簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳楓翔
Chen, Feng-Hsiang
論文名稱: 無人機輔助物聯網網路中數據收集的信息年齡最小化
AoI Minimization for Data Gathering in UAV-Assisted IoT Networks
指導教授: 許健平
Sheu, Jang-Ping
口試委員: 陳宗禧
Chen, Tzung-Shi
高榮駿
Kao, Jung-Chun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電機資訊學院 - 資訊工程學系
Computer Science
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 32
中文關鍵詞: 無人機信息年齡數據收集物聯網
外文關鍵詞: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Age of Information, Data Gathering, Internet of Things
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 利用無人機作為數據收集的方法,是近來在許多實際場景中,具有前景和新穎的應用。本文研究無人機在物聯網網路中,信息新鮮度(Freshness)相關的數據收集問題。最近新鮮信息的實時(Real-time)傳輸,已成為一個重要的研究議題。信息年齡(Age of Information, AoI)被定義為無人機的飛行時間加上離開該傳感器節點後的數據上傳時間。在我們的問題中,無人機從事數據收集的任務,從來源數據中心收集感測器數據到目標數據中心。經由考慮軌跡規劃、信息年齡和總完成時間,我們提出了一種三階段演算法來最小化無人機輔助物聯網網絡中任務的平均信息年齡。實驗結果證明我們的效能優於其他演算法。


    The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to collect data is a recent promising and novel application in many practical scenarios. This paper studies the data collection problem related to how fresh the information is in the UAV-assisted IoT networks. The real-time transmission of fresh data has been an increasingly crucial topic recently. The Age of Information (AoI) is defined as the flight time of the UAV plus the data uploading time after leaving this sensor node. In our problem, UAV is assigned the mission of data gathering to collect real-time data from the source data center to the destination data center by considering the trajectory planning, information age, and the total completion time. We proposed a three-phase algorithm to minimize the average AoI of the mission in UAV-assisted IoT networks. Simulation results show that our performance outperforms the baselines.

    Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Related Work 4 3 System Model and Problem Formulation 8 3.1 System Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4 Algorithm 12 5 Simulation Results 20 5.1 Simulation Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 5.2 Simulation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.2.1 Varying Number of Sensors . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.2.2 Varying Data Size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.2.3 Time versus Different Algorithm . . . . . . . . . 26 5.2.4 Total Execution Time Versus Number of Sensors . . 27 6 Conclusion 28 References 29

    [1] Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, “Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 36–42, 2016.
    [2] J. Liu, P. Tong, X. Wang, B. Bai, and H. Dai, “UAV-aided data collection for information freshness in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2368–2382, 2021.
    [3] T. F. Villa, F. Salimi, K. Morton, L. Morawska, and F. Gonzalez, “Development and validation of a UAV based system for air pollution measurements,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 12, 2016.
    [4] A. Girard, A. Howell, and J. Hedrick, “Border patrol and surveillance missions using multiple unmanned air vehicles,” in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control(CDC), vol. 1, pp. 620–625, 2004.
    [5] S. Kaul, R. Yates, and M. Gruteser, “Real-time status: How often should one update?,” in International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 2731–2735, 2012.
    [6] Y. Sun, E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, R. Yates, C. E. Koksal, and N. B. Shroff, “Update or wait: How to keep your data fresh,” in IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 1–9, 2016.
    [7] J. Liu, X. Wang, B. Bai, and H. Dai, “Age-optimal trajectory planning for UAV-assisted data collection,” in IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), pp. 553–558, 2018.
    [8] V. Tripathi, R. Talak, and E. Modiano, “Age optimal information gathering and dissemination on graphs,” in IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 2422–2430, 2019.
    [9] Z. Jia, X. Qin, Z. Wang, and B. Liu, “Age-based path planning and data acquisition in UAV-assisted IoT networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pp. 1–6, 2019.
    [10] C. Li, Y. Huang, Y. Chen, B. Jalaian, Y. T. Hou, and W. Lou, “Kronos: A 5G scheduler for AoI minimization under dynamic channel conditions,” in IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pp. 1466–1475, 20
    [11] R. Talak, S. Karaman, and E. Modiano, “Optimizing information freshness in wireless networks under general interference constraints,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2020.
    [12] S. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Song, Z. Han, and H. V. Poor, “Sensing and communication tradeoff design for AoI minimization in a cellular internet of uavs,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6, 2020.
    [13] C. Mao, J. Liu, and L. Xie, “Multi-UAV aided data collection for age minimization in wireless sensor networks,” in International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), pp. 80–85, 2020.
    [14] H. Hu, K. Xiong, G. Qu, Q. Ni, P. Fan, and K. B. Letaief, “AoI-minimal trajectory planning and data collection in UAV-assisted wireless powered IoT networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1211–1223, 2021.
    [15] Z. Gong, Q. Cui, C. Chaccour, B. Zhou, M. Chen, and W. Saad, “Lifelong learning for minimizing age of information in internet of things networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6, 2021.
    [16] M. Sun, X. Xu, X. Qin, and P. Zhang, “AoI-energy-aware UAV-assisted data collection for IoT networks: A deep reinforcement learning method,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 24, pp. 17275–17289, 2021.
    [17] S. F. Abedin, M. S. Munir, N. H. Tran, Z. Han, and C. S. Hong, “Data freshness and energy-efficient UAV navigation optimization: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 5994–6006, 2021.
    [18] B. Choudhury, V. K. Shah, A. Ferdowsi, J. H. Reed, and Y. T. Hou, “AoI-minimizing scheduling in UAV-relayed IoT networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Smart Systems (MASS), pp. 117–126, 2021.
    [19] G. Ahani, D. Yuan, and Y. Zhao, “Age-optimal UAV scheduling for data collection with battery recharging,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1254–1258, 2021.
    [20] M. M. Silva, A. Subramanian, T. Vidal, and L. S. Ochi, “A simple and effective metaheuristic for the minimum latency problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 221, no. 3, pp. 513–520, 2012.
    [21] J. Baek, S. I. Han, and Y. Han, “Energy-efficient UAV routing for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 1741–1750, 2020.
    [22] M. B. Ghorbel, D. Rodr ́ıguez-Duarte, H. Ghazzai, M. J. Hossain, and H. Menouar, “Joint position and travel path optimization for energy efficient wireless data gathering using unmanned aerial vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 2165–2175 2019.
    [23] D. Yang, Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Energy tradeoff in ground-to-UAV communication via trajectory design,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 6721–6726, 2018.
    [24] M. Chen, W. Liang, and S. K. Das, “Data collection utility maximization in wireless sensor networks via efficient determination of UAV hovering locations,” in IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications(PerCom), pp. 1–10, 2021.
    [25] Y. Li, W. Liang, W. Xu, and X. Jia, “Data collection of IoT devices using an energy-constrained UAV,” in International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), pp. 644–653, 2020.
    [26] S.-J. Yoo, J. hyun Park, S. hee Kim, and A. Shrestha, “Flying path optimization in UAV-assisted IoT sensor networks,” ICT Express, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 140–144, 2016.
    [27] F. C. Chen, G. Gugan, R. Solis-Oba, and A. Haque, “Simple and efficient algorithm for drone path planning,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6, 2021.
    [28] H. C. Tsai, Y. W. Hong, and J. P. Sheu, “Completion time minimization for UAV-enabled surveillance over multiple restricted regions,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2022.
    [29] Z. Yuhua, J. Xiangdong, W. Yuxin, and C. Shengnan, “A research on age of information minimization scheme of wireless sensor network assisted by UAV,” in International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing (ICSP), pp. 1149–1152, 2021.
    [30] T. Wu, J. Liu, J. Liu, Z. Huang, H. Wu, C. Zhang, B. Bai, and G. Zhang, “A novel AI-based framework for AoI-optimal trajectory planning in UAV-assisted wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2462–2475, 2022.
    [31] Y. Yang, W. Wang, L. Liu, K. Dev, and N. M. F. Qureshi, “AoI optimization in the UAV-aided traffic monitoring network under attack: A stackelberg game viewpoint,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1–10, 2022.
    [32] B. Choudhury, V. K. Shah, A. Ferdowsi, J. H. Reed, and Y. T. Hou, “AoI-minimizing scheduling in UAV-relayed IoT networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Smart Systems (MASS), pp. 117–126, 2021.
    [33] F. Chiariotti, O. Vikhrova, B. Soret, and P. Popovski “Information freshness of updates sent over LEO satellite Multi-Hop networks,” 2020.
    [34] J. Gong, T.-H. Chang, C. Shen, and X. Chen, “Aviation time minimization of UAV for data collection from energy constrained sensor networks,” in IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–6, 2018.
    [35] D. Yang, Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Energy tradeoff in ground-to-UAV communication via trajectory design,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 6721–6726, 2018.
    [36] S. Sahni and T. Gonzalez, “P-complete approximation problems,” Journal of the ACM, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 555–565, 1976.
    [37] R. Sitters, “The minimum latency problem is NP-Hard for weighted trees,” in Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 230–239, 2002.
    [38] M. Elbanhawi and M. Simic, “Sampling-based robot motion planning: A review,” IEEE Access, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–77, 2014.

    QR CODE