本篇論文首先探討的是漢語與英語的發生類動詞。在過去的文獻中，發生類動詞被視為非賓格動詞(unaccusative verb)，且常出現於「處所倒裝」結構(locative inversion)，可參考Perlmutter (1978), Levin & Rappaport Hovav (1995)。在漢語中，也有諸多學者認為漢語也有所謂的「處所倒裝」結構，也就是「處所倒裝」的句子的主詞是由內部處所論元往上提昇的結果(Li & Thompson 1981, S. Huang 1982, Wu 2008)。然而Lin (2001, 2008, 2009)認為漢語中不存有「處所倒裝」現象。處所主語是由輕動詞所引介的，與謂語內部的任何成分都沒有關係。
因此，本文提供了幾個佐證，證明漢語發生類動詞的處所主語是由輕動詞(OCCUR)所引介，生成在vP指示語(specifier)位置。而英語的發生類動詞happen，它的處所主語則位在VP的指示語(specifier)的位置，且此VP是vP的補語，且與vP形成一致(agreement)。除此之外，我們也將會探討漢語動詞「發生」與英語動詞happen 在補語選擇上的不同之處。我們採用Pustejovsky (1995)所提出的衍生詞彙理論(the theory of Generative Lexicon)以及語義誘迫機制(type coercion)來分析兩個動詞的不同之處。
此外，本篇論文還觸及到另一個議題，主要探討的是漢語出現類動詞「出現」與「出」的特質與句法結構。首先，我們觀察到動詞「發生」與動詞「出現」的不同之處在於，動詞「發生」為輕動詞(OCCUR)的補語，然而動詞「出現」為輕動詞(EXIST)的補語。此外，我們也探討了動詞「出」各種不同的用法，在我們的分析中，動詞「出」有兩種不同的句法結構。第一、它能作為及物動詞(transitive verb)且帶有兩個論元(argument)。第二、它可作為移動動詞(motion verb)，且帶有名詞組(noun phrase)為其補語，補語被視為來源(source)。

This work starts with the discussion on the verbs of happening fasheng ‘happen’ in Mandarin Chinese and happen in English. Previous studies show that verbs of happening are unaccusative verbs and also occur frequently in the locative inversion constructions (Perlmutter 1978, Levin & Rappaport Hovav 1995). Besides, there also have been researchers who propose that Mandarin Chinese exhibits locative inversion, that is, an internal locative argument raising to the subject position (Li & Thompson 1981, S. Huang 1982, Wu 2008). However, Lin (2001, 2008, 2009) assumes that the locative subjects may not arise from inversion of an internal argument or adjunct, but is introduced by light verbs. The locative subjects have no association with any VP-internal position.
Therefore, from the evidence provided in this work, I adopt Lin’s (2009) theory and propose that the verb fasheng ‘happen’ is introduced by the light verb OCCUR. Besides, the locative expression is licensed by the light verb OCCUR as its specifier. In English, the verb happen projects a VP, with a locative expression as the specifier and this VP is the complement of a light verb v, which agrees with the verb happen. Additionally, we also compare fasheng ‘happen’ and happen. In fact, there is an asymmetry between fasheng ‘happen’ and happen in their complement selection. On this point, we introduce the theory of Generative Lexicon proposed by Pustejovsky (1995) and type coercion mechanisms to explain this asymmetry.
Another issue addressed in this thesis is the properties and structures of the verbs of appearance chuxian ‘appear’ and chu ‘appear’ in Mandarin Chinese. First, we investigate the difference between fasheng ‘happen’ and chuxian ‘appear’ and observe that fasheng ‘happen’ is the complement of the light verb OCCUR, but chuxian ‘appear’ is the complement of the light verb EXIST. Second, we also discuss the different uses of the verb chu ‘appear’. In our analysis, there are two different syntactic constructions. Namely, the verb chu can be a transitive verb, and takes two arguments, or functions as a motion verb taking NP (source) as its complement.

Burzio, L. (1986). Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. D. Dordrecht, Reidel, Holland.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In Events and grammar (pp. 53-103). Springer Netherlands.
Fernández‐Soriano, O. (1999). Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects. Syntax, 2(2), 101-140.
Higginbotham, J. (2000) “On Events in Linguistic Semantics,” in J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. Varzi, eds. Speaking of Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
Higginbotham, J. (2004) “Events, States, and Actions: Some Clarifications,” talk given at National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
Huang, C. T. J. (1987). Existential sentences in Chinese and (in) definiteness. The representation of (in) definiteness, 226, 253.
Huang, C. J., Li, Y. A., & Simpson, A. (2014). The handbook of Chinese linguistics. John Wiley & Sons.
Huang, C. T. J. (2007). Thematic Structures of Verbs in Chinese and their Syntactic Projections. Linguistics Science.
Huang, C. T. J., Li, Y. H. A., & Li, Y. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, S. F. (1966). “Subject and object in Mandarin,” in Essays in the Grammar of Chinese. Crane, Taipei.
Hu, L.-Y. (2016). Temporal Clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Master thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Landau, I. (2010). The locative syntax of experiencers (Vol. 34). Cambridge: MIT press.
Larson, R. (1998). “Events and Modification in Nominals” in D. Strolovitch and A. Lawson eds., Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 8, CLC Publications, Ithaca, New work.
Levin, Beth. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface (Vol. 26). MIT press.
Lin, T. H. J. (2001). Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Lin, T. H. J., & Liu, C. Y. C. (2005). Coercion, event structure, and syntax. Nanzan Linguistics, 2, 9-31.
Lin, T. H. J. (2008). Locative subject in Mandarin Chinese. Nanzan Linguistics, 4, 69- 88.
Lin, T. H. J. (2009). Occurrence of event and locative subjects in Mandarin Chinese. Manuscript, National Tsing Hua University.
Lin, T. H. J., & Huang, Y. S. (2015). Structures of the Mandarin gei constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 24(3), 309-338.
McNally, Louise. 2011. Existential sentences. Semantics : an international handbook of natural language meaning, edited by Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, Paul Portner: pp.1829-1848
Moltmann, F. (2013). The semantics of existence. Linguistics and philosophy, 36(1), 31-63.
Nakajima, Heizo. (2001). Verbs in locative constructions and the generative lexicon. The Linguistic Review 18: 43-67.
Pan, Haihua and Jingchuan Han. (2005). Xianxing fei binge dongxi jiegou de jufa yanjiu [Syntactic analysis of constructions with overt unaccusative verbs]. Yuyan Yanjiu 3: 1-13.
Perlmutter, D.M. (1978). Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4, 157-189.
Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2000. Deriving adversity. WCCFL 19: 399-410.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology and syntactic description, 3, 57-149.
Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 2007. Two types of light verbs in Chinese. Paper presented in Taiwan – Hong Kong – China Forum on Chinese Syntax. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. (2008). Generalized inversion and theory of agree (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 
Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. (2013). Experiencers as Mental Locations. Book of abstracts of the 8th Conference of the European Association of Chinese Linguistics.
Xu, Jie. (1999). Liangzhong baoliu binyu jushi ji xiangguan jufa lilun wenti [Two types of retained-object constructions and the related syntactic questions]. Dandai Yuyanxue 1: 16-29.
Xu, Jie. (2001). Pupian yufa yuanze yu Hanyu yufa xianxiang [Principles of Universal Grammar and the grammatical phenomena in Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing University Press.