不舒適程度之評比。
由實驗結果得知,男性與女性在主觀評估造成工作負荷的因子並不相同,女性對於高頻率的動作較容易感到不舒適,而造成男性不舒適感的主要因子為握持高度。本研究建立之標準化男性與女性不舒適評比迴歸模型的判定係數分別為0.7與0.76,因此只要蒐集握持高度、距離、重量、頻率,及持續時間等變數資訊,應用本研究之迴歸模型即可有效預測出人員主觀不舒適程度。
Cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs) have a great impact on the health and safety of workers. By using subjective discomfort rating to evaluate workload, improper designs of work can be improved. It can both prevent workers from CTD of the upper limbs and enhance job satisfactions.
In the experiment, we considered the combination of holding height (shoulder height, hand heights of flexion and extension 30o from shoulder height), load (0.86 kg and 1.12 kg), frequency (2 times/min. and 4 times/min.) and duration (5 sec. and 10 sec.) of motion to simulate the 48 holding tasks. Fifteen male and fifteen female voluntary subjects executed each experiment condition for 60 seconds, then conducted discomfort ratings of whole body and local body parts. At the same time, rapid upper-limb assessment (RULA), EMG, range of joints motion and speed of motion were collected to compare with the discomfort ratings.
The results of the analysis of discomfort ratings showed that male subjects differed significantly from female subjects. The male subjects had the highest discomfort feeling in target height over shoulder, but the female subjects in high frequency of motion. For the constructed discomfort prediction models for holding tasks, the coefficients of determination (R2) for males and for females were 0.7 and 0.76. The models can provide a convenient and efficient tool to predict one’s subjective discomfort with the parameters including holding height and distance, load, frequency and duration time.
1. 劉哲綱,2003,3D人體模型之動態評估,國立清華大學,工業工程與工程管理研究所,碩士論文。
2. 王茂駿,王明揚,林昱呈,2002,台灣人體計測資料庫手冊,中華民國人因工程學會。
3. 吳昇光譯,2003,Clarkson M. H.箸,肌肉骨骼評估關節活動度與徒手肌力測量,合記圖書出版社。
4. 王正一,1996,職業疾病監控實證研究—上肢傷害,行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所。
5. Allman, B. L. and Rice, C. L., 2003, Perceived exertion is elevation in old age during an isometric fatigue task, European Journal of Applied Physiology, 89, 191-197.
6. Ayoub, M. M. and Dempsey, P. G., 1999, The psychophysical approach to manual material handling task design, Ergonomics, 42(1), 17-31.
7. Baker, J. S., Bailey D. M., and Davis, B., 2001, The relationship between total-body mass, fat-free mass and cycle ergometry power components during 20 seconds of maximal exercise, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 1, 1-9.
8. Borg, G., 1982, Psychophysical bases of perceived excretion, Medicine and Science in Sports and Medicine, 14, 377-381.
9. Bubb, H., 2003, Research for a strength based discomfort model of posture and movement, IEA Conference, Soul, Korea, 24-29.
10. Burgess, P. R. and Jones, L. F. 1997, Perception of effort and heaviness during fatigue and during the size-weight illusion, Somatosensory and Motor Research, 14, 189-202.
11. Carey E. J. and Gallwey T. J., 2002, Evaluation of human postures with aids and virtual workplace designs, International Journal of Production Research, 40(4), 825-843.
12. Chevalot, N. and Wang X., 2004, An experimental investigation of the discomfort of arm reaching movements in a seated position, Digital Human Model for Design and Engineering Symposium Proceedings, Rochester, Michigan, Hune 15-17, 2004, SAE No 2004-01-2141.
13. Corlett, E. N. and Bishop, R. P., 1976, A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics, 19, 175-182.
14. Congleton, J. J., Ayoub, M.M., and Smith, J. L., 1985, The design and evaluation of the neutral posture chair for surgeons, Hum Factors, 5, 589-600.
15. Davis, K. G., Jorgensen, M. J. and Marras, W. S., 2000, An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift, Ergonomics, 43, 143-159.
16. Ellermeier, W., and Westqhal, W., 1991. On the “absoluteness” of category and magnitude scales of pain. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 159-166.
17. Giacomin, J. and Quattrocolo, S., 1997, An analysis fo human comfort when entering and exiting the rear seat of an automobile, Applied Ergomics, 28, 397-406.
18. Goslin, B.R., and Rorke, S. C., 1986, The perception of exertion during load carriage, Ergonomics, 29, 677-686.
19. Jung, E. S., Choe, J., and Kim, S. H., 1994, Psychophysical cost function of joint movement for arm reach posture prediction, In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA, 702-706.
20. Jung, E. S. and Choe, J., 1996, Human reach posture prediction based on psychophysical discomfort, Internation Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 18, 173-179.
21. Karwowski, W., et al., 1992, Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting. Ergonomics, 35, 729-744.
22. Kee, D., 2002, A method for analytically generating 3D isocomfort workspace based on perceived discomfort, Applied Ergonomics, 33, 51-62.
23. Kee, D. and Karwowski, W., 2003, Ranking systems for evaluation of joint and joint motion stressflness based on perceived discomforts, Applied Ergonomics, 34, 167-176.
24. Kee, D. and Karwowski, W., 2004, Joint angle of isocomfort for female subjects based on the psychophysical scaling of static standing postures, Ergonomics, 47, 427-445.
25. Marley, R.J. and Kumar, N., 1994, An improved musculoskeletal discomfort assessment tool. Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety VI, Aghazadech, F. Ed., Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 45-52.
26. Mayes, J., and James, C., 2000, Human Modeling: Inverse Kinematics with Maximum Joint Availability, Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, 5, pp. 356-359.
27. McAtamney, L. and Corlett, N., 1993, RULA: A survey method for investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91-99.
28. Mital, A., 1999, Nonfatal occupational injuries in the United States, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25, 109-129.
29. Murrell, K., 1969, Ergonomics, Chapman & Hall, London.
30. O’Connor, P. J., Poudevigne, M. S. and Pasley, J. D. 2002, Perceived exertion responses to novel elbow flexor eccentric action in women and men, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34, 882-888.
31. Shen, W. and Parsons, C. K., 1997, Validity and reliability of rating scales for seated pressure discomfort, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 441-461.
32. Skinner, J. S., Hustler, R. Bergsteinova, V., Buskirk, E. R., 1973, The validity and reliability of a rating scale of perceived exertion, Medical Science and Sports, 5, 94-96.
33. Snook, S. H., 1978, The design of manual handling tasks, Ergonomics, 21, 963-985.
34. Straker, L. M., Stevenson, M. G., and Twomey, L. T., 1997, A comparison of risk assessment of single combination mannual handling task: 2. Discomfort, Rating of Perceived Exertion and heart rate measures, Ergonomics, 40(6), 656-669.
35. Zhang, L., Helander, M. G. and Drury, C. G., 1996, Identifying Factors of Comfort and Discomfort in Sitting, Humman Factors, 38(3), 377-389.