筆記型電腦產品的生命週期非常短，筆記型電腦產業的新產品導入生命週期，從「概念的產生」到量產階段，只剩四到六個月的時間，加上全球性競爭時代的來臨，新產品導入之時效性、品質與產品可靠度，成為企業增加本身競爭力日益重要的一環。本研究之目的在建立完整的筆記型電腦新產品導入績效指標評估系統，利用此評估系統，提供改善建議以提升筆記型電腦業新產品導入的績效。藉由問卷與訪談的方式，收集兩家主要筆記型電腦公司的資料，本研究中所達成之成果包括：1）建構台灣筆記型電腦廠新產品導入績效指標，包括： 27項新績效指標、10項市場面績效指標、9項研發面績效指標、8項製造面績效指標與10項跨部門評估方式（DFX）指標；2）建構一套以EXCEL為基礎，系統化評估的介面『筆記型電腦廠新產品導入績效評估系統』，提供一個人性化的輸入介面，使用者只需依據步驟填寫問卷資料，系統會自動將評估結果輸出，提供使用者本廠的新產品導入績效評比與改善建議。

Abstract
The life cycle of notebook manufacturing is very short. A typical new product design from concept to mass production takes 4 to 6 months. Due to global competition, a fast and high yield, reliable new production introduction (NPI) is one of the major competitive advantages in the industry. The purpose of the research is to establish a new product introduction performance measurement mechanism and evaluating system for notebook computer industry. Data is collected from 2 major manufacturers in Taiwan by questionnaire and interviews. Our contributions include: 1) establishing NPI performance index for notebook computer industry, including 37 new indices, 10 for marketing performance, 9 for R&D performance, 8 for manufacturing performance and 10 cross-functional (DFX) indices; 2) establishing an excel-base evaluating system; 3) providing improving suggestions.

參考文獻
1. Alting, L. (1991), “Life cycle design”, Concurrent Engineering, 1(6), pp.19-27.
2. Brown, W. B. and D. Gobeli (1992),” Observations on the Measurement of R&D Productivity: A Case Study”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39(4), pp.324-331
3. Calantone, Roger J., Shawnee K. Vickery, and Cornelia Droge, “Business performance and Strategic New Product Development Activities: An Empirical Investigation”, J prod Innov. Manag. 1995; 12:214-223.
4. Cornelia, D., Jayanth Jayaram, and Shawnee K. Vickery, “The Ability to Minimize the Timing of New Product Development and Introduction: An Examination of Antecedent Factors in the North American Automobile Supplier Industry”, J prod Innov. Manag. 2000; 17:24-40.
5. Geisler, E. (1994), “Key Output Indicators in Performance Evaluation of Research and Development Organization”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp.189-203.
6. Gobeli, D. H. and J. Brown (1987), “Analtzing Product Innovations”, Research Management, pp.25-31.
7. Green, David L., David L. Wilemon, “Accelerating Team Learning in New Product Development” Innovation Management Program, School of Management Suite 400 Syracuse University, Syracuse NY 13244, USA.
8. Jan, O., “Competence Management by Informatics in R&D:The Corporate Level”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No. 2, May 1997.
9. Kurt, M., Hans H. Hinterhuber, “How to Make Product Development Projects More Successful by Integrating Kano’s Model of Customer Satisfaction into Quality Function Deployment” Technovation, 18(1) (1998) 25-38.
10. Larso, D. and Hacker M., “Performance measurement in new product development: concepts and literature review”, Management of Engineering and Technology, 1999. Technology and Innovation Management. PICMET '99. Portland International Conference on , Volume: 1 , 1999 Page(s): 495 vol.1
11. Lebas, Michael J. (1995), “Performance Measurement and Performance Management”, International Journal of Production Economics, No.41, pp.23-35.
12. Michael, N. and Barry Stoker (1991), “Data Envelopment Analysis-The Assessment of Performance”, John Wiley & Sons.
13. Narahari, Yadati, Nukala Viswanadham, Fellow, IEEE, and V. Kiran Kumar, “Lead Time Modeling and Acceleration of Product Design and Development”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 15, No. 5, October 1999.
14. Packer (1983), “Analyzing productivity in R&D Organizations”, Research Management, No.21 (1) pp.13-20.
15. Rauscher, Tomlinson G. and Preston G. Smith, “From Experience Time-Driven Development of Software in Manufactured Goods” J prod Innov. Manag. 1995; 12:186-199.
16. Sameh R Salem, “New Product Development Balanced Scorecard”, GE power Systems, Schenectady, NY, 2001 IEEE
17. Sbragia, R., (1984), “Clarity of Manager Roles and Performance on R&D Multi-disciplinary Projects in Matrix Structures”, R&D Management, 14(2): 113~126
18. Smith, M., P.J., Pretorius, “Common problems in the performance measurement of profit and cost centers”, 2002. IEEE AFRICON. 6th , Volume: 1 , 2002 Page(s): 485 –488
19. Speirs, J., Nash, T.J., “The use of standards in performance measurement”, IEE Colloquium on 3 Apr 1995
20. Taudes, A., G. Dorffner, M. Natter, M. Feurstein, C. Merz, A. Mild, M. Trcka, “Learning Marketing-Production Interactions”, 1999 IEEE
21. Ulrich, Karl T., Steven D. Eppinger著, 宋同正/蔡登傳譯，產品設計與開發，華泰文化事業公司
22. 朱詣尹，「同步工程與整合性產品開發」，清華大學工業工程系課程講義。
23. 伍家德，『新產品開發特性與新產品開發管理機制相關之研究』，東海管理評論，第二卷，第一期，民國八十九年十一月
24. 邱淮治，『層級一致分析法（HCA）－一種新的權重設定方法』，元智工學院工業工程研究所，85，碩士論文。
25. 林育理，『企業研發部門知識學習能力、組織能耐與研發績效關係模式之研究』，長榮管理學院，經營管理研究所，89，碩士論文。
26. 林明杰，李政雄，『新產品開發策略與市場資訊處理機制對新產品績效影響之研究』，技術管理學刊，第五卷，第一期，民國八十九年六月。
27. 林明杰，彭凌峰，『不同情境下創新專案關鍵成功因素間關係之研究』，管理學報，第十七卷，第四期，民國八十九年十二月。
28. 許棟樑，『台灣筆記型電腦全面品質管理標竿建立及分析---總計畫』，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，民國86年。
29. 張政楠，『筆記型電腦業管理評估系統』，國立清華大學，工業工程學系，90，碩士論文。
30. 陳俊依，『同步工程應用於新產品開發專案工作協調之研究』，國立台北科技大學，生產系統工程與管理研究所，91，碩士論文。
31. 黃建銘，『組織績效指標的運用與管理意涵--英國經驗之探討』，人力發展，66 民國八十八年七月 頁52-63。
32. 黃振煜，『產品開發在接單後生產模式中所扮演角色之研究』，國立成功大學，工業設計學系，88，碩士論文。
33. 楊長林，『新產品開發』，國立台灣科技大學，工業管理系，博士論文。
34. 蔣維理，『成功的新產品開發模式研究』，國立交通大學，管理學程碩士班，90，碩士論文。