簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 羅亞欣
Lo, Ya-Sin
論文名稱: 魔鏡魔鏡,我是最漂亮的人嗎? 虛榮心、社會比較、廣告訴求在廣告吸引力中扮演的角色
Mirror Mirror on the Wall, Am I the Fairest of Them All? The Roles of Vanity, Social Comparison, and Advertising Appeal in Advertising Attractiveness
指導教授: 高登第
Kao, Teng-Ti
口試委員: 陳宜棻
郭素蕙
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 竹師教育學院 - 教育心理與諮商學系
Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 96
中文關鍵詞: 虛榮心廣告訴求社會比較廣告吸引力
外文關鍵詞: vanity, advertising appeal, social comparison, advertising attractiveness
相關次數: 點閱:73下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究試圖探討虛榮心是否會影響消費者對廣告吸引力的感知,並探討廣告訴求和社會比較在之中的調節效果。研究共設計了兩項實驗:實驗一討論身體虛榮對廣告吸引力的影響,實驗二則是討論成就虛榮對廣告吸引力的影響。研究方法採取2(虛榮心:高與低)× 2(廣告訴求:溫暖與能力)× 2(社會比較:向上與向下)受試者間設計,以了解變項之間的交互作用。研究結果主要發現:(1)當廣告以能力為廣告訴求時,高虛榮心的消費者比低虛榮心的消費者覺得廣告更有吸引力。另一方面,當廣告以溫暖為廣告訴求時,兩項實驗顯示出不同的結果,在實驗一中,低虛榮心的消費者比高虛榮心的消費者覺得廣告更有吸引力,但在實驗二中,高虛榮心和低虛榮心的消費者感覺到的廣告吸引力沒有差異。(2)當在觀看廣告前經歷了向上社會比較的情境,高虛榮心的消費者會比低虛榮心的消費者覺得廣告更有吸引力。反之,當在觀看廣告前經歷了向下社會比較的情境,高虛榮心和低虛榮心的消費者對廣告吸引力的看法並不會不同。


    This research attempts to examine whether the personality trait of vanity affects consumers' perceived attractiveness of advertising, and also explores the moderating roles of advertising appeal and social comparison. Research design two studies: study 1 discusses the impact of physical vanity and study 2 discusses the impact of achievement vanity. Participants were recruited and randomly assigned to a 2 (vanity: high vs. low) × 2 (advertising appeal: warmth vs. competence) × 2 (social comparison: upward vs. downward) between-subjects design to understand the interaction effect between variables. The key finding demonstrates that (1) When an advertisement is characterized by competence appeal, consumers with high vanity are likely to perceive higher advertising attractiveness than those with low vanity. On the other hand, when an advertisement is characterized by warmth appeal, two studies obtained different results. Consumers with low vanity are likely to perceive higher advertising attractiveness than those with high vanity in study 1, but in study 2 there is no difference in perception. (2) When exposed to a context of upward social comparisons, consumers with high vanity are likely to perceive higher advertising attractiveness than those with low vanity. On the contrary, when exposed to a context of downward social comparisons, there is no different perception of advertising attractiveness between consumers with high vanity and those with low vanity. Overall, these findings provide important insights into the factors that influence consumers’ perception of advertising attractiveness.

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Background Overview and Theoretical Development 4 2.1 Vanity 4 2.2 Advertising Attractiveness 6 2.3 Advertising Appeal: Warmth and Competence 7 2.3.1 Interaction Effects of Vanity and Advertising Appeal on Advertising Attractiveness 9 2.4 Social Comparison: Upward and Downward 10 2.4.1 Interaction Effects of Vanity and Social Comparison on Advertising Attractiveness 11 2.5 Interaction Effects of Vanity, Advertising Appeal, and Social Comparison on Advertising Attractiveness 13 Chapter 3 Methodology 18 3.1 Research Framework 18 3.2 Research Process 18 3.3 Data Collection 19 3.4 Study 1 21 3.4.1 Measurement of Vanity 21 3.4.2 Measurement of Advertising Attractiveness 23 3.4.3 Manipulation of Advertising Appeal (Warmth and Competence) 23 3.4.4 Manipulation of Social Comparison (Upward and Downward) 24 3.5 Study 2 26 3.5.1 Measurement of Vanity 26 3.5.2 Manipulation of Social Comparison (Upward and Downward) 26 Chapter 4 Results 28 4.1 Study 1 28 4.1.1 Measurement of Physical Vanity and Advertising Attractiveness 28 4.1.2 Manipulation Check for Advertising Appeal 29 4.1.3 Manipulation Check for Social Comparison 30 4.1.4 Hypothesis Testing: H1, H1a and H1b 30 4.1.5 Hypothesis Testing: H2, H2a and H2b 32 4.1.6 Hypothesis Testing: H3 34 4.1.7 Hypothesis Testing: H3a and H3b 36 4.1.8 Hypothesis Testing: H3c and H3d 37 4.2 Study 2 39 4.2.1 Measurement of Achievement Vanity and Advertising Attractiveness 39 4.2.2 Manipulation Check for Advertising Appeal 40 4.2.3 Manipulation Check for Social Comparison 41 4.2.4 Hypothesis Testing: H1, H1a and H1b 41 4.2.5 Hypothesis Testing: H2, H2a and H2b 43 4.2.6 Hypothesis Testing: H3 45 4.2.7 Hypothesis Testing: H3a and H3b 47 4.2.8 Hypothesis Testing: H3c and H3d 48 Chapter 5 Conclusions 52 5.1 General Discussion 52 5.1.1 Reasons to the Hypotheses Rejection 52 5.2 Theoretical Contribution 53 5.3 Practical Implications 54 5.4 Limitations and Future Research 55 References 57 Appendix A. Questionnaire 1 65 Appendix B. Questionnaire 2 69 Appendix C. Questionnaire 3 73 Appendix D. Questionnaire 4 77 Appendix E. Questionnaire 5 81 Appendix F. Questionnaire 6 85 Appendix G. Questionnaire 7 89 Appendix H. Questionnaire 8 93

    Aaker, D. A., Stayman, D. M., & Hagerty, M. R. (1986). Warmth in advertising: Measurement, impact, and sequence effects. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1086/208524

    Adler, A. (1927). Individual psychology. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,22(2), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072190

    Amandeep, D., Varshney, S., & Aulia, S. (2017). The impact of advertising on consumer purchase decision with reference to consumer durable goods in Oman. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 5(12), 11-19.

    Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014201

    Argo, Jennifer J., White, K., & Dahl, Darren W. (2006). Social comparison theory and deception in the interpersonal exchange of consumption information. The Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1086/504140

    Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2012). Advertising and Promotion : An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Buunk, B. P., Kuyper, H., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2005). Affective response to social comparison in the classroom. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3),229-237. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2703_459

    Campbell, C., Mattison Thompson, F., Grimm, P. E., & Robson, K. (2017). Understanding why consumers don't skip pre-roll video ads. Journal of Advertising, 46(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1334249

    Chen, K., Wu, Z., & Sharma, P. (2023). Role of downward versus upward social comparison in service recovery: Testing a mediated moderation model with two empirical studies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75,103477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103477

    Chinelato, R. S. d. C., Ferreira, M. C., & Valentini, F. (2021). Predictors of job crafting behaviors: A mediation analysis. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa.

    Corcoran, K. C. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards and mechanisms. Theories in Social Psychology, 119-139.

    Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Elsevier Science & Technology, 40, 61-149.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0

    Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x

    Das, M., Habib, M., Saha, V., & Jebarajakirthy, C. (2021). Bandwagon vs snob luxuries: Targeting consumers based on uniqueness dominance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102582

    Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). Dynamics of communicator and audience power: The persuasiveness of competence versus warmth. The Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 68-85.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw006

    Durvasula, S., Lysonski, S., & Watson, J. (2001). Does vanity describe other cultures? A cross-cultural examination of the vanity scale. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00108.x

    Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2),117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

    Fiske, S. T. (2010). Envy up, scorn down: How comparison divides us. The American Psychologist, 65(8), 698-706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.65.8.698

    Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

    Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

    Gao, L., Mei, Y., Yang, X., Zhao, C., & Li, D. (2021). Vanity and food waste: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 55(4), 1211-1225.

    Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, 278-306.

    Han, D. E., & Laurent, S. M. (2023). Beautiful seems good, but perhaps not in every way: Linking attractiveness to moral evaluation through perceived vanity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(2), 264-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000317

    Hartz, A. J. (1996). Psycho-socionomics: Attractiveness research from a societal perspective. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11(4), 683-694.

    Horai, J., Naccari, N., & Fatoullah, E. (1974). The effects of expertise and physical attractiveness upon opinion agreement and liking. Sociometry, 37(4), 601-606.https://doi.org/10.2307/2786431

    Hung, K.-p., Huiling Chen, A., Peng, N., Hackley, C., Amy Tiwsakul, R., & Chou, C.-l. (2011). Antecedents of luxury brand purchase intention. The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(6), 457-467.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421111166603

    Hwang, J., Yoon, Y.-S., & Park, N.-H. (2011). Structural effects of cognitive and affective reponses to web advertisements, website and brand attitudes, and purchase intentions: The case of casual-dining restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 897-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.01.011

    James, W. L., & Kover, A. J. (1992). Observations: Do overall attitudes toward advertising affect involvement with specific advertisements? Journal of Advertising Research, 32(5), 78.

    Kastanakis, M. N., & Balabanis, G. (2014). Explaining variation in conspicuous luxury consumption: An individual differences' perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2147-2154.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.024

    Kim, T., & Ball, J. G. (2021). Unintended consequences of warmth appeals: An extension of the compensation effect between warmth and competence to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 622-638.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1940393

    Lee, W.-H. (2018). The effects of the regulatory fit between product name and product appealing on advertisement attraction and persuasion. Marketing Review, 15(2).

    Loureiro, S. M. C., Costa, I., & Panchapakesan, P. (2017). A passion for fashion: The impact of social influence, vanity and exhibitionism on consumer behaviour. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(5), 468-484.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-11-2016-0202

    Mandel, N., Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_8

    Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3),318. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150973

    Netemeyer, R. G., Burton, S., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1995). Trait aspects of vanity: Measurement and relevance to consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 612-626. https://doi.org/10.1086/20942263

    Parekh, H., & Kanekar, S. (1994). The physical attractiveness stereotype in a consumer-related situation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(3), 297-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711733

    Park, H.-J., Rabolt, N. J., & Sook Jeon, K. (2008). Purchasing global luxury brands among young Korean consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 12(2), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020810874917

    Praxmarer, S. (2011). How a presenter's perceived attractiveness affects persuasion for attractiveness-unrelated products. International Journal of Advertising, 30(5),839-865. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-5-839-865

    Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(4), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026086

    Rozeboom, G. J. (2020). When vanity is dangerous. Philosophy & Public Affairs,48(1), 6-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12156

    Sedikides, C., Gregg, A. P., Cisek, S., & Hart, C. M. (2007). The I that buys: Narcissists as consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(4), 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10577400701542346

    Septianto, F., Seo, Y., & Zhao, F. (2022). The effects of competence and warmth appeals on luxury and sustainable brand advertising: The moderating role of construal level. Journal of Advertising, 51(3), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1921633

    Shao, A., & Li, H. (2021). How do utilitarian versus hedonic products influence choice preferences: Mediating effect of social comparison. Psychology & Marketing, 38(8), 1250-1261. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21520

    Sharda, N., & Bhat, A. (2019). Role of consumer vanity and the mediating effect of brand consciousness in luxury consumption. The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(7), 800-811. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2017-1564

    Shrum, L. J., Wong, N., Arif, F., Chugani, S. K., Gunz, A., Lowrey, T. M., Nairn, A.,Pandelaere, M., Ross, S. M., Ruvio, A., Scott, K., & Sundie, J. (2013). Reconceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1179-1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.010

    Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 760-773.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.760

    Wheeler, M. A., Burns, L. R., & Stephenson, P. (2023). A narcissism/vanity distinction? Reassessing vanity using a modern model of narcissism based on pride, empathy, and social behaviors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(9), 762.

    Wiedmann, K.-P., & Walter, v. M. (2021). Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise - social influencers’ winning formula? The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(5), 707-725. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2019-2442

    Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,24(12), 1251-1263.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412001

    Wong, W., & Malone, T. (2016). Contribution of vanity to consumer apparel advertising perception. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management,20(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-06-2015-0045

    Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231-248.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231

    Workman, J. E., & Lee, S.-H. (2013). Relationships among consumer vanity, gender,brand sensitivity, brand consciousness and private self-consciousness. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01112.x

    Zarantonello, L., Schmitt, B. H., & Jedidi, K. (2014). How to advertise and build brand knowledge globally: Comparing television advertising appeals across developed and emerging economies. Journal of Advertising Research, 54(4),420-434. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-54-4-420-434

    Zawisza, M., & Pittard, C. (2015). When do warmth and competence sell best? The"golden quadrant" shifts as a function of congruity with the product type, targets' individual differences, and advertising appeal type. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(2), 131-141.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1015130

    Zheng, X., Baskin, E., & Peng, S. (2018). Feeling inferior, showing off: The effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption. Journal of Business Research, 90, 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.041

    QR CODE