簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡思涵
Tsai, Ssu-Han
論文名稱: 移動方式與空間能力對於玩家尋路行為與空間知識建構之影響
The Effects of Different Movement Modes and Spatial Ability on Players’ Wayfinding Behaviors and Spatial Knowledge Construction.
指導教授: 許有真
Hsu, Yu-chen
口試委員: 王浩全
Wang, Hao-Chuan
許峻誠
Hsu, Chun-Cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電機資訊學院 - 資訊系統與應用研究所
Institute of Information Systems and Applications
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 180
中文關鍵詞: 虛擬環境空間能力移動方式尋路空間知識
外文關鍵詞: virtual environments, spatial ability, movement, wayfinding, spatial knowledge
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 人們常於不熟悉環境中迷路,不論在真實世界或虛擬環境中,性別、空間能力等皆是影響尋路行為因素。迷失問題一直存在於虛擬環境中,然而,人們尋路行為相當複雜,過去研究顯少探討虛擬空間中使用者移動方式之差異,且無從得知使用者的空間能力是否直接影響他們傾向使用尋路策略,另一方面,在虛擬環境中的線索不及真實世界來的多元豐富,使用者是否會因此改變其在真實世界中慣用的尋路策略。本研究探討在3D虛擬環境中移動方式與空間能力差異對於尋路行為與空間知識建構是否有影響。採用2x2因子實驗設計,自變項為「移動方式(步行/飛行)」與「空間能力(高/低)」,分成四組:高飛組、高走組、低飛組與低走組,依變項則為「尋找目標物數量/時間/困難度」、「傾向使用尋路策略」、「路徑陳述」、「臨場感」、「地圖繪製正確率」與「空間知識測驗分數」,研究中使用空間能力量表篩選出72位空間能力高或低受試者,在虛擬環境中執行尋找目標物、尋路、地圖繪製與空間知識測驗等任務。
    研究結果顯示,移動方式對於玩家在虛擬環境中尋找3D建築物之時間、數量與困難度及尋找2D平面物困難度均有影響。在虛擬環境中,空間能力高飛行者傾向以俯瞰策略來尋路且擅長以方位作為路線陳述;步行者則傾向採用地標策略與路徑策略且擅長以左右轉與地標作為路線陳述。而現實世界與虛擬環境尋路策略僅路徑策略有差異。最後,本研究結果顯示高空間能力者俯瞰知識建構完整度高於空間能力低者,而飛行者地標知識與俯瞰知識建構完整度高於步行者。研究結果可依不同類型任務提供適合移動方式,促進空間知識形成與提升績效,亦可做為虛擬環境設計者的建議,設計符合使用者尋路行為的介面與操作方式,讓使用者在虛擬環境中降低迷失方向的經驗。


    Humans often lose their way in an unfamiliar setting, in virtual as well as real environ-ments. In both cases, gender, spatial ability, and other factors affect wayfinding behaviors. However, human wayfinding behaviors are complicated. Although several factors have been examined in previous studies, little is known about different types of movement in virtual environments and whether users’ spatial ability directly affects the wayfinding strategies they adopt. On the other hand, virtual environments provide fewer navigational cues than the real world; hence, users may apply different wayfinding strategies than those they use in the real world. The goal of this study was to determine how different movement modes and spatial abilities affect wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge construction in a 3D virtual world.
    Between-participant factorial analyses were used to determine the effects of two inde-pendent variables, movement modes and spatial ability, on users’ wayfinding performance and spatial knowledge construction. An experiment examined four groups of participants: those with high spatial ability who were instructed in flying or walking in the environment and those with low spatial ability who were instructed in flying or walking. The dependent variables were the number of targets found, the time required, the difficulty of finding tar-gets, preferred wayfinding strategies, route description, presence, the correct rate of sketch-ing map, and users’ spatial knowledge test scores. A total of 72 participants with high or low spatial ability were selected to complete the experiment on the basis of their spatial ability scores. Participants were required to find targets, perform wayfinding activities, sketch maps, and have their spatial knowledge tested in the virtual world.
    The results showed that the type of movement (flying or walking) affected the number of 3D targets found, time required, difficulty of finding 3D targets, and difficulty of finding 2D targets. In the virtual world, participants with high spatial ability and flyers preferred to adopt a survey strategy and were good at using directions to describe a route. Walkers pre-ferred to adopt a landmark strategy along with a route strategy and were good at using left or right turns to describe a route. Thus, the results showed that the movement mode was the main effect factor. A comparison of the real world and virtual world wayfinding strategies revealed that only the route strategy differed. Furthermore, the results also indicated that participants with high spatial ability constructed more complete survey knowledge than those with low spatial ability. In addition, flyers constructed a more complete landmark knowledge and survey knowledge than walkers.
    Finally, our results can be applied to suggest suitable movement modes according to the type of task that promote the acquisition of spatial knowledge and improve users’ perfor-mance in virtual worlds. The results also provide design principles for game developers that facilitate the development of interfaces and operational modes that prevent users from los-ing their way.

    中文摘要 I 英文摘要 II 目錄 V 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 預期研究貢獻/重要性 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 虛擬環境 6 2.1.1虛擬環境 6 2.1.2虛擬環境之導覽問題 7 2.1.3遊戲類型 10 2.1.4第二人生 12 第二節 尋路 13 2.2.1 定義 13 2.2.2尋路過程 15 2.2.3 尋路之研究方法 17 (1) 搜尋任務 17 (2) 目標物方位位置判斷 18 (3) 地圖繪製 19 (4) 路徑自我陳述 23 (5) 方向感量表 24 (6) 尋路策略量表 24 2.2.4 影響尋路行為因素 26 (一) 個人因素 26 (1) 性別 26 (2) 空間能力 27 (3) 尋路策略 28 (4) 年齡 31 (5) 認知風格 31 (二) 環境因素 32 (三) 個人和環境交互影響 32 (1) 視角 32 (2) 移動方式 34 第三節 認知圖與空間知識 37 2.3.1 認知圖 37 2.3.2 空間知識 38 第四節 遠距臨場感 42 2.4.1 定義 42 2.4.2 測量方式 44 第五節 小結 47 第三章 研究方法 54 第一節 研究架構 54 3.1.1 自變項 54 3.1.2 依變項 56 3.1.3 研究架構 57 第二節 研究問題與假設 59 第三節 實驗設計 62 3.3.1實驗環境 62 3.3.2 實驗場地與設備 64 第四節 實驗方法 64 3.4.1 研究對象 64 3.4.2 整體實驗流程 65 3.4.3 量表工具 67 3.4.4 實驗任務設計 69 3.4.5 前測 80 3.4.6 正式實驗 80 第四章 研究結果 81 第一節 樣本敘述統計 81 第二節 各組統計結果與假設驗證 82 4.2.1尋找指定目標物 83 4.2.2虛擬環境傾向尋路策略 92 4.2.3空間能力與性別對於真實世界之傾向使用尋路 99 4.2.4真實世界與虛擬環境之傾向使用尋路策略比較 102 4.2.5路徑陳述 104 4.2.6臨場感 109 4.2.7地圖繪製 115 4.2.8空間知識測驗分數 119 4.2.9 尋路參考線索 122 第三節 假設驗證結果 127 第五章 結論與建議 129 第一節 研究發現與討論 129 5.1. 移動方式對於尋找目標物類型、時間與數量困難度有相當程度影響 129 5.2空間能力高低與移動方式差異,對於虛擬環境之尋路行為影響 132 5.3真實世界與虛擬環境傾向使用尋路策略與尋路參考線索之比較 142 5.4空間能力與移動方式差異,對於空間知識建構的影響 147 5.5任務類型與尋路策略 150 第二節 結論 151 第三節 研究貢獻 154 第四節 研究限制 156 第五節 未來研究建議 157 中文文獻 159 英文文獻 160 附錄 169 附錄1. 尋路策略問卷 169 附錄2. 臨場感問卷 171 附錄3. 空間知識測驗題組題目 173 附錄4. 虛擬環境地圖繪製 179 附錄5. 空間能力量表授權使用同意書 180

    [中文文獻]

    林生傳 (2007)。教育心理學(三版 )。台北: 五南。
    張文德 (2008)。尋路導航輔助設計之比較與應用(博士論文)。取自http://ndlt
    d.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22097NTUS5619002%22.&searchmode=basic
    張郁靂,許浩龍 (2007年11月)。虛擬環境中的空間認知模型:以數位城市的空間
    為例。2007優質家庭生活科技關鍵技術(U-Home)發表之論文,台南市崑山科技大學。
    張智超、虞孝成 (2001)。網咖。連線遊戲異軍突起。台北: 聯經出版社。
    張慶勳 (2010)。論文寫作手冊(第四版)。台北: 心理出版社。
    畢恆達 (2005年12月10日)。環境知覺一二三。取自http://web.bp.ntu.edu.tw/
    webusers/hdbih/%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90%E5%A0%B1%E7%AC%AC11%E6%9`C%9F.htm
    郭生玉 (1995)。心理與教育測驗。台北: 精華書局。
    郭易 (2009年5月17日)。研究方法經典解釋名詞(二)。取自http://kuojsblog.
    pixnet.net/blog/trackback/3b3c53ce76/22990031
    陳建雄、張文智、張文德 (2007)。“尋路績效自我評鑑量表”之發展。測驗學
    刊, 54(2), 355-376.
    曾俊豪 (2005)。空間能力、視角以及情緒因素對 3D 電腦遊戲玩家於尋路行為
    中認知資源分配之影響(碩士論文)。取自http://nctur.lib.nctu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/9851
    蔡詠琪(譯)(2007)。 遊戲開發概論 (原作者:Novak, J.)。台北: 學貫股份有
    限公司。
    戴文雄、陳清檳、孫士雄 (2001)。空間能力量表之探討與建構。工業教育學刊,
    25,27-36。

    [英文文獻]

    Alsina-Jurnet, I., & Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J. (2010). Influence of personality and individual abilities on the sense of presence experienced in an-xiety triggering virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 788-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.07.001
    Baskaya, A., Wilson, C., & Özcan, Y. Z. (2004). Wayfinding in an unfamiliar environment. Environment and Behavior, 36(6), 839-867.
    Baskaya, A., Wilson, C., & Ozcan, Y. Z. (2004). Wayfinding in an unfamiliar environment: Different spatial settings of two polyclinics. Environment and Behavior, 36(6), 839-867.
    Billinghurst, M., & Weghorst, S. (1995). The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments. Paper presented at the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1995. Proceedings.
    Biocca, F., Burgoon, J., Harms, C., & Stoner, M. (2001). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
    Bowman, D., Koller, D., & Hodges, L. (1998). A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments. Virtual Re-ality, 3(2), 120-131.
    Bowman, D. A., Davis, E. T., Hodges, L. F., & Badre, A. N. (1999). Maintaining Spatial Orientation during Travel in an Immersive Virtual Environm-ent. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(6), 618-631.
    Brooks, A. G. (2003). Aids for training real-world spatial knowledge using virtual environments. Energy, simulation-training, ocean engineering, a-nd instrumentation: research papers of the Link Foundation fellows, 3, 71.
    Brown, E., & Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion. Paper presented at the CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in c-omputing systems, Vienna, Austria.
    Castelli, L., Latini Corazzini, L., & Geminiani, G. C. (2008). Spatial navigation in large-scale virtual environments: Gender differences in surv-ey tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1643-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.005
    Chai, X. J., & Jacobs, L. F. (2009). Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape. Behavioral Neuroscience, 123(2), 276-283.
    Chen, C.-H., Chang, W.-C., & Chang, W.-T. (2009). Gender differences in relation to wayfinding strategies, navigational support design, and wayfi-nding task difficulty. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 220-226.
    Chen, J. L., & Stanney, K. M. (1999). A Theoretical Model of Wayfinding in Virtual Environments: Proposed Strategies for Navigational Aiding. Pres-ence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(6), 671-685. doi: 10.1162/105474699566558
    Chen, J. L., & Stanney, K. M. (1999). A theoretical model of wayfinding in virtual environments: Proposed strategies for navigational aiding. Pres-ence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(6), 671-685.
    Chittaro, L., & Venkataraman, S. (2006). Navigation aids for multi-floor virtual buildings: a comparative evaluation of two approaches. Paper pre-sented at the Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality soft-ware and technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
    Coluccia, E., Bosco, A., & Brandimonte, M. A. (2007). The role of visuo-spatial working memory in map learning: New findings from a map drawing p-aradigm. Psychological Research, 71(3), 359-372.
    Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 329-340. doi: 10.1 016/j.jenvp.2004.08.006
    Conway, M., Audia, S., Burnette, T., Cosgrove, D., & Christiansen, K. (2000). Alice: lessons learned from building a 3D system for novices. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, The Hague, The Netherlands.
    Dabbs Jr, J. M., & Chang, E. (1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(2), 89-98.
    Darken, R., & Sibert, J. (1996). Navigating in large virtual worlds. The International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1), 49-72.
    Darken, R. P., & Sibert, J. L. (1993). A toolset for navigation in virtual environments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
    Darken, R. P., & Sibert, J. L. (1996a). Navigating large virtual spaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1), 49-71. doi: 10.1080/10447319609526140
    Darken, R. P., & Sibert, J. L. (1996b). Wayfinding strategies and behaviors in large virtual worlds. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
    Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & Bertolo, L. (1999). Spatial disco
    urse and navigation: an analysis of route directions in the city of Ven-ice. Applie Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 145-174.
    Elvins, T. T. (1997). VisFiles: virtually lost in virtual worlds—wayfinding without a cognitive map. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 31(3), 15-17. doi: 10.1145/262171.262177
    Freundschuh, S. (1992). Is there a relationship between spatial cognition and environmental patterns?Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space. In A. Frank, I. Campari & U. Formentini (Eds.), (Vol. 639, pp. 288-304): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
    Gale, N., Golledge, R. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Doherty, S. (1990). The acquisition and integration of route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10(1), 3-25. doi: 10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80021-0
    Goerger, S., Darken, R., Boyd, M., Gagnon, T., Liles, S., Sullivan, J., & Lawson, J. (1998). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and virtual environments in complex architectural spaces.
    Haik, E., Barker, T., Sapsford, J., & Trainis, S. (2002). Investigation into effective navigation in desktop virtual interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the seventh international conference on 3D Web technology, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
    Hegarty, M., Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K., & Subbiah, I. (2002). Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, 30(5), 425-447. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2896(02)00116-2
    Ishikawa, T., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive psychology, 52(2), 93-129.
    Jansen-Osmann, P. (2002). Using desktop virtual environments to investigate the role of landmarks. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 427-436. doi: 10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00055-3
    Jansen-Osmann, P., Schmid, J., & Heil, M. (2007). Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of environmental structure. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 66(1), 41-50. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185.66.1.41
    Jeffrey, P., & Mark, G. (1998). Constructing Social Spaces in Virtual Environments: A Study of Navigation and Interaction. Paper presented at the Workshop on Personalised and Social Navigation in Information Space.
    Jul, S., & Furnas, G. W. (1997). Navigation in electronic worlds: a CHI 97 workshop. Sigchi Bulletin, 29, 44-49.
    Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). The fairyland of Second Life: Virtual social worlds and how to use them. Business Horizons, 52(6), 563-572. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.07.002
    Kato, Y., & Takeuchi, Y. (2003). Individual differences in wayfinding strategies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 171-188. doi: Doi: 10.1016/s0272-4944(03)00011-2
    Koenig, S., Crucian, G., Dalrymple-Alford, J., & Dünser, A. (2010). Assessing Navigation in Real and Virtual Environments: A Validation Study. 7-16.
    Koenig, S., Crucian, G., Dalrymple-Alford, J., & Dünser, A. (2011). Assessing navigation in real and virtual environments: A validation study. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 10(4), 325.
    Kyritsis, M., Gulliver, S. R., & Grzybek, H. (2010a). Understanding Individual Differences Learning space in Virtual Environments.
    Kyritsis, M., Gulliver, S. R., & Grzybek, H. (2010b). Understanding individual differences: learning space in virtual environments. Paper present-ed at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, Bangkok, Thailand.
    Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30(11), 765-779. doi: 10.1007/bf01544230
    Lawton, C. A. (1996). STRATEGIES FOR INDOOR WAYFINDING: THE ROLE OF ORIENTATION. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(2), 137-145. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0011
    Lawton, C. A., & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender Differences in Wayfinding Strategies and Anxiety About Wayfinding: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Sex Roles, 47(9), 389-401. doi: 10.1023/a:1021668724970
    Lee, J. (2010). The Effects of Emotion,Spatial Ability,and View Point for The Sence of Telepresence in A 3D Computer Game Envioonment. Paper pres-ented at the IInternational Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research, Paris.
    Lee, J. J. (2007). Emotion and sense of telepresence: the effects of screen viewpoint, self-transcendence style, and NPC in a 3D game environment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: intelligent multimodal interaction envir-onments, Beijing, China.
    Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282-297.
    Luo, Z., Luo, W., Chen, I. M., Jiao, R. J., & Duh, H. B. L. (2010). Spatial representation of a virtual room space: perspective and vertical movement. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26(7), 661-674.
    Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City: MIT press.
    May, A., Ross, T., Bayer, S., & Tarkiainen, M. (2003). Pedestrian navigation aids: information requirements and design implications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(6), 331-338. doi: 10.1007/s00779-003-0248-5
    Minsky, M. (1980). How the development of teleoperators would have immense
    benefits in the areas of Energy, Productivity, and Space Exploration. T-elepresence.
    Modjeska, D. (2000). Hierarchical Data Visualization in Desktop Virtual Reality. PhD Dissertation, Univeristy of Toronto, Toronto.
    Morganti, F., Carassa, A., & Geminiani, G. (2007). Planning optimal paths: A simple assessment of survey spatial knowledge in virtual environments. Computers i-n Human Behavior, 23(4), 1982-1996.
    Murakoshi, S., & Kawai, M. (2000). Use of knowledge and heuristics for wayfinding in an artificial environment. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 756-774.
    Murray, C. D., Bowers, J. M., West, A. J., Pettifer, S., & Gibson, S. (2000). Navigation, Wayfinding, and Place Experience within a Virtual City. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(5), 435-447. doi: 10.1162/105474600566934
    Nori, R., Grandicelli, S., & Giusberti, F. (2006). Visuo-spatial ability and wayfinding performance in real-world. Cognitive Processing, 7(0), 135-137. doi: 10.1007/s10339-006-0104-4
    Oneill, M. J. (1991). Effects of Signage and Floor-Plan Configuration on Wayfinding Accuracy. Environment and Behavior, 23(5), 553-574.
    Ozer, P. (2008). Actual Avatar Behavior Tracking in Second Life. Master Radboud University Nijmegen.
    Parush, A., & Berman, D. (2004). Navigation and orientation in 3D user interfaces: the impact of navigation aids and landmarks. International Jou-rnal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(3), 375-395. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.018
    Passini, R. (1984). Spatial representations, a wayfinding perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(2), 153-164.
    Passini, R. (1996). Wayfinding design: logic, application and some thoughts on universality. Design Studies, 17(3), 319-331.
    Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2001). Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. The European Journa-l of Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 493-508.
    Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2001). Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 493-508.
    Peruch, P., Belingard, L., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2000). Transfer of spatial knowledge from virtual to real environments. Spatial Cognition II, 253-264.
    Prestopnik, J. L., & Roskos–Ewoldsen, B. (2000). THE RELATIONS AMONG WAYFINDING STRATEGY USE, SENSE OF DIRECTION, SEX, FAMILIARITY, AND WAYFINDI-NG ABILITY. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(2), 177-191. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0160
    Rollings, A., & Adams, E. (2003). Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on game design: New Riders Games.
    Rovine, M. J., & Weisman, G. D. (1989). Sketch-map variables as predictors of way-finding performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(3), 217-232.
    Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1997). Navigating buildings in "desk-top" virtual environments: Experimental investigations using exte-nded navigational experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Appli-ed, 3(2), 143-159. doi: 10.1037/1076-898x.3.2.143
    Saucier, D. M., Green, S. M., Leason, J., MacFadden, A., Bell, S., & Elias, L. J. (2002). Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies? B-ehav Neurosci, 116(3), 403-410.
    Savage, R. (2006). Training wayfinding: Natural movement in mixed reality. Ph.D., University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida.
    Sayers, H. M., Wilson, S., & McNeill, M. D. J. (2004). Navigational tools for desktop virtual environment interfaces. Virtual Reality, 7(3), 131-139. doi: 10.1007/s10055-004-0124-2
    Schneider, L. F., & Taylor, H. A. (1999). How do you get there from here? M
    ental representations of route descriptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(5), 415-441.
    Schuurink, E. L., & Toet, A. (2010). Effects of Third Person Perspective on Affective Appraisal and Engagement: FindingsFrom SECOND LIFE. Simulatio-n & Gaming, 41(5), 724-742. doi: 10.1177/1046878110365515
    Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking: Cambridge Univ Pr.
    Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in child development and b-ehavior, 10, 9-55.
    Sjo¨linder, M., Ho¨o¨k, K., Nilsson, L.-G. r., & Andersson, G. (2005). Age differences and the acquisition of spatial knowledge in a three-dimensi-onal environment: evaluating the use of an overview map as a navigation aid. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 63(6), 537-564. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.024
    Son, A. (2005). The measurement of tourist destination image: applying a sketch map technique. International Journal of Tourism Research, 7(4-5), 279-294. doi: 10.1002/jtr.532
    Sousa Santos, B., Dias, P., Pimentel, A., Baggerman, J. W., Ferreira, C., Silva, S., & Madeira, J. (2009). Head-mounted display versus desktop fo-r 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 41(1), 161-181.
    Steuer, J. (1992). Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
    Thorndyke, P. W., & Goldin, S. E. (1983). Spatial learning and reasoning skill, in Spatial Orientation:Theory. Paper presented at the Research an-d Application.
    Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive psychology, 14(4), 560-589. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90019-6
    Tlauka, M., Brolese, A., Pomeroy, D., & Hobbs, W. (2005). Gender differences in spatial knowledge acquired through simulated exploration of a vir-tual shopping centre. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.12.002
    Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599-604.
    Vinson, N. G. (1999). Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
    Waller, D. A. (1999). An assessment of individual differences in spatial knowledge of real and virtual environments. Ph.D, University of Washington.
    Wallet, G., Sauzéon, H., Rodrigues, J., & N'Kaoua, B. (2009). Transfer of spatial knowledge from a virtual environment to reality: Impact of rout-e complexity and subject's strategy on the exploration mode. Journal o-f Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 6(4).
    Ward, S. L., Newcombe, N., & Overton, W. F. (1986). Turn left at the churh,or three miles north. Environment and Behavior, 18(2), 192-213.
    Witmer, B. G., Jerome, C. J., & Singer, M. J. (2005). The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Enviro-nments, 14(3), 298-312.
    Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686 doi:10.1162/105474698565686
    Woollett, K. a. M., EA. (2010). The effect of navigational expertise on wayfinding in new environments. J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, 30(4), 565 - 573.
    Wright Jr, G. T. (2000). Helicopter Urban Navigation Training Using Virtual Environments: DTIC Document.
    Wuheng, Z., Baihua, X., He, Y., & Zhilin, F. (2009). Effect of Navigation Aids and Landmarks on Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge in Virtual Envir -onments.
    Xia, J., Packer, D., & Dong, C. (2009). Individual differences and tourist wayfinding behaviours. Paper presented at the 18th World IMACS/MODSIM C-ongress, Cairns, Australia.
    Zuo, W., Xu, B., Feng, Z., Yuan, H., & Zhao, D. (2009, 6-7 June 2009). Effect of Interaction Characteristics of Virtual Environments on Spatial R-epresentation. Paper presented at the Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing, 2009. CINC '09. International Conference on.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE