隨著能源需求的增長和核能發電的應用，核廢料處置成為一個重要的環境和社會議題，過去研究多由鄰避效應的風險認知出發，討論補償措施的重要性，本研究除透過問卷調查資料來瞭解台灣民眾對於低階核廢料貯存場的風險認知外，最大不同之處在於使用假設市場評估法來估算民眾對於規避低階核廢料貯存場設置的願付價格。結果發現多數受訪者對於核廢料貯存場設置於住家附近表示擔憂，並願意支付一定的費用以避免這種情況，而迴歸分析結果顯示，薪資、有無子女、政治傾向等變數對願付價格有顯著影響。本研究結果可作為政策制定者提供參考，促進核廢料管理政策的制定和實施。

This study aims to investigate the risk perception and willingness to pay (WTP) of Taiwanese citizens regarding low-level nuclear waste storage sites. With the increasing energy demand and the application of nuclear power, nuclear waste disposal has become a significant environmental and social issue. Data was collected through a questionnaire survey and the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) was employed to estimate the public's WTP. The results indicate that most respondents expressed concerns about having nuclear waste storage sites near their residences and were willing to pay a certain amount to avoid this situation. Several regression analyses revealed that variables such as salary, having children, and political inclination significantly influenced WTP. Furthermore, the literature review results indicate that international studies on the NIMBY effect emphasize the importance of risk perception, compensation measures, and socio-economic factors. The findings of this study can provide valuable insights for policymakers to facilitate the formulation and implementation of nuclear waste management policies.

1. 丘昌泰 (2004)，「公共設施中鄰避情節的成因與因應：以民營電廠為例」，《政治學報》，37，37-110。 [Chiu, C.-T. (2004), “The Causes and Countermeasures of the NIMBY Syndrome in Public Facilities: A Case Study of Private Power Plants,” Political Science Journal, 37, 37-110.]
2. 林幸君與林億明 (2009)，「衡量行動電話基地台設置之外部成本：假設市場評估法之應用」，《亞太經濟管理評論》，13(1)，1-16。 [Lin, H.-C. & Lin, Y.-M. (2009), “Measuring the External Costs of Mobile Phone Base Station Installation: Application of the Contingent Valuation Method,” Asia-Pacific Economic Management Review, 13(1), 1-16.]
3. 林彥妤與柳婉郁 (2020)，「森林遊樂區美景經濟價值評估研究－以惠蓀森林遊樂區為例」，《應用經濟論叢》，108，207-246，中興大學應用經濟學系。 [Lin, Y.-Y. & Liu, W.-Y. (2020), “Economic Valuation of Scenic Beauty in Forest Recreation Areas: A Case Study of Huisun Forest Recreation Area,” Journal of Applied Economics, 108, 207-246, Department of Applied Economics, National Chung Hsing University.]
4. 林晏州、George L. Peterson、林寶秀與Patricia A. Champ (2007)，「遊客與居民對太魯閣國家公園資源保育願付費用之影響因素分析與比較」，《觀光研究學報》，13(4)，309-326。 [Lin, Y.-Z., Peterson, G. L., Lin, P.-X., & Champ, P. A. (2007), “Analysis and Comparison of Factors Affecting Tourists' and Residents' Willingness to Pay for Taroko National Park Resource Conservation,” Journal of Tourism Studies, 13(4), 309-326.]
5. 金韶顯 (2022)，「核廢料處置與協同治理：台灣與南韓案例之比較研究 」，國立政治大學亞太研究碩士論文。 [Kim, S.-H. (2022), “Nuclear Waste Disposal and Collaborative Governance: A Comparative Study of Taiwan and South Korea,” Master Thesis, Asia-Pacific Studies, National Chengchi University.]
6. 邱崇原與湯京平 (2014)。「公民投票與鄰避困境－台灣低放射性廢棄物貯存場的選址經驗及南韓之啟示」，《臺灣民主季刊》，11(4)，1-36。 [Chiu, C.-Y. & Tang, C.-P. (2014), “Referendum and NIMBY Dilemma: Taiwan’s Experience in Siting Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage and the Implications from South Korea,” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 11(4), 1-36.]
7. 洪鴻智 (2005)，「科技鄰避設施風險知覺之形成與投影：核二廠」，《人文及社會科學集刊》，17(1)，33-70。 [Hung, H.-C. (2005), “Formation and Projection of Risk Perception of Technological NIMBY Facilities: The Case of the Second Nuclear Plant,” Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(1), 33-70.]
8. 黃則鳴 (2017)，「台灣核廢料政策之論述分析-2011年至2016年」，國立台灣大學公共事務研究所碩士論文。 [Huang, T.-M. (2017), “Discourse Analysis of Taiwan’s Nuclear Waste Policy: 2011 to 2016,” Master Thesis, Graduate Institute of Public Affairs, National Taiwan University.]
9. 梁世武與李均揚 (2014)，「從鄰避效應與認知失調解析台灣民眾的核電風險認知與態度」，《台灣公共衛生雜誌》，33(4)，428-444。 [Liang, S.-W. & Lee, C.-Y. (2014), “Analyzing the Risk Perception and Attitude of Taiwanese People Towards Nuclear Power from the Perspective of NIMBY Effect and Cognitive Dissonance,” Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 33(4), 428-444.]
10. 曾家宏 (2015)，「我國民眾對電力暨綠色電力願付價格之研究」，行政院原子能委員會委託研究計畫研究報告。 [Tseng, C.-H. (2015), “A Study on the Willingness to Pay for Electricity and Green Electricity among Taiwanese People,” Research Report Commissioned by the Atomic Energy Council of the Executive Yuan.]
11. 陳璋玲與伍亮帆 (2006)，「嘉義市國際管樂節活動吸引力、滿意度與忠誠度關係及願付價格之研究」，《旅遊管理研究》，6(1)，101-123。 [Chen, C.-L. & Wu, L.-F. (2006), “A Study on the Attraction, Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Willingness to Pay of the Chiayi International Band Festival,” Journal of Tourism Management Studies, 6(1), 101-123.]
12. 陳宛君、林鴻忠與余婷茱 (2010)，「社區居民及遊客對森林步道之評價-以宜蘭縣新寮瀑布、林美石磐及松羅步道為例」，《中華林學季刊》，43(1)，55-71。 [Chen, W.-J., Lin, H.-C., & Yu, T.-J. (2010), “Evaluation of Forest Trails by Community Residents and Tourists: A Case Study of Xinliao Waterfall, Linmei Shipan, and Songluo Trails in Yilan County,” Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry, 43(1), 55-71.]
13. 蕭代基 (1996)，「污染性設施之設置與居民信心之建立」，《台灣經濟預測與政策》，27(1)，39-52。 [Hsiao, T.-C. (1996), “Establishment of Confidence among Residents in the Siting of Polluting Facilities,” Taiwan Economic Forecast and Policy, 27(1), 39-52.]
14. 蕭代基與黃德秀 (2001)，「補償對鄰避現象的影響─以烏坵低放射性廢料場址為例」，國立臺北大學資源管理研究所碩士論文。 [Hsiao, T.-C. & Huang, T.-H. (2001), “The Impact of Compensation on the NIMBY Phenomenon: A Case Study of the Wuchiu Low-Level Radioactive Waste Site,” Master Thesis, Graduate Institute of Resource Management, National Taipei University.]
15. 湯京平 (1999)，「鄰避性環境衝突管理的制度與策略─以理性選擇與交易成本理論分析六輕建廠及拜耳投資案」，《政治科學論叢》，10，355-84。 [Tang, C.-P. (1999), “Institutional and Strategic Management of NIMBY Environmental Conflicts: An Analysis of the Sixth Naphtha Cracker Plant and Bayer Investment Case Using Rational Choice and Transaction Cost Theories,” Political Science Review, 10, 355-84.]
16. Foster, J., & Warren, M. (2022), "The NIMBY Problem," Journal of Theoretical Politics, 34(1), 145-172.
17. Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1996). "The Fair Siting Procedures: An Empirical Analysis of Their Importance and Characteristics," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3), 353-376.
18. Frey, B. S., Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Eichenberger, R. (1996). "The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets," Journal of Political Economy, 104(6), 193-209.
19. Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). "The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out," American Economic Review, 87(4), 746-755.
20. Ferreira, S., & Gallagher, L. (2010), "Protest Responses and Willingness to Accept: A Case Study of a Mine in Ireland," Land Use Policy, 27(3), 638-652.
21. Gawande, K., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (2001), "Nuclear Waste Transport and Residential Property Values: Estimating the Effects of Perceived Risks," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42(2), 207-233.
22. Gowda, M. V. R., & Easterling, D. (1998). "Voluntary Siting and Equity: The MRS Facility Experience in Native America," Risk Analysis, 20(6), 917-929.
23. Greenberg, M. (2009), "NIMBY, CLAMP, and the Location of New Nuclear-Related Facilities: U.S. National and 11 Site-Specific Surveys," Risk Analysis, 29(9), 1242-1254.
24. Hadden, S. G. (1991), "Public Perception of Hazardous Waste," Journal of Environmental Management, 31(3), 279-291.
25. Hüppe, M., & Weber, J. (1999), "Effects of Distance, Age and Sex upon Attitudes toward Nuclear Power Plants: An Empirical Study," Zentralblatt für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, 202, 331-344.
26. Ibitayo, O. O., & Pijawka, K. D. (1999). "Reversing NIMBY: An Assessment of State Strategies for Siting Hazardous-Waste Facilities," Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17, 379-389.
27. Kasperson, R., Goldin, D., & Tules, S. (1992). "Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risk," The Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 161-187.
28. Kraf, R. E., & Clary, B. B. (1991), "Citizen Participation and Hazardous Waste Policy," Public Administration Review, 51(3), 239-245.
29. Kunreuther, H., & Easterling, D. (1991). "Are Risk-Benefit Tradeoffs Possible in Siting Hazardous Facilities?" American Economic Review, 33, 252-256.
30. Kunreuther, H., & Easterling, D. (1992). "Gaining Acceptance for Noxious Facilities with Economic Incentives," in Daniel W. Bromley & Kathleen Segerson (Eds.), The Social Response to Environmental Risk: Policy Formulation in an Age of Uncertainty.
31. Kunreuther, H., & Easterling, D. (1996). "The Role of Compensation in Siting Hazardous Facilities," in Daigee Shaw (Ed.), Comparative Analysis of Siting Experience in Asia. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
32. Kunreuther, H., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., & Fitzgerald, K. (1996). "Siting Hazardous Facilities: Lessons from Europe and America," in Paul R. Kleindorfer (Ed.), Energy, Environment and the Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33. Kunreuther, H., Fitzgerald, K., & Aarts, T. (1993). "Siting Hazardous Facilities: A Test of the Facility Siting Credo," Risk Analysis, 13, 301-318. .
34. Liao, S.-Y., Tseng, W.-C., & Chen, C.-C. (2010), "Eliciting Public Preference for Nuclear Energy Against the Background of Climate Change," Energy Policy, 38, 7054-7069.
35. López-Mosquera, N., & Sánchez, M. (2013), "Direct and Indirect Effects of Received Benefits and Place Attachment in Willingness to Pay for Parks," Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 27-35.
36. Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Kunreuther, H. (1999). "Siting Low Level Radioactive Waste Repository in Pennsylvania," International Workshop on CHALLENGES AND ISSUES IN FACILITY SITING, Taipei: Academia Sinica.
37. Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Kunreuther, H. (1999). "Social Pressure in Siting Conflicts: A Case Study of Siting A Radioactive Waste Repository in Pennsylvania," paper presented at International Workshop on CHALLENGES AND ISSUES IN FACILITY SITING, Taipei: Academia Sinica, January 7-9..
38. O'Hare, M. (1977). "Not on My Block You Don’t: Facility Siting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation," Public Policy, 24(4), 407-458.
39. O'Hare, M., Sanderson, D., & Bacow, L. (1983). Facility Siting and Public Opposition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
40. Slovic, P. (1987). "Perception of Risk," Science, 236, 280-285.
41. Slovic, P. (1993). "Perception of Risk, Trust, and Democracy: A System of Perception," Risk Analysis, 13, 675-682.
42. Sun, C., Zhu, X., & Yang, X. (2014), "Chinese Public Willingness to Pay to Avoid Having Nuclear Power Plants in the Neighborhood," Energy Policy, 69, 186-194.
43. Tsukahara, K., & Takeuchi, K. (2000), "WTPとWTAの環境政策への適用可能性:乖離要因の検討とスコーフテスト," Environmental Economics, 11(4), 123-134.
44. Van der Horst, D. (2007), "NIMBY or not? Exploring the Relevance of Location and the Politics of Voiced Opinions in Renewable Energy Siting Controversies," Energy Policy, 35(5), 2705-2714.
45. Wertenbroch, K., & Skiera, B. (2002), "Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase," Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 228-241.
46. Zweifel, P., Schneider, Y., & Wyss, C. (2007), "Spatial Effects in Willingness-to-Pay: The Case of Two Nuclear Risks," Working Paper No. 0502, Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich.