本文目的在於應用3D 人模與機能工作姿勢之概念，提出工作場所設計與改善的依據。國內的勞工因骨骼肌肉傷害所引致的職業安全衛生問題相當嚴重，其原因繁多複雜並且頗具爭議：有用力負荷過大、重複性施力過於頻繁、施力時程過長、工作姿勢不良…等的問題。然而，「不良的工作姿勢」無疑是個普遍存在而且比較沒有爭議的問題。有鑑於此，本文提出「機能工作姿勢」(FunctionalPosture)的理論，其概念在於使工作場所設施符合作業人員的體型，進而誘導其
採行較「自然」且「省力」的工作姿勢。本研究將此概念應用在一百個工作場所，針對每個工作場所提出合適的機能姿勢，每個機能姿勢都經過人體計測學與生物力學詳細的評估。最後，以3D 方式呈現這些機能姿勢與場景，彙整這些結果並提出一冊「工作場所設計圖譜」以供工業應用。圖譜完成後，為驗證圖譜的適用性，本研究用圖譜去改善另53 個工作場所。改善成果顯示除少數案例，的確都能找到工作性質相近的圖譜做為參考，其中建議的尺寸也確實可直接應用。
關鍵字：工作姿勢、機能姿勢、3D 動態人模、人體計測學

In Taiwan, work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) is a serious occupational problem. Its causes are highly controversial, and may attribute to over-exertion, prolonged-duration, high-frequency, and awkward posture. Among these causes, awkward posture is the most prevalent and less disputed. In order to induce the worker in adopting a preferred working posture during task performance, this study proposed a “functional posture” concept to facilitate the design of workplace. The theme of functional posture is “natural” and” effort-saving”. We
applied this concept in the intervention of 100 workplaces. We proposed a preferred functional posture for each workplace and each functional posture was evaluated both
anthropometrically and biomechanically. Then a desirable workplace design solution with recommended dimensions was proposed. All these design solutions were compiled into a “WorkPlace Design Atlas” to be used as reference for industry. In order to validate the usefulness of this atlas, a validating study consisting of the intervention of 53 workplaces was undertaken. The result was quite promising, any workplace to be redesigned can find a correspondent or similar atlas as design reference, and most recommended dimensions are directly applicable, except a few cases

1. Liang Hui-Wen ,Council Of Labor Affairs Executive Yuan Taiwan，2003 Labor
investigate yearly report, A brief of WMSDs，Industrial safety scientific and
technological quarterly2003，Vol.50，P.2-6
2. Cheng-Lung Lee，MSDs of Construction labourer, Labor Safe and Hygiene
News in Brief1999,Vol.39,4
3. E. N. Corlett and I. Manenica,〝The effects and measurement of working
postures,〞Applied Ergonomics1980, Vol.11, No.1, 7-16.
4. M. Kathleen Killough and Lesia L. Crumpton,〝An investigation of cumulative
trauma disorders in the construction industry,〞International Journal of Industrial
Ergonomics1996, Vol.18, 399-405
5. Joyce A. Cameron, 〝Assessing work-related body-part discomfort: current
strategies and a behaviorally oriented assessment tool,〞International Journal of
Industrial Ergonomics1996, Vol.18, 389-398
6. Kuorinka, B. Johnson, A. Kilbom, H. Vinterberg, F. Biering-Sorensen, G.
Andersson and K. Jorgensen,〝Standardized Nordic Questionnaires for the
analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms,〞Applied Ergonomics1987, Vol.18, No.3,
233-237
7. Karasek, R., “Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude and Mental Strain:
Implications for Job Redesign”, Administrative Science Quarterly1979, 24,
pp285-307
8. Osmo Karhu, Reino Harkonen, Pentti Sorvali and Pentti Vepsalainen,〝Observing
working postures in industry : examples of OWAS application,〞Applied
Ergonomics1981, Vol.12, No.1, 13-17
9. Lynn McAtamney and E. Nigel Corlett,〝RULA: a survey method for the
37
investigation of related upper limb disorders,〞Applied Ergonomics1993, Vol.24,
No.2, 91-99
10. Kristina Kemmlert,〝A method assigned for the identification of ergonomic
hazards−PLIBEL,〞Applied Ergonomics1995, Vol.26, No.3, 199-211
11. W. Rohmert〝, AET − A new job-analysis method,〞Ergonomics1985, Vol.28, No.1,
245-254
12. 李正隆，人因工程常用的評估技術及案例探討，人因工程危害預防技術研討
會，經濟部工業局主辦，中華民國工業安全衛生協會執行
13. Chaffin et. Al., Occupational biomechanics, John Wiley & Sons1988,p.293
14. Chaffin et. Al., Occupational biomechanics, John Wiley & Sons1988,p.304
15. E. N. Corlett, S. J. Madeley and I. Manenica,〝Posture Targeting: a technique for
recording working postures,〞Ergonomics1979, Vol.22, No.3, 357-366
16. Council Of Labor Affairs Executive Yuan Taiwan，Human Factor Guide Book，
Taipei 1995
17. Chaffin et. Al., Occupational biomechanics, John Wiley & Sons1988,p.132~146
18. Chaffin et. Al., Occupational biomechanics, John Wiley & Sons1988,p.147~153
19. Roebuck J. A., , Anthropometric methods: designing to fit the human body,
Human factors and ergonomics society 1993
20. Chaffin et. Al., Occupational biomechanics, John Wiley & Sons1988,p.45
21. Chaffin et. Al., Occupational biomechanics, John Wiley & Sons1988,p.421
22. Dennis R. Ankrum ,Viewing angle and distance in computer workstations,
Ankrum Associates
23. Chen Chih-Yong etal.，Renew of existing indigeous, anthropometric database
and its application on the facility measurement of workplace2005，Institute of
Occupational Safety and Health
24. Dennis R. Ankrum, Visual Ergonomics in the Office, Ankrum Associates,
38
25. Chi Ju-Pei A Method in Extraction of Functional Measurements from 3D
Animation Human Figures - The Design and Installation of the Basin 2004,
Master's Thesis of NTHU
26. Huang Yu-Tsang，The Development of Human Animation Figures Using 3D
Anthropometrical Database(2006)，Master's Thesis of NTHU
27. OSHA,2000,Ergonomics: The Study of Work, U.S. Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
28. 陳志勇、陳協慶，　2002，上肢重複性傷害危險因子現場監測技術開發，
行政院勞工安主衛生研究所
29. Niklas Krause et al.,2004,”Physical Workload Ergonomic Problems and
Incidence of Low Back Injury:A 7.5-Year Prospective Study of SanFrancisco
Transit Operators”,American Journal of Industrial Medicine,vol.46,pp.570-585
30. 陳俐安，2003，高市公車司機肌肉骨骼危害暴露研究，行政院勞工委員會勞
工安全衛生研究所
31. 行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所，人因工程肌肉骨骼傷害預防指
引,2001.12.02
32. 葉文裕、林彥輝，1997，工作現楊人因工程檢核表適用性之研究，行政院勞
工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所
33. 施啟明、王子康，1998，運輸業累積性肌肉骨骼傷害調查分析—新竹地區，
行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所
34. Kermit G. Davis, William S. Marras,2003,”Partitioning the contributing role of
biomechanical, psychosocial, and individual risk factors in the development of
spine loads”, The Spine Journal, vol.3,pp.331-338.
35. 江傳江，2003，肌肉骨骼評估基礎與技術，合記書局，台北
36. 陳志勇、李開偉，　2001，攝影記者下背傷害評估研究，行政院勞工委員
會勞工安全衛生研究所
39
37. 作業場所人力尺寸圖譜
38. 張振平、陳志勇、游志雲、杜信宏，工作場所設計圖譜