以資料包絡分析法發展綠色供應商評選程序｜國立清華大學博碩士論文庫

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	紀如夢 Chi, Ju-Meng
論文名稱：	以資料包絡分析法發展綠色供應商評選程序 Developing Green Supplier Selection Procedure: A DEA Approach
指導教授：	溫于平 Wen, Ue-Pyng
口試委員:
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年：	2010
畢業學年度：	98
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	52
中文關鍵詞：	綠色供應商評選、綠色供應鏈、碳足跡、資料包絡分析法、層級分析法、網路分析法、保證區域
外文關鍵詞：	Green Supplier Selection, Green Supply Chain, Carbon Footprint, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP), Analytical Network Process (ANP), Assurance Region (AR)
相關次數：	點閱：2 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

　　供應商評選是企業經營上常見的決策問題，隨著國際間陸續針對環境議題訂定規範，選擇合適的綠色供應商變成管理上重要的議題。針對傳統供應商的評選模式研究已臻成熟，相對下綠色供應商選擇是一門剛起步的議題，因此本研究致力於建立一個完整的綠色供應商評選程序，協助企業做出最具效益的決策。
　　本研究回顧過往的文獻來制訂出一組兼顧環保、傳統及夥伴關係的指標組合，並且由於近期碳足跡揭露在國際上備受重視，因此將其列入評選指標中。再者，目前針對綠色供應商評選議題的文獻多使用層級分析法及網路分析法來作分析，受限於方法論的限制而只能處理較小規模的問題。本研究導入資料包絡分析法，與前者結合成一個適用於不同規模的情境下的整合性評估模式，再利用成對比較問卷收集群體決策資訊、克服填卷上的不一致性，進而建立保證區域將決策者的主觀意見適量地投入模式，提升模式的鑑別力，此評估模式與評選指標結合後建構出完整且可實行的綠色供應商評選架構。

Supplier selection is a common decision-making problem in operating enterprises. In the rising of international treaties and directives of environmental aspects, selecting the suitable green supplier become a critical managerial issues. While the researches focusing on the traditional supplier selection model have reached maturity, green supplier selection problem is on the preliminary stage. Therefore, this study aims on establishing a comprehensive green supplier selection framework to assist the enterprise in making the most efficient decision.
Based on the literature, this study proposes a criteria set including green, traditional, and partnership issues. The criteria set takes carbon footprint into account, because the international regulations have paid much attention on the carbon footprint exposure. Moreover, most of the recent studies of green supplier selection use analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and analytical network process (ANP) to evaluate. According to the limitation of methodology, they can treat the smaller scale problem only. This study introduces data envelopment analysis (DEA) into assessment, and combined with AHP/ANP to establish an integrated model. Furthermore, we use the questionnaire of pairwise comparison to gather information of group decision, overcome the inconsistency problem, and establish the assurance region that implemented not only to take the opinion of decision makers into consideration, but also to increase the discriminating power of the model. Merging with the above criteria set, this evaluating model turns into a practical integrated framework of green supplier selection.

摘要 ........................................................................................................................................... i
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... ii
誌謝詞 ...................................................................................................................................... iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... iv
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... v
LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... vi
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1
1 Background .............................................................................................................. 1
2 Motivation................................................................................................................ 1
3 Research Framework ............................................................................................... 2
LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................................. 4
1 The Background of Green Supply Chain Management ........................................... 4
1.1 International Environmental Directives ....................................................... 5
1.2 Carbon Footprint .......................................................................................... 8
2 Criteria for Evaluating Suppliers ........................................................................... 10
3 Methodologies of Supplier Selection .................................................................... 14
4 Data Envelopment Analysis ................................................................................... 18
THE DEA MODEL ......................................................................................................... 26
1 Data Setting of the DEA Model ............................................................................. 26
2 Numerical Example: Case I ................................................................................... 31
THE INTEGRATED MODEL ........................................................................................ 39
1 Background of the Integrated Model ..................................................................... 39
2 The Proposed Integrated Model............................................................................. 40
3 Numerical Example: Case II .................................................................................. 41
CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................. 47
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 49

                                

[1] Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science , 39 (10), pp. 1261-1265.
[2] Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Model for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science , 30 (9), pp. 1078-1092.
[3] Braglia, M., & Pentroni, A. (2000). A Quality Assurance-oriented Methodology for Handling Trade-offs in Supplier Selection. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 30 (2), pp. 96-112.
[4] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research , 2 (6), pp. 429-444.
[5] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
[6] Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). Rank Order Data in DEA: A General Framework. European Journal of Operational Research , 174 (2), pp. 1021-1038.
[7] Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Yu, G. (1999). IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for Dealing With Imprecise Data in DEA. Management Science , 45 (4), pp. 597-607.
[8] Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Yu, G. (2001). An Illustrative Application of IDEA (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company. Operations Research , 49 (6), pp. 807-820.
[9] Dickson, G. W. (1966). An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions. Journal of Purchasing , 2 (1), pp. 5-17.
[10] Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses. The Journal of the Operational Research Society , 45 (5), pp. 567-578.
[11] Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society , 120, pp. 253-281.
[12] Ha, S. H., & Krishnan, R. (2008). A Hybrid Approach to Supplier Selection for the Maintenance of a Competitive Supply Chain. Expert Systems with Applications , 34, pp. 1303-1311.
[13] Handfield, R., Walson, S. V., Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying Environmental Criteria to Supplier Assessment: A Study in the Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research , 141 (1), pp. 70-87.
[14] Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria Decision Making Approaches for Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research , 202 (1), pp. 16-24.
[15] Huang, H. (2009). Design of Green Supplier Selection Procedure. Master Thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
[16] Humphreys, P. K., Wong, Y. K., & Chan, F. T. (2003). Integrating Environmental Criteria into the Supplier Selection Process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology , 138, pp. 349-356.
[17] Kao, C. (2006). Interval Efficiency Measures in Data Envelopment Analysis with Imprecise Data. European Journal of Operational Research , 174 (2), pp. 1087-1099.
[18] Lee, A. H., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., & Hung, H. C. (2009). A Green Supplier Selection Model for High-Tech Industry. Expert Systems with Applications , 36 (4), pp. 7917-7927.
[19] Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology , 140, pp. 1-55.
[20] Lu, L. Y., Wu, C. H., & Kuo, T. C. (2007). Environmental Principles Applicable to Green Supplier Evaluation by Using Multi-Objective Decision Analysis. International Journal of Production Research , 45 (18-19), pp. 4317-4331.
[21] Noci, G. (1997). Designing ―Green‖ Vendor Rating Systems for the Assessment of a Supplier’s Environmental Performance. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , 3 (2), pp. 103-114.
[22] Park, K. S. (2004). Simplification of the Transformations and Redundancy of Assurance Regions in IDEA (Imprecise DEA). The Journal of the Operational Research Society , 55 (12), pp. 1363-1366.
[23] Saen, F. R. (2006). A Decision Model for Selecting Technology Suppliers in the Presence of Nondiscretionary Factors. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 181 (2), pp. 1609-1615.
[24] Saen, F. R. (2007). Supplier Selection in the Presence of Both Cardinal and Ordinal Data. European Journal of Operational Research , 183, pp. 741-747.
[25] Saen, F. R. (2008). Supplier Selection by the New AR-IDEA Model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39, pp. 1061-1070.
[26] Sarkis, J., & Talluri, S. (2002). A Model for Strategic Supplier Selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management , 30 (1), pp. 18-28.
[27] Tuzkaya, G., Ozgen, A., Ozgen, D., & Tuzkaya, U. R. (2009). Environmental Performance Evaluation of Suppliers: A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Approach. International Journal of Enviromental Science and Technology , 6 (3), pp. 477-479.
[28] The European parliament and the council of the European Union, 2003a, directive 2002/96/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), Official Journal of the European Union 13.2.2003, 24-37.
[29] The European parliament and the council of the European Union, 2003b, directive 2002/96/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, Official Journal of the European Union 13.2.2003, 19-23.
[30] Wang, M. Y., Greatbanks, R., & Yang, B. J. (2005). Interval Rfficiency Assessment Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 153 (3), pp. 347-370.
[31] Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vender Selection Criteria and Methods. European Journal of Operational Research , 50 (1), pp. 2-18.
[32] Wu, W. Y., Shih, H. A., & Chan, H. C. (2009). The Analytic Network Process for Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances. Expert Systems with Applications , 36, pp. 4646-4653.
[33] Zhu, J. (2003). Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis (IDEA): A Review and Improvement With an Application. European Journal of Opeational Research , 144 (3), pp. 513-529.

全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文