研究生: |
張嘉圓 Chang, Chia-Yuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
下市條款對處於成長期公司之影響:以美中台為例 The Impact of Delisting Regulations on the Firms in the Growth Stage:Evidence from United States, China and Taiwan |
指導教授: |
吳儀玲
Wu, Yi-Lin |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 計量財務金融學系 Department of Quantitative Finance |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 44 |
中文關鍵詞: | 上市 、下市條款 、生命週期 、成長期 、面板數據 、中國 |
外文關鍵詞: | listing, delisting regulation, life cycle, growth stage, panel data, China, law and finance |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文以2002年及2003年於美國紐約交易所、NASDAQ、臺灣證券交易所、臺灣證券櫃檯買賣中心、中國大陸上海及深圳交易所上市者為研究對象,由上市年度後之五年內為觀察期間,依照各交易所下市相關制度中,選取可量化之變數,以面板數據回歸分析方式探討下市條款對處於成長期公司之影響。
各國下市條款規定方面,以英美法系為主的美國其交易所下市條款較具有差異化,且規定較明確,數量化條款亦較多;大陸法系為主的臺灣其交易所下市條款無差異化且主觀判斷條款較多;具中國特色社會主義法律體系的中國大陸,下市條款較簡潔,可完善空間較大。
實證結果顯示,景氣佳時同年度上市家數較多,然五年內下市比例亦較高,且寬鬆的下市條款上市公司存活率愈高,然銷貨成長率、資產成長率、獲利率卻未必較高,顯示採用寬鬆的下市條款無法有誘因使成長期公司表現優於其他市場,而且當交易所有市場價值及獲利能力相關規定時有助於提升公司銷貨成長率、資產成長率及獲利率。
This article uses the 2002 and 2003 listing data of New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ, Taiwan Stock Exchange, GreTai Securities Market, Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange. The observation period is five years after the listing year. Measurable independent variables are chosen according to delisting regulations of each exchange, and panel data regression is used to study the impact of delisting regulations on the firms in the growth stage.
As for the delisting regulations, with common law legal system, the regulations in the United States are more case-specific, objective, and having much more numerical standards. On the contrary, the regulations in Taiwan follow the civil law legal system. The delisting regulations in Taiwan do not differ across cases, and have many subjective judgments. The regulations in the Mainland China adopt Socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics. Despite the delisting regulations in the Mainland China are more concise, there is still much to improve.
The empirical results show that at good times, the number of listing companies is larger, but the ratio of delisting companies in five years is also higher; more loosen delisting regulations correspond to higher survival rate, but the sales growth rate, asset growth rate, and profitability ratio are not necessarily higher. Therefore, the exchanges adopting loosen delisting regulations do not produce the incentive to make the firms in the growth stage to have better performance. Furthermore, having regulations on market value and profitability would contribute to raise the firms’ sales growth rate, asset growth rate, and profitability ratio.
法規參考來源
臺灣證券交易所http://www.twse.com.tw/
證券櫃臺買賣中心 http://www.otc.org.tw/
New York Stock Exchange http://www.nyse.com/
NASDAQ Stock Market http://www.nasdaq.com/
上海證券交易所 http://www.sse.com.cn/
深圳證券交易所 http://www.szse.cn/
英文參考文獻
Paul J.M. van Steen and Piet H. Bellenbarg, 2003, The Netherlands in Maps: Geographies of money in the Netherlands, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93 (5), 586-595
Nidal Rashid Sabri, 2002, Cross Listings of Stocks among European-Arab (Mediterranean) Markets, Finance India, XVI (1), 205-227.
Gary C. Sanger and James D. Peterson, 1990, An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Delistings, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25(2), 261 -272
Danny Miller and Peter H. Friesen., 1984, A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life
Cycle, Management Science, Vol.30, No.10, pp. 1161-1183.
A. F. Burns and W. C. Mitchell, 1946, Measuring business cycles, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research
C. W. J. Granger, 1996, The Typical Spectral Shape of an Economic Variable, Econometrica, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 150-161
Cécile Carpentier and Jean-Marc Suret, 2009, The survival and success of Canadian Penny Stock IPOs, Small Business Economics,2007-2028.
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French ,2004,New lists: Fundamentals and survival rates Journal of Financial Economics 73 ,229–269.
Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, 1998, Law and finance, Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113-1155
Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes Andrei Shleifer ,and Robert W. Vishny ,1997, Legal determinants of external finance Journal of Finance 52, 1131-1150.
Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer,2006, What works in securities laws? Journal of Finance 61, 1-32.
Michael H. R. Stanley, Luís A. N. Amaral, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Shlomo Havlin , Heiko Leschhorn, Philipp Maass, Michael A. Salinger, and H. Eugene Stanley,1996, Nature 379, 804 - 806
Raghuram G. Rajan and Luigi Zingales ,1998,Financial Dependence and Growth American Economic Review 88(3),559-586.
Yishay Yafeh and Oved Yosha, 2003, Large Shareholders and Banks: Who Monitors and How? The Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No. 484, pp. 128-146
Edward I. Altman, 1968, Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 589-609
Luigi Zingales ,2000, In Search of New Foundations, Journal of Finance 55, 1623–1653.
See Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, 1998,Law and Finance, Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113-1155.
WFE, 2008, Market Structure and statistics: getting the whole picture, World Federation of Exchanges, No.189
Brealey, Myers and Allen, 2006, Corporate Finance, 8th ed. Mc Graw Hill
中文參考文獻
王連娟、龍成鳳、孫琦編著,「民營企業上市實務與案例」,北京:中國人民大學出版社,2006。
倪勇,「中國股票市場退出機制研究」,上海:復旦大學管理學院產業經濟學系博士論文,2004。
章友馨,「我國上市公司退場機制妥適性之探討」,臺灣:證券交易所九十四年度研究報告提要表,2005。