隨著國際化競爭日益升高，新產品技術創新及開發速度日益增快，加上顧客需求變化快速，形成產品生命週期日漸縮短，因此許多企業都希望能有一套新產品的開發模式，來增加上市成功的機會。所以組織如何加速研發創新的速度，縮短新產品開發時程，以掌握產品的上市時機，已成為企業經營的成敗關鍵。

目前相關文獻對於智慧資源規劃（Intelligence Resources Planning;IRP）的探討仍著重在概念及方法的釐清和探索，較缺乏結合實際案例之具體研究，因此本研究將探討結合智慧資源規劃的新產品開發模式，來改變過去的產品開發流程較重視有形的產品所帶來的實質獲利的觀念，轉而以發展組織智慧財產為主的新產品開發模式，以加強企業的核心競爭力。在模式中將透過智慧資源規劃的方法，來達到新產品開發的時效性與成本最佳化。

本研究以無線通訊產業的WiMAX（Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access; 全球互通微波存取）產品進行實證研究，結合技術發展路徑的分析，再與專案管理之工作分項結構結合，配合產品開發流程，來建立細部規劃與執行的參考架構，並強化原有產品開發流程，以建立新產品開發之智慧資產。

As the international competition increases daily, the new product innovation and development speed is also improved rapidly, and the customer demand change becomes faster, the result is that the product life cycle has been reduced dramatically. So it is the desire of many companies to possess a new model for new product development to increase the the probability of market success of a new product.

How to accelerate the innovation and development speed for a new product to grasp its market opportunity has become the key for business success. Most related studies in literature regarding IRP（Intelligence Resources Planning; IRP） only emphasize the concepts and methods for explanation and exploration, but they usually lack a solid methodology for application. Therefore this research will propose a new model for new product development with intellectual resources planning to improve the past product development practices which usually focus on the visible part of a product to make a profit instead of the management of an organization's intellectual property to increase its competitiveness. This model by using IRP to strengthen the enterprise core competence ability and to achieve the effectiveness and cost optimization of new product development.

A case study of a company for manufacturing WiMAX（Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access: WiMAX ) products is conducted to illustrate the application of the proposed , for managing intellectual properties.

英文文獻：

1.Ansoff, Igor, Corporate Strategy, McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1965.
2.Clark, Kim and Steven Wheelwright, Managing new product and process
development, Harvard Business School, 1993.
3.Chandler, A.D., (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the history of
American Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T Press.
4.Drucker, Peter F., The Theory of the Business, Harvard Business Review,
Sep.-Oct. 1994.
5.Galvin, Robert, Science Roadmaps, Science, Vol. 280, May 8, 1998.
6.Henderson, J.C., & H. Venkatraman, Strategic Alignment: Leveraging
information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Systems Journal,
vol.32, No.1, 1993.
7.Heppelmann, J., Collaborative Commerce in the Design Chain, Implementation
Road Map at IMET 2000 Expo, Rosemont, IL, USA, 2000.
8.Hitt, Michael A., Brian K. Boyd and Dan Li, The state of strategic management
research and a vision of the future, in D. Ketchen and D. Bergh (2004) Research
Methodology in Strategy and Management, Vol. 1. Elsevier.
9.Kaplan R.S. & D.P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School
Press, 1997.
10.Kaplan R.S. & D.P. Norton, Strategy Maps: Converting intangible assets into
tangible outcomes, Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
11.Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton, Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create
Corporate Synergies. Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
12.Kappel, Thomas A., Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the
future, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (2001) 39–50.
13.Kurokawa, Sam and John Meyer, An overview of technology roadmapping,
2001. [http://www.lebow.drexel.edu/kurokawa/mot/6th_sec/roadmap1.doc]
14.Labovitz, G., & Rosansky, V., The Power of Alignment: How Great Companies
Stay Centered and Accomplish Extraordinary Things. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997
15. Lee, Hei-Kuang, Chih-Ming Liu and Meng-Hua Lee, Renovate WBS Planning
with Technology Roadmap for New Product Development, INCOSE 2005, July
2005.
16. Luftman, J.N., Applying the Strategic Alignment Model, in Competing in the
Information Age Strategic Alignment in Practice, Luftman, J.N. Eds., Oxford
University Press, 1996.
17. Martin, Mark Valeton, Design for Variety - A methodology for developing
product platform architectures, PhD Dissertation, Stanford University,
November 1999.
18. Meyer, Marc H. and Dhaval Dalal, Managing platform architectures and
manufacturing processes for nonassembled products, The Journal of Product
Innovation Management, vol. 19, 277–293, 2002.
.
中文文獻：

1. 柯普郎與諾頓著，朱道凱譯，平衡計博達，民國89年。
2. 柯普郎與諾頓著，陳正平譯，策略地圖，臉譜，民國93年。
3.柯普郎與諾頓著，高子梅、何霖譯，策略校準，臉譜，民國96年。
4.孔恩著，程樹德、傅大為、王道環、錢永祥等譯，科學革命的結構，遠流，
民國83年。
5.周延鵬著，虎與狐的智慧力，天下文化，民國95年。
6.李海光，從策略到新產品開發的策略校準模式，民國96年。
7.王國安，以三維決策分析模式建構新產品開發專案，清華大學碩士 論文，民國
97年。
8.楊善淵，策略規劃及預算配置方法之建立，清華大學碩士 論文，民國94年。
9.吳安妮，「平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動（上）」，會計研究月刊，民國86 年1月，第134 期，頁 133-139。
10.吳安妮，「平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動（中）」，會計研究月刊，民國86 年2月，第135 期，頁 102-115。
11.吳安妮，「平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動（下）」，會計研究月刊，民國86 年3月，第136 期，頁 108-117。
12.黃凱鴻，新產品開發績效評估項目之研究，台灣科技大學碩士 論文，民國92年。
13.林明儀，以設計評核為導向的新產品開發模式，中原大學碩士 論文，民國95年。
14.黃子賢，以射擊理念為基礎之策略形成模式研究 ，清華大學博士 論文，民國95年。
15.王偉任，以績效指標作為新產品開發流程再造之探討，屏東科技大學 第五屆兩岸產業發展與經營管理研討會，民國95年8月。

網路資料：
科技政策中心資訊 http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw

國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心 http://www.stpi.org.tw

電子工程專刊 http://www.eettaiwan.com