研究生: |
林周緯 Lin, Juway |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台灣製藥廠商核心能力價值評估:市場投資者之觀點 Evaluating the Value of Core Competence for Taiwan’s Pharmaceutical Companies : the View of Investors |
指導教授: |
胡美智
Hu, Mei-Chih |
口試委員: |
陳寶蓮
Chen, Pao-Lien 劉玉雯 Liu, Yu-Wen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 經營管理碩士在職專班 Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 127 |
中文關鍵詞: | 核心能力 、核心能力成長 、價值獲得 、製藥產業 、生物技術 |
外文關鍵詞: | Core Competence, Core Competence Growth, Value Gain, Pharmaceutical industry, Biotechnology |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
一直以來生技及製藥產業公司大多是知識強度高且擁有大量無形的資產,因此有許多不實的能力宣言及誇大的無形技術經常發生在許多生物技術新創公司。其中一項難以評估生技產業的主要原因是難以言喻及量化的知識程度,尤其是對投資者而言。這篇論文主要應用了核心能力及價值獲得之概念,目標在為投資者提供經評估過的新藥開發公司及一般製藥公司之市場價值。以台灣的新藥開發公司及一般製藥公司為例,本篇論文顯示出台灣的新藥開發公司及一般製藥公司的核心價值在2015年後一直處於減損之狀態。此外,本篇論文也納入加拿大及澳洲的生技及製藥公司的結果,進而希望能找出造成生技及製藥產業在這三國發展出不同軌跡之主要因素。本篇論文也顯示出包含財物、營運及投資者觀點的價值獲得觀念可與其他的評估指標如專利活動並用,以利更精準的評估公司及產業之表現。
The performance of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies used to be knowledge-intensive and intangible, thereby ‘massive fraud’ through false or exaggerated claims thus become commonly exercised by many biotechnology startups such as Theranos (was once a famous unicorn company in Silicon Valley). One of the critical reasons is resulted from the difficulty to evaluate the actual value for tacit knowledge, especially for investors. This study applied the notion of core competence (CC) and value gain (VG), aiming at providing a referenced market value of new drug development and manufacturing companies for investors. Taking Taiwan’s new drug development and manufacturing companies as examples, this study demonstrated that the value of core competence has declined in both Taiwan’s new drug development and manufacturing sectors and involved companies since 2015. Drug companies in Canada and Australia were also enrolled to investigate possible features contributing to differential development of pharmaceutical industries in these countries. This study further suggests that value gains can be utilized in association with other evaluation indicators such as patenting activities, in which core competence of the firm involving finance, operational management and perception of investors counts.
1. Alegre, J., Chiva, R., Lapiedra, R. 2009. Measuring innovation in long product development cycle industries: An insight in biotechnology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 21:535-546.
2. Andersson, T., Gleadle, P., Haslam, C., Tsitsianis, N. 2010. Bio-pharma: A financialized business model. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21:631-641.
3. Bontis, N. 2001. Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews 3:41-60.
4. De Luca, L. M., Verona, G., Vicari, S. 2010. Market orientation and R&D effectiveness in high-technology firms: An empirical investigation in the biotechnology industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27:299-320.
5. Hoenen, S., Kolympiris, C., Schoenmakers, W., Kalaitzandonakes, N. 2014. The diminishing signaling value of patents between early rounds of venture capital financing. Research Policy 43:956-989.
6. Kim, K. Y. 2012. Strategic R&D alliance factors that impact innovation success in the biotechnology industry. International Journal of Technology Management 59:116-138.
7. Lavelle, A., Rathjen, D. 2012. CEO and Chair welcome. Australasian Biotechnology 24:4-7.
8. Lazonick, W. 2014. Innovative enterprise and shareholder value. Law & Financial Markets Review 8:52-64.
9. Lazonick, W. 2018. Comments on Gary Pisano: “toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities”. Industrial and Corporate Change 27:1165-1174.
10. Loffler. 2002. Trends in biotechnology: Implications for the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Medical Marketing 2:345-348.
11. Mayer-Haug, K., Read, S., Brinckmann, J., Dew, N., Grichnik, D. 2013. Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs. Research Policy 42:1251-1273.
12. McConomy, B., Xu, B. 2004. Value creation in the biotechnology industry. CMA Management 78:28-31.
13. Molloy, P. 2019. Value creation and investor performance of the Australian drug development biotech sector. Faculty of Business and Law Swinburne University of Technology.
14. Nicolau, J. L., Santa-María, M.J. 2015. Battle royal in biotechnology: R&D vs. product vs. process innovations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 27:503-516.
15. Olmeda, G. D. 2012. Determinants of International Competitiveness
16. in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Esic Market Economic and Business Journal 43 (2):371-385.
17. Owen, G. 2016. The secret of a world-class biotech sector. Financial Times:9.
18. Perez-Rodriguez, J. V., Valcarcel, B.G.L. 2012. Do product innovation and news about the R&D process produce large price changes and overreaction? The case of pharmaceutical stock prices. Applied Economics 44:2217-2229.
19. Quintana-García, C., Benavides-Velasco, C.A. 2005. Agglomeration economies and vertical alliances: The route to product innovation in biotechnology firms. International Journal of Production Research 43:4853-4873.
20. Reiss, T. 2001. Success factors for biotechnology: lessons from
21. Japan, Germany and Great Britain. Int. J. Biotechnology, 3 (Nos. 1/2).
22. Rzakhanov, Z. 2001. Innovation, product development and market value: Evidence from the biotechnology industryinnovation in biotechnology industry. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 13:747-760.
23. Scannell, W., Blanckley, A., Boldon, H. 2012. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nature Reviews/Drug Discovery 11:191-200.
24. Varela, G. D. O. a. J. C. S. 2012. Determinants of International Competitiveness
25. in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Esic Market Economic and Business Journal 43 (2):371-385.
26. Wu, C.-W. 2013. Global-innovation strategy modeling of biotechnology industry. Journal of Business Research 66:1994-1999.