簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 陳浩正
論文名稱： 基於問題解決情境之觸控式創意齒輪遊戲設計研究
指導教授： 廖冠智
口試委員:
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱：
論文出版年： 2013
畢業學年度： 101
語文別： 中文
中文關鍵詞： 問題解決 、連鎖反應情境 、齒輪 、遊戲設計 、觸控操作
外文關鍵詞： problem solving, the scenario of chain reaction, gears, game design, touched operation
相關次數： 點閱：1  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 中文摘要
    遊戲是學童自我本能之一，遊戲式教學除了可以強化學習效率，在過程中亦能增添樂趣，獲得高度的學習成果。本研究旨在進行「創意齒輪實驗室」的製作，以問題解決為發想情境，在遊戲單元中設計探索式介面以及圖像式工具，引導學童直覺探索進行問題解決之悅趣學習。本遊戲運用觸控面板來進行操作，其特性有如日常生活中直覺性的行為模式。
    遊戲介面主要以實驗室為背景，設計許多科學小物件引發學童的好奇心，激發其探索動機嘗試主動瞭解並解決所預設的情境問題。裝置工具則設計十種圖像為代表，其設計概念主要參考國小自然與生活科技領域的教學內容，引導學童以動手做做看的方式建立合理且具作用的齒輪組件，啟動一連串程序的觸媒以產生連鎖效應，進而解決遊戲所預設的問題。「創意齒輪實驗室」設計完成後，研究者進行初步敘事訪談並探究受訪學童的操作歷程，主要結果發現：
    一、應用國小自然與生活科技領域進行遊戲發想建置「創意齒輪實驗室」的可行性。
    二、系統中的情境動畫與齒輪工具有助於學童從生活經驗中聯想進行遊戲問題解決。
    三、學童能透過觀察與生活經驗聯想認知遊戲情境目的、工具操作以及在齒輪失效情境找尋困境癥結點。

    Abstract
    Playing game is one of children’s instinct, game-based teaching could learning efficiency be enhanced in addition to add fun and get better learning outcomes in the process. The purpose of this study is to design the “Creative Gears Lab”, being problem solving to think scenario, in the game units, that designing exploratory interface and image-based tools to guide children intuition to explore doing game-based learning of problem solving. In this game, touched panel is used to operate, that characteristic just like intuitive behavior patterns in everyday life.
    The background of interface is mainly about laboratory in this game, designing many scientific tiny things to initiate curiosity of children, stimulating their exploratory motivation to try finding out and solving preset situational problems. Device tools that designing ten kinds of image to represents, that designed concept is referenced mainly the teaching content of elementary nature and life technology to guide children used the mode of their hands to establish the reasonable and functional gear module, starting a series of procedures to produce chain reaction and then solving preset problems. After the “Creative Gears Lab” been designed complete, I made progress initial narrative interview and explored the operating progress of this interviewed children, the findings were as follows:
    1.Using elementary nature and life technology to devise this game and set possibility of the “Creative Gears Lab”.
    2.The situational animation and gear tools in this system that can help children thinking from their life experience to solve the game problems.
    3.Children can through watching and thinking their life experience to recognize the purpose of the game situations, tool operation and find predicamental point in gear invalid scenario.

    目次 致謝 ......................................................I 摘要 .....................................................II Abstract ................................................III 目次 .....................................................IV 表次 ...................................................VIII 圖次 .....................................................IX 第一章 緒論 ................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ........................................1 第二節 研究目的 .............................................3 第三節 研究範圍與限制 ........................................4 一、研究範圍 ...............................................4 二、研究限制 ...............................................4 第四節 解釋名詞 .............................................5 一、問題解決(Problem Solving) ...............................5 二、連鎖反應(Chain Reaction).................................5 三、觸控操作 ............................................5 四、創意齒輪遊戲 ............................................5 第二章 文獻探討 .............................................7 第一節 互動腳本與遊戲設計 .....................................7 一、互動腳本設計............................................7 二、互動遊戲設計............................................8 三、情境與遊戲探索歷程......................................10 第二節 互動遊戲對創意性問題解決能力之影響......................12 一、互動遊戲對於創造力的表現...............................12 二、互動遊戲對於問題解決能力之表現.........................14 第三節 GIGO式互動遊戲設計....................................18 第四節 悅趣學習之動力理論.....................................20 第三章 研究方法.............................................23 第一節、研究流程.............................................23 第二節、實驗對象.............................................25 第三節、連鎖反應遊戲之設計概念.................................25 一、FF至PF階段：探討使用者如何觀看遊戲畫面與認知情境問題之類型........................................................28 二、IF階段：瞭解使用者思考動力機件、元件工具型式與連鎖反應元件之關聯性........................................................29 三、SF至AF階段：歸納與評估各種解決方法的可能組成方案......31 第四節、敘事訪談的設計與說明...................................33 一、A組：探究問題解決能力之情境問題認知之能力.............33 二、B組：探究問題解決能力之工具組件觸控操作之能力.........36 三、C組：探究問題解決能力之齒輪鏈結失效之解決能力.........38 第四章 創意齒輪實驗室之情境與互動設計...........................41 第一節、介面各功能簡介........................................41 第二節、問題解決情境之設計....................................45 一、瘋狂實驗之章...........................................45 二、瘋狂趣味之章...........................................45 三、連鎖反應情境...........................................46 第三節、問題解決情境特色......................................48 第四節、齒輪工具特色.........................................59 第五節、各單元連鎖反應過程....................................67 一、一次性任務.............................................67 二、連續性任務.............................................69 三、即時性任務.............................................72 四、因果關係性任務.........................................76 五、同步性任務.............................................79 第五章 研究成果與分析.............................................84 一、遊戲情境之問題認知表現..................................84 二、工具組件觸控操作之表現..................................86 三、解決齒輪鏈結失效之表現..................................88 第六章 研究結論與建議........................................90 第一節、研究結論.............................................90 一、應用國小自然與生活科技領域進行遊戲發想建置創意齒輪實驗室........................................................90 二、系統中的情境動畫與齒輪工具有助於學童的經驗聯想進行問題解決........................................................91 三、學童透過觀察與生活經驗聯想認知遊戲情境目的、工具操作以及在齒輪失效情境找尋困境癥結........................................91 第二節、未來研究建議.........................................93 一、系統設計之建議.........................................93 二、未來研究之建議.........................................95 參考文獻...................................................96 附錄......................................................99 附錄一、等待共鳴的提琴之連鎖反應過程...........................99 附錄二、玩具焚化爐之連鎖反應過程...............................100 附錄三、飢餓的烏龜之連鎖反應過程...............................101 附錄四、凍僵的小貓之連鎖反應過程...............................102 附錄五、王子的熱氣球之連鎖反應過程.............................103 附錄六、乾枯的金魚之連鎖反應過程...............................104 附錄七、棉花糖的魔豆之連鎖反應過程.............................105 附錄八、美髮師的秘密之連鎖反應過程.............................106 附錄九、公主的真面目之連鎖反應過程.............................107 附錄十、轉動吧！小綿羊I之連鎖反應過程..........................108 附錄十一、轉動吧！小綿羊II之連鎖反應過程.......................109 附錄十二、轉動吧！小綿羊III之連鎖反應過程......................110 附錄十三、大野狼的誘惑之連鎖反應過程...........................111 附錄十四、沒電的娃娃機之連鎖反應過程...........................112 附錄十五、快烤焦的乳豬之連鎖反應過程...........................113 附錄十六、貪吃糖女孩之連鎖反應過程.............................114 附錄十七、情境單元選擇表.....................................115 附錄十八、情境問題認知能力之觀察紀錄表.........................116 附錄十九、工具組件觸控操作能力之觀察紀錄表.....................117 附錄二十、齒輪鏈結失效解決能力之觀察紀錄表.....................118 附錄二十一、情境問題認知能力之紀錄資料I........................119 附錄二十二、情境問題認知能力之紀錄資料II.......................120 附錄二十三、工具組件觸控操作能力之紀錄資料I....................121 附錄二十四、工具組件觸控操作能力之紀錄資料II...................122 附錄二十五、齒輪鏈結失效解決能力之紀錄資料I....................124 附錄二十六、齒輪鏈結失效解決能力之紀錄資料II...................125

    參考文獻
    一、中文部份
    彭銘君(2004)。遊戲情境中思考風格對設計創造力的影響。國立交通大學理學院網路學習碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    柳銘巖(2003)。以遊戲軟體為環境探討國小學生思考風格對問題解決歷程之影響。國立交通大學理學院網路學習組碩士論文。
    廖根龍(2004)。遊戲學習情境中思考風格對問題解決的影響。國立交通大學理學院網路學習碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    李訓桐、劉寶鈞(2009)。TrainB&P – 創造力及問題解決能力之遊樂式學習系統設計。元智大學資訊工程學系碩士論文。
    盧素碧(1990)。幼兒教育課程與活動設計。幼兒教育年刊，3期，153-170頁。
    國科會(1998)。兒童訊月刊軟體設計展示：機械反斗城計畫。台北：國科會。
    黃秀青(2004)。電腦益智遊戲與國小學童推理思考過程之研究。屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。
    張春興(1999)。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。
    蘇惠玉(2008)。以問題解決導向數位學習遊戲探究國小學生認知能力。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    蘇秀玲、謝秀月(2006)。科學遊戲融入國小自然科學童的問題解決能力之研究。理工研究學報，第40 卷1 期，47-68 頁。
    汪榮才(1991)。資賦優異學生創造性問題解決的教學。台南師院學報。第 24 期。頁27-38。
    二、英文部份
    Andrew, G. (2004). Interactive Storytelling: Techniques for 21st Century Fiction, AK Peters.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
    Bloom,B. S. (1956), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay Co Inc, New York.
    Campbell, J. (1949). The Hero With a Thousand Faces, New York: Bollingen.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
    Dansky, J. (1980). Make-believe: a mediator of the relationship between play and associative fluency. Child Development, (51): 576–579.
    Eladhari, M. (2002), Object Oriented Story Construction in Story Driven Computer Games, the Master Thesis of Department of History of Literature and History of Ideas Stockholm University.
    Gagne, E.D., Yekovich, C.W., & Yekovich, F.R. (1993).The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd Edition).New York: Harper Collins.
    Gee, J. P. (2005). Why video games are good for your soul pleasure and learning. Australian: Common Ground.
    Howe (1997), Creative problem solving approaches processes for teaching and doing creative activity. Handbook of seminar on instruction for creative thinking, Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University
    Jonassen, D. (1996). Mindtools: computers in the classroom. Prentice Hall: Englewood.
    Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Keller, J. M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K. Shaw & A. J. Trott (Eds.), Aspects of Educational Technology Volume XVII: staff Development and Career Updating. London: Kogan Page.
    Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2 – 10.
    Kuecklich, J. (2001). Literary Theory and Computer Games. Proceedings of the First Conference on Computational. Semiotics for Games and New Media (COSIGN), Amsterdam, September 10-12, 2001.
    Liao, G. Z. (2011), “Investigation On Design Method And Thinking Of Chain Reaction Game For Image-based Problem-Solving Ability”, IASDR2011- The International Association of Societies of Design Research, Delft in Netherlands.
    Lindley, C. (2002), The Gameplay Gestalt, Narrative, and Interactive Storytelling, Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference, Tampere, Finland.
    Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory in intrinsically movtivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333-369.
    Malone, M. R. & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Fan (Series Eds.), R. F. Snow & J. F. Marshall (Vol. Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction, vol. 4: Conative and affective process analyses (pp.223-253). Hilisdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribauni Associates.
    Mayer, R. E. (2002). A taxonomy for computer-based assessment of problem-solving. Computer in Human Behavior, 18(6), 623-632.
    Pepler, D. J., & Ross, H. S. (1981). The effects of play on convergent and divergent problem solving. Child Development, (52): 1202-1210.
    Piaget, J. (1962). Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York. WW Norton.
    Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. NY: Scribners.
    Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery: on understand learning, and teaching problem solving. New York: Scribner’s.
    Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Games-Based Learning. New York & London. McGraw-Hill.
    Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
    Rubin, K. H., Fein, G., & Vanderberg, B. (1983). Play. In P. Mussen & E. M.Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 693-774). New York: Wiley.
    Schiller, F. (1759~1805). On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a series of Letters.
    Sylva, K., Bruner, J., & Genova, P. (1976). The role of play in the problem solving of children 3–5 years old. In J. Bruner, A. Jolly & K. Sylva (Eds.) Play: Its role in development and evolution. New York: Basic Books.
    Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, (63): 365-369.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. NY: Simon & Schuster Inc.
    Vogler, C. (1993). A Practical Guide to the Hero’s Journey. Retrieved October 25, 2011, from http://www.thewritersjourney.com/
    Vandenberg, B. (1980). Play, problem solving, and creativity. New Directions for Child Development, (9): 49–68.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE