研究生: |
黃昭瑛 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
組織導入知識管理之員工變革抗拒因素探討--以工研院電通所網路技術組為例 A Study on the Employee’s Resistance to Organizational Change when Implements the Knowledge Management in Organization: Case of Industry Technology Research Institute Computer Communication Laboratory IP Network Technology. |
指導教授: | 陳惠邦 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
|
論文出版年: | 2004 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 173 |
中文關鍵詞: | 知識管理 、變革 、變革抗拒 |
外文關鍵詞: | Knoeledge management, Change, Resistance to change |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要 組織導入知識管理之員工變革抗拒因素探討--以工研院電通所網路技術組為例
本研究主要為了解工研院導入知識管理的作法及探求員工抗拒實施知識管理的關鍵因素,最後再針對研究結果提出結論及建議,以供其他企業導入知識管理之參考。為達上述研究目的,本研究以質化研究為主、量化研究為輔的方式進行調查,其中質化部分主要維持十七個月的個案研究,以訪談、觀察及文件分析的方式進行;量化部分則是以根據文獻及訪談結果自編的「工研院員工對實施知識管理之看法」問卷進行調查,研究結果發現:
一、工研院導入知識管理的現況策略
主要區分策略層面、流程層面、人員層面、科技層面,分別包含1.先導單位的導入、明確的組織目標及願景、善用本身的獨特資源;2.人性化的推動方式、領導者的支持、組織文化與知識管理價值一致、良好的溝通;3.建立專業知識管理推動團隊、培養知識管理師;4.科技層面。以上都是工研院導入知識管理的優勢,其他企業在導入知識管理時,可參考仿效之。
二、員工的抗拒因素
包含龐大的組織結構、認知因素資訊不足或錯誤、時間資源不足、激勵措施尚待提升、知識管理師的專業性仍有不足、專職人員的不足、分享機制的溝通宣傳不足、擔心既得利益的損失、無法計算沈澱成本、習慣性的問題。
最後,並依據研究結論,針對相關單位及未來研究等方面提出建議。
Abstract A Study on the Employee’s Resistance to Organizational Change when Implements the Knowledge Management in Organization: Case of Industry Technology Research Institute Computer Communication Laboratory IP Network Technology.
The purpose of this research is to investigate that how ITRI implements knowledge management and to find the key factors regarding the resistance to the employees. The researcher will discuss the results of the research and provide concrete suggestions at the end of the research, which will reference and promote the organization to implement knowledge management. In order to reach the purpose, the methodology used includes qualitative (mainly) and associated questionnaire investigation. The qualitative method uses a case study, and collects data by interviews, observations, and analyses of documents. The time spent was 17 months.
The finding of the thesis are the following:
1.The strategies of the implementation in ITRI:
This study is aimed at the four components of strategy: tactic, people, processes and technology.
(1) Tactic: It implements KM by the vanguard, clear organizational goals and vision, as well as using resources well.
(2) People: Person-oriented is to set into action, and be a supportive leader. The organization culture is the same as the KM value. Good communication.
(3) Process: Organize the professional KM group. To train the KM administrator.
(4) Technology.
That’s all the competitive advantages to help ITRI to implement KM, and it could refer to the others.
2. The factors of employee’s change of resistance:
It includes the huge organizational structure, selective information processing, not having enough time, motivating promotion, the KM administrator does not have enough professional ability, the people of the change agents aren’t enough, the advertisement is not enough for the sharing, it’s a threat to established resource allocations, and the sunk cost and habit problem can’t be computed.
參考文獻
一、中文部分
工研院。組織架構與人力結構。民92年10月20日,取自
http://www.ccl.itri.org.tw/Aboutccl/About02.asp
王湧水(民89)。從個體觀點探討組織成員因應組織變革策略之研究。
國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文,台北縣。
王建彬(民89)。知識管理導入實務—以經濟部技術處ITIS為例。產
業論壇,第二卷 第二期。
伍忠賢(民90)。知識管理策略與實務。台北:華泰。
伍忠賢、王建彬(民90)。知識管理—策略與實務。台北:聯經。
杜榮瑞、安德、吳安妮譯(民80)。轉捩點上的成本管理。台北:遠
流出版。
李茂興、李慕華、林宗鴻譯(民83)。組織行為。台北:揚智。
李奉儒(民90)。質性教育研究之基礎。載於黃光雄(主譯),質性
教育研究:理論與方法,5-68。嘉義:濤石文化。
林欽榮(民89)。企業心理學。台北:揚智。
吳定(民73)。組織發展理論技術。台北:天一。
吳秉恩 (民82)。組織行為學。台北:華泰。
吳清山、林天祐(民89)。教育名詞:知識經濟、知識管理。教育資
料與研究,100-101。
柯愷瑜(民90)。影響組織變革抗拒因素之探討。國立海洋大學航運
管理學系碩士論文,基隆。
孫本初(民73)。機關組織更新之研究,著重在用比較方法來評估計劃
式的組織更新效果。政治大學政治研究所博士論文,台北。
姜占魁(民82)。組織行為與行政管理。台北:曉園。
許士軍(民84)。管理學。台北:東華書局。
許士軍(民90)。自經營模式觀點探討我國加入WTO後對於高等教育
之衝擊。我國加入WTO後私立大學校院之因應研討會,高雄義守
大學。
陳幸雄(民89)。知識形服務業推動知識管理實務研究—以工研院產業
經濟與資訊服務中心為例。國立台灣大學資訊管理學研究所碩士
論文,台北。
陳幸雄、易維綺、洪立瑜 (民90)。知識管理對產業資訊服務業者
的時代意義與實務探討。產業論壇,3,3,92-117。
郭崑謨(民82)。管理學。台北:空中大學。
黃光雄、簡茂發(民86)。教育研究法。台北:師大書苑。
黃英忠、吳融枚(民85)。企業文化對員工工作態度的影響-以面臨民
營化變革之公營事業為例。台灣銀行季刊,52,2。
黃瑞琴(民88)。質的教育研究方法。台北市:心理。
黃英忠、趙必孝(民80)。產業內知覺之新工作比較在離職模式內的因
果關係研究。政治大學管理評論。
張紹勳(民89)。研究方法。台中:滄海。
翁靜柏(民90) 。知識管理在國立大學教務處的應用研究。國立中正
大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,嘉義。
楊子江、王美音譯(民86)。創新求勝:智價企業論。台北:遠流。
鄭明仁(民90)。台灣企業推行學習型組織之個案研究--阻力與助力因
素之探討。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,嘉義。
廖春文(民90)。知識管理在學校行政實際應用之研究。知識管理與
教育革新發展研討會,花蓮東華大學。
蔡碩川(民91) 。農會信用部組織變革認知、組織承諾與變革態度之
研究。義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,高雄。
聞君予 (民88)。領導型態、組織變革與抗拒之研究—以三商銀民營
化為例。國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,桃園。
劉京偉譯(民89)。知識管理的第一本書。台北:商周。
劉常勇(民89)。知識管理。民國92年10月20日,取自
http://www.cme.org.tw/know/(2003/10/20)
謝安田(民71)。企業管理。台北:五南。
謝安田(民81)。企業管理。台北:五南。
簡宏江(民89)。論抗拒變革的管理。育達研究叢刊,1,32-46。
顧淑馨譯(民90)。資訊革命了什麼?。台北:先覺。
韓經綸譯 (民83)。組織行為學導論。台北:五南。
二、英文部分
Ashford, S. J. (1988). Individual strategies for coping
with stress during organizational transitions. Journal
of Applied Behavioural, 24, 19-36.
APQC. What is knowledge management. Retrieved December 20,
2001, from http://www.it-
consultancy.com/extern/apqc.html.
Broadbent, M. (1998). The phenomenon of knowledge
management:What dose it mean to the information
profession? Information Outlook, May, 23-36.
Bonora, E. A. and Revang, O. (1991). As strategic framework
for analyzing professional service firm-developing
strategies for sustaines performance, Strategic
Management Society Interorganizational Conference,
Toronto, Canada.
Costley, D. L. and Todd, R. (1991). Human Relations in
Organization. St, Paul,Minn.West.
Daft, R. L. and Streers, R. M. (1988). Organizations: A
micro/macro approach.Illinois:Scott, Foresman and
Company.
Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge:
How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA:
Harvard Business School Press.
Ellen, M. K. (1998). Knowledge management. Business &
Economic Review, July- Sept, 5.
Ettlie, J. E. and Reza, E. M. (1992). Organizational
Integration and Process Innovation. Academy of
Management Journal, 35(4), 795-827.
Griffin, R. W. (1995). Management News Jersey:Houghton
Mifflin Company.
Hodge, B. J. and Johnson, H. J. (1970). Management and
organization behavior A multidimensional approach,
N.y.: John Wiley and sons, 432-433.
Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge?The influence of
ICT on Motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and
Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
Hellrigel, D. and Slocum, J. W. (1994). Management 6th ed.
Addision-Wesley Publishing Co, 721.
Kotter, J. P. and Schelesinger, L. A. (1979). Choosing
strategies for change .Harvard Business Review, 57, 106.
Kirton, M. J. and Mulligan, G. (1973). Correlates of
Managers' Attitudes toward Change, Journal of Applied
Psychology, 58, 101-107.
Kotter, J. P. (1998). Harvard business review on change.
Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Klein, K. J. and Sorra, J. S. (1996). The Challenge of
Innovation implementation, Academy of Management
Review, 21(4), 1055-1080.
Wiig, K. M. (1997). Roles of Knowledge-Based ystem in
Support of Knowledge. New York: CRC Press, 69-88.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York
Harper & Row.
Leavitt H. J.(1964)﹒Managerical psychology, Revised
Edition﹒The University of Chicago Press.
Liebowitz, J. (2000). Building organizational intelligence:
A knowledge management primer. London:CRC Press.
McDermott, R. and O’Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural
barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 1(5),76-85.
Nadler, D .A. (1981). Managing organizational change:An
integrative perspective .The Journal of Applied
Behavior,191-211.
Nonaka , I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational
Knowledge Creation .Organization Science , 15(1), 14-37.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating
Company. Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of “Ba”:
Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation.
California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54.
O’Dell,C. and Grayson, C. (1998). If only we knew what we
know:identification and transfer of interal best
practices. California Management review,40(3) ,154-174.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external
control of organizations: A resource dependence
perpextive, New York: Harper and Row.
Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and
recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of
attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of
Management Journal, 25 (4), 783-794.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY:
Doubleday Anchor.
Robbins, S. P. (1993). Organixation behavior. Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersy, Prentice- Hall.
Summer, F. G. and Weber, T. N. (1987). Organization
behavior and the practice of management. 5th ed.
Glenview, Ⅲ:Scott, Foresman and Company.
Senge, P. (1998). Sharing knowledge, Executive Excellence,
15(6), 11-12.
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth:
Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. San
Francisco, CA: Berrett- Koehler Publishers.
Tepper, J., Eisenbach, R. J., Krby, S. L. and Potter, P. W.
(1998). Test of a Justice-Based Model of unbordinates
Resistance To Downward Influence Attempts.Group and
Organization Management,23(1), 44-160.
Trumbo, D. A. (1961). Individual and Group Correlates of
Attitudes toward Work-Related Change, Journal of
Applied Psychology, 45, 338-344.
Watson, G. (1973). Resistance to Change, in Gerald Zaltman
(eds.), Process Phenomena of Social Change, New York:
Wiley, 117-131.
Webber, R. A. (1979). Management: Basic Elements of
Managing Organization , Homewood, Illinois: Richard P.
Irwin, Inc.
Whitaker, P. (1993). Managing Change in Schools ,
Philadelphia: Oxford University Press.
Wiig, K. M. (1993). Knowledge management foundations
thinking about thinking-How people and organizations
create, represent, and use knowledge. Arlington, TX.
Zaltman, G. and Duncan, R. (1977). Strategies for Planned
Change , N.y.: John Wiley and sons.
Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing Codified nowledge, Sloan
Management Review, Summer, 45-48.