This study examined the differences in the learning of wh- and yes/no question forms of Taiwanese university learners of English across the four conditions of a two-by-two experimental design. The two independent variables included learner agency (performers/active vs. observers/passive) and corrective feedback (CF) type (prompts vs. recasts). Those participants categorized as performers completed two tasks in a synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) environment via Skype in which an English native speaker (NS) provided either recasts or prompts in response to question form errors. Those participants categorized as observers, on the other hand, completed the same two tasks while being passively exposed to video recordings of the interaction sessions. Prompts and recasts were defined as in Lyster (2004). A pretest, posttest, delayed posttest design was used to evaluate the learning outcome based on the two dependent measures: accuracy and fluency. The tests all involved question form elicitation which was timed and recorded via Microsoft PowerPoint. Fluency was operationalized as the average response time while accuracy was operationalized according to a formula which deducted points for grammatical errors in question formation. The potential implications of this line of research in terms of distance learning of English as a foreign/second language are discussed.

Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 29–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and the acquisition of English possessive determiners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.

Brumfit, C.J. 1984. Communicative methodology in language eaching: The roles of
fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cerezo Ceballos, L. (2010). Talking to avatars: The computer as a tutor and the incidence of learner's agency, feedback, and grammatical form in SLA. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. (Doctoral Dissertation).

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C.A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533-568.

Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.),
Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Messaging, gaming, peer-to-peer sharing: Language learning strategies and tools for the millennial generation. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 17-22.

Hama, M. (2012). Strategic Planning, Recasts, Noticing, and L2 Development. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. (Doctoral Dissertation).

Hulstijn, J. H., & de Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97–112.

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language
Learning, 40, 387–417.

Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.

Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.

Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 361-377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Loewen, S. (2012). The Role of Feedback. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisiton (pp. 24-40). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.

Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 55–85.

Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.

Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453-498.

Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second
language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40.

Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587.

Mackey, A. (Ed.) (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S.M. (Eds.) (2012). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Mackey, A., Gass, S.M., & McDonough, A. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471–497.

McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.

Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.

Pedhazur, E., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Philp, J., & Iwashita, N. (2013). Talking, tuning in and noticing: Exploring the benefits of output in task-based peer interaction. Language Awareness, 22, 353-370.

Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45-141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Research Centre, AMEP.

Russell, V. (2009). Corrective feedback, over a decade of research since Lyster and Ranta (1997): Where do we stand today? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6, 21-31.

Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Corrective feedback and peer interaction for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591-626.

Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 200-219). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 593–610). New York: Routledge.

Shirazi, Z. R. H., & Sadighi, F. (2012). Implicit versus explicit feedback in classroom: An experimental study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3, 439–445.

Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (2009). Interaction research in second/foreign language classrooms. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 157-175). New York: Routledge.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input
and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–252). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235–263.