台灣醫療照護系統排名世界第二(CEOWORLD 2021)，而醫師的人才培養都是萬中選一的頂尖人才，結合台灣高科技產業，臺灣應可以積極發展國際醫療市場。台灣人在海外就業人口根據主計處最新統計有高達73.9萬人，其中多以中國大陸及東南亞地區為主，而這些地區醫療比臺灣落後，經濟成長率卻是發展快速的新興國家，正好可以將台灣優質醫療技術往外輸出賺取外匯或是往內發展國際觀光醫療，這批73.9萬人的台灣海外就業人士就是一個很好的宣傳行銷管道;同時台灣人在海外工作有就醫需求時，對當地的醫療並不孰悉也較不安心，若能由台灣醫師先做線上諮詢，對於病人心裡及實際照護上都是相對安心有保障。隨著智慧醫療的發展，以及目前COVID19疫情肆虐，人們越來越能接受智慧醫療的模式，其中又以行動醫療發展最為迅速。本研究即以行動醫療app作為研究主題，從行銷的觀點，運用Davis(1989)提出的科技接受模式(TAM)理論為基礎，並以知覺風險作為外部因素探討這批海外就業人士的使用意願。
透過208份問卷分析研究結果發現中國大陸及東南亞的海外就業人士比在東北亞的人有更高的使用意願;而海外就業人士對行動醫療APP的知覺有用性偏低，建議可加入家庭醫師設計透過醫師推薦提高行動醫療App的有用性。而知覺易用性對使用意願無顯著影響。知覺有用性對使用意願有較顯著影響，同時降低使用者知覺風險以提升使用意願。建議行動醫療APP的業者針對使用者所擔心的隱私風險加以改善，盡量避免索取過多個人資料，並在隱私權政策，服務條款清楚說明對使用者的隱私保護之方式，以降低使用者之疑慮。

Taiwan's medical care system ranks second in the world(CEOWORLD 2021), and the doctors are top talents selected from a million. Combining high-tech industries, Taiwan should be able to actively develop the international medical market. According to the latest statistics from the Department of Accounting and Statistics, the number of Taiwanese employed overseas is 739,000 people. Most of them are mainly in mainland China and Southeast Asia. Emerging countries where medical care is lagging behind Taiwan and whose economic growth rates are developing rapidly. We can use this advantage to export high-quality medical technology abroad to earn foreign exchange or develop international tourism and medical treatment inbound, these 739,000 Taiwanese overseas employees would be the best channel for promotion and marketing; at the same time, when Taiwanese work overseas and have medical needs, they can contact Taiwanese doctors for online consultation first, it will be relatively safe and secure for the patient's actual care. With the development of mobile health and the current raging COVID19 epidemic, the more people are able to accept the mobile health, and the mobile health has developed the fastest. This research takes the mobile medical apps as the research theme, uses the technology acceptance model (TAM) theory proposed by Davis (1989) as the basis, and uses perceived risk as an external factor to explore the willingness of these overseas employees to use it.
The study found that overseas employees in mainland China and Southeast Asia have a higher willingness to use them than those in Northeast Asia; while overseas employees have low perceived usefulness of mobile health apps, and perceived risks have a negative impact on the perceived usefulness of users. Significant impact, it is recommended to add family physician design to improve the usefulness of mobile health through family doctors recommendation. At the same time, the user's perceived risk is reduced to increase the willingness to use. It is recommended that mobile health APP operators make improvements in response to the risks that users worry about. For example, try to avoid requesting too much personal information, and in the privacy policy, the terms of service clearly state the way to protect the user's privacy, so as to reduce the user's doubts.

參考文獻
1. 中華民國統計資訊網：108年國人赴海外工作人數統計結果 https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=46643&ctNode=2291&mp=4
2. CEOWORLD Magazine, Countries with the Best Health Care Systems,2021
https://ceoworld.biz/2021/04/27/revealed-countries-with-the-best-health-care-systems-2021/
3. 衛生福利部國際醫療網站;醫療、生活品質超圈粉，台灣連續3年奪旅外人士最愛去處No.1
https://www.medicaltravel.org.tw/Act-News-Content.aspx?l=1&nid=293&p=1&title=&fromCnt=0
4. 蔡鳳凰, 台灣智慧醫療產業的發展. 經濟前瞻, 2011(136): p. 125-129.
Eysenbach, G., What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2001. 3(2)
Anderson, J.G., Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health. Int J Med Inform, 2007. 76(5-6): p. 480-3.
5. Gerber, T., et al., An Agenda For Action On Global E-Health. Health Affairs, 2010. 29(2): p.235-238.
6. Oh, S.-Y., et al., Recent trends in convergence based smart healthcare service. International Journal of Technology and Health Care, 2014. 22(3): p. 303-307.
7. Hsu, M.-H., Smart health care reform. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010. 182(7):p.699-699-c.
8. Voros, S. and A. Moreau-Gaudry, Sensor, signal, and imaging informatics: big data andsmart health technologies. Yearbook of medical informatics, 2014. 9(1): p. 150.
6. Wu, B., et al. eWellness: Building a smart hospital by leveraging RFID networks. in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005. IEEE-EMBS 2005. 27th Annual International Conference of the. 2006: IEEE.
7. Noury, N., et al. Level of activity, night and day alternation, and well being measured in a smart hospital suite. 2008.
8. Bastawrous, A. and M.J. Armstrong, Mobile health use in low- and high-income countries: an overview of the peer-reviewed literature. J R Soc Med, 2013. 106(4): p. 130-42.
9. Corpman, D.W., Mobile health in China: a review of research and programs in medicalcare, health education, and public health. J Health Commun, 2013. 18(11): p. 1345-67.
10. Kallander, K., et al., Mobile health (mHealth) approaches and lessons for increased performance and retention of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a review. J Med Internet Res, 2013. 15(1): p. e17.
11. Martinez-Perez, B., I. de la Torre-Diez, and M. Lopez-Coronado, Mobile health applications for the most prevalent conditions by the World Health Organization: review and analysis. J Med Internet Res, 2013. 15(6): p. e120.
12. Beratarrechea, A., et al., The impact of mobile health interventions on chronic disease outcomes in developing countries: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health, 2014. 20(1): p. 75-82.
13. Chib, A., M.H. van Velthoven, and J. Car, mHealth adoption in low-resource environments:a review of the use of mobile healthcare in developing countries. J Health Commun, 2015.20(1): p. 4-34.
14. Della Mea, V., What is e-Health (2): The death of telemedicine? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2001. 3(2).
16. Solanas, A., et al., Smart Health: A Context-Aware Health Paradigm within Smart Cities.Ieee Communications Magazine, 2014. 52(8): p. 74-81.
17. Fatehi, F. and R. Wootton, Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2012. 18(8): p. 460-464.
18. Association, A.T., Telemedicine, telehealth, and health information technology: An ATAissue paper. May). Washington, DC: American Telemedicine Association, at http://www. americantelemed. org/files/public/policy/HIT_Paper. pdf, accessed, 2012. 8.
19. Silva, B.M., et al., Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015. J Biomed Inform, 2015.56: p. 265-72.
20. Moumtzoglou, A., M-health innovations for patient-centered care.
21. 卿雁冰,劉俐惠,于愷英,馬麗芳,黃雯琦,蘇春香, 基於Web of Science 的國際移動醫療應用程式研究的視覺化分析, 中華現代護理雜誌2021.27(6):p714-720
22. 陳嘉雯(2019)。電子商務平台企業形象對購買意願之影響：信任與知覺風險的角色。國立台北大學，台北市。
23. 熊震宇(2015)。以理性行為理論、擴充科技接受模型探討從眾行為對APP遊戲使用行為之影響-以Candy Crush為例。國立成功大學，臺南市。
24. Krebs P，Duncan DT. Health App use among US mobile phone owners：a national survey［J］. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth，2015，3（4）： e101. DOI：10.2196/mhealth.4924. ［J］. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth，2015，3（1）：e27. DOI：10.2196/
25. toyanov SR，Hides L，Kavanagh DJ，et al. Mobile app rating scale：a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps ［J］. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth，2015，3（1）：e27. DOI：10.2196/mhealth.3422
26. Kumar S，Nilsen WJ，Abernethy A，et al. Mobile health technology evaluation the mHealth evidence workshop［J］. Am J Prev Med，2013，45（2）：228-236. DOI：10.1016/ j.amepre.2013.03.017
27. Riley WT，Rivera DE，Atienza AA，et al. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions：are our theories up to the task?［J］. Transl Behav Med，2011，1（1）：53-71. DOI： 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7
28. Liu YH，Guo H，Yang L，et al. Visualization analysis on international stroke care study based on Web of Science［J］. J Nurs，2018，25（5）：6-11
29. Bauer, R. A. (1960), Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. Chicago: American Marketing Association
30. Cox, D. F. (1967), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior. Boston: Harvard University Press, 34-81
31. Garretson, J. A. and K. E. Clow (1999), “The Influence of Coupon Face Value on Service Quality Expectations, Risk Perceptions and Purchase Intentions in the Dental Industry,” The Journal of Services Marketing, 13 (1), 59-72
32. Roselius, Ted (1971), “Consumer Ranking of Risk Reduction Methods,” Journal of Marketing, 35 (1), 56-61
33. Jacoby, Jacob and Leon B. Kaplan (1972), “The Components of Perceived Risk,” Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 382-393.
34. Peter, J. P. and Lawrence X. Tarpey (1975), “A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (1), 29-37
35. Stone, Robert N. and Kjell Grønhaug (1993), “Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline,” European Journal of Marketing, 27 (3), 39-50
36. Bansal, Harvir S. and Peter A. Voyer (2000), “Word-of-Mouth Processes Within a Services Purchase Decision Context,” Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166-177.
37. Guseman, Dennis S. (1981), Risk Perception and Risk Reduction in Consumer Services. Chicago: American Marketing Association
38. Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1981), How Consumer Evaluation Processes Differ Between Goods and Services. Chicago: American Marketing
39. Tan, Soo Jiuan (1994), “Strategies for Reducing Consumers’ Risk Aversion in Internet Shopping,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16 (2), 163-180
40. Dowling, Grahame R. and Richard Staelin (1994), “A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 119-134.
41. Davis, F., Bagozzi R., & Warshaw P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003
42. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340
43. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley
44. 勤業眾信 （Deloitte） 研究報告:行動醫療商機觀察201
42.李秋桂、林秋芬(2015)。比較住院病人對隱私權的重視與獲得程度之差異。護理雜誌，62(5)，61-71。
43.教育部體育署（2020）。109年運動現況調查成果發表記者會，防疫有成快樂運動多元運動i臺灣。取自https://www.sa.gov.tw/News/NewsDetail?Type=3&id=3053&n=92