簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 羅玉君
Lo, Yu Chun
論文名稱: 應用根本原因分析方法(RCA)於TPR系統之後端資料分析 : 針對藥物異常事件
Application of RCA to the Data Analysis in Adverse Drug Events of the TPR system
指導教授: 王明揚
Wang, Min Yang
口試委員: 張堅琦
Chang, Chien Chi
潘錫光
Poon, Sek Kwong
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系
Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 91
中文關鍵詞: 藥物異常事件根本原因分析(RCA)台灣病人安全通報系統(TPR)HFACS模型
外文關鍵詞: Adverse drug events, Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), Root Cause Analysis (RCA), Taiwan Patient Safety Reporting System (TPR)
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著病人安全重要性的提升,促進病人安全能夠有效改善醫療品質、醫病關係、以及降低醫療成本。台灣病人安全通報系統(Taiwan Patient Safety Reporting System, TPR)成立目的即在透過異常事件經驗之分享,提升病安環境、成就更完備的醫療品質。本研究之目的在於提升TPR系統後端資料分析效用,找出藥物異常事件根本原因,以期更有效地運用TPR系統所收集之資料,提升病人安全。
    本研究主要分成兩階段,第一階段針對原有系統做評估。此階段利用18筆藥物異常事件進行根本原因分析(Root Cause Analysis, RCA),並招募30位護理師進行此18筆藥物異常事件之通報,再利用Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)模型分析比較兩者結果,評估原有TPR系統後端資料分析之效用。研究結果顯示,原版TPR系統所獲得之因果要素總數少於RCA所獲得之總數;而將因果要素利用HFACS模型分類之後,由原版TPR系統所萃取之各層級因果要素數量包含總數皆顯著少於由RCA方法所獲得之因果要素數量,結果顯示,原版TPR系統的後端資料分析效用與RCA結果差異極大。第二階段針對前階段結果提出改良後的新版TPR系統,並招募另外30名護理師再次通報此18筆異常事件,利用相同方式評估新版系統效用,新版系統將導入RCA概念,引導通報者系統化地思考事件內容。研究結果發現,新版系統能夠獲得較多的因果要素,以HFACS模型分類因果要素後,新版系統於第二層級、第三層級所獲的因果要素數量皆顯著多於原版系統,結果顯示改良後的新版系統確實能協助使用者更全面地思考藥物異常事件,並獲得更貼近於RCA結果之資料,提升後端資料分析效用。


    With the importance of patient safety increasing, improving patient safety can enhance the medical quality. The goal of the Taiwan Patient Safety Reporting System (TPR System) is to promote the patient safety and the quality of medical service by knowledge sharing between hospital institutions. The purpose of this study is to make good use of the data gathered from the TPR system by identifying the root causes of the
    adverse events precisely and correctly.
    The study consists of two stages. The first stage is to evaluate the original TPR system by comparing the results of the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and the TPR system itself. We used 18 adverse drug events as our materials and recruited 4 experts to analyze those events by using RCA. Thirty nurses were recruited to report those events to the TPR system. With systematical approach, we applied the HFACS model to analyze these two results. The study indicated that the sum of the causal factors and the number of causal factors from all layers in HFACS model are less than the results from the RCA. It implied that the original TPR system cannot offer useful and effective information for causal analysis. The second stage was based on the conclusions in the previous stage. We established an improved TPR system which was added the core thinking of the RCA and guided the user to consider the adverse events in systematic approach. We recruited another 30 nurses to report those 18 events by the new system and used the same way to evaluate the new system. Comparing the original and improved TPR system, the results showed that the new system can obtain more causal factors; moreover, the number of causal factors in the second, third layer in HFACS model are significantly much more than the original system. After the improvement, the new system may help user to reconsider the adverse event completely and the results from the new system is more closed to the RCA. It suggested that the new TPR system can enhance the utility of the
    data which the system obtained and discover the root causes more easily.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iv 目錄 v 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1 藥物異常事件 6 2.1.1 藥物異常事件定義 7 2.1.2 藥物異常事件之特殊性 12 2.1.3 小結 15 2.2 台灣病人安全通報系統(TPR)15 2.2.1 醫療通報系統 15 2.2.2 台灣病人安全通報系統(TPR) 18 2.2.3 TPR系統資料的後端分析 20 2.2.4 小結 21 2.3 人為失誤分析方法 21 2.3.1 根本原因分析 22 2.3.2 HFACS 模型 24 2.3.3 小結 26 第三章 研究方法 27 3.1 研究流程 27 3.2 實驗設計與準備階段 29 3.2.1 實驗設計 29 3.2.2 研究材料、場域之準備 29 3.2.3 前測 30 3.3 資料收集階段 30 3.3.1 成立根本原因分析小組 30 3.3.2 資料重建 31 3.3.3 因果要素分析 33 3.3.4 根本原因分析 34 3.3.5 原版TPR系統檢測 36 3.4 資料分析階段 37 3.4.1 導入HFACS模型 37 3.4.2 資料分析 38 3.5 設計原型階段 38 3.5.1 建立新版TPR系統 39 3.5.2 檢測新版TPR系統 39 第四章 研究結果與討論 40 4.1 參與者基本資料 40 4.2 根本原因分析方法 41 4.2.1 根本原因分析結果 41 4.3 原版TPR系統通報 46 4.3.1 原版TPR系統資料分析 46 4.4 新版TPR系統通報 52 4.4.1 新版TPR系統設計 52 4.4.2 新版TPR系統資料分析與結果 60 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 64 5.1 結論 64 5.1.1 原版TPR系統問題 64 5.1.2 新版TPR系統改善與檢測結果 64 5.2 研究限制 66 5.2.1 研究材料取得與數量 66 5.2.2 HFACS模型使用限制 66 5.2.3 新版TPR系統介面設計 67 5.3 未來研究方向 67 5.4 總結 68 中文參考文獻 68 英文參考文獻 69 附錄一 研究材料 73 附錄二 原版系統介面 80 附錄三 新版系統介面 85 附錄四 參與者相關意見詢問大綱 90 附錄五 專家意見詢問大綱 91

    台灣病人安全資訊網(民103)。台灣病人安全通報系統2014年TPR年報。線上檢索日期:104年3月5日。網址: http://www.patientsafety.mohw.gov.tw/Content/Downloads/List01.aspx?SiteID=1&MmmID=621273303702500244

    台灣病人安全資訊網(民104)。台灣病人安全通報系統沿革。線上檢索日期:104年3月5日。網址: http://www.patientsafety.mohw.gov.tw/Content/zMessagess/Contents.aspx?SiteID=1&MmmID=652754726103121460

    台灣病人安全資訊網(民104)。名詞釋義。線上檢索日期:104年4月20日。網址: http://www.patientsafety.mohw.gov.tw/Content/Tablist/Contents.aspx?&SiteID=1&MmmID=621273400072357272&MSid=621306711776134135

    石崇良(主編) (民93)。根本原因分析Root Cause Analysis教師版手冊。台北縣:行政院衛生署。

    李長興(民93)。藥物主動監視與藥物流行病學介紹。中醫藥年報,24(5),236-280。

    高純琇、石崇良、廖熏香、梁漢湶、翁惠英(民96)。台灣病人安全通報系統藥物事件之分析。臺灣醫學,11(5),546-555。

    Aronson, J. K. (2009). Medication errors: what they are, how they happen, and how to avoid them. QJM, 102(8), 513-521. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp052

    Barach, P., & Small, S. D. (2002). Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ, 320, 759-763.

    Barker, K. N., Flynn, E. A., Pepper, G. A., Bates, D. W., & Mikeal, R. L. (2002). Medication Errors Observed in 36 Health Care Facilities. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 1897-1903.

    Beasley, J. W., Escoto, K. H., & Karsh, B. T. (2004). Design Elements for a Primary Care Medical Error Reporting System. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 103(1), 56-59.

    Brennan T. A., Leape L. L., Laird N. M., Hebert L., Localio A. R., Lawthers A. G., …,Hiatt H. H. (1991). Incidence of adverse events and negligence care in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 324, 370-376.

    Carayon, P. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press.

    Department of Energy. (1999). DOE Workbook: Conducting Accident Investigations. Washington D.C. Retrieved on May 1, 2015 from http://158.132.155.107/posh97/private/AccidentPhenonmenon/investigation-workbook.pdf

    Escoto, K. H., Karsh, B. T., & Beasley, J. W. (2006). Multiple User Considerations and Their Implications in Medical Error Reporting System Design. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48(1), 48-58. doi: 10.1518/001872006776412207

    Ferner, R. E., & Aronson, J. K. (2006). Clarification of Terminology in Medication Errors Definition and Classification. Drug Safety, 29(11), 1011-1022.

    Kaushal, R., Bates, D. W., Landrigan, C., Mckenna, K. J., Clapp, M. D., Federico, F., Goldmann, D. A. (2001). Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA. 285, 2114-2120.

    Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (1999). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Lawton, R., & Parker, D. (2002). Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare system. Qual Saf Health Care, 11, 15-18.

    Leape, L. L. (2002). Reporting of Adverse Event. N Engl J Med,, 347(20), 1633-1638.

    Lee, T. T., Liu, C. Y., Kuo, Y. H., Mills, M. E., Fong, J. G., & Hung, C. (2011). Application of data mining to the identification of critical factors in patient falls using a web-based reporting system. Int J Med Inform, 80(2), 141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.009

    Lin, C. C., Shih, C. L., Liao, H. H., & Wung, C. H. (2012). Learning from Taiwan patient-safety reporting system. Int J Med Inform, 81(12), 834-841. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.007

    Morimoto T., Gandhi, T. K., Seger A. C., Hsieh T. C.& Bates, T.W. (2004). Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care. 13(4), 306-14.

    National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (2015). Medication Errors. Retrieved on March 11, 2015 from http://www.nccmerp.org/about-medication-errors

    Nebeker, J. R., Barach, P., & Samore, M. H. (2004).
    Clarifying Adverse Drug Events: A Clinician's Guide to Terminology Documentation and Reporting. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140, 794-801.

    Neily, J., & Ogrinc, G. (2003). Using Aggregate Root Cause Analysis to Improve Patient Safety. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 29(8), 434-439.

    NHS-National Patient Safety Agency (2015). Welcome to NRLS Reporting. Retrieved on March 7, 2015 from https://report.nrls.nhs.uk/nrlsreporting/

    Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Reason, J. (1995). Understanding adverse events: human factors. Quality in Health Care, 4, 80-89.

    Reason, J. (2000). Human error models and management. British Medical Journal, 320(7237), 768-770.

    Rooney, J. J., & Heuvel, L. N. V. (2004). Root Cause Analysis for Beginner. Quality Progress, 37(7), 45-53.

    Sandars, J., & Esmail, A. (2003). The Frequency and Nature of Medical Error in Primary Care: Understanding the Diversity across Studies. Family Practice, 20(3), 231-236.

    Shappell S. A. & Wiegmann, D. A. (2000). The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System–HFACS. Washington D.C.: Office of Aviation Medicine.

    Shaqdan, K., Aran, S., Besheli, D. L., & Abujudeh, H. (2014). Root-cause analysis and health failure mode and effect analysis: two leading techniques in health care quality assessment. J Am Coll Radiol, 11(6), 572-579. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.024

    Shojania, K. G., Duncan, B. W., McDonald, K. M.,& Wachter, R. M. (2002). Safe but sound: patient safety meets evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 288, 508-513.

    Sklet, S. (2004). Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 111, 29-37.

    The International Conference on Harmonization. (1995). Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting. Retrieved on April 15, 2015 from http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002749.pdf

    Thomas, E. J., & Peterson, L. A. (2003). Measuring Errors and Adverse Events in Health Care. Journal of General Internal Medicine 18(11), 61-67.

    Wang, P. C., Wung, C., & Shih, C. L. (2014). Analysis on Central Venous Catheter - Related Incidents in the Taiwan Patient - safety Reporting (TPR) System. Fu-Jen Journal of Medicine, 12(1), 37-50. doi: 10.3966/181020932014031201004

    VA Center for Medication Safety & VHA Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Healthcare Group and the Medical Advisory Panel. (2006). Adverse Drug Events, Adverse Drug Reactions and Medication Errors – Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved on April 15, 2015 from http://www.va.gov/ms/professionals/medications/adverse_drug_reaction_faq.pdf

    Wu, A. W., Lipshutz, A. K. M., & Pronovost, P. J. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of root cause analysis in medicine. JAMA, 299(6), 685-687. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.685

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE